I scare me.

[David H. Adler]

I'm sure it needs a few tweaks, but I've managed to write a hq9+
interpreter in pasm.

[insert deity here] help us all. :-)

Any thoughts on this?

http://www.thetasigma.com/parrot/

dha
--
David H. Adler - <d...@panix.com> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
"It's all eggs, bacon, beans and a fried slice." - Madness

[Nicholas Clark]

On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 01:49:05AM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
> I'm sure it needs a few tweaks, but I've managed to write a hq9+
> interpreter in pasm.

> Any thoughts on this?

+ isn't a portable file name character is it?
So although Unix (and CVS) will be quite happy, it would not be a great
idea naming a subdirectory hq9+ ?

What should we call it

prn.Im_told_CPM_still_has_its_claws_in_windows ? :-)

Nicholas Clark

[Michael G Schwern]

On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 10:35:56AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 01:49:05AM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
> > I'm sure it needs a few tweaks, but I've managed to write a hq9+
> > interpreter in pasm.
>
> > Any thoughts on this?
>
> + isn't a portable file name character is it?
> So although Unix (and CVS) will be quite happy, it would not be a great
> idea naming a subdirectory hq9+ ?
>
> What should we call it

hq9p, same as the .pasm file.

PS I think READ needs s/S1/S5/ if I'm reading it correctly. Otherwise
everything after the 1024th character will be ignored, and then you
couldn't write Enterprise Level hq9+ programs!

--
Quit looking, kids! It'll EAT YOUR MIND!!
-- http://www.angryflower.com/fuck.gif