Topic for the next sprint

[dvdrw]

The next sprint will begin on Oct 13th 2020.

The two topics to choose from are:

1. Chat, chat users, and message moderation
2. Announcements, news page, admin-to-user messaging, and other on-site information channels

Topic choice 1. is obviously more popular, and will likely involve Dispatch weighing in, perhaps
even collaborating. It will also involve a lot of nitty-gritty work, such as defining what chat is, or
what is a chat user.

Topic choice 2. is a long needed discussion. [bitwave.tv] has the infrastructure mostly, and can
resize to fit, for what is a basic thing. Discussion may possibly even involve reworking whispers,
notifications, and reports. It is also what is separating [bitwave.tv] from being fully independent
of external communication services.

I, personally, would rather see topic 1. get resolved sooner, since it seems easier to write (though
not necessarily to discuss/agree upon).

[DOOM TUBE]

I'd like to see some way for users to feedback info in a more transparent way, my vote is on topic 2.

A in-site forum/discussion board could achieve these things outside of live chat, without requiring another sign-in or discord.

As far as channel mods go, a lot of appeal was in giving users power to troll streamers. Generally streamers with higher views won't want to deal with that, requiring a safe space. I suggest making Streamers pay a server-upkeep fee just to even use janny tools, with no extra weight in decisions. ie $5/mo for mod tools and 1-2 mods, and additionally $1/mo per channel mod. Allow user superchats to override streamer bans occasionally? Allow users to gift coins to each other via forum direct message/inbox.

Thanks

[dvdrw]

You cannot trade wavecoins because wavecoins are not a currency.

https://streamable.com/hpf0ky

[Senator Funstein]

One thing I think can be included in topic 2 is discoverability of features, especially chat settings and all the new features enumerated in topic 1. I think that topic 2 has great potential for becoming a whole suite of improvements. I would be in favor of starting with topic 1 as that seems to serve a more immediate need. In addition, I think all the various ideas within the scope of topic 1 are much better understood by many. 

[Jim]

I vote to start with Topic 1, it will be good practice for getting topic 2 wrong.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RFC Committee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rfccommittee...@bitwave.tv.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/bitwave.tv/d/msgid/rfccommittee/8d54538a-3f5d-d092-7476-94d75d5b34ff%40bitwave.tv.

[dvdrw]

This makes Topic 1 win 3:1.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/bitwave.tv/d/msgid/rfccommittee/422be23e-b650-5a8c-52d1-23d67d63d1d9%40gmail.com.