A Simple Question for Mr. Bradbury
Sara Salzman
Just so we can both have all our facts in order, I want to make sure
that the information I have is correct. Please feel free to point out if
I have missed anything:
The first post I could find that gives your address was on Dec. 14,
1999. It was posted by Anon...@cotse.com
The first response to that post was from me. It said:
"Whoever is the vile piece of scum doing this, you are absolutely beneath
contempt. NO ONE, not even Tavish, should be treated this way.
Sara"
Oh, and I REMOVED your address from my response.
The only post I can find where I actually posted your address was on
April 23, 2003 - more than THREE YEARS after your address had been made
public by an Anonymous Coward.
Does this jibe with your archives?
Sara
--
My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
Larry Mondello
<catamont-117604...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>Mr. Bradbury:
>
>Just so we can both have all our facts in order, I want to make sure
>that the information I have is correct. Please feel free to point out if
>I have missed anything:
>
>The first post I could find that gives your address was on Dec. 14,
>1999. It was posted by Anon...@cotse.com
It was posted by your co-hort Yale F. Edeiken hiding behind COTSE and I can
prove it and he rather clumsily implicated himself as being the culprit too as
shown here beyond any fault:
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmi...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=385f2abb%40news3.enter.net&output=gplain
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: WHY NOT GIVE THE NAZI SHITHEAD TAVISH A CALL AND THEN BE HUNTED
DOWN FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE!
Date: 1999/12/21
Message-ID: <385f...@news3.enter.net>
Defendant Tavish <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:83n35...@news1.newsguy.com...
>Care to make a list of the "crimes" that YOU think I'll be paying for? Care
>to tell me of the date when I will be arraigned, indicted or charged?
Start with death threats. Sent over the internet. A fleont under
federal law.
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Thanks for the legal opinion and I guess this means you have escaped justice so
far seeing how you made a sworn statement to a civil court of law that I had
threatened you when I all I did was make a reply to someone who had posted my
address and telephone number with the invitation people visit me with baseball
bats. You swore that I threatened you personally (it was one of your
"complaints" against me in your "lawsuit" against me) when I responded to
"nazihunter." For you to be threatened by what I replied to "nazihunter" with
you would have had to be him in December 1999 and afterall-- you had just
received my unlisted telephone number and address from my ISP which you just
subpoenaed!
Here are the facts and the "confession":
I now prove beyond any fault that Yale F. Edeiken made an admission he was
"nazihunter" on December 14th and 15th 1999 and how he hung himself:
For a fact: I was not advised the subpoena to my ISP was going to be made and
(required by law on the plaintiffs' attorney's behalf) allowed to "quash it" NOR
was the returned subpoena entered into the docket! Those are FACTS!
I WAS NEVER GIVEN NOTICE THAT A SUBPOENA WAS GOING TO BE SERVED ON MY ISP AND
THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY HAD BEEN REPEATEDLY E-MAILING ME AGAINST MY WILL AT
THE TIME TOO! HE VIOLATED THE LAW PLAIN AND SIMPLE!!!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=8OSy5.1269%24mC.69080%40monger.newsread.com&rnum=3
Message-ID: <8OSy5.1269$mC.6...@monger.newsread.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:27:48 GMT
"Materail that is subpoenaed must be turned over... The material becomes public
information unless a court orders otherwise. Subpoenas are NOT automatically
issued and the other side has an opportnuity to ogject ("quash") any subpoena."
<END>
That subpoena was NOT turned over and it does NOT appear on the docket thus it
is NOT public domain and for a fact the plaintiff's attorney illegally
distributed the information he obtained and for a FACT I was not allowed to
object or quash it!
Courtesy of Ken McVay, director of Nizkor, and from Nizkor web site:
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
YALE F. EDEIKEN :
:
Plaintiff :
:
vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
:
SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a "DOC TAVISH" (Defendant)
1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
[...]
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side"
[...]
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken
c/o Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: (610) 434-7004
Fax: (610) 434-6978
<END>
From the above admission to Lehigh County Civil Court and on public record as
sworn testimony I now ask these questions concerning the above "ADMISSION OF
FACT":
1) Who identified himself as the Plaintiff?
2) Who claimed that he was threatened when I posted these words as he
stated them in his "complaint": <I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." :-) Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side">
Before I ask the third question I want to make sure you all know the answers
to 1 & 2. Do you? Everyone I've showed this to has answered:
Yale F. Edeiken
3) Who did I address my remark to as a matter of legal fact? I state such
in my reply to which Yale F. Edeiken charged: "On December 18, 1999,
Defendant published the following threat to Plaintiff:"?
I addressed as shown in my reply- "nazihunter" YET Yale F. Edeiken charges
that I threatened him! Now I ask:
a) Who claimed to be threatened by me? <Yale F. Edeiken>
b) Who was I, in fact, replying to? <nazihunter>
4) Is it not logical to conclude that Yale F. Edeiken was nazihunter on
the night of December 14th? Everyone of sound mind and reasoning thinks
so!
Here is the post and how I replied in actual context:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded..
Date: 12/18/1999
Author: Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>
On 15-Dec-1999, "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
> It seems that ever since Tavish's address was published, he
> seems to have disappeared.
> Has he fled?
> Or, better yet, has someone paid him a visit?
I'm standing behind you with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded
slowly squeezing the trigger for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-)
Sleep on that a while "nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side
<END>
Did Yale F. Edeiken or did he not implicate himself as being:
"nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>? If he did not implicate himself then why
would he be personally threatened with my reply to "nazihunter" who at that time
was just a mentally unbalanced poster who on the night before made a criminal
death threat against me? The above is in court records and was filed as a sworn
complaint against me, the Defendant, who on just the night before had his name,
address, and telephone number posted with an incitement to murder.
Did "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> post this just the night before?
From: "nazihunter"
Subject: WHY NOT GIVE THE NAZI SHITHEAD TAVISH A CALL
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com>
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Anonymously posted.
The following is the address for Doc Tavish
Scott Bradbury
<address and telephone number deleted>
Why not call him and tell him what a nazi prick he is.
Better yet, why not visit him.......with a baseball bat.
<END>
More supporting evidence which proves that Yale F. Edeiken alone was sole
possessor of my identity, address, and telephone number at that time:
(Yale F. Edeiken's activities on December 14, 1999)
Now take note of the following post from Yale F. Edeiken himself:
Concerning being arrested:
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: We Want Porn Please Add Us to Your Lists!
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <3856...@news3.enter.net>
References: <82rla9$f...@sirius.infonex.com>
<82s6km$444$2...@dosa.alt.net>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: atmax-4-5.enter.net
X-Trace: 14 Dec 1999 14:38:06 -0500, atmax-4-5.enter.net
[... more false accusations linking to an anonymous post deleted]
You will be interested to learn that a civil suit has already been
filed and a warrant for his arrest is about to be issued.
