It does not at the expense of correctness AIUI. That doesn't seem a
great trade-off?
-- Emilio
> positions/issues/1302 <
https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/
> issues/1302> about whether this feature triggers more layouts, which it
> does not IIUC. But if there is more feedback from Mozilla on this and
> some changes are needed for Gecko to avoid extra layout work, we should
> adjust the spec and implementation as needed.
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 8:16 AM Morten Stenshorne <
mste...@chromium.org
> <mailto:
mste...@chromium.org>> wrote:
>
> *Contact emails*
>
mste...@chromium.org <mailto:
mste...@chromium.org>
>
> *Explainer*
> /No information provided/
>
> *Specification*
>
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#anchor-position-size
> <
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#anchor-position-size>
>
> *Summary*
> When an anchor-positioned element is tethered against an anchor that
> has a transform (or is contained by something with a transform),
> resolve anchor() and anchor-size() functions against the bounding
> box of the transformed anchor.
>
> *Blink component*
> Blink>Layout <
https://issues.chromium.org/issues?
> q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ELayout%22>
>
> *Web Feature ID*
> anchor-positioning <
https://webstatus.dev/features/anchor-positioning>
>
> *Motivation*
>
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#anchor-position-size
> <
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#anchor-position-
> size> says that transform effects on an anchor should affect the
> anchor box, so that anchor-positioned elements may be positioned
> with regards to where an anchor is on screen. This chimes well with
> how scroll offsets are also taken into account. https://
>
drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#scroll <https://
>
drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#scroll> This behavior is
> crucial for creating sophisticated UI effects where elements need to
> remain logically connected while one of them is being transformed.
> Consider a tooltip that points to a button. If the button rotates or
> scales on hover, you want the tooltip to move along with it,
> maintaining its relative position.
>
> *Initial public proposal*
> /No information provided/
>
> *TAG review*
> /No information provided/
>
> *TAG review status*
> Pending
>
> *Risks*
>
>
> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
> /No information provided/
>
> /Gecko/: No signal (
https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/
> issues/1302 <
https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/
> issues/1302>)
>
> /WebKit/: No signal (
https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/
> issues/558 <
https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/558>)
>
> /Web developers/: No signals
>
> /Other signals/:
>
> *WebView application risks*
>
> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based
> applications?
>
> /No information provided/
>
>
> *Debuggability*
> /No information provided/
>
> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
> Yes
>
> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests <https://
>
chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/
> web_platform_tests.md>?*
> Yes
>
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-anchor-position?
> label=master&label=experimental&aligned <
https://wpt.fyi/results/
> css/css-anchor-position?label=master&label=experimental&aligned>
>
> *Flag name on about://flags*
> /No information provided/
>
> *Finch feature name*
> CSSAnchorWithTransforms
>
> *Rollout plan*
> Will ship enabled for all users
>
> *Requires code in //chrome?*
> False
>
> *Tracking bug*
>
https://issues.chromium.org/issues/382294252 <https://
>
issues.chromium.org/issues/382294252>
>
> *Estimated milestones*
> Shipping on desktop 144
> Shipping on Android 144
> Shipping on WebView 144
>
>
>
> *Anticipated spec changes*
>
> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat
> or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known
> github issues in the project for the feature specification) whose
> resolution may introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to
> naming or structure of the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>
> /No information provided/
>
> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5201048700583936?
> gate=5152239350054912 <
https://chromestatus.com/
> feature/5201048700583936?gate=5152239350054912>
>
> *Links to previous Intent discussions*
> Intent to Prototype:
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/
> msgid/blink-dev/
> CAKWZFm6cenwaNiH0YEpJae2n%3DfWz7O553%3D9fKSukBL_KhvUK0A%
40mail.gmail.com <
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKWZFm6cenwaNiH0YEpJae2n%3DfWz7O553%3D9fKSukBL_KhvUK0A%40mail.gmail.com>
>
>
> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
> <
https://chromestatus.com/>.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send an email to
blink-dev+...@chromium.org <mailto:
blink-
>
dev+uns...@chromium.org>.
> DSddU4B2P4mKLU4GQ%
40mail.gmail.com <
https://groups.google.com/a/
>
chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKWZFm7qjp6xQ2TX2jSFaXszEZnyBSKA-
> DSddU4B2P4mKLU4GQ%
40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to
blink-dev+...@chromium.org <mailto:
blink-
>
dev+uns...@chromium.org>.
> CAARdPYdb6iroDcWtbBDUNPoTF8aPQ24%3D8tex2_L%3DUPJVMDBhLg%
40mail.gmail.com
> <
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/
> CAARdPYdb6iroDcWtbBDUNPoTF8aPQ24%3D8tex2_L%3DUPJVMDBhLg%
40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.