blink-dev

LGTM2 - It seems to have ended up on our lists in chromestatus when I put my LGTM there, but you

# Contact emails ane...@gmail.com # Explainer None (This is a small compatibility fix - the spec PR

Contact emails diby...@google.com, dmu...@google.com, fin...@google.com Explainer https://github.com

On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 6:03 PM Philip Jägenstedt <foo...@chromium.org> wrote: LGTM1 Before

On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 08:58:18AM -0800, Daniel Cheng wrote: > There is discussion happening

Hello feature owners, I'm writing to announce two process changes for the Testing review gate on

(including device-dev as well) On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:36 AM Josh Comeau <joshw...@gmail.com

> I assume that the plan is to migrate non-incognito usage to SQLite as well once we have data on

Contact emails apase...@chromium.org, cshar...@chromium.org Explainer https://w3c.github.io/

LGTM1 On Wednesday, December 10, 2025 at 8:02:23 PM UTC+1 Bramus Van Damme wrote: On Wednesday,

Contact emails mjac...@microsoft.com, mmo...@google.com, mjac...@chromium.org Explainer https://

LGTM2 On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 10:37 AM 'Abdelrahman Eed' via blink-dev <blink-dev@chromium

Contact emails chomi...@google.com Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/cssom-view-1/#dom-window-

Hi team, Currently we want to exempt the request from LNA policy, and from what I understand is that

LGTM3 On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 10:53 AM Daniel Bratell <brat...@gmail.com> wrote: LGTM2 /

Do I understand correctly and you're requesting an extension from M145 to M147 (inclusive)? Can

Contact emails sche...@chromium.org, fma...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/schenney-

Contact emails vk...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/security-info-web

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2025-12-09 02:52, TAMURA, Kent wrote: LGTM2 On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 2:02 AM Philip

I'm wondering if `CanvasRenderingContext2D.letterSpacing` and `CanvasRenderingContext2D.

Contact emails nrose...@chromium.org Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-3/#

Sounds good, thanks! I don't think we need additional reviews for such a minor addition. On 12/5/

Hi all, Per this discussion, we're relaxing the user activation requirements for Writer, Rewriter

LGTM3 On 12/3/25 8:12 am, Vladimir Levin wrote: LGTM2 On Wednesday, December 3, 2025 at 11:07:16 AM

This is a good point, Dirk. My understanding of the ecosystem is that users who were previously

LGTM3 On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 4:29 PM Daniel Bratell <brat...@gmail.com> wrote: LGTM2 I can

Daniel Bratell <brat...@gmail.com> writes: > LGTM3 > > Other vendors don't seem

Amazing news! Great to see Chromium reconsidering JPEG XL given all it's benefits. Le vendredi 21

This is purely from memory, and could be inaccurate, but I seem to remember developers trying

LGTM3 On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 9:34 PM Mike Taylor <mike...@chromium.org> wrote: LGTM2 On 12/2/