--YFE
~~End of Post~~
Did everyone notice the time and date the post was archived originally by
DejaCom? It was: Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
The above post as well as the posts which follow were all archived in
a very short time frame by DejaCom. Notice in the following posts you see
my name being forged and also my telephone number and address being posted
along with the mention of me being arrested! Now I ask what are the odds
that another person just would happen to obtain my unlisted telephone
number and address and at the same time be posting it to USENET announcing
I am going to be arrested. Once again Yale F. Edeiken engaging in criminal
harassment!
From: "Bradbury MacTavish" <anon...@cotse.com>
Subject: Tavish's widdle dickie needs a lickin
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com>
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa
Anonymously posted.
Hello to all of my friends and fans out there! Once again,
as the holidays approach, my widdle dickie feels the need
of your attention.
Won't you come and visit my widdle dickie, before Bubba
makes me his and his alone, like before I get arrested?
I live at <address and telephone number deleted>, but
if you are not able to put your lips on widdle dickie in
person, call me for phone sex, at <address and telephone
number deleted> and we'll get it on...
----------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:28:32 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <1999121501...@cotse.com>
From: "Scott Bradbury" <anon...@cotse.com>
Subject: Please suck my tiny dick as a holiday gift
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Lines: 27
Anonymously posted.
My name is Scott Bradbury ..... my adoring and sometimes
sniveling fans know me as "Doc Tavish."
I have a difficult problem. I am about to be arrested,
which means only this guy named Billy Bob will be sucking
my tiny dick.
I don't know when I'm going to be jailed, but the warrant's
been issued... even my close friend and sometimes-lover Fat
Harold won't be able to cuddle my tiny dick then...
Will you show your affection now, by sucking my tiny dick
before I am arrested?
I live in Texas, you know..... where we grow really big
mouths and really small dicks. I live at <address and
telephone number deleted> if you can't suck my tiny dick in
person, can we have phone sex instead? I sure hope so,
because you won't be able to reach me at <address and
telephone number deleted> much longer!
--------------------------------------------------------------
Remember the two posts above mention me being arrested in addition to
giving out my unlisted telephone number and address! What are the odds
that a separate person from Yale F. Edeiken would be posting my unlisted
telephone number and address in addition to announcing I was going to be
arrested? Notice the time and dates of the archival process!
All of the above criminal harassment happened because a mentally disturbed
attorney obtained my unlisted address and unlisted telephone number by use
of a subpoena as shown here:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading:
Yale F. Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding:
"(1) Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net.. This subpoena was issued at the request of the
following person: Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID#
40290.. November 30,1999 Return address: Yale F. Edeiken, 918 North Bayard
Street; Allentown, PA 18104." (Subpoena on file with my attorney, Flash
Net, and law enforcement) [For the record the subpoena does NOT appear on
the docket- rather my confidential info went directly to one of
Yale F. Edeiken's "drops."]
Yale F. Edeiken had a subpoena issued on November 30,1999 and sent it from
Allentown, Pennsylvania to Flash Net in Dallas, Texas. The travel time and
turnaround would be reasonable to assume that Yale F. Edeiken received
my confidential info on about December 14, 1999! I ask again; what are the odds
that another person other than Yale F. Edeiken would be using the COTSE
anonymizer in a small time frame on the night of December 14, 1999 to
violate my right to privacy!? Yale F. Edeiken did in FACT identify himself
as the plaintiff and that the plaintiff was threatened (personally) when I
replied to "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>.
[...]
Docket details of Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786--
Anyone may obtain the docket for $3.00 and here is how and
partially what it shows:
Andrea Naugle -- Clerk Civil Court
Lehigh County Court House
Room 202
4555 West Hamilton Street
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101-1614
and "Request Docket Printout for Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786" and you
will see for yourself among the following:
03-Nov-1999 PRAE FOR SUMMONS
17-Dec-1999 PRAE TO REISSUE WRIT OF SUMMONS
06-Jan-2000 SHRF RTN SUMMONS... DELIVERY DATE 30-Dec-1999
[...]
25-Apr-2000 Y F Edeiken ESQ's NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA..
[...]
[No subpoena to Flash Net shows! This is FACT! I was not given a chance
either as required by law to object to having my unlisted address and
unlisted telephone number subpoenaed! End of Doc Tavish comment]
From the above one can discern that the subpoena Yale F. Edeiken issued on
November 30, 1999 never made it back to the court house to be entered on the
docket. Yale F. Edeiken had my identity, unlisted telephone number and address
returned to his "drop" at:
Yale F. Edeiken
918 North Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104
Hence the information he obtained never in FACT became public knowledge like he
wants everyone to believe! Yale F. Edeiken issued the subpoena
on November 30, 1999 from Allentown, Pennsylvania to my ISP Flash Net in Dallas,
Texas. With the time consideration for United State's Postal Service trip two
ways and Flash Net processing the request a fair estimation would say Yale F.
Edeiken received what he wanted on or about December 14, 1999. Seeing how the
subpoena never made it to the docket and became "public knowledge" Yale F.
Edeiken was the sole possessor of my information on December 14, 1999.
The real rub in knowing this comes from the knowledge Yale F. Edeiken engaged in
his criminal acts and death threats against me on December 14, 1999, a full 16
days before his lawsuit was served on me!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here is Yale caught in two lies regarding him being his own attorney and his
subpoenaing my ISP to get my unlisted phone number and address (all fully
documented and archived locally):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=b5JH4.301%24%25L6.22667%40monger.newsread.com&output=gplain
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: --->Violation of USC Title 18, Chapter 13, Section 241?--
Edeiken's Legal Troubles Deepen<---
Date: 08 Apr 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <b5JH4.301$%L6.2...@monger.newsread.com>
References: <8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com>
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com...
> I was going to take some days off for rest and relaxation but the official
> Doc Tavish hotline rang and I was advised that a Yale F. Edeiken mailing
> list recipient
That's a lie.
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- For the record it is ONLY by an Edeiken
mailing list recipient that my personal info has been abused by death
threat telephone calls and death threats being posted with my unlisted
telephone number and unlisted address being posted.))
> Yale F. Edeiken is also on record as claiming that he never posted
> my private information. "
I never did.
<<January 13, 2003 comment: You did as "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>>>
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Morris' assumption "I suspect that his
> own attorneys obtained the information" is only valid to the point that
> Edeiken has no attorneys
That's a lie. The name of my attorney is being kept confidential WITH THE
KNOWLEDGE OF THE PRESIDENT JUDGE AND CLERK becasue of your attempts to incite
criminal harassment.
<<Special addition July 13, 2003 which exposes the lie Yale made above:
<START>
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
Yale claimed: "The name of my attorney is being kept confidential WITH THE
KNOWLEDGE OF THE PRESIDENT JUDGE AND CLERK becasue of your attempts to incite
criminal harassment." YET all court documents show: "Counsel for Plaintiff
(Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq." which again is another example of his
dishonesty! End of special addition>>
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- The ONLY attorney's name on the subpoena
issued to FlashNet Communications, which was abused to deny me my civil
rights, was the name of Yale F. Edeiken))
> > And then Yale had it posted over USENET.
