Contact emails
Requesting approval to ship?
No.--
--
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromi...@chromium.org
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chromium-dev...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/chromium-dev/CALHg4nnwifzfCtSq_oc8eC5xc%3Doa19RzJ81JwUAfQd%2BKOq%3DaTA%40mail.gmail.com.
On 1/15/19 12:09 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote:
> This is awesome! It was a feature we had in Presto (and in early versions of Chromium based Operas but we dropped it to focus on other things) and I
> have missed it.
>
> As you notice it is possible to confuse pages that don't expect to ever get any more events after a click on a button for instance. There will need to
> be an education effort included with the release, and as you write in the design document, a document today can have a lot of external tentacles that
> might make it harder to have it enabled.
>
> On the other hand onfreeze/onsuspend handlers will give the browser a hint that the page knows how to quickly resume itself. Hopefully not with a full
> reload().
FWIW, pagehide/pageshow events are the ones designed for bfcache. But sure, freeze/suspend work quite similarly.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/8eee25ca-0656-9c18-3105-a4027121b956%40welho.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAK7ODi_-ecT2Zvn4qv5Tv_3WfHEDK3CaNO76dSPzMiXxaCgnnQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Can you please file a full launch tracking bug? I want to make sure security does a full review (how will this interact with site isolation), and privacy (how will clearing the cache or cookies affect pages in the cache)?
Has there been any thought into how this will interact with service worker fetch handling.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bfcache-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bfcache-dev...@chromium.org.
To post to this group, send email to bfcac...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/bfcache-dev/f79d3e31-13d1-4f2e-b92a-e2bd4cc9b1be%40chromium.org.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bfcache-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bfcache-dev...@chromium.org.
To post to this group, send email to bfcac...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/bfcache-dev/d1e3037e-062c-4091-aaa0-988a529035ca%40chromium.org.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bfcache-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bfcache-dev...@chromium.org.
To post to this group, send email to bfcac...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/bfcache-dev/ee8586c6-4d2d-4a43-b540-4ea742a16b23%40chromium.org.
How does bfcache cope with, if page js does not respond to navigation events per spec?
--
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/bfcache-dev/CABg10jxTi24XfzSeDOc%2BBzjc%3DdTVsGKKEjbe6iyLJA7cXQo5hg%40mail.gmail.com.
(1) how to suspend/freeze each frame's js execute state is very tricky, chromium M56+ has refactored source code to use T& instead of T*, which causes a lot of crashes on back-restore...
(2)pagecache MUST be occupied with AdBlock, since many 3rd ads use iframes to load ad contents, if not filtering them, may cause a lot of problems
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/bfcache-dev/7274618d-5465-4f39-9d68-06b3407cb278%40chromium.org.
(1) in what version of Chrome will this functionality become available (or, if that isn't yet known, what the approximate time frame is),
(2) will setting the http cache-control header to "no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate" be sufficient to disable bf caching -- we have an app that breaks if bf caching is enabled, and
(3) how can I get access to pre-release version of chrome to verify that our bfcache disabling is working?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bfcache-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bfcache-dev...@chromium.org.
To post to this group, send email to bfcac...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/bfcache-dev/699d145c-1d1b-46e1-94e2-3ec458a2795f%40chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/bfcache-dev/e5122641-a638-43eb-9123-3fd2426584f0%40chromium.org.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bfcac...@chromium.org.
window.addEventListener("pageshow", function(event){
remove_spinner()
);
Hi Arthur,Thanks for pointing us to those page events. When we do our testing once bfcache is included in canary, we will give that a try.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/1a3c6a2b-de0e-468a-8f96-76b03a2fb629%40chromium.org.