|Shipping on desktop||117|
|DevTrial on desktop||117|
|Shipping on Android||117|
|DevTrial on Android||117|
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/27CA7B34-5C7E-44DE-A75D-41E6034DD833%40gmail.com.
As to the fingerprintability, we should think about the
trade-offs we're making between accessibility and adding more
active surfaces that give away some bits of entropy. I'd love to
hear more about requests from the a11y or developer community to
actually have this MQ available to them. My own take is that if it
can benefit some users, and sites will use it, the incremental
entropy available here is probably acceptable.
I note that
effectively empty, with an inline issue saying ~"TODO: figure out
if these are OK". That doesn't seem super great. Do we know if
there is consensus among editors on the utility vs privacy trade
offs of these MQs? (Maybe Tab can chime in on this topic...).
it doesn't seem like there's a lot of appetite from Apple or
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/ffce1bda-3b46-4bd1-870b-3dbef003a8f4n%40chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/75c64edc-098f-402f-95d4-f803a23bc1d6%40chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/882f3803-f44e-daf6-5ccc-b9b6e7c9a8b3%40gmail.com.