It's also worth clarifying that the franchise agreement only covers
"cable" because that's the way the legal framework that covers
public-access television is written. In the long run, we need to work on
a political solution to ensure that access centers remain funded as the
technology moves toward broadband, streaming, and unicast models.
If you're curious, wikipedia has a nice history and summary of the issues:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-access_television
On 9/21/15 11:48 AM, Jim Lescault wrote:
> Hi Makers@Amherst Media,
>
> I want to thank Alex for his identification of one of the very important
> issues that should be testified to during the Cable/Comcast hearings:
> the community should be requesting/demanding that Comcast/XFINITY
> carries our shows via their “Video On Demand” (VOD). Of course the
> recommendation that we also request/demand that the connectivity be IP
> based will enable quicker downloading and higher quality viewing.
>
> I thank Charlie for circulating the information about the hearings and
> hope to either see you there or read your written testimony or both.
>
> Jim Lescault
>
dire...@amherstmedia.org <mailto:
dire...@amherstmedia.org>
> <
http://amherstmedia.org/apple>
> <mailto:
schr...@umass.edu>> wrote:
>
>> Supporting the Amherst Media group is a very important cause to take
>> up. You guys have my full support! Along those lines, however:
>>
>> The requests on your website are still very cable-focused. We for one
>> are certainly a cable-cutting household and I am wondering if there is
>> a vision “beyond cable”? I see a note on your site about Access 360,
>> which seems to be going in that direction but there’s not much info in
>> the post.
>>
>> For example, I see as more important than getting an HD channel the
>> question whether Amherst Media content could be included in the
>> XFINITY player (on web and devices). Wouldn’t it be great to browse
>> all kinds of local content next to where you find movies.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alex
>>
>> *alexander c. schreyer*,
m.a.sc., dipl.-ing.
>>
>> *program director* [building and construction technology],
>> *senior lecturer*, university of massachusetts
>> *author* of “architectural design with sketchup”
>> *structural engineer* [wood structures] / *bauingenieur* [holzbau]
>>
>> web >
alexschreyer.net <
http://www.alexschreyer.net/>
>> umass >
bct.eco.umass.edu <
http://bct.eco.umass.edu/>
>> <
https://alexschreyer.youcanbook.me/>
>> connect >
linkedin.com/in/alexschreyer
>> <
http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexschreyer>
>>
>> *From:* Charles Schweik [mailto:
csch...@pubpol.umass.edu]
>> *Sent:* Sunday, September 20, 2015 13:38
>> *To:*
mak...@amherstmedia.org <mailto:
mak...@amherstmedia.org>
>> *Subject:* [M@AM] Support Amherst Media this week!
>>
>> Hi Makers@AmherstMedia,
>>
>> This is coming not from an Amherst Media employee, but from me, a town
>> citizen who appreciates what Amherst Media does for our community.
>>
>> FYI, there is an important town meeting this Thursday at 6:30 in the
>> Town Room in the Town Hall where people can speak up or show support
>> for what Amherst Media does.
>>
>> See *
https://amherstmedia.org/ascertainment.*
>>
>> Consider coming to the town meeting, or at least writing a letter to
>> the town manager's office. More information is on the link above.
>>
>> Thanks for your consideration,
>>
>> Charlie
>>
>> --
>> Charlie Schweik
>>
>> Professor, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
>> Dept of Environmental Conservation and Center for Public Policy and
>> Administration
>>
>> Personal website:
http://people.umass.edu/cschweik
>> Publications:
http://works.bepress.com/charles_schweik/
>>
>> Author, Internet Success: A Study of Open Source Software (MIT Press,
>> 2012) - see
http://tinyurl.com/d3e4545
>>
>> --------------------------------------------
>> Q: Why do I try my best to keep my emails to five sentences or less?
>> A:
http://five.sentenc.es <
http://five.sentenc.es/>
>> an email
tomakers+u...@amherstmedia.org
>> <mailto:
makers+un...@amherstmedia.org>.