> --
> Chromium OS Developers mailing list: chromiu...@chromium.org
> View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
> http://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-os-dev?hl=en
--
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer
Google Moscow
You can alway do a
sudo rm -rf
I know it is frowned up because you could have some mounted stuff (probably cleared by a reboot) But that works. I have done it many times.
My guess: was the /home/glotov/chromeos/chroot.plain directory owned
by sudo user? The unusual "chroot.plain" name implies that something
manual was done.
-Matt
What are the permissions of /home/glotov/chromiumos/ ?
This code can only fail if you (your user) lacks write access to that directory... which would be very odd, and wouldn't be nfs related.
Also, I'm mildly curious why you're explicitly forcing a different name for the chroot?
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Brian Harring <ferr...@google.com> wrote:What are the permissions of /home/glotov/chromiumos/ ?I have already deleted that chroot with 'mf -rf', but I have another one left. But cros_sdk works fine for it.drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 4096 2012-02-08 17:29 /home/glotov/local/cros_release-R18-1660.B/chroot.instr/
This code can only fail if you (your user) lacks write access to that directory... which would be very odd, and wouldn't be nfs related.I could manually `sudo touch /home/glotov/chromiumos/chroot.plain/.chroot_lock`.
Also, I'm mildly curious why you're explicitly forcing a different name for the chroot?Because I work with 2 chroots simultaneously: One for regular build, and another for instrumented build (I instrument Chrome to track its execution and optimize later, more info here: https://sites.google.com/a/google.com/chrome-msk/dev/boot-speed-up-effort).