If anyone messes up and commits any feature-related changes between
now and Wednesday, I'll back the changes out and open a ticket, so I
(or someone else) can re-apply them afterwards.
I notice that the current tree doesn't pass the tests even on my
rather forgiving machine, so there's some work to do. :-) (MANIFEST is
broken again, and nci.t is failing. I'll fix the first now.)
Any suggestions for the name of the 0.0.9 release? Right now, I'm
split between "0.0.9" and "Nazgul".
Whoa! Looks like Simon Glover has fixed the MANIFEST already. Cool,
thanks!
> I notice that the current tree doesn't pass the tests even on my
> rather forgiving machine, so there's some work to do. :-) (MANIFEST is
> broken again, and nci.t is failing. I'll fix the first now.)
nci.t has started failing because we're only skipping the first 9 tests,
and not the 2 new ones that Leo has just added. This suggests an obvious
fix, but I'm not sure quite why we were skipping all of the tests in
nci.t in the first place; would anybody more knowledgeable care to
comment?
Simon
It crashes rather badly in a number of spots on OS X, unfortunately.
I've also noticed that we have no Win32 systems in the tinderbox. Are
we building OK on Win32 anywhere?
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
d...@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
> It crashes rather badly in a number of spots on OS X, unfortunately.
> I've also noticed that we have no Win32 systems in the tinderbox. Are
> we building OK on Win32 anywhere?
s/Win32//g :-(
*percy* parrot <open> 5 red, 14 orange, 0 green: TD-Corvette (Test Failed),
+TD-Thunderbird (Burning),
*percy* TD-Camaro (Test Failed), drinky-drinky (Burning), TD-Viper (Test
+Failed),
*percy* TD-ParkAvenue (Test Failed), frivolous (Test Failed), TD-Miata (Test
+Failed),
*percy* TD-Camry (Test Failed), TD-Millenia (Burning), TD-Firebird (Test
+Failed),
*percy* TD-Continental (Burning), TD-Ferrari (Test Failed), TD-Celica (Test
+Failed),
*percy* glastig (Test Failed), TD-Seville (Test Failed), galactic-tcc
+(Burning), frivolous (Test Failed),
*percy* galactic-lcc (Test Failed)
Nicholas Clark
> ... but I'm not sure quite why we were skipping all of the tests in
> nci.t in the first place; would anybody more knowledgeable care to
> comment?
The nci tests need a shared library, which we can't reliably build on
all platforms (s. #18832), so it isn't in the test_prep target.
But after 0.0.9 release we should really enable building libnci$(SO) to
have building shared libs tested as well as nci (which would need some
more signatures in call_list.txt).
Please (after applying #18832 to Makefile) try to:
$ make libnci.so / libnci.dll
and run
$ perl t/harness --running-make-test --gc-debug t/pmc/nci.t
on different platforms.
> Simon
leo