Article in IHE: Can We Afford Free Textbooks?

81 views
Skip to first unread message

Cuillier, Cheryl A - (ccuillie)

unread,
Mar 27, 2017, 8:24:05 AM3/27/17
to OER Digest, oerd...@googlegroups.com, sparc-...@arl.org, OPEN...@listserv.educause.edu, open-ed...@lists.okfn.org, oer-advocac...@googlegroups.com, cccoer-...@googlegroups.com, Open Textbook Network

It’s really disappointing that this is what Inside Higher Ed chose to run during Open Education Week:

 

Can We Afford Free Textbooks?

When it comes to student success, “new” open resources ultimately do little more than further entrench an ineffective status quo, argues Robert S. Feldman.

 

Cheryl

 

Cheryl Cuillier, OER Coordinator

Main Library A207
University of Arizona

P.O. Box 210055

Tucson, AZ 85721

(520) 310-9874

ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6010-4405

Jeff Gallant

unread,
Mar 27, 2017, 9:46:31 AM3/27/17
to sparc-...@arl.org

Hi Cheryl and all,

 

The IHE editorial is an interesting (if overplayed) take on educational resources, and from an institution which was one of the first when it comes to early OER creators and adopters. The timing’s quite bad, but it does at least help us to think about the arguments out there. It got me to type out some thoughts, which is rare! (Sorry, LibOER! ALG has been pretty busy over here.)

 

In some ways, Feldman’s argument seems like comparing apples to oranges; a type of medium (textbooks versus adaptive learning systems) versus a method of licensing and distribution (open education). After all, even OpenStax is pursuing adaptive courseware. However, it’s also a common argument among publishers that textbooks are already dead, and these new systems are the modern form of the educational resource.

 

The open textbook reply to this argument is simply this: We would not have this conversation at all if textbooks, traditional textbooks, weren’t still the majority of educational resources used in higher education. McGraw-Hill’s higher education president famously (to us) said “Textbooks are dead. They’re dinosaurs” back in 2014, but textbooks continued to be a pain point for making education affordable from college administrators and faculty. If textbooks were indeed fossilized underground in 2014, our calls for open educational resources wouldn’t have been received nearly as well.

 

Part of why textbooks aren’t dead is that institutions and faculty are not ready to adopt these alternatives, because adaptive learning platforms have not always delivered on what they have promised. The AAP has their own cited article in the IHE editorial, but there are recent studies by external researchers that show adaptive platforms aren’t meeting the needs they advertise while keeping costs the same or increasing costs. Plus, companies have been so eager to jump onto the adaptive learning buzzword that there isn’t a standardized definition of what adaptive learning is. Some adaptive platforms only respond to students’ multiple choice questions alone, “pathing” them based on what they get right or wrong within one paired textbook. Others break an entire subject down to its granular bits of knowledge and plot a student’s course based on not only what they answered, but what the system predicts based on what other students answered. And, of course, those more granular systems integrate OER, because the 5R’s allow systems to learn better, too.  

 

I think real adaptive learning is set to take off in the next five years. What we know as “adaptive” systems at the moment are largely brute-force data miners instead of thinkers, but once neural networks are developed enough to be implemented, this will change. Then we’ll have a much larger debate on not only the state of open education, but on the state of education at large.

 

Just some thoughts! Maybe someone from OpenStax has some machine learning ideas to contribute?

 

Happy Open Education Week, everyone!

 

Best,

Jeff

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SPARC Libraries & OER Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sparc-liboer...@arl.org.
To post to this group, send email to sparc-...@arl.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/a/arl.org/group/sparc-liboer/.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/arl.org/d/msgid/sparc-liboer/00cf2285285b477fa299221330681158%40IRIS.catnet.arizona.edu.

Labadorf, Kathleen

unread,
Mar 27, 2017, 10:04:59 AM3/27/17
to Jeff Gallant, sparc-...@arl.org

Thanks for bringing this to our attention, Cheryl. I’m just reading it now and will probably have more to say later.  His thinking is simply textbooks, as far as I can see.

 

BUT… Here’s his bio: Robert S. Feldman is deputy chancellor and professor of psychological and brain sciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. He also serves as chair of the McGraw-Hill Education Learning Science Research Advisory Council. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own.

 

 

I’d love to hear a little context from Marilyn or Jeremy. These challenges appear and can become clarifications in the end. Meet it head on and, as in The Labyrinth, remember – “You have no power over me.”

 

Kathy

 

Kathy Labadorf

Open Educational Resources, Information Literacy, and WGSS Librarian

Phone: 860-486-1253

 

“In the spring, at the end of the day, you should smell like dirt.” 

