Looking For Lawyers Who Have The Ability To Run Over The Professional Criminals Who Run This System
Biswanath Halder
Sometime ago I challenged the NCR Corporation's employment
policies in the Federal Court. As soon as NCR found themselves
in trouble, the Corporation bribed the Court (presided over by
the Hon Carl B Rubin). Can you guess what happened
subsequently?
Despite the supposed superior intellect of the company and
its lawyers, they left a trail of evidence of virtually
everything illegal this company has done. Therefore, I pursued
NCR through governmental channels. Unfortunately, the US
Attorney in Dayton at the time, Terry Lehmann, was on NCR's
payroll. He blocked all of my efforts to investigate and
prosecute this corporate criminal.
One group of lawyers is a part of the system -- day in and
day out they practice conspiracy, bribery, perjury, and forgery.
People call them successful because they live in huge mansions
and drive expensive cars. Another group of lawyers has a firm
conviction that they cannot fight the system. This second group
is nothing but a bunch of eunuchs. The eunuchs end up having
lunch at McDonald's and dinner at Burger King. If a third group
of lawyers -- real men and real women who have the ability to
run over the professional criminals who run this system -- does
not emerge from this legal profession, it is just a matter of
time before this society pays an exceptionally heavy price.
If you belong to this third group of lawyers, or know of
anyone who does, I would like to hear from you.
Sincerely yours,
Biswanath Halder
################################################################
United States Department of Justice
________
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Southern District of Ohio
P.O. Box 280
Mid-City Station
Dayton, Ohio 45402
(513) 225-2910 (FTS) 774-2910
August 20, 1979
Hon. Tony P. Hall
Member of Congress
501 Federal Building
200 West Second Street
Dayton, Ohio 45402
Re: Biswanath Halder
Dear Congressman Hall:
We are in receipt of your letter of July 20, 1979
concerning copies of correspondence you received from one
Biswanath Halder. We have reviewed the matter and have made
some inquiries.
First of all, the problem stems from a case presently
pending before the Sixth Circuit in which Mr. Halder is a party
to a discrimination suit against the NCR Corporation. Mr.
Halder alleges that Judge Rubin's court reporter changed some of
a witnesses' testimony on her shorthand tape. This office
checked with the court reporter and asked her to examine her
notes to see if they were altered in any way.
The Court reporter states that the tape was not altered
in any way and a visual inspection readily reveals no
alteration. I might add that this office has observed the work
of this court reporter for many years and on no occasion have we
had even the slightest question as to whether or not she was
recording the testimony verbatim.
Therefore, we did not feel it necessary to submit the
tape to the FBI laboratory as there appeared to be no foundation
to Mr. Halder's complaint.
Since the law suit is apparently still pending before
the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals we are in no position to
comment further on the litigation itself. If you have any
further questions, please don't hesitate to call upon us.
Very truly yours,
JAMES C. CISSELL
United States Attorney
TERRY W. LEHMANN
Sr. Asst. United States Attorney
JCC:TWL:cms
################################################################
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
________________________________________________________________
Office of the Assistant Attorney General
Washington, D.C. 20530
May 22, 1980
Honorable Howard M. Metzenbaum
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Metzenbaum:
On January 15 and March 20, 1980, you wrote to the
Department of Justice concerning a claim by Mr. Biswanath Halder
that the trial transcript in his discrimination suit against
N.C.R. had been altered by the court reporter, resulting in a
decision he described as "contrary to all the evidence submitted
by the parties." Your letters have been referred to the Civil
Rights Division for response.
The United States Attorney for the Southern District of
Ohio has assured this Department that he is satisfied that the
court reporter made no changes in the trial transcript, and,
hence, it is unnecessary to submit the transcript tape to the
FBI for testing. The accuracy of the trial transcript is a
question of fact which can be answered only by the trial court,
which heard the testimony. Until such time as that court makes
a determination that the testimony was not accurately
transcribed there is no basis for the Civil Rights Division to
request a federal investigation under the jurisdiction of
federal criminal civil rights statutes.
We assume that Mr. Halder's suit, now pending in the Sixth
Circuit Court of Appeals, is being handled by private counsel
who can advise him of appropriate steps to take in this matter.
Sincerely,
Drew S. Days, III
Assistant Attorney General
Civil Rights Division
################################################################
Jol Silversmith
> Sometime ago I challenged the NCR Corporation's employment
> policies in the Federal Court. As soon as NCR found themselves
> in trouble, the Corporation bribed the Court (presided over by
> the Hon Carl B Rubin). Can you guess what happened
> subsequently?
You lost, because like in other cases you filed, you failed to put forward
any evidence to support your claims, just like you "failed completely to
make the requisite showing" of discrimination and lost Halder v. Avis
Rent-a-Car System, 541 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1976)?
--
Jol A. Silversmith __________________________ silv...@law.harvard.edu
http://www.nyx.net/~jsilvers/index.html _______ jasi...@ix.netcom.com
Opinions are my own, and should not be construed as legal advice, etc.