Web developers: Positive (https://discourse.wicg.io/t/webcodecs-proposal/3662/)
Provides efficient, low-level access to built-in (software and hardware) media encoders and decoders.
TAG review status
Initial feedback addressed. Awaiting feedback from latest review request.
Interoperability and Compatibility
The main risk is that other browsers do not implement it.
Gecko: Positive co-editing the spec (Paul Adenot)
Edge: Positive co-editing the spec (Bernard Aboba)
WebKit: No signal (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AJmgUNzPqbu8yub8e0HxB9G9op16Bfcp6UaxYKv6Xag/edit#heading=h.oml89rehr07t) "We have some concerns about WebCodecs, but don’t think we’ve stated a public position on it. Concerns about fingerprinting and design of the API, but I don’t think it’s fair to say “negative”. " - Myles Maxfield
Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
Links to previous Intent discussions
Intent to Experiment: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/7OdxQf5HnlQ/m/oyb3oFVaAAAJ
First Experiment Extension: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/3MNyU3OAacI/m/sj8IdIMRAwAJ
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CALG6eSrX3oJByJ17foGnHbFw%3DKgUbu1zUtt3Cv0j8YPDG9ESag%40mail.gmail.com.