On 8/26/2021 3:34 AM, harvey sachs wrote:
> - I've taken apart, cleaned and reassembled maybe a dozen S/A hubs over
> the decades. 3- and 4-speeds, and the famous ASC 3-speed fixed gears. First
> patent was ~1903. Elegant design, lots of small parts, and runs forever if
> occasionally given a booster of oil. I can't remember taking apart a Sachs
> (=SRAM), but the reputation is that they are bullet-proof - except for the
> indicator and trigger.
I've had the Sachs apart many times. I wouldn't call them
"bullet-proof". They have, IMHO, poor bearing seals, small bearing
balls, and unobtanium axle nuts. I was totally happy to replace my Sachs
hubs with Sturmey-Archers.
Sachs tear down:
https://bicycles.thurstons.us/
> So, the question is why you might want to bother going to Sturmey instead
> of sticking with the SRAM.
I can think of quite a few reasons, Harvey.
While not metric, the Sturmey-Archer axle threads are more common than
the Sachs-only thread. Replacement nuts and cones are available.
The bearing seals, while not perfect, are far superior on the
Sturmey-Archer.
Finding replacement caged bearing sets for the Sachs is a frustrating
experience. Be prepared to replace them with loose bearing balls. And
heaven help you if you ever need replacement cones. The right side cone
is long and unthreaded. The left side cone is threaded to fit exactly
Sachs-threaded axles.
The freehub of the Sturmey-Archer will accept modern 8/9/10/(and some
11) speed cassettes.
The indicator chain, like the axle nuts, is a far more common commodity
than that used on the Sachs. It is far less prone to damage than the
SRAM click-box.
--
John Thurston
Juneau, Alaska