Intent to Ship: Interoperable pointerrawupdate events exposed only in secure contexts

72 views
Skip to first unread message

Chromestatus

unread,
Sep 15, 2025, 10:33:38 AM (3 days ago) Sep 15
to blin...@chromium.org, mus...@chromium.org
Contact emails
mus...@chromium.org

Explainer
None

Specification
https://w3c.github.io/pointerevents/#the-pointerrawupdate-event

Summary
The PointerEvents spec restricted pointerrawupdate to secure contexts in 2020, hiding both the event firing and the global event listeners from insecure contexts. Through this feature, Chrome will match the updated spec and become interoperable with other major browsers.

Blink component
Blink>Input

Web Feature ID
pointer-events-api

TAG review
None

TAG review status
Not applicable

Risks


Interoperability and Compatibility
This will improve Interop: Firefox already matches the spec. (Safari doesn't support pointerrawupdate yet.) The compat risk is non-zero. We believe the risk is negligible because pointerrawupdate is not a popular API, and non-secure pages are not expected to be widespread these days.

Gecko: Shipped/Shipping (https://bugzil.la/1550462)

WebKit: No signal

Web developers: No signals

Other signals:

WebView application risks

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? None



Debuggability
None

Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?
Yes

Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests?
Yeshttps://wpt.fyi/results/pointerevents?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=pointerevents%2Fpointerevent_pointerrawupdate.

Flag name on about://flags
None

Finch feature name
PointerRawUpdateOnlyInSecureContext

Non-finch justification
The finch flag covers only the event firing. The IDL change for the global event listeners onpointerrawupdate is not behind a flag (because Blink Extended IDL doesn't allow this).

Rollout plan
Will ship enabled for all users

Requires code in //chrome?
False

Tracking bug
https://crbug.com/404479704

Estimated milestones
Shipping on desktop143
Shipping on Android143
Shipping on WebView143


Anticipated spec changes

Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of the API in a non-backward-compatible way). None

Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5151468306956288?gate=4786060139823104

This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status.

Alex Russell

unread,
Sep 15, 2025, 2:00:54 PM (3 days ago) Sep 15
to blink-dev, Chromestatus, Mustaq Ahmed
LGTM1

Dan Clark

unread,
Sep 15, 2025, 2:15:13 PM (3 days ago) Sep 15
to blink-dev, sligh...@chromium.org, Chromestatus, mus...@chromium.org
LGTM2

Chris Harrelson

unread,
Sep 15, 2025, 2:44:40 PM (3 days ago) Sep 15
to Dan Clark, blink-dev, sligh...@chromium.org, Chromestatus, mus...@chromium.org
LGTM3

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/487895e6-084b-4c54-89da-8fa194a12d94n%40chromium.org.

Mustaq Ahmed

unread,
Sep 17, 2025, 10:10:34 AM (21 hours ago) Sep 17
to Chris Harrelson, Dan Clark, blink-dev, sligh...@chromium.org, Chromestatus
Thanks everyone, we are now landing this to M142.

FYI, I wanted to call out the two part shipping plan for this (in case the "Non-finch justification" in the original post was not obvious):
- The IDL change for the global event listeners cannot be flag-guarded, so we will ship this part w/o a flag.
- The remaining (event firing) part will be shipped by slipping the flag PointerRawUpdateOnlyInSecureContext.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages