Have you considered joining our cmi5 Working group?
In our cmi5 working group, we address the LMS side of xAPI interoperability and would be happy to have you join our group.
Dear Pankaj,First of all, I would like to thank you for the incredible work you have done with the video COP.
I have just implemented a first experiment using VideoJS and Trax LRS to analyse learners behaviors.
I found the video profile spec very clear, simple and usefull. Great job!
I totally agree with the need to define a "LMS activities" profile.
I am currently in the process of getting LMS events and transforming them into xAPI Statements and there is a lot of things to define and clarify.
Just to take an example, if you want to say that a learner completed a "course" (LMS course), what activity type should be used?
There are already 2 "course" activity types defined in xAPI profiles (CMI5 and ADL). But they are refering to "content packages", not to LMS courses.
So should we define a "LMS course" activity type? Should we use CMI5 or ADL course activity type?
It was just an example. I am convinced that such a profile should be defined to improve interoperability between LMS.
Creator of Trax LRS
Yes, this is getting a bit frustrating…
Here is my previous response:
You are correct, we have focused primarily on this, however, we are always looking for areas we may need to expand. Since the LMS and xAPI are the focus, cmi5 should be where this is spec’d out.
We have not covered these areas, but it does not mean we should not be.