Chromestatus
unread,Jan 21, 2026, 1:46:26 PM (13 hours ago) Jan 21Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to blin...@chromium.org, alm...@microsoft.com, kbab...@microsoft.com, mho...@microsoft.com, samome...@microsoft.com
Contact emails
samome...@microsoft.com,
kbab...@microsoft.com
Explainer
No information provided
Specification
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/11913/files
Summary
This proposal untangles ‘border-width’, ‘outline-width’, and ‘column-rule-width’ from their corresponding ‘*-style’ properties. Previously, if a ‘*-style’ property, such as ‘border-style’, was set to ‘none’ or ‘hidden’, the computed ‘*-width’, such as ‘border-width’, would resolve to ‘0px’, even if the width was explicitly set to ‘10px’.
Following a resolution in the CSSWG [1], the computed values of ‘border-width’, ‘outline-width’, and ‘column-rule-width’ will now reflect their specified values, regardless of the associated style property's value. Similarly, the resolved values of ‘outline-width’, and ‘column-rule-width’ will now reflect their specified values, regardless of the associated style property's value.
[1]:
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11494#issuecomment-2675800489
Blink component
Blink>CSS
Web Feature ID
No information provided
Motivation
Today, CSS special-cases ‘border-*-width’, ‘outline-width’, and ‘column-rule-width’ so that their computed value becomes ‘0px’ when the corresponding ‘*-style’ is ‘none’ or ‘hidden’, even if the author specified a nonzero width. With Gap Decorations extending ‘column-rule-*’ properties to support lists/repeaters, applying that special-case becomes ambiguous and difficult to define consistently. Having ‘*-width’ values independent of ‘*-style’, provides an intuitive model for these properties and better reflects the author-specified value.
Initial public proposal
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11494
Search tags
column-rule-width,
border-width,
outline-width
TAG review
No information provided
TAG review status
Not applicable
Risks
Interoperability and Compatibility
The interoperability risk is low as both Gecko and Webkit have already implemented these changes.
Compatibility risk is also low. The resolved value for `border-width` via `getComputedStyle()` will remain 0px when `border-style` is set to `none`/ `hidden`, maintaining backward compatibility. For `outline-width` and `column-rule-width`, both computed and resolved values will show the specified values, as these properties are rarely queried and unlikely to impact existing content. To support the claim, we collected UseCounter data measuring how often these values are queried.
The computed‑value counters for these properties are extremely low (<0.0001%). The resolved‑value counters for ‘column-rule-width’ and ‘outline-width’ show ~2.37% usage, which reflects calls to ‘getComputedStyle()’ rather than observable rendering usage. Since ‘getComputedStyle()’ is frequently queried by automated tooling (e.g. scrapers and fingerprinting scripts) that do not depend on property semantics, this usage does not indicate meaningful web‑facing reliance. As a result, the compatibility risk remains low.
Gecko: Shipped/Shipping (
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1998285)
WebKit: Shipped/Shipping (
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=304940)
Web developers: No signals
Other signals:
WebView application risks
Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs,
such that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based
applications?
No information provided
Debuggability
No extra functionality is needed in Devtools to debug this feature update.
Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms
(Windows, Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?
Yes
Yes
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-backgrounds/animations/border-width-interpolation.html
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/CSS2/ui/outline-width-096.xht
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/CSS2/borders/border-width-011.xht
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/CSS2/borders/border-width-012.xht
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-ui/parsing/outline-width-computed.html
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-ui/outline-009.html
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-ui/animation/outline-width-interpolation.html
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-multicol/parsing/column-rule-width-computed.html
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-multicol/parsing/column-rule-computed.html
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-backgrounds/animations/border-width-interpolation.html
Flag name on about://flags
No information provided
Finch feature name
DecoupleComputedBorderWidthFromStyle,DecoupleResolvedColumnRuleWidthFromStyleEnabled
Rollout plan
Will ship enabled for all users
Requires code in //chrome?
False
Tracking bug
https://issues.chromium.org/issues/393631108
Estimated milestones
| Shipping on desktop | 146 |
| Shipping on Android | 146 |
| Shipping on WebView | 146 |
Anticipated spec changes
Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github
issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution
may introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or
structure of the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
No information provided
Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5133099851317248?gate=5201902006173696