https://github.com/abinpaul1/resource-timing/blob/explainer-content-type/Explainers/Content-Type.md
Resource Timing PR : https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/pull/341
Fetch PR : https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1481
Adds a field to PerformanceResourceTiming that holds a string corresponding to the Content-type header of the fetched resource when the resource was fetched.
Blink>PerformanceAPIs>ResourceTiming
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/785
Issues addressed
Gecko: Positive (https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/705)
WebKit: No signal (https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/88)
Web developers:
Developer interest for the feature : https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues/203
Other signals:
No
No risks
No risks
Does this intent deprecate or change behaviour of existing APIs, such that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? No
The new attribute shows up in Devtools. No implementation changes are required.
Yes
Yes
https://wpt.fyi/results/resource-timing/content-type.html?label=master&label=experimental&aligned
https://wpt.fyi/results/resource-timing/content-type-parsing.html?label=master&label=experimental&aligned#enable-experimental-web-platform-features
False
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1366706
Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open source repository and its open-source dependencies to function?
No
Chrome for desktop 115
Chrome for Android 115
Android Webview 115
No ongoing discussion that could lead to future changes
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5156068351541248
Intent to prototype: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/Dk2uL_gXpZc/m/OhY2ZomeAwAJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAM2ZH3c1k1fLSb-GmSPEs9MsZDY-O3TaGn9PuvT7DL2NATWFPQ%40mail.gmail.com.
LGTM1
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfUjfO88eOh3k1xdp1dSJKDdx%3DA2-6_qQD1KoowbfkGZmQ%40mail.gmail.com.
/LGTM2
/Daniel
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/7dd0e397-123b-57f6-bab6-8df4087529ee%40chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/9b8cf680-9647-1ca7-a6fe-d034e737e9da%40gmail.com.
Hi Abin (or Yoav?),What's blocking this spec PR from landing?
As discussed here, our standard process is to do what we can to get spec changes fully landed if possible.
I see that both the Resource
Timing and Fetch PRs
have landed - does that mean this I2S is unblocked now (and just
needs an LGTM3)?
I see that both the Resource Timing and Fetch PRs have landed - does that mean this I2S is unblocked now (and just needs an LGTM3)?
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6388a806-7b9e-c8c1-6b52-f84e7b473558%40chromium.org.