Contact emails
awogb...@google.comExplainer
https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/scroll-triggered-animations/blob/main/TRIGGER_SCOPE.mdSpecification
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-animations-2/#trigger-scopeSummary
trigger-scope gives authors the ability to limit the names of animation triggers declared by trigger-instantiating properties. Trigger-Instantiating properties, such as timeline-trigger, declare names which can be referenced by the animation-trigger property in order to attach animations to triggers. However, these names are global by default (similar to anchor-name) and it is often useful for author to limit the visibility of the names so as to isolate animation-to-trigger interactions.Blink component
Blink>AnimationWeb Feature ID
Missing featureMotivation
Similar to anchor-scope[1], trigger-instantiating properties need a mechanism for limiting the visibility of the names declared by the trigger-instantiating property. [1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#anchor-scopeInitial public proposal
No information providedTAG review
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1175TAG review status
PendingRisks
Debuggability
No information providedWill this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?
YesYeshttps://wpt.fyi/results/?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=trigger-scope (As of this writing, only the parsing tests are present on the dashboard but functional tests[1] are quickly following) [1] https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/56601Flag name on about://flags
No information providedFinch feature name
No information providedNon-finch justification
No information providedRollout plan
Will ship enabled for all usersRequires code in //chrome?
FalseTracking bug
https://crbug.com/466134208Estimated milestones
| Shipping on desktop | 145 |
| Shipping on Android | 145 |
| Shipping on WebView | 145 |
Anticipated spec changes
Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
No information providedLink to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5152759609425920?gate=5794840308744192