Contact emails
ari...@chromium.org, wande...@chromium.org, joha...@chromium.org, cfre...@chromium.org, kaust...@chromium.org
Specification
https://privacycg.github.io/saa-non-cookie-storage/
Feedback
https://github.com/privacycg/saa-non-cookie-storage/issues
Design Doc
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19qCGb4qwOcGiNrQM3ptWvRmB4JtpaTFgFVlWLXNOQ6c/edit
Intent to Prototype
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/inRN8tI49O0
Intent to Experiment
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/SEL7N-xIE5s/
Origin Trial
https://developer.chrome.com/origintrials/#/view_trial/577023702256844801
Summary
We propose extending the StorageAccessAPIBeyondCookies origin trial, which allows developers to test extensions to the Storage Access API that expose first-party communication/storage mechanisms beyond just cookies. We decided to extend the experiment based on a need for greater ecosystem feedback before shipping the proposed API. We would like to request extending the end date from June 24, 2024 (M124) to August 6, 2024 (M125). We estimate that we will send the intent to ship for this API for M125 (pending feedback gathered from this extension).
Developers have indicated the extensions to the Storage Access API in this experiment are crucial to site functionality given Storage Partitioning has launched and the Storage Partitioning Deprecation Trial is currently slated to end in M126. We want to be sure to ship the right API, but some components were late to arrive (Shared Worker support was only added in M123). Given the increasing volume of interest in this API in the past month we should be as sure as possible what we are shipping is what’s needed, especially given the lack of adoption by other vendors to date.
TAG review
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/906 (closed)
Compatibility
The Storage Access API is already implemented in Safari, Firefox, and Chrome, but the proposed API shape would not change existing behavior without new arguments added.
Gecko: No Position Yet https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/898
WebKit: No Position Yet https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/262
Web developers: Positive
Storage written can be examined in devtools.
Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests?
Tracking bug
https://issues.chromium.org/40282415
Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
I'm recused on this one, but even with the extension to 125,
you're still not going beyond the default 6 milestones for an OT
(the original request was for 120 to 124) - so the approval should
be fairly trivial.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5DL7W60fWez8v7-%2BfkvYN-nr3iqN7hsdpuULJ_%3DL%2Brw4%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscribe@chromium.org.