:.
> That is, of course, a lie. I never posted it anywhere.
<<January 13, 2003 comment: You did as "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>>>
> Defendant Tavish's statement is mnore evidence of his continued
> defamation.
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))
Then I do so now.
((Tavish comment: Do you now wish to continue your denial now that I
have a photocopy of your subpoena in my personal possession Yale
and that you were your own attorney? Please do! I want everyone to
see what a liar and disreputable lawyer you are!))
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpts~~
I have in my possession right at this very moment a copy of a
subpoena which states:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading: Yale F.
Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding: "(1)
Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net" "This subpoena was issued at the request of the
following person: Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID#
40290"
{Issued November 30, 1999 and the return address was:
Yale F. Edeiken
918 North Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104]
BTW Sara-- that subpoena was NOT admitted to the court and the fact is was not
is the absence of it on the docket with all the other subpoenas! I have a hard
copy of the docket too from the Court Clerk! IOW Yale and YOU illegally
distributed subpoenaed information which was not registered with the court--
thus never being public information which you have claimed to cover your sorry
criminal conspiratorial ass!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-1605042226560001%40ts005d08.den-co.concentric.net&rnum=1
From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Subject: Re: Yale Now Admits To Distributing Subpoenaed Information to a Group
of People... Date: 2000/05/17
Message-ID: <catamont-160...@ts005d08.den-co.concentric.net>
In article <39221529....@news.flash.net>,
doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com wrote:
>On Wed, 17 May 2000 03:28:14 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
><iloU4.3589$v%5.26...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
>
>>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>>news:3921f38a....@news.flash.net...
>>> On Wed, 17 May 2000 00:48:50 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
>>> <S%lU4.7966$LM4.5...@monger.newsread.com> wrote:
:.
>>> >> Thanks for posting another death threat. It has already been
>>> >> established that you got my address from Yale F. Edeiken as an
>>> >> "e-mail list recipient." BTW how's the weather in Toronto and the
>>> >> campus life at the university?
:.
>>> > Another actionable lie from Defendant....
:.
>>> No matter how g-d damned hard you try psycho you will NOT be able to
>>> distance yourself from distributing my confidential information via YOUR
>>> mailing list!
:.
>> I have no such "private mailing list."
>>
>> It is, therefore, you who are the liar.
:.
>The facts as archived at DejaCom say otherwise!
:.
>>> You are forever archived here with your lies about your subpoena issued to
>>> get my ulisted telephone number and unlisted address and your lies about
>>> YOUR mailing list. All admissable in court--- your recent words too!
:.
>> None of which mean what you state they mean. Mailing something to a
>>group of people is NOT"a private mailing list."
:.
>So now I do have you on record admitting to: "Mailing something to a
>group of people..."
>
>Thanks for the final admission asswipe!
>
>The "something" you mailed to a group of people was confidential
>information obtained using a subpoena. What you have confessed to is
>illegal activity!
Wrong again, anti-Lawyer.It's not confidential, it's PUBLIC INFORMATION.
<<Tavish comment July 14, 2003: WRONG perjurer and co-conspirator to multiple
acts of criminal harassment and death threats. That subpoena was never turned
over to the court or else it would be on the DOCKET. The info Yale subpoenaed
went directly to him and no further other than to his fellow criminals!>>
Check.
Certified.
or Jumpsuit.
<<Tavish comment July 14, 2003: Come to my jurisdiction and subject yourself to
their authority and we will see who wears a Jumpsuit!!>>
The choice is yours.
Sara
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Come to my jurisdiction and subject yourself to their authority and see what
happens! Art Tandy's posting where I live and then saying (after numerous
protests have been made to stop it): "WHO CARES? I HOPE THEY BURN YOUR HOUSE
DOWN WITH YOU IN IT." and also stating: ""Who ever bumps you off should get a
medal, scum." shows an undeniable criminal intent to intimidate me into silence
thus depriving me of my Constitutional right of free speech. The fact that he
does it as well as Patrick and you and Yale enabling them and others to do so
falls under this Federal Statute (which I will also seek prosecution on):
USC Code Chapter 18 Sec. 241. Conspiracy against rights
"If two or more persons conspire to intimidate, oppress, threaten, or
intimidate any citizen in the free exercise of any right or privilege
secured by him by the Constitution of the United States, or because
of his having exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go on the highway, or on the premises of
another, with the intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or
enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured --
They shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for more
that ten years, or both; and if death results, they shall be subject to
imprisonment for any terms of years, or life."
>The first response to that post was from me. It said:
>
>"Whoever is the vile piece of scum doing this, you are absolutely beneath
>contempt. NO ONE, not even Tavish, should be treated this way.
Damage control or a smoke screen to divert from who was really behind who did
it? I'll be willing to let law enforcement and the court decide! I will press
charges too!
You also can't prove that you have made the slightest effort to stop Patrick
Humphrey and Art Tandy to stop posting where I live! They would not be doing
such if it weren't for YOU and Yale! Remember that federal stature above and
what it stated! It's obvious that you thugs are attempting to intimidate me into
silence!!
SEE YOU IN COURT AND/OR YOU BEHIND BARS YOU EVIL BITCH!
>Sara"
>
>Oh, and I REMOVED your address from my response.
Big deal!
>The only post I can find where I actually posted your address was on
>April 23, 2003 - more than THREE YEARS after your address had been made
>public by an Anonymous Coward.
WRONG!! I have posts where you posted my complete address along with my new
unlisted telephone number I got LONG after Yale filed his kook lawsuit against
me! I have it all locally archived and the DA and the Sheriff will be getting it
all in a short-short as I am compiling it now.
>Does this jibe with your archives?
SEE YOU IN COURT AND/OR YOU BEHIND BARS YOU EVIL BITCH!
BTW This is a promise-- as long as your fellow thugs keep posting where I live-
I will keep REPLYING by posting where the two demons live who made it possible
in the first place! YOU CAN COUNT ON IT!!