 Margaret AtwoodBluebeard's Egg

Labadorf, Kathleen

unread,
Mar 27, 2017, 10:20:31 AM3/27/17
to Labadorf, Kathleen, Jeff Gallant, sparc-...@arl.org

Hi again,

 

He really makes good points but his flaw is in thinking only in terms of textbooks. That is a simplistic way of thinking about open and easy to use arguments against. This movement is not about textbooks, it is about making Higher Ed more affordable as well as allowing our faculty to be creative and teach what they know the students need to learn.  One interesting note – IHE could be accused of inflammatory publishing – trying to inflame. When I went to save this as a PDF, the actual title printed there is:

 

Colleges should focus on keeping students in college, not free textbooks (essay)

 

And he includes links to references.  I’ve attached the PDF here (in case they change it).

 

Kathy

 

Kathy Labadorf

Open Educational Resources, Information Literacy, and WGSS Librarian

Phone: 860-486-1253

 

“In the spring, at the end of the day, you should smell like dirt.” 

 Margaret AtwoodBluebeard's Egg

 

Colleges should focus on keeping students in college, not free textbooks (essay).pdf

Allegra Swift

unread,
Mar 27, 2017, 11:20:31 AM3/27/17
to Cuillier, Cheryl A - (ccuillie), OER Digest, oerd...@googlegroups.com, sparc-...@arl.org, OPEN...@listserv.educause.edu, open-ed...@lists.okfn.org, oer-advocac...@googlegroups.com, cccoer-...@googlegroups.com, Open Textbook Network
The author's McGraw-Hill connection that Kathy points out is key. The "digital learning tools" he is describing bypass the library and directly connect with the publisher. Students are being forced to pay for content the library subscribes to. One article supplied but each student pays for it. In addition, one system I am looking at (marketed directly to faculty) states that it makes textbook resale a non-issue and forces sale of content supplied by "thieves." Instead of saving students money, this systems are forcing students to pay even more and reporting, grades, etc are tied to the content.

The faculty are unaware of the costs but wooed by the prospects of saving time in reading, grading and the ease of reports that tell them where students are struggling earlier so that they can intervene (student success).

We need OER that is not replicated old tech (print) but including annotation and reporting features as the faculty want and need.

Allegra Swift
Claremont Colleges

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SPARC Libraries & OER Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sparc-liboer+unsubscribe@arl.org.

Jeremy Smith

unread,
Mar 28, 2017, 9:52:58 AM3/28/17
to Labadorf, Kathleen, Jeff Gallant, sparc-...@arl.org
Kathy,

I don’t think we can provide any extra context here. The flaws in his argument have been made explicitly clear by all of your comments and the comments under the article. Marilyn has been at odds with him over this issue for many years. Fortunately, his opinions don’t seem to infect many elements of campus that I am aware of. We have widespread support from students, administration, and faculty. Including faculty in the departments he has taught in.

Jeremy Smith
Digital Projects Manager in Scholarly Communication
W.E.B. Du Bois Library
154 Hicks Way
Amherst, MA 01003
413.545.6729

Amy Hofer

unread,
Mar 28, 2017, 11:07:13 AM3/28/17
to Jeremy Smith, Labadorf, Kathleen, Jeff Gallant, sparc-...@arl.org
Hi all, 

That was the most satisfying read of comments that I can remember! I agree that the arguments and conflict of interest in the article are thoroughly debunked below. Thank you Richard Saunders for pointing out the most glaring flaw for me - that the author assumes that high costs have no impact on completion rates. 

Onward...

Amy

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sparc-liboer+unsubscribe@arl.org.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SPARC Libraries & OER Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sparc-liboer+unsubscribe@arl.org.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SPARC Libraries & OER Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sparc-liboer+unsubscribe@arl.org.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SPARC Libraries & OER Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sparc-liboer+unsubscribe@arl.org.

To post to this group, send email to sparc-...@arl.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/a/arl.org/group/sparc-liboer/.



--
Amy Hofer
Coordinator, Statewide Open Education Library Services

PCC Southeast Library Room 206
2305 SE 82nd Ave
Portland, OR 97216

kate.makowiecka

unread,
Mar 28, 2017, 4:35:26 PM3/28/17
to k.mako...@murdoch.edu.au, Labadorf, Kathleen, Jeff Gallant, sparc-...@arl.org




Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sparc-liboer...@arl.org.

To post to this group, send email to sparc-...@arl.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/a/arl.org/group/sparc-liboer/.

jpavy

unread,
Mar 29, 2017, 9:50:35 AM3/29/17
to Open Textbook Network, oerd...@gmail.com, oerd...@googlegroups.com, sparc-...@arl.org, OPEN...@listserv.educause.edu, open-ed...@lists.okfn.org, oer-advocac...@googlegroups.com, cccoer-...@googlegroups.com
I agree, it is disappointint to see this, especially during Open Ed Wee, but it is heartening to read the comments, which run heavily against the article's position.  Several commenters also point out the author's affiliation with McGraw-Hill.  

Jeanne
University of New Orleans
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages