Harvard Library publishes report on converting subscription journals to open access

[Peter Suber]

Harvard Library publishes report on converting subscription journals to open access

August 5, 2016

The Harvard Library Office for Scholarly Communication (OSC) is pleased to announce the release of a comprehensive literature review on strategies for converting subscription journals to open access.

In the spring of 2015, the OSC commissioned the research from David Solomon, Mikael Laakso, and Bo-Christer Björk, who completed it in the spring of 2016. We posted a preliminary draft online for a four month public-comment period, and asked a distinguished panel of 20 colleagues to add their own comments. 

The authors identified 15 journal-flipping scenarios: 10 that depend on article processing charges (APCs) and 5 that dispense with APCs. For each one they give examples, evidence, and their assessment of its strengths and weaknesses. The examples come from all scholarly niches by academic field, regions of the world, and economic strata. 

This comprehensive review of diverse approaches is the report’s strength. Not every flip was a success, and not all the flips that were successful using one scenario would have been successful with a different scenario. But there were successes under every scenario and in every scholarly niche. Journals that picked a scenario that fit their circumstances were able preserve or enhance their readership, submissions, quality, and financial sustainability.

The invited panelists represent a wide range of relevant experience and expertise, including OA and non-OA academic publishing, fee-based and no-fee OA publishing, for-profit and non-profit OA publishing, society and non-society OA publishing, the global north and global south, the sciences and humanities. 

The overall questions were: What has already been done? What conversion methods have been tried or proposed? What has been the outcome for submissions, readership, quality, impact, and finances? Which conversion scenarios have good track records, and in which scholarly niches? When journal publishers consider a move to OA, what options and evidence should they take into account?

The research was made possible by a grant to the Harvard Library from the Arcadia Fund.  We thank both the Arcadia Fund and the Harvard Library for supporting this research. 

Text of the report

https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/27803834

Journal-flipping project home page

https://osc.hul.harvard.edu/journal-flipping

View this announcement online 

https://osc.hul.harvard.edu/programs/journal-flipping/report-released

..... Contact info .....

Peter Suber

Director, Office for Scholarly Communication

Widener Library

Harvard University

peter...@harvard.edu

bit.ly/petersuber  

[David Solomon]

As the authors of the report we would like to thank Peter Suber for allowing us to conduct this project and all his help in carrying it out. We would also like to thank the twenty plus people who commented on the report. Their comments form an excellent addition that has significantly enriched the report.

David Solomon, Mikael Laakso, and Bo-Christer Björk

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SPARC OA Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to sparc-...@arl.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sparc-oaforum+unsubscribe@arl.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/a/arl.org/group/sparc-oaforum

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SPARC OA Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sparc-oaforum+unsubscribe@arl.org.