Hello Fellow Chrome Developers,
QUIC has been enabled in Google Chrome for 90% of users via a multi-year field trial, and default enabled in a number of popular mobile apps including Google Search and YouTube, for several years. As our various blog posts and SIGCOMM 2017 paper have detailed, this has been a huge win for performance and user experience and we are confident that our QUIC support is robust and solid.
As a result, we will be changing the way QUIC is enabled in M82. Instead of explicitly enabling QUIC when the network stack is configured, QUIC will be enabled by default. This means that QUIC will be implicitly enabled for embedders who accept the default options. An embedder will need to explicitly disable QUIC if they do not wish to support it. This can be done by setting the "enable_quic" member of URLRequestContextConfig to false.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact net...@chromium.org
Thanks
QUIC Team
--
--
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromi...@chromium.org
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chromium-dev...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/chromium-dev/CAD9fJvzjSG91cxd0nJ%3DNjByAMYpUrgteevBjbUp-tVNEokY8TA%40mail.gmail.com.
Howdy, all.A few questions from the Microsoft Edge team:With regard to David's statement: "We are default-enabling QUIC, and that means all versions of QUIC" -- does this encompass all available versions or is the claim just meant to say that on-by-default encompasses both "gQUIC" and some versions of ietfQUIC?In particular, we on the Edge team are interested in understanding whether the plan includes enabling IETF Draft25 and Draft27?With regard to Ryan's specific concern about special case behavior, I've weighed in on the https://crbug.com/1060290 issue.thanks!
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chromi...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/chromium-dev/CAD9fJvzjSG91cxd0nJ%3DNjByAMYpUrgteevBjbUp-tVNEokY8TA%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "net-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to net-dev+u...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/net-dev/5f9e18f8-3f24-4d59-849a-3fa5a95aa109%40chromium.org.
Thanks for helping clarify David. Are you able to share your experiment details regarding draft-25 and any plans for draft-27? When I took a look I only saw some small (2-11% buckets) of h3-Q048/49/50 and h3-T050 but didn't find the instances of h3-25 or h3-27 being offered.With properties like Cloudflare (https://developers.cloudflare.com/http3/intro/release/ - h3-23,24,25) and IIS(http.sys)/OWA (h3-25/27) experimenting with H3 offerings based on the IETF drafts it would be great to better understand the roadmap for these versions and ideally get broader usage outside of users who opt to manually add a version target when launching their browser. Do you have any planned milestones or time frames you plan to enable these in?Thanks,Brandon
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to net...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/net-dev/5f9e18f8-3f24-4d59-849a-3fa5a95aa109%40chromium.org.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "net-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to net-dev+u...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/net-dev/914fb090-36c6-4687-98af-844083915c36%40chromium.org.