>Sara
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against me
with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit. I
would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my peers why YOU and Yale "bore false
witness" against me and why you two are not responsible for all of the criminal
harassment I have had done to me. I want YOU and Yale to deny causing the
harassment I have been subjected to because of my address being distributed and
the info being used criminally. I want Yale to state his motive for subpoenaing
my medical record and then lying about what it stated. I will show copies to the
jury and have Yale explain how he deduced it stated "morbid obesity" and that I
weighed well over 300 pounds when there are no height nor weight fields on it
and the diagnosis was: "sleep apnea, narcolepsy, vertigo." I want YOU to explain
why the telephone number YOU distributed was different than the one the subpoena
stated and how YOU knew it seeing how it was unlisted number. I want YOU and
Yale to prove what I ever actually did to either of you that I deserve all of
the ill treatment I have been subjected to because of legal system abuse. I want
YOU and Yale to explain why I am accountable for what a person in another state
and another country allegedly did so that I get harassed as a proxy of your
vindictiveness. I want YOU to explain why I, nor David Michael, or our attorneys
were never served with the complaints against us YET after the lawsuit was
dismissed in my favor then the "complaints" were posted and distributed giving
out my address and new telephone number. I want YOU to tell a jury of my peers
what the purpose was for YOU to do that to me. IF YOU TWO GOD DAMNED VILE EVIL
SHITS DON'T RE-FILE THEN LET IT BE KNOWN FOREVER THAT YOU TWO ARE COWARDS
AND THAT LAWSUIT HAD NO REAL VALIDITY IN THE FIRST PLACE!! IF YOU DON'T DO ALL
OF THIS THEN IT IS YOU AND YALE WHO ARE THE COWARDS!! MAKE YOUR SAME ACCUSATIONS
TO MY FACE IN FRONT OF A JURY OF MY PEERS AT MY COURTHOUSE IN MY JURISDICTION!!
ARE YOU UP TO IT YOU PERJURIOUS COWARD!?
Tavish
______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Sara Salzman
Larry Mondello <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> wrote:
> On 14 Jul 2003 14:10:38 GMT,
> <catamont-117604...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >Mr. Bradbury:
> >
> >Just so we can both have all our facts in order, I want to make sure
> >that the information I have is correct. Please feel free to point out if
> >I have missed anything:
> >
> >The first post I could find that gives your address was on Dec. 14,
> >1999. It was posted by Anon...@cotse.com
>
> It was posted by your co-hort Yale F. Edeiken hiding behind COTSE and I can
> prove it and he rather clumsily implicated himself as being the culprit too
> as
> shown here beyond any fault:
[ridiculous attempt to shift blame from Don/Pat to Yale snipped....]
Thanks for agreeing with me. I appreciate it.
>
> >The first response to that post was from me. It said:
> >
> >"Whoever is the vile piece of scum doing this, you are absolutely beneath
> >contempt. NO ONE, not even Tavish, should be treated this way.
>
> Damage control or a smoke screen to divert from who was really behind who did
> it? I'll be willing to let law enforcement and the court decide! I will press
> charges too!
Thanks for agreeing with me. I appreciate it.
> >The only post I can find where I actually posted your address was on
> >April 23, 2003 - more than THREE YEARS after your address had been made
> >public by an Anonymous Coward.
>
> WRONG!! I have posts where you posted my complete address along with my new
> unlisted telephone number I got LONG after Yale filed his kook lawsuit
> against
> me! I have it all locally archived and the DA and the Sheriff will be getting
> it
> all in a short-short as I am compiling it now.
Please provide Google links to these posts -- since you claim you will
be "pressing charges," you should have no trouble providing those links.
Thanks again,
Larry Mondello
<catamont-321A7C...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <3po5hvcc7fc7mlcv1...@4ax.com>,
> Larry Mondello <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> wrote:
>
>> On 14 Jul 2003 14:10:38 GMT,
>> <catamont-117604...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>> >Mr. Bradbury:
>> >
>> >Just so we can both have all our facts in order, I want to make sure
>> >that the information I have is correct. Please feel free to point out if
>> >I have missed anything:
>> >
>> >The first post I could find that gives your address was on Dec. 14,
>> >1999. It was posted by Anon...@cotse.com
:.
>> It was posted by your co-hort Yale F. Edeiken hiding behind COTSE and I can
>> prove it and he rather clumsily implicated himself as being the culprit too
>> as shown here beyond any fault:
What Sara Salzman deleted in her manic denial partially restored for the
archives:
It was posted by your co-hort Yale F. Edeiken hiding behind COTSE and I can
prove it and he rather clumsily implicated himself as being the culprit too as
shown here beyond any fault:
Xref:
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
[...]
[...]
<END>
<END>
Anonymously posted.
<END>
>[ridiculous attempt to shift blame from Don/Pat to Yale snipped....]
Those hard hitting irrefutable proofs are pummeling you like hailstones raining
down on the wicked! Yale has always been responsible as the source of my
address and telephone number and no amount of your squealing like a pig will
detract from it! BTW I don't think Don/Pat were on Yale's mailing list-- do you?
>Thanks for agreeing with me. I appreciate it.
How did I agree with you o' deluded one?
>> >The first response to that post was from me. It said:
>> >
>> >"Whoever is the vile piece of scum doing this, you are absolutely beneath
>> >contempt. NO ONE, not even Tavish, should be treated this way.
:.
>> Damage control or a smoke screen to divert from who was really behind who did
>> it? I'll be willing to let law enforcement and the court decide! I will press
>> charges too!
:.
>Thanks for agreeing with me. I appreciate it.
How did I agree with you? Your logic and denial are about the same as Susan
Cohen's with her pathetic attempts at trying to save her bacon!
>> >The only post I can find where I actually posted your address was on
>> >April 23, 2003 - more than THREE YEARS after your address had been made
>> >public by an Anonymous Coward.
:.
>> WRONG!! I have posts where you posted my complete address along with my new
>> unlisted telephone number I got LONG after Yale filed his kook lawsuit
>> against me! I have it all locally archived and the DA and the Sheriff will be
>> getting it all in a short-short as I am compiling it now.
:.
>Please provide Google links to these posts
So you can NUKE them? No thanks! I may have them archived locally but it will be
far more compelling that the authorities can see such at GOOGLE on their own!
> -- since you claim you will be "pressing charges," you should have no trouble
>providing those links.
Now you are whining and you don't see how hypocrite you are. Yale sued me and
didn't provide myself nor my attorney his complaints which is grievous and which
you and your fellow shits always want to overlook YET you demand I provide links
to your own posts for you!? I will tell you what Yale told my attorney who
repeatedly asked him for the "complaints" against me: "FUCK YOU"!
>Thanks again,
You are thanking me for your own imaginations.
Tavish
>Sara
Patrick Humphrey
>On 14 Jul 2003 17:49:07 GMT,
><catamont-321A7C...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
[...]
>>> >The only post I can find where I actually posted your address was on
>>> >April 23, 2003 - more than THREE YEARS after your address had been made
>>> >public by an Anonymous Coward.
>>> WRONG!! I have posts where you posted my complete address along with my
>>> new unlisted telephone number I got LONG after Yale filed his kook lawsuit
>>> against me! I have it all locally archived and the DA and the Sheriff will
>>> be getting it all in a short-short as I am compiling it now.
>>Please provide Google links to these posts
>So you can NUKE them? No thanks! I may have them archived locally but it will
>be far more compelling that the authorities can see such at GOOGLE on their
>own!
Given your history of lying, Scott, why are you refusing to prove that such
articles are archived by Google? Could it be that there are NO such articles
at Google, and the only place they exist is in your archives -- which says
very little about YOUR credibility?
Provide the links, or answer the question. If she was going to cancel them,
she'd have done so by now. You can't have it both ways.
>> -- since you claim you will be "pressing charges," you should have no
>>trouble providing those links.
