— In my opinion we provide no support for new chapters. "If they can’t make it on their own, let them fail," seems to be the ICG’s policy. I am aware that occasionally an existing chapter will try to work with a newly recognized one, but that doesn’t happen a lot. Maybe we need to adopt a policy of assigning a mentor to every new chapter (one who really can guide the new chapter) and provide more written guidance than we do now. We have a fair amount of descriptive infuriation about the ICG’s programs and services but not much in explanations about how to use them and what they’re for.
— Equally important, we recognize very small groups as chapters. If they meet the six-member minimum, we happily recognize them and then abandon them to their fate instead of working with them to develop into stable organizations. Lately, new chapters tend to be local and already organized on a local basis. Over time, members drift away and are not replaced because the locality has no replacements. They may have a small city and its suburbs as its their specific areas. In contrast, when we recognized the Sick Pups, we gave the chapter the states of New Jersey and New York as their specific area. We were quite successful in attracting members in New Jersey, less so in New York. Costumers Guild West had the entire state of California. Half our members used to be from Guild West. When it left, due to its financial problems, it took them with it.
— Related to the small size, I don’t think we make it sufficiently plain to chapters that they may accept members from anywhere, not just their specific area. (I recall a dispute over whether the Oregon chapter could seek members in Washington, back when I was ICG President. Since I’ve been the Pups’ Prez, I’ve been carefully active in bringing our chapter to the attention of costumers from outside our specific area. At this time, we have more members in Pennsylvania than in either New Jersey or New York and have members in California, South Carolina, and Ontario. The 2025 worldcon in Seattle had a rather impressive display of costumes and some costuming-related information. It also had 40 copies of the Pups’ standard flyer that we provided. So far as I could see no other chapter provided any information about themselves, or even their existence. Nor did the ICG.
— Like many membership-based organization, we were hurt by the pandemic. Many artists who would have been drawn to a group of like-minded practitioners avoid participating in potential sources of illness. Compounding this is the change in costumers’ interests. Today, most are cosplayers, not traditional costumers who may make costumes from the skin out and prefer to show them on a stage rather than in a ballroom. We haven’t been very effective in bringing them to us by offering services that might catch their attention. (I admit I’m not blameless.) The one service I can think of is Guild West’s videoconference series. Note that it’s offered by a chapter, not the ICG.
Perhaps we should create at least two working groups, one to work on the development of support for new chapters, the other to develop our outreach to new costumers, and especially in the cosplayer groups. There are groups; cosplay is well organized.
Byron