Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

'Big Brother' sicko UK TV - 'slaughter the pig' protestors paid?

2 views
Skip to first unread message

banana

unread,
Jul 22, 2002, 7:44:48 AM7/22/02
to
It has been reported (Sunday Times, 21 July 2002, presumably in tabloid
TV/newspapers too) that in connection with the important and very widely
covered conditioning known as the 'Big Brother' TV 'reality' show,
'protestors' have gone to the vicinity of the building in which the
participants are living, carrying banners including one bearing the
slogan 'SLAUGHTER THE PIG'. This is directed against one of the
participants, 'Jade', who has apparently been built up as a figure of
hatred among members of the spectator population.

First question: have these protestors been paid, just as those teenage
girls who met the Beatles at Heathrow airport 30-odd years ago were paid
to scream and thereby demonstrate 'Beatlemania'?

Second question: what next? Already of course one victim of
everyone-hates-you in a version of this horrendous shit shown on TV
elsewhere in Europe killed themselves shortly after being 'ejected'.
--
banana

whatulike

unread,
Jul 22, 2002, 8:12:24 AM7/22/02
to
First question: have these protestors been paid, just as those teenage
girls who met the Beatles at Heathrow airport 30-odd years ago were paid
to scream and thereby demonstrate 'Beatlemania'?

This at least is a complete falsehood ....

Beck

unread,
Jul 22, 2002, 8:28:31 AM7/22/02
to

"banana" <banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:wQKmSnA1F$O9E...@borve.demon.co.uk...

> It has been reported (Sunday Times, 21 July 2002, presumably in tabloid
> TV/newspapers too) that in connection with the important and very widely
> covered conditioning known as the 'Big Brother' TV 'reality' show,
> 'protestors' have gone to the vicinity of the building in which the
> participants are living, carrying banners including one bearing the
> slogan 'SLAUGHTER THE PIG'. This is directed against one of the
> participants, 'Jade', who has apparently been built up as a figure of
> hatred among members of the spectator population.
>
> First question: have these protestors been paid, just as those teenage
> girls who met the Beatles at Heathrow airport 30-odd years ago were paid
> to scream and thereby demonstrate 'Beatlemania'?
>
> Second question: what next? Already of course one victim of
> everyone-hates-you in a version of this horrendous shit shown on TV
> elsewhere in Europe killed themselves shortly after being 'ejected'.

Its going way over the top now, its only a bloody gameshow. Trouble is,
some sicko may carry out the actions.

Beck


The Jaggler

unread,
Jul 22, 2002, 10:24:35 AM7/22/02
to

"banana" <banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:$A7lGPAwA$O9E...@borve.demon.co.uk...

> It has been reported (Sunday Times, 21 July 2002, presumably in tabloid
> TV/newspapers too) that in connection with the important and very widely
> covered conditioning known as the 'Big Brother' TV 'reality' show,
> 'protestors' have gone to the vicinity of the building in which the
> participants are living, carrying banners including one bearing the
> slogan 'SLAUGHTER THE PIG'. This is directed against one of the
> participants, 'Jade', who has apparently been built up as a figure of
> hatred among members of the spectator population.
>
My guess is that a tabloid journalist paid somebody to carry this banner
just like tabloid journalists hung an effigy of david beckham up after the
1998 world cup, and just like tabloid journalists pay hooligans occasionally
to start trouble. Tabloid journalists are the scum of the earth. If I was
going down to the BB house I would carry a banner saying "tabloid newspapers
and the people who work for them are vermin", but I suspect I would be made
to take the banner down.


DD

unread,
Jul 22, 2002, 10:54:32 AM7/22/02
to
Tim C is that you?


In article <wQKmSnA1F$O9E...@borve.demon.co.uk>, banana

<banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>It has been reported (Sunday Times, 21 July 2002, presumably in tabloid
>TV/newspapers too) that in connection with the important and very widely
>covered conditioning known as the 'Big Brother' TV 'reality' show,
>'protestors' have gone to the vicinity of the building in which the
>participants are living, carrying banners including one bearing the
>slogan 'SLAUGHTER THE PIG'. This is directed against one of the
>participants, 'Jade', who has apparently been built up as a figure of
>hatred among members of the spectator population.
>

Jaded

unread,
Jul 22, 2002, 10:59:36 AM7/22/02
to
"banana" <banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:$A7lGPAwA$O9E...@borve.demon.co.uk...
> It has been reported (Sunday Times, 21 July 2002, presumably in tabloid
> TV/newspapers too) that in connection with the important and very widely
> covered conditioning known as the 'Big Brother' TV 'reality' show,
> 'protestors' have gone to the vicinity of the building in which the
> participants are living, carrying banners including one bearing the
> slogan 'SLAUGHTER THE PIG'. This is directed against one of the
> participants, 'Jade', who has apparently been built up as a figure of
> hatred among members of the spectator population.
>

Come in, Dr Fernandez, I've been expecting you.

> First question: have these protestors been paid, just as those teenage
> girls who met the Beatles at Heathrow airport 30-odd years ago were paid
> to scream and thereby demonstrate 'Beatlemania'?
>

Protestors?

> Second question: what next? Already of course one victim of
> everyone-hates-you in a version of this horrendous shit shown on TV
> elsewhere in Europe killed themselves shortly after being 'ejected'.

What next? Slaughter the llamas of course!

Roger

unread,
Jul 22, 2002, 1:17:21 PM7/22/02
to
In article <$A7lGPAwA$O9E...@borve.demon.co.uk>, banana <banana@REMOVE_T
HIS.borve.demon.co.uk> writes
[snip]

>
>First question: have these protestors been paid, just as those teenage
>girls who met the Beatles at Heathrow airport 30-odd years ago were paid
>to scream and thereby demonstrate 'Beatlemania'?

