Mozilla undo

Graham R

unread,

Jan 28, 2003, 5:34:48 PM1/28/03

to

I've just discovered that Mozilla "Mail & Newsgroup" client has multiple
undos.

Neat!

--
Graham R.

The application "Brain" has unexpectedly quit because an error occurred.

Graham R

unread,

Jan 29, 2003, 5:59:56 PM1/29/03

to

Richard P. Grant wrote:
> In article <IzDZ9.5934$pS2.373923@stones>,

> Graham R <Gra...@NOT.offbeat.idps.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>I've just discovered that Mozilla "Mail & Newsgroup" client has multiple
>>undos.
>>
>>Neat!
>
>

> What, so you can undo others' stupid posts or your own emails sent in
> anger?
>
yes, ans you cna correct speeling mistales ans typos ;-)

zoara

unread,

Jan 30, 2003, 1:46:18 PM1/30/03

to

Richard P. Grant <rp...@yahoo.co.uk.invalid> wrote:

> In article <IzDZ9.5934$pS2.373923@stones>,
> Graham R <Gra...@NOT.offbeat.idps.co.uk> wrote:
>

> > I've just discovered that Mozilla "Mail & Newsgroup" client has multiple
> > undos.
> >
> > Neat!
>

> What, so you can undo others' stupid posts or your own emails sent in
> anger?

I think they should extend it to the entire internet.

"Undo slammer worm"
"Undo broadband"
"Undo Flash"
"Undo <blink> tag"

-z-

--
"I'm not sure how useful this is, but it's bloody clever."
- Jonathon Sanderson in uk.comp.sys.mac
Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow?
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting

Graham R

unread,

Jan 30, 2003, 6:00:26 PM1/30/03

to

zoara wrote:

> "Undo Flash"

Flash is a brilliant and bandwidth efficient technology when properly
weilded.

zoara

unread,

Jan 31, 2003, 2:43:55 PM1/31/03

to

Graham R <Gra...@NOT.offbeat.idps.co.uk> wrote:

> zoara wrote:
>
> > "Undo Flash"
>
> Flash is a brilliant and bandwidth efficient technology when properly
> weilded.

No disagreement here. It's just that it's too easily wielded like a big
blunt object.

Graham R

unread,

Jan 31, 2003, 7:53:03 PM1/31/03

to

zoara wrote:
> Graham R <Gra...@NOT.offbeat.idps.co.uk> wrote:

>>Flash is a brilliant and bandwidth efficient technology when properly
>>weilded.
>
>
> No disagreement here. It's just that it's too easily wielded like a big
> blunt object.

Agreed. [Skip intro] [Knock yourself out]
:-)

zoara

unread,

Feb 2, 2003, 8:32:43 AM2/2/03

to

Graham R <Gra...@NOT.offbeat.idps.co.uk> wrote:

> zoara wrote:
> > Graham R <Gra...@NOT.offbeat.idps.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >>Flash is a brilliant and bandwidth efficient technology when properly
> >>weilded.
> >
> >
> > No disagreement here. It's just that it's too easily wielded like a big
> > blunt object.
>
> Agreed. [Skip intro] [Knock yourself out]
> :-)

*roffle*

The North

unread,

Feb 14, 2003, 7:24:15 AM2/14/03

to

In article <1fpmi1q.1o2iher1k453jrN%m...@privacy.net>,
m...@privacy.net (zoara) wrote:

>Graham R <Gra...@NOT.offbeat.idps.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> zoara wrote:
>>
>> > "Undo Flash"
>>
>> Flash is a brilliant and bandwidth efficient technology when properly
>> weilded.
>
>No disagreement here. It's just that it's too easily wielded like a big
>blunt object.

Well there is that, but without it you'd never get to see things like...
<http://www.tantricteddies.com/>
...and wouldn't life be immeasurably poorer without such experiences? :)

[probably *not* safe for work!]

cheers,

the North

--
personal@ <http://www.compensationculture.co.uk>
professional@ <http://www.rubberductions.com>