Intent to Ship: Web Authentication Conditional Create (Automatic Passkey Upgrades)

[Chromestatus]

Contact emails

mart...@google.com

Specification

https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-credential-management/#dom-credentialmediationrequirement-conditional:~:text=For%20create

Summary

WebAuthn Conditional Create allows websites to automatically create passkeys for existing users that have a matching password saved in their password manager.

Blink component

Blink>WebAuthentication

Web Feature ID

No information provided

Motivation

WebAuthn Conditional Create requests let a website (aka a Relying Party or RP) create a passkey without prominent modal mediation, if the user has previously consented to credential creation. The motivating use case is commonly referred to as "passkey upgrades". I.e., if the browser/credential manager already stores an existing password credential for the same website/relying party and user, conditional create allows the the website automatically create a matching passkey. An explainer with more information is hosted in the W3C WebAuthn wiki: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/wiki/Explainer:-Conditional-Registration-Extension

Initial public proposal

No information provided

TAG review

No information provided

TAG review status

Issues addressed

Risks

Interoperability and Compatibility

WebKit already shipped this feature ahead of Blink, so this launch is positive for interoperability.

Gecko: No signal

WebKit: Shipped/Shipping (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-release-notes/safari-18-release-notes#Authentication:~:text=Implemented%20conditional%20credential%20creation.%20)

Web developers: No signals

Other signals:

WebView application risks

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?

No information provided

Debuggability

No information provided

Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?

Yes
Blink implements this feature on all platforms. On Android, requests are forwarded to the native Credential Manager API, where supporting password managers need to implement it separately.

Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests?

Yes
https://wpt.fyi/results/webauthn/conditional-mediation.https.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned

Flag name on about://flags

No information provided

Finch feature name

No information provided

Non-finch justification

No information provided

Rollout plan

Will ship enabled for all users

Requires code in //chrome?

False

Tracking bug

https://crbug.com/377758786

Launch bug

https://launch.corp.google.com/launch/4373425

Estimated milestones

Shipping on desktop	136
Shipping on Android	142

Anticipated spec changes

Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of the API in a non-backward-compatible way).

No information provided

Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status

https://chromestatus.com/feature/5135710007590912?gate=5163515357429760

Links to previous Intent discussions

Intent to Prototype: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/67329059.2b0a0220.26ec07.069d.GAE%40google.com
Ready for Trial: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/XFJmqtQpMds/m/ipPKSS5ECQAJ

This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status.

[Martin Kreichgauer]

Hello API Owners,

This feature was launched on Desktop in Chrome 136 and Android in 142, and we unfortunately forgot to request Intent to Ship approvals. I just realized this mistake while we were cleaning up old feature flags, my apologies. Are there any concerns or could we please have retroactive LGTMs?

For context, this was an additional feature to WebAuthn that had an already existing spec and an implementation in WebKit. Several large Relying Parties have adopted it already.

Thanks,
Martin Kreichgauer