C++11 Feature Proposal: static_assert

[Peter Kasting]

What: static_assert() tests its argument at compile time.

Why: We provide this via macros like COMPILE_ASSERT that are (now) just wrappers around static_assert() anyway.  Let's simply replace the wrappers with the real thing.

v8/src/base/macros.h also implies that static_assert()'s errors are easier to read than the hand-rolled version it still has sitting around as an alternative, so if there are places that aren't implemented using static_assert() yet, we should definitely change them.

PK

[Antoine Labour]

+1, no-brainer.

Antoine 

--
--
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromi...@chromium.org
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-dev

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chromium-dev...@chromium.org.

[James Robinson]

Sure, let's do it.

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:00 PM, 'Peter Kasting' via Chromium-dev <chromi...@chromium.org> wrote:

--

[Nico Weber]

This is now in the "allowed" list: http://chromium-cpp.appspot.com/