My 2 cents as someone who lives 2 homes away from El Monte and 4 homes away from the Springer/El Monte Y intersection and as a parent whose child crossed El Monte by foot, bike and scooter twice every school day for 12+ school years.
I sent my own comments to CTC urging them to adopt Alternative 3 -which is the consensus after nearly a decade of studies, meetings, outreach cycles ..and probably a half dozen BPAC meetings- w/o anything that could delay or change the scope of the project . I wish these improvements were reached during our child's school years....I now hope it'll be done during my lifetime :(
re: your two suggestions:
I agree that the Escuela/ECR intersection treatment could be better BUT this was covered -at length- during the El Camino Real Streetscape in preparation of the ECR repaving project and BPAC during its deliberations at the last meeting considered it as settled. As currently proposed it's a huge safety improvement. I want the community to see these benefits asap vs. waiting -for who knows how long- for perfection. A safer way to make a left -specially for kids- will be to use the crosswalk from the CostPlus side- and use the new bike lanes through the intersection-
The second issue was always out of scope for the Study (which started nearly a decade ago), that part of the street is also controlled by Los Altos which would complicate things.. Maybe another project down the road in collaboration with Los Altos, Let's refrain from scope creep on this particular project. Same goes with the idea of a roundabout at Springer/El Monte intersection mentioned in the letter. It was always out of scope from the study and is controlled by Los Altos.