blink-dev

LGTM3 On Wednesday, October 22, 2025 at 11:07:30 AM UTC-4 Rick Byers wrote: LGTM2 Would be nice to

LGTM3 On Wednesday, October 22, 2025 at 8:04:47 AM UTC-7 Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 10/15/25 10:46

Huh, I wonder why I did not get the original e-mail you replied to... ☆PhistucK On Tue, Oct 21, 2025

I had a chat with Chris about this. https://chromestatus.com/feature/5162372125818880 has been

FYI, I updated Chromestatus with Mozilla's position on the feature (strongly negative). It's

On 10/22/25 4:05 am, Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails ror...@microsoft.com, rago...@microsoft.com,

LGTM1 On 10/20/25 4:14 pm, Reilly Grant wrote: IWA OWNER LGTM This is an extension to an existing IWA

On 10/21/25 11:52 am, Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails va...@chromium.org, cl...@chromium.org

Hey there, This Intent to Ship is missing a lot of what API OWNERs need to evaluate before approving.

Contact emails ssi...@chromium.org Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/mst-content-hint/#dom-

Contact emails jja0...@gmail.com Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-4/#propdef-letter-

Contact emails nrose...@chromium.org Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-3/#

Contact emails vmp...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/vmpstr/htmldemos/blob/master/vt/

Hi Bramus! Thank you for reaching out! I tried to reproduce the issue, but I haven't been able to

Responding for Suresh since he's OOO this week. We have UKM metrics that tell us which IDPs would

Responding for Suresh since he's OOO this week. For breakage, we already have UKM metrics for any

I see - thank you very much for the explanation and test cases! Sounds good to me. :) ☆PhistucK On

Could you please request the Privacy, Security, Enterprise, etc bits in your chromestatus entry? On

Contact emails ft...@google.com Specification https://tc39.es/ecma402/#sec-Intl.Locale.prototype.

Context: This feature has been implemented behind an experimental status flag for over a year and has

Contact emails lin...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/

The Firefox implementation of chromestatus requires an update, which has already shipped in Firefox

On Thu, Oct 16, 2025, 2:58 AM 'Harald Alvestrand' via blink-dev <blin...@chromium.org

Hi Rick, We are in touch with the impacted major consumers(Google docs and codemirror) and they are

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2025-10-15 17:15, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 7:01 AM '

LGTM3 On Wednesday, October 15, 2025 at 7:33:27 AM UTC-7 Rick Byers wrote: Looks great to me, LGTM2.

LGTM3 On Wednesday, October 15, 2025 at 11:09:02 AM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 10/14/25 1:53

Seems like a minor incremental risk on top of the broader LNA feature. Thank you for being careful

The compat risk of this seems minor and manageable to me. The exact use of socket pools is really an

Thanks, makes sense. So IMHO it's debatable whether you need API owners approval for this.