Were they?

--
Roger

banana

unread,
Jul 22, 2002, 7:48:56 PM7/22/02
to
In article <GeTSpMAh...@peaksys.co.uk>, posted to
alt.conspiracy.princess-diana and stamped at '18:17:21' on 'Mon, 22 Jul

Yes, although I should have typed '40-odd years ago' rather than '30-odd
years ago', since the famous occasion was in 1963 :-) According to
Donald Clarke, 'money for screaming' had previously been paid for Frank
Sinatra in 1939.
<http://www.musicweb.uk.net/RiseandFall/12.htm>. No apologies for
iconoclasm, but it's all hype by people who want your money! :-)
--
banana [holding up 'APPLAUSE' sign :-)]

banana

unread,
Jul 22, 2002, 8:39:58 PM7/22/02
to
In article <s5V_8.1018$TK5.10...@news-text.cableinet.net>, posted to
alt.conspiracy.princess-diana and stamped at '14:59:36' on 'Mon, 22 Jul

2002', Jaded <ag...@bigbro.co.go.oh.no> writes:

>"banana" <banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:$A7lGPAwA$O9E...@borve.demon.co.uk...

<snip>

>> Second question: what next? Already of course one victim of
>> everyone-hates-you in a version of this horrendous shit shown on TV
>> elsewhere in Europe killed themselves shortly after being 'ejected'.
>
>What next? Slaughter the llamas of course!

Would that be with or without a CCW permit?

Hear what Chalfont said today about the Chinook and the MOD's adoption
of the (quote) doctrine of infallibility (unquote)? Betcha John Reid
will have grokked.
--
banana

Howard Beale

unread,
Jul 23, 2002, 1:21:42 PM7/23/02
to

banana <banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:$A7lGPAwA$O9E...@borve.demon.co.uk...
> It has been reported (Sunday Times, 21 July 2002, presumably in tabloid
> TV/newspapers too) that in connection with the important and very widely
> covered conditioning known as the 'Big Brother' TV 'reality' show,
> 'protestors' have gone to the vicinity of the building in which the
> participants are living, carrying banners including one bearing the
> slogan 'SLAUGHTER THE PIG'. This is directed against one of the
> participants, 'Jade', who has apparently been built up as a figure of
> hatred among members of the spectator population.

I wonder will they report Graham Norton's comment on his show last night,
about Prince Harry and his ginger hair?
(Just keeping a little on topic for ACPD)


--
Howard Beale

"I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore"


.·°^°·. Tidley .·°^°·.

unread,
Jul 23, 2002, 1:35:49 PM7/23/02
to

"Howard Beale" <how...@REMOVEmad-as-hell.com> wrote in message
news:ahk3mv$6jl$1...@dorito.esatclear.ie...

> I wonder will they report Graham Norton's comment on his show last night,
> about Prince Harry and his ginger hair?
> (Just keeping a little on topic for ACPD)

> Howard Beale
>

Bloody hell - that ng still going????????

Tids


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.375 / Virus Database: 210 - Release Date: 10/07/02


banana

unread,
Jul 23, 2002, 3:27:54 PM7/23/02
to
In article <ahk3mv$6jl$1...@dorito.esatclear.ie>, posted to
alt.conspiracy.princess-diana and stamped at '18:21:42' on 'Tue, 23 Jul

Yikes, what did he say? :-)
--
banana

banana

unread,
Jul 23, 2002, 3:35:19 PM7/23/02
to
In article <etg%8.1383$7h7.1...@newsfep1-win.server.ntli.net>, posted
to alt.conspiracy.princess-diana and stamped at '18:35:49' on 'Tue, 23

Jul 2002', .·°^°·. Tidley .·°^°·. <tidl...@hotmal.com> writes:

>
>"Howard Beale" <how...@REMOVEmad-as-hell.com> wrote in message
>news:ahk3mv$6jl$1...@dorito.esatclear.ie...
>
>> I wonder will they report Graham Norton's comment on his show last night,
>> about Prince Harry and his ginger hair?
>> (Just keeping a little on topic for ACPD)
>
>> Howard Beale
>
>Bloody hell - that ng still going????????

Yes, and the two English inquests haven't reached verdicts yet.
Reportedly the Princess Diana one will be reconvened this year or next
year. The press is keeping quiet about the Dodi Fayed one. Moreover, if
a jury is appointed in the Princess Diana inquest, it will have to
consist of officers of the Royal Household. This is according to the
Coroners Act 1988, which is published online at:

<http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/Ukpga_19880013_en_1.htm>

Section 29(4) states that when an inquest is presided over by the
Coroner to the Royal Household, any jury appointed must come from
officers (sic) of the Royal Household.

Oh and the former Coroner of the Royal Household, John Burton, has
retired, to be replaced by his deputy, Michael Burton, who is also
presiding over the Dodi Fayed inquest in his capacity as coroner for
Surrey.

Pip-pip!
--
banana

Graybags

unread,
Jul 23, 2002, 3:39:41 PM7/23/02
to

"banana" <banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:KVr4DnA3$aP9...@borve.demon.co.uk...

She died in a car-crash.

End of

Graybags


Howard Beale

unread,
Jul 23, 2002, 3:42:40 PM7/23/02
to

banana <banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:CFo63bA6...@borve.demon.co.uk...

Started off as a gag about some article about Harry giving a £2 tip after a
£200 meal, and Norton saying that he liked a "tight prince". And then
commenting about his ginger hair, saying "explain that"

David-S

unread,
Jul 27, 2002, 5:56:24 PM7/27/02
to
Why do you cross post this nonsense into alt.conspiracy.princess-diana?
Especially as you have neither understanding nor knowledge of the subject on
which you pontificate. But then, what is new about that?
0 new messages