Re: [cas-user] Want to Seperate hazelcast startup from cas and make cas use seperate instance of hazelcast

53 views
Skip to first unread message

Ray Bon

unread,
Mar 17, 2025, 1:39:26 PM3/17/25
to cas-...@apereo.org
If you have more than one cas server (and consequently, more than one hazelcast server), the tickets are shared and maintained by the hazelcast cluster. As long as at least one cas server is running, the cas sessions will be preserved.
You may have to upgrade to get that capability.
If you want to use an external hazelcast, the one started by cas would not be used. This may required appropriate config in the external instance.

Ray


On Tue, 2025-02-25 at 22:26 -0800, 1000milesdrunk wrote:
You don't often get email from specsu...@gmail.com. Learn why this is important
Hi,
I have a doubt where i want to separate hazelcast from cas so that whenever I restart cas the logged in users dont get logged out since cas is restarting hazelcast ,so I want to seperate cas and hazelcast so that the restart does not affect the logged in users
I am currently having CAS 5.3
What property to add for that or what to remove
currently using 
cas.ticket.registry.hazelcast.cluster.members=hazelcast1.enhancesys.com:5701
cas.ticket.registry.hazelcast.cluster.instanceName=sessionConfig
cas.ticket.registry.hazelcast.cluster.port=5701
tried
cas.ticket.registry.hazelcast.cluster.enabled=false which does not start the cas itself,what to do


1000milesdrunk

unread,
Apr 24, 2025, 10:02:09 PM4/24/25
to CAS Community, Ray Bon
Thanks Ray,
So I am planning to upgrade it to 7.1.2 and hazelcast to latest how do I configure cas to use the external hazelcast instead of creating a new hazelcast instance

Sudharsan

unread,
Apr 24, 2025, 10:02:19 PM4/24/25
to CAS Community, Ray Bon
Thanks Ray,
How to configure CAS to use the existing hazelcast so that it doesn't start a new instance,
So I am currently in the process of updating cas from 5.3 to 7.1.2 and hazelcast to latest
Any guide to do that

On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 11:09:26 PM UTC+5:30 Ray Bon wrote:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages