Rows with "empty" values

21 views
Skip to first unread message

karan...@chromium.org

unread,
Jan 23, 2018, 12:46:26 AM1/23/18
to telemetry
I was running a benchmark (loading.desktop) locally, and noticed that rows corresponding to many stories had "empty" values. Does this mean the metrics for these stories were not recorded due to some failure? 

Juan Antonio Navarro Pérez

unread,
Jan 23, 2018, 6:09:36 AM1/23/18
to karan...@chromium.org, telemetry
rows for which metrics? can you share the results.html file you produced?

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 5:46 AM <karan...@chromium.org> wrote:
I was running a benchmark (loading.desktop) locally, and noticed that rows corresponding to many stories had "empty" values. Does this mean the metrics for these stories were not recorded due to some failure? 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "telemetry" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to telemetry+...@chromium.org.

Karan Bhatia

unread,
Jan 23, 2018, 1:12:57 PM1/23/18
to telemetry, karan...@chromium.org
Attached the file. Several of the metrics have empty rows for "cold" cache temperature. Also see timeToFirstIdleCpu. Example: navigate to: 

results.html?s=avg&g=name.stories.cache_temperatureTag&c=0&t=timeToOnload-(e-1.r-(AirBnB-(e-1).Colorado%2eedu-(e-1).ArsTechnica-(e-1).AllRecipes-(e-1))).timeToFirstContentfulPaint-(e-1.r-(ArsTechnica-(e-1).AirBnB-(e-1).AllRecipes-(e-1))).timeToFirstCpuIdle-(e-1).timeToFirstPaint-(e-1.r-(AllRecipes-(e-1).AirBnB-(e-1)))
results.html

Karan Bhatia

unread,
Jan 23, 2018, 6:45:06 PM1/23/18
to telemetry, karan...@chromium.org
Also, I found it weird that the onload times for "cold" cache temperature were better than those for "warm". Shouldn't it be the other way round?

Ned

unread,
Jan 23, 2018, 6:46:22 PM1/23/18
to Karan Bhatia, kou...@google.com, ksak...@google.com, telemetry, karan...@chromium.org
+Kouhei Ueno +Kunihiko Sakamoto may be able to help with diagnosing the weirdness of the results

Karan Bhatia

unread,
Jan 23, 2018, 6:56:25 PM1/23/18
to Kouhei Ueno, Ned, ksak...@google.com, telemetry
The file is attached in one of the above messages. Also, I filed a bug https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=805115, it seems that loading.desktop is being tested with mobile sites.

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Kouhei Ueno <kou...@google.com> wrote:
Would you share us the file?

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to telemetry+unsubscribe@chromium.org.



--
kouhei

Kouhei Ueno

unread,
Jan 23, 2018, 7:04:35 PM1/23/18
to Ned, Karan Bhatia, ksak...@google.com, telemetry, karan...@chromium.org
Would you share us the file?
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 8:46 AM, Ned <nedn...@google.com> wrote:
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to telemetry+unsubscribe@chromium.org.



--
kouhei

Kunihiko Sakamoto

unread,
Jan 24, 2018, 6:49:32 AM1/24/18
to karan...@google.com, Kouhei Ueno, Ned, tele...@chromium.org
loading benchmark doesn't wait for CPU idle after load, so timeToFirstCpuIdle / timeToInteractive can be empty.

Other metrics being empty is probably due to bad recordings. https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/883004 should fix it.



Kunihiko Sakamoto


2018年1月24日(水) 8:56 Karan Bhatia <karan...@google.com>:
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to telemetry+...@chromium.org.



--
kouhei

Karan Bhatia

unread,
Jan 24, 2018, 6:09:36 PM1/24/18
to telemetry, karan...@google.com, kou...@google.com, nedn...@google.com
Ah, this didn't get posted on the thread:

The fact that the average computations shown in results.html, merely ignores these values without any indication of the same is a bit misleading. The average values can't then be used to compare two runs of the benchmark.

Also, do you have an idea about this discrepancy?
Also, I found it weird that the onload times for "cold" cache temperature were better than those for "warm". Shouldn't it be the other way round?

Thanks.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages