Warnocks Dilemma (was Maybe [PATCH] move some stuff out of io.h to io_privat.h)
Juergen Boemmels
last week I send in a patch which creates io/io_private.h, but nobody
replied to it. The classical Warnock's Dilemma. I have the strange
feeling that its because nobody read my mail, because sometimes the
p6i mailinglist does not like mail with attachments. But otherwise it
made its way to
http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.internals/17670
so somebody should have read it.
Anyway, I can resend it, resend it with the patch inline or put it in
the bug-tracker. What should I do?
bye
boe
--
Juergen Boemmels boem...@physik.uni-kl.de
Fachbereich Physik Tel: ++49-(0)631-205-2817
Universitaet Kaiserslautern Fax: ++49-(0)631-205-3906
PGP Key fingerprint = 9F 56 54 3D 45 C1 32 6F 23 F6 C7 2F 85 93 DD 47
Leopold Toetsch
> Hello,
> last week I send in a patch which creates io/io_private.h, but nobody
> replied to it. The classical Warnock's Dilemma. I have the strange
> feeling that its because nobody read my mail,
Sorry, forgot about that patch. Applied, thanks for your patches and the
reminder ;-)
leo
Lars Balker Rasmussen
> I have the strange
> feeling that its because nobody read my mail, because sometimes the
> p6i mailinglist does not like mail with attachments.
That's ezmlm-idx which doesn't like Gnus' minimalistic approach to
Content-type in text-attachments. I've patched my Gnus to be slightly
more verbose, which has fixed it for me (as seen in this message).
Fixing ezmlm-idx is a bit more demanding...
Dan Sugalski
> Hello,
>
> last week I send in a patch which creates io/io_private.h, but nobody
> replied to it. The classical Warnock's Dilemma. I have the strange
> feeling that its because nobody read my mail, because sometimes the
> p6i mailinglist does not like mail with attachments. But otherwise it
> made its way to
> http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.internals/17670
> so somebody should have read it.
I see Leo's got the patch in, but... have we gotten you CVS access yet?
You're the defacto IO maintainer at the moment, so it'd make sense to do
so.
Dan
Leopold Toetsch
> I see Leo's got the patch in, but... have we gotten you CVS access yet?
> You're the defacto IO maintainer at the moment, so it'd make sense to do
> so.
Yep. Juergen's patches are fine, I second that.
> Dan
leo
Melvin Smith
>Hello,
>
>last week I send in a patch which creates io/io_private.h, but nobody
>replied to it. The classical Warnock's Dilemma. I have the strange
>feeling that its because nobody read my mail, because sometimes the
>p6i mailinglist does not like mail with attachments. But otherwise it
>made its way to
>http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.internals/17670
>so somebody should have read it.
Actually I reviewed it and didn't have an issues so I didn't respond.
I assumed you already had CVS commit access. If not, you should.
-Melvin
Dan Sugalski
I put in the request, and it's been taken care of. Juergen's now got
checkin privs--lucky him. :)
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
d...@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk