60% of Journals Allow Immediate Archiving of Peer-Reviewed Articles - but it gets much much better...

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Peter Suber

unread,
Nov 24, 2011, 10:26:48 AM11/24/11
to SOAF post, BOAI Forum post
[Forwarding from Peter Millington, via the JISC-Repositories list.  --Peter Suber.]


*** Apologies for cross posting ***

New charts published on the SHERPA/RoMEO Blog show that 87% of journals allow some form of immediate self-archiving of articles, although in only 60% of cases is this a post-peer-reviewed version.

http://romeo.jiscinvolve.org/wp/?p=196

This rises impressively once embargo periods have expired and any other restrictions have been complied with, showing that 94% of journals permit peer-reviewed articles to be archived. Furthermore, nearly a quarter of journals allow the publisher's version/PDF to be archived. Only 5% of journals do not permit any form of archiving.

The statistics were compiled from a snapshot of the RoMEO Journals database taken on the 15th Nov.2011, when it contained about 19,000 titles.

Peter Millington

SHERPA Technical Development Officer
Centre for Research Communications
Greenfield Medical Library, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages