blink-dev

> What's the status of the spec PR? I just updated the commit message and pinged a reviewer.

Hey, sorry for the slow reply. Could you file a bug at crbug.com about this and link it to me? It

I like the change, but the linked "explainer" doesn't cover the ground we expect to see

LGTM3 On Tuesday, September 9, 2025 at 10:15:17 AM UTC-4 Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Tue, Sep 9,

> with authentication handled by cookies I created an issue for that part as (to my limited

LGTM3 On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 12:49 PM Daniel Bratell <brat...@gmail.com> wrote: LGTM2 /Daniel

Contact emails fla...@chromium.org, perry...@gmail.com Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/css-

LGTM3 (note Alex reminder of which two remain) /Daniel On 2025-09-08 20:24, Alex Russell wrote: LGTM2

Can you please request the other "Prepare to ship" reviews (Privacy, WP Security, etc) in

LGTM3 On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 11:31 AM 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev <blin...@chromium.org

Alright; thanks. LGTM. On Wednesday, September 3, 2025 at 9:54:32 PM UTC+1 Ken Buchanan wrote: We

There's quite a bit of discussion going on in the TAG and I'm (still) waiting on feedback

Contact emails vmp...@chromium.org, fla...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/vmpstr/htmldemos

Thank you! https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12236 This is now specified and addressed in

Oops, yes fixed. Thanks for catching that! On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 10:20 AM Mike Taylor <miketaylr@

Sorry if this is not the right place to ask but I'm curious what the status of this is? I'm

Contact Emails ari...@chromium.org, a...@google.com, la...@chromium.org Explainer https://explainers-

It's been a while since the last round of prototyping and origin trial, but I working to move

Hi there, Is controlled-frame API currently supported in Kiosk deployed IWAs (via https://admin.

You got it right! And no, there's no need for the heavier-weight about:flags for these sorts of

LGTM3 Thanks, Vlad On Wed, Sep 3, 2025, 12:58 pm Chris Harrelson <chri...@chromium.org> wrote:

LGTM3 On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 5:15 PM Daniel Bratell <brat...@gmail.com> wrote: LGTM2. A pity

Makes sense to me as an opt-in, thanks for working on this Yoichi! Rick On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 12:21

Hello, I've addressed the comments on my review. As mentioned in one of them, I've had some

Contact emails go...@google.com, n...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/w3c-fedid/idp-

Checking in on this again, https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/5232 shows

Contact emails and...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification None Summary The 'revert-rule

LGTM3 On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 5:24 PM Philip Jägenstedt <foo...@chromium.org> wrote: LGTM2 On

Hey Marja, API OWNERS looked at this again today and were wondering if there has been progress on

LGTM3