>Now you are whining and you don't see how hypocrite you are. Yale sued me and
>didn't provide myself nor my attorney his complaints which is grievous and
>which
He provided them and YOU MAILED THEM BACK UNOPENED, dumbass!
>you and your fellow shits always want to overlook YET you demand I provide
>links to your own posts for you!? I will tell you what Yale told my attorney
>who repeatedly asked him for the "complaints" against me: "FUCK YOU"!
In other words, you're claiming to have proof, but refusing to provide it.
Sounds like you're more than a little paranoid that she might get to the
articles and beat YOU to the courthouse with them, and then your "case" would
be deader than your Führer.
>>Thanks again,
>You are thanking me for your own imaginations.
Your own diseased imagination is what will do you in, Scott. All you're doing
is making sure certain people get front-row seats.
--PLH, definitely looking forward to my ninth Bradbury-free MS 150 ride next
year
sailor57
> Mr. Bradbury:
>
> Just so we can both have all our facts in order, I want to make sure
> that the information I have is correct. Please feel free to point out if
> I have missed anything:
>
> The first post I could find that gives your address was on Dec. 14,
> 1999. It was posted by Anon...@cotse.com
>
> The first response to that post was from me. It said:
>
> "Whoever is the vile piece of scum doing this, you are absolutely beneath
> contempt. NO ONE, not even Tavish, should be treated this way.
>
> Sara"
>
> Oh, and I REMOVED your address from my response.
>
> The only post I can find where I actually posted your address was on
> April 23, 2003 - more than THREE YEARS after your address had been made
> public by an Anonymous Coward.
>
>
> Does this jibe with your archives?
>
> Sara
Fatboy's mind is made up-don't confuse him with facts.
Ken McVay
Country Style
2 cups of self-rising cornmeal
2 eggs beaten
2 cups buttermilk
2 Tablespoons bacon drippings, melted, or veg. oil
Heat oven to 450 degrees. Grease your 9-inch skillet with about 2 tablespoon
of shortening or oil (Use bacon drippings instead if available). Leave oil
in bottom of pan... Place pan in oven to heat ....
Combine cornmeal, 2 eggs, buttermilk, and the melted bacon drippings. Mix
well. I find a whisk does this nicely. Pour into hot skillet. Batter will
sizzle.
Bake at 450 degrees for 35 minutes or until golden brown. Serves 6 to 8
Hint: Sprinkle a little cornmeal in the hot pan before adding the batter. It
will brown and add a crispier texture.
Larry Mondello
<pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>Now you are whining and you don't see how hypocrite you are. Yale sued me and
>>didn't provide myself nor my attorney his complaints which is grievous and
>>which
:.
>He provided them and YOU MAILED THEM BACK UNOPENED, dumbass!
FALSE!!
All I sent back where standard envelopes addressed to DEFENDANT CSOTT BRADBURY
which was intended to harass and intimidate and the ones I original opened were
his rants! If he had sent his voluminous complaints the envelope would have been
quite bulky and beside he was bound by a written agreement to my attorney whom I
already made a payment to- to no longer make any direct contact with me bay any
means. Yale was bound to make ALLL communications to my attorney whom I had
already paid good money to handle the matter for me. Yale chose instead to avoid
my attorney and he told him "FUCK YOU" when my attorney tried to get the
complaints. The same thing was done to David's attorney too!
You defend liars and criminals and you know what that makes you!
Tavish
Patrick Keenan
news:q5u6hvshtk3bjqj6d...@4ax.com...
> On 14 Jul 2003 14:23:14 -0500, <szksmp8...@hagbard.io.com> Patrick
Humphrey
> <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
> >>Now you are whining and you don't see how hypocrite you are. Yale sued
me and
> >>didn't provide myself nor my attorney his complaints which is grievous
and
> >>which
> :.
> >He provided them and YOU MAILED THEM BACK UNOPENED, dumbass!
>
> FALSE!!
>
> All I sent back where standard envelopes addressed to DEFENDANT CSOTT
BRADBURY
Pleae clarify this. You say you did not send back unopened documents, but
you DID send back unopened documents. Which one is it?
You say you DID send envelopes back and don't know what was inside them -
how could you if you didn't open them?
> which was intended to harass and intimidate and the ones I original opened
were
> his rants! If he had sent his voluminous complaints the envelope would
have been
> quite bulky and beside he was bound by a written agreement to my attorney
whom I
> already made a payment to- to no longer make any direct contact with me
bay any
> means. Yale was bound to make ALLL communications to my attorney whom I
had
> already paid good money to handle the matter for me.
And you missed a prime opportunity right there. Some lawyer you turned out
to have. All he could quash on was jurisdiction.
> Yale chose instead to avoid
> my attorney and he told him "FUCK YOU" when my attorney tried to get the
> complaints. The same thing was done to David's attorney too!
>
> You defend liars and criminals and you know what that makes you!
So in short, you agree that you DID send back communications and do not
know what they contained (and cannot know, because you did not open them)
though you guess they were 'rants'.
Bear in mind that you are answering both 'no' and 'yes' to this aparently
simple question.
-pk
Larry Mondello
<t1LQa.3260$104.3...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
wrote:
>"Larry Mondello" <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> wrote in message
>news:q5u6hvshtk3bjqj6d...@4ax.com...
>> On 14 Jul 2003 14:23:14 -0500, <szksmp8...@hagbard.io.com> Patrick
>>Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>Now you are whining and you don't see how hypocrite you are. Yale sued
>> >>me and didn't provide myself nor my attorney his complaints which is grievous
>> >>and which
:.
>> >He provided them and YOU MAILED THEM BACK UNOPENED, dumbass!
:.
>> FALSE!!
:.
>> All I sent back were standard envelopes addressed to DEFENDANT SCOTT
>>BRADBURY
:.
>Pleae clarify this. You say you did not send back unopened documents, but
>you DID send back unopened documents. Which one is it?
How did you come up with that twisted thought?
>You say you DID send envelopes back and don't know what was inside them -
>how could you if you didn't open them?
I already answered it numerous times and it yet has sunk into hard heads who are
in denial:
Once again and what you ignored:
All I sent back were standard envelopes addressed to DEFENDANT SCOTT BRADBURY
which was intended to harass and intimidate and the ones I originally opened
were his rants! If he had sent his voluminous complaints the envelope would have
been quite bulky and beside he was bound by a written agreement to my attorney
whom I already made a payment to- to no longer make any direct contact with me
by any means. Yale was bound to make ALL communications to my attorney whom I
had already paid good money to handle the matter for me. Yale chose instead to
avoid my attorney and he told him "FUCK YOU" when my attorney tried to get the
complaints. The same thing was done to David's attorney too!
>And you missed a prime opportunity right there. Some lawyer you turned out
>to have. All he could quash on was jurisdiction.
Why don't you admit a judgment was overturned which most of you said wouldn't be
opened much less overturned BUT was and it and that lawsuit were dismissed?
It just eats you up doesn't it?
Your Monday Morning Quarterbacking falls flat. You as well as the other
bystanders who have a definite bias against me will never accept what Yale did
was unprofessional and unethical.
>> Yale chose instead to avoid my attorney and he told him "FUCK YOU" when my
>> attorney tried to get the complaints. The same thing was done to David's
>> attorney too! You defend liars and criminals and you know what that makes you!
:.
>So in short, you agree that you DID send back communications and do not
>know what they contained (and cannot know, because you did not open them)
>though you guess they were 'rants'.
That is what all the ones I opened were. Yale was obliged to no longer make any
contact in any form with me. What about that you can't understand? I hired an
attorney to represent me and all Yale did was avoid him and not give him the
complaints against me which is what an ethical and reputable attorney would do!
>Bear in mind that you are answering both 'no' and 'yes' to this aparently
>simple question.
NO-- you are just in denial. Yale never would serve his complaints on David
Michael nor myself not our attorneys. If Yale had sent that shitwad of
complaints to me they would have come in a very bulky envelope instead of the
normal envelopes most people mail a one or two page letter in! Get the point
now? I hope so because I will ignore you if you ask again because you are a
waste of time and gtyou aren't seeking truth but rather you are tring to do
damage control for a shyster.
Tavish
>-pk
Patrick Humphrey
>On 14 Jul 2003 14:23:14 -0500, <szksmp8...@hagbard.io.com> Patrick Humphrey
><pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>>Now you are whining and you don't see how hypocrite you are. Yale sued me
>>>and didn't provide myself nor my attorney his complaints which is grievous
>>>and which
>>He provided them and YOU MAILED THEM BACK UNOPENED, dumbass!
>FALSE!!
>All I sent back where standard envelopes addressed to DEFENDANT CSOTT
>BRADBURY which was intended to harass and intimidate and the ones I original
>opened were his rants! If he had sent his voluminous complaints the envelope
>would have been quite bulky and beside he was bound by a written agreement to
>my attorney whom I already made a payment to- to no longer make any direct
>contact with me bay any means. Yale was bound to make ALLL communications to
>my attorney whom I had already paid good money to handle the matter for
>me. Yale chose instead to avoid my attorney and he told him "FUCK YOU" when
>my attorney tried to get the complaints. The same thing was done to David's
>attorney too!
Repeating your bullshit STILL doesn't make it true, Scottie. I wonder why
you're not "proving" this particular assertion.
>You defend liars and criminals and you know what that makes you!
*yawn* Yeah, I'm someone who's hated with a passion by a certified fruitcake
out in the far suburbs. Why don't you head on down to Palacios tonight and
welcome in the hurricane? After all, it's something you can relate to -- a
lot of hot air...
-PLH, the Bard foresaw Bradbury
sailor57
> BASIC SOUTHERN CORNBREAD
>
> Country Style
I have taken the liberty of translating certain passages into
Bradburyese, the language of the functionally illiterate,mentally
retarded, morally decrepit roundworms who skim the floor of the Gulf
of Mexico looking for dirt.
>
>
>
>
> 2 cups of self-rising cornmeal(Fatboy will call you a homosexual for posting that)
> 2 eggs beaten(Watch Bradscum accuse you of threatening violence)
> 2 cups buttermilk
> 2 Tablespoons bacon drippings, melted, or veg. oil
>
> Heat oven to 450 degrees. Grease(Fatty will call that a racial slur) your 9-inch skillet with about 2 tablespoon
> of shortening or oil (Use bacon drippings instead if available). Leave oil
> in bottom of pan... Place pan in oven to heat ....
> Combine cornmeal, 2 eggs, buttermilk, and the melted bacon drippings. Mix
> well. I find a whisk does this nicely. Pour into hot skillet.
Batter(Oh my-more violence) will
> sizzle.
> Bake at 450 degrees for 35 minutes or until golden brown.(More racism-shame on you)
Patrick Keenan
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:02:33 -0400,
> <t1LQa.3260$104.3...@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan"
<te...@dev.null>
> wrote:
>
> >"Larry Mondello" <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> wrote in message
> >news:q5u6hvshtk3bjqj6d...@4ax.com...
> >> On 14 Jul 2003 14:23:14 -0500, <szksmp8...@hagbard.io.com> Patrick
> >>Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >>Now you are whining and you don't see how hypocrite you are. Yale
sued
> >> >>me and didn't provide myself nor my attorney his complaints which is
grievous
> >> >>and which
> :.
> >> >He provided them and YOU MAILED THEM BACK UNOPENED, dumbass!
> :.
> >> FALSE!!
> :.
> >> All I sent back were standard envelopes addressed to DEFENDANT SCOTT
> >>BRADBURY
> :.
> >Pleae clarify this. You say you did not send back unopened documents, but
> >you DID send back unopened documents. Which one is it?
>
> How did you come up with that twisted thought?
From your words, of course.
>
> >You say you DID send envelopes back and don't know what was inside them -
> >how could you if you didn't open them?
>
> I already answered it numerous times and it yet has sunk into hard heads
who are
> in denial:
Yes, you have said that you sent back, unopened, items that you received.
You cannot, of course, know what was in those items.
Well, I should add a qualification: perhaps you *can* read unopened mail,
and in that case, I suggest you file for the JREF challenge. I think it's
a million dollars. A million's not what it used to be, but hey, it's
serious pocket change anyway.
>
> Once again and what you ignored:
>
> All I sent back were standard envelopes addressed to DEFENDANT SCOTT
BRADBURY
> which was intended to harass and intimidate and the ones I originally
opened
> were his rants! If he had sent his voluminous complaints the envelope
would have
> been quite bulky and beside he was bound by a written agreement to my
attorney
> whom I already made a payment to- to no longer make any direct contact
with me
> by any means. Yale was bound to make ALL communications to my attorney
whom I
> had already paid good money to handle the matter for me. Yale chose
instead to
> avoid my attorney and he told him "FUCK YOU" when my attorney tried to get
the
> complaints. The same thing was done to David's attorney too!
And your attorney made no use of this. That's some representation you got
yourself there.
> >And you missed a prime opportunity right there. Some lawyer you turned
out
> >to have. All he could quash on was jurisdiction.
>
> Why don't you admit a judgment was overturned which most of you said
wouldn't be
> opened much less overturned BUT was and it and that lawsuit were
dismissed?
On jurisdictional grounds. You could have pursued other remedies at the
time, but did not.
> It just eats you up doesn't it?
Me? No. You? Yes. It's plainly consuming you.
>
> Your Monday Morning Quarterbacking falls flat. You as well as the other
> bystanders who have a definite bias against me will never accept what Yale
did
> was unprofessional and unethical.
Apparently, neither does your attorney, or he'd have made use of it at the
time. It's quite simple.
> >> Yale chose instead to avoid my attorney and he told him "FUCK YOU" when
my
> >> attorney tried to get the complaints. The same thing was done to
David's
> >> attorney too! You defend liars and criminals and you know what that
makes you!
> :.
> >So in short, you agree that you DID send back communications and do not
> >know what they contained (and cannot know, because you did not open them)
> >though you guess they were 'rants'.
>
> That is what all the ones I opened were.
So you did open some, and not others. You assume what the contents were -
you cannot know. And you failed to forward them to your attorney, so
there's only your word that this even happened. You don't have any
evidence; you threw it away.
> Yale was obliged to no longer make any
> contact in any form with me. What about that you can't understand?
What I don't understand is why you did not make use of this obligation.
> I hired an
> attorney to represent me and all Yale did was avoid him and not give him
the
> complaints against me which is what an ethical and reputable attorney
would do!
And so, why did you return this correspondence rather than forwarding it to
your attorney?
> >Bear in mind that you are answering both 'no' and 'yes' to this aparently
> >simple question.
>
> NO-- you are just in denial. Yale never would serve his complaints on
David
> Michael nor myself not our attorneys.
Did you expect the complaint documents to come from Mr. Eideken or the
court?
> If Yale had sent that shitwad of
> complaints to me they would have come in a very bulky envelope instead of
the
> normal envelopes most people mail a one or two page letter in! Get the
point
> now?
What I don't get is why you failed to involve your lawyer. If what you say
is true, it was a great opportunity and you blew it. But, you've thrown
the evidence away.
> I hope so because I will ignore you if you ask again because you are a
> waste of time and gtyou aren't seeking truth but rather you are tring to
do
> damage control for a shyster.
No, I'm trying to understand why you kept such poor representation.
-pk
Sara Salzman
"Patrick Keenan" <d...@null.net> wrote:
The answer to this is quite simple. He didn't HAVE an attorney at that
time. In fact, if I remember correctly, he did not bother to engage an
attorney until after Yale had received a judgment against him.
Larry Mondello
<catamont-1EDD05...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>The answer to this is quite simple. He didn't HAVE an attorney at that
>time. In fact, if I remember correctly, he did not bother to engage an
>attorney until after Yale had received a judgment against him.
More lies you are caught in. I had an attorney May 29, 2000 and he had an e-mail
exchange with Yale advising him I was his client and that Yale was to no longer
make any direct contact with me and Yale later accused me of forging the e-mail
but he was exposed as being a lying Jew bastard when he later admitted the
e-mail did exist!!!!!!!! Yale also issued a subpoena on Daylin Leach on July 14,
2000 and it is all on the docket and I have posted such details numerous times
in the past! Yale's judgment was August 25, 2000. You Sara Salzman claimed I had
no attorney prior to August 28, 2000!
My proofs:
Everyone try to count all the lies sara, Yale and other kooks were caught in.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=%25vDt5.5816%24V67.297087%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=1
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Tje Case Against Bradbury
Message-ID: <%vDt5.5816$V67.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 02:59:07 GMT
"On August 25, 2000, I filed a default judgment against Scott Bradbury."
Special Note: Everyone count all the lies Yale F. Edeiken and his supporters get
exposed in with the following:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=38c4hv4b615oe2si2737c5fh6e8afnol1q%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Legal System Abuse by a Pathological Liar Named Yale F. Edeiken Who
Lied About a May 29, 2000 E-Mail R_0713
Message-ID: <38c4hv4b615oe2si2...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=dglr5.3384%24V67....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
View: Complete Thread (16 articles)
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=dglr5.3384%24V67.156844%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fsafe%3Dimages%26ie%3DISO-8859-1%26as_umsgid%3Ddglr5.3384%2524V67.156844%40newshog.newsread.com%26lr%3D%26hl%3Den
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
References: <jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com>
<jg_brown-300...@cvg-27-166-171.cinci.rr.com>
<s8drqscsl6aija0cf...@4ax.com>
<jg_brown-300...@cvg-27-166-171.cinci.rr.com>
<39adbdf6$1...@post.usenet.com>
Subject: Re: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale F.
"Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Message-ID: <dglr5.3384$V67.1...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 04:35:21 GMT
P.W. Blakely <pwbla...@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:39adbdf6$1...@post.usenet.com...
> **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
>
> And as usual, Brown presents zero proof of Tavish forging Criminal
> Edeiken.
He has already admitted that he has.
--YFE
The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
The Einsatzgruppen page is at http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/
The Cybrary of the Holocaust is at http://www.remember.org/
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Why would I admit I forged an e-mail when I know I had an e-mail from my
attorney which I posted a copy of? Also if I did not have an attorney at the
time then why does Yale F. Edeiken name my attorney and then restore my
attorney's e-mail address to an e-mail he denied existed and then lied when he
claimed I admitted it was a forgery as he did above? Here is the thread of the
above post and how it progressed:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=dglr5.3384%24V67.156844%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fsafe%3Dimages%26ie%3DISO-8859-1%26as_umsgid%3Ddglr5.3384%2524V67.156844%40newshog.newsread.com%26lr%3D%26hl%3Den
My original post which started the thread:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=selm=jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9pfatrposi1ec4g8mf%404ax.com
Subject: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale F.
"Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Message-ID: <jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 23:32:50 GMT
To all who have been aware of Tubby Edeiken's frivolous lawsuit
against me here is an extract from an e-mail dialog that he had with my
Allentown attorney. Tubby Edeiken and his poltroons who listen to him and
believe him deny "disciplinary rules" exist thus Tubby hasn't violated
them yet Tubby uses the term himself!
I have said before that I do have in my possession the hardcopy of
the e-mailings between my attorney and Tubby Edeiken. I'd imagine that all
of Tubby's snail mails I've FWD to my attorney will be presented to court
within a day or so showing Tubby Edeiken agreeing to not make direct
contact with me.
Now from Tubby's very own reply and in his exact words and poor
spelling I show:
From: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Message ID: <001501bfc9d5$2ddae340$d99c10cf!oemcomputer>
To: Dxxx...@aol.com
References: <e8.501626...@aol.com
Subject: Re: Edeiken v. Bradbury
Date: Mon, May 29 2000 21:20:00 -0400
[...]
> Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
> any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney.
> Please refrain from having any contact with Mr. Bradberry.
If this confirms your representation I certainly will.
If so I expect to hear an explanation of why you advised
a client to defy a court order. As you well know that constitutes
a flagrant violation of the disciplinary rules, Furter, should you
actually be representing this creature, I expect a check for the
sanctions already imposed to be forwarded to me immediately.
-- Yale F. Edeiken
<End of EXACT copy of a small portion of the e-mail>
Please God in the Heavens above let Yale deny publicly the authenticity
of the above communication! I will be a very good boy too!
For the record-- my attorney now correctly spells my last name
correctly! :-)
For the record I just "return to sender" another one of Yale's violation
of the disciplinary rules he agreed to today 8/30/2000. He is not honest
and he does not stick to his written word!!
Yale F. Edeiken has denied in very recent postings that "disciplinary
rules" exist YET he agreed to abide by them and implied my own attorney
was not obeying them! (see example below) I did not make the above letter
up! I have the actual hard copy as sent to me by my Allentown attorney.
Yale will have to explain shortly why he agreed in writing to my attorney
to no longer make direct contact with me while proving false to the
agreement he made! He has since filled my snail mail box with his
"demands" and threats as well as making an obscene harassment telephone
call!
Yale will also have to answer for illegally distributing confidential
information he obtained using a subpoena to a list of e-mail recipients
which my attorney says is illegal in Pennsylvania!
There is no way on God's Green Earth Tubby will be able to escape
violating the disciplinary rules he agreed to in writing and escaping the
fact he illegally distributed confidential information obtained with a
subpoena to a list of people via e-mail.
Now for Tubby Edeiken's current lies concerning the above e-mail excerpt:
(Let us count the lies Tubby has told!)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=B1Iq5.2901%24V67.112066%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=2&filter=0
Subject: Re: Attn Pat Blakely - Please Read and Send Reply if One is Made
by The Liar and Miscreant
Date: 08/29/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Message-ID: <B1Iq5.2901$V67.1...@newshog.newsread.com>
> For the record Pat I wonder if Yale would deny in public:
> 1) I have an attorney in Allentown representing me.
Absolutely. You have no attorney of record in the action against you.
<<Lie #1 exposed. Yale acknowledged in the above e-mail that I was being
represented after my attorney referred to me as his "client.">>
[...]
Gurther the arrorney who contacted me in your name was asked directly
whether he represented you in this matter. He denied such representation;
in fact, he did not even know your name referring to you as "Bradberry."
<<Lie #2 exposed. My attorney said precisely: "with my client as long as
he has an attorney." More than adequately shows I am being represented!>>
[...]
I had posted previously:
> 2) He made a written agreement via e-mail to my attorney dated
> May 29, 2000 under "Disciplinary Rules" to not make any more direct
> contact with me. (My attorney sent me a printout of the e-mail dialogue
> and Yale's agreement.)
Dirst, thre is no such document as the "Disciplinary Rules."
<<Lie #3 exposed. Yale denies that Disciplinary Rules exist yet in his
e-mail agreement with my attorney he stated: "..as you well know that
constitutes a flagrant violation of the disciplinary rules.." and
furthermore he agreed to no longer make direct contact with me
which is Lie #4 exposed because he keeps sending me stuff in violation
to his written agreement on file!!>>
He has threatened one person who exposed his lies with sexual molestation,
torture, death and mutilation.
<<Lie #5 to be exposed in court. Yale will be compelled to show the post
complete with all headers which was made in the name of Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentirc.net> to which I allegedly did as he accuses above
complete with my reply as either Scott Bradbury or Doc Tavish complete
with all headers which would contain Sara's message ID in the references.
If he is unable to do so (and he will be unable to do so) then he will
have to answer for making false accusations in filing his lawsuit against
me! Very serious charge!>>
----end----
Yale even has poltroons who deny "disciplinary rules" exist:
http://x60.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=663390235
Subject: Re: Attn Pat Blakely - Please Read and Send Reply if One is Made
by The Liar and Miscreant
Date: 08/28/2000
Author: John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
[...]
I had stated:
>2) He made a written agreement via e-mail to my attorney dated
>May 29, 2000 under "Disciplinary Rules" to not make any more direct
>contact with me. (My attorney sent me a printout of the e-mail
>dialogue and Yale's agreement.)
There are no such rules.
<<If that is so John then why did Yale make a legally binding written
agreement with my attorney and then he said himself: "..you well know that
constitutes a flagrant violation of the disciplinary rules.."? I want Yale
to publicly deny the authenticity to the above quoted e-mail at the top.
I'll FWD it to Allentown so damned quick it will make his head spin like
Reagan in the movie The Exorcist!>>
~~~End of DejaCom Archival Snippet~~~
http://x60.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=663425455
Subject: Re: Attn Pat Blakely - Please Read and Send Reply if One is Made
by The Liar and Miscreant
Date: 08/28/2000
Author: Patrick L. Humphrey <pat...@eris.io.com>
[...]
>2) He made a written agreement via e-mail to my attorney dated
>May 29, 2000 under "Disciplinary Rules" to not make any more direct
>contact with me. (My attorney sent me a printout of the e-mail dialogue
>and Yale's agreement.)
Ain't no such animal as "disciplinary rules", Scottie.
~~~End of DejaCom Archival Snippet~~~
What sort of knowledge do Patrick Humphrey or John Morris have about
whether the disciplinary rules exist or not? They are Yale's poltroons and
nothing more!
COME ON YALE-- DENY IN PUBLIC THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE E-MAIL!!!
I'll HAVE IT IN ALLENTOWN IN A FLASH!!
Here is Edeiken lying about having issued a subpoena to obtain my unlisted
telephone number and unlisted address documented. (Be sure to count the
lies)
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=b5JH4.301%24%25L6....@monger.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: --->Violation of USC Title 18, Chapter 13, Section 241?--
Edeiken's Legal Troubles Deepen<---
Date: 08 Apr 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <b5JH4.301$%L6.2...@monger.newsread.com>
References: <8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com>
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com...
> I was going to take some days off for rest and relaxation but the official
> Doc Tavish hotline rang and I was advised that a Yale F. Edeiken mailing
> list recipient
That's a lie.
<<Tavish comment 4/18/2000- For the record it is ONLY by an Edeiken
mailing list recipient that my personal info has been abused by death
threat telephone calls and death threats being posted with my unlisted
telephone number and unlisted address being posted.>>
<START>
ORDER
[...]
<STOP>
<<Tavish comment 4/18/2000- The ONLY attorney's name on the subpoena
issued to FlashNet Communications, which was abused to deny me my civil
rights, was the name of Yale F. Edeiken>>
> > And then Yale had it posted over USENET.
:.
> That is, of course, a lie. I never posted it anywhere.
<<January 13, 2003 comment: You did as "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>>>
> Defendant Tavish's statement is mnore evidence of his continued
> defamation.
:.
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))
Then I do so now.
<<Tavish comment: Do you now wish to continue your denial now that I
have a photocopy of your subpoena in my personal possession Yale
and that you were your own attorney? Please do! I want everyone to
see what a liar and disreputable lawyer you are!>>
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpt~~
I have in my possession right at this very moment a copy of a
subpoena which states:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading:
Yale F. Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding:
"(1) Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net" "This subpoena was issued at the request of the
following person: Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme
Court ID# 40290" (For the record the subpoena was issued 11/30/1999)
How many lies did Yale tell in the one post above? I count two!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yale denied using his power of attorney to otherwise obtain my unlisted
telephone number and my unlisted address BUT was shown to be a liar in the
above example. Yale further lied about having a list and e-mailing the
information he obtained using the subpoena as documented below:
(Be sure to count each and every documented lie Yale tells!)
http://x76.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=624379718
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Can't Escape Mailing Out Via E-Mail Subpoenaed
