Complying with MPL2

[John]

Hi,

I'd like to test libaudioverse as an alternative to openal-soft. Can I confirm that it would be possible to statically link to libaudioverse in a commercial application if 1) I publish any changes made to libaudioverse and 2) I disclose the fact that I'm using libaudioverse somewhere a user would see it?

John

[Austin Hicks]

You should be fine to statically link it.  I don't think credit is even required, but it would be nice.

The main difference between MPL2 and something like Apache or BSD is that you have to make any changes you make to Libaudioverse itself available in some form to people who download the application.  The main difference between GPL and MPL2 is that MPL2 doesn't require any code that isn't part of Libaudioverse to be made public and can't infect your application in any way or under any circumstances.

I am of course a programmer and not a lawyer.  But if it turns out that this isn't fine, we need to talk about relicensing again.  My intent was that you'd be allowed to do exactly this when I added the MPL2 option.  If you can't, then I have failed.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libaudioverse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to libaudiovers...@camlorn.net.
To post to this group, send email to libaud...@camlorn.net.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/camlorn.net/d/msgid/libaudioverse/617383b1-88fc-4eb3-b9df-fbc822a14686%40camlorn.net.