Chromium supports animation of the caret-color property, but when animated the default blinking behavior of the caret interferes with the animation. For instance, see the example at https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#caret-animation where an animation from blue to red and back is rendered as a blinking cursor that is randomly blue or red. The CSS caret-animation property has two possible values: auto and manual, where auto means browser default (blinking) and manual means the page author is controlling the caret animation. In addition, via a user stylesheet, it allows users who are disturbed by or have adverse reactions to blinking or flashing visuals to disable the blinking.
None
Likely to be used with existing support for caret-color animation to improve the behavior of that feature.
No risks.
None.
Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
No specific Webview risk.
Support in DevTools.
Tests will land with the feature. I have confirmed that WPT can be created to test the feature.
Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open source repository and its open-source dependencies to function?
None.Shipping on desktop | 133 |
Shipping on Android | 133 |
Shipping on WebView | 133 |
Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
The feature is in the spec draft and was recently discussed and resolved in the working group.Is Apple is pushing back on caret animation for battery life reasons? Do we share that concern?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/fddf09e9-6bc7-468b-83cd-cf243ac3a50fn%40chromium.org.
Could you please file formal positions requests for Mozilal and Apple?
Also, CSSWG issue 9707 is still open, why is that?
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGsbWzQr5tYkCtfQZAOTE8xsroUWXQiGvjEQgRtF9yhJLxUO8w%40mail.gmail.com.
Thanks for the review.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscribe@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/fddf09e9-6bc7-468b-83cd-cf243ac3a50fn%40chromium.org.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscribe@chromium.org.
Thanks for the review.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/fddf09e9-6bc7-468b-83cd-cf243ac3a50fn%40chromium.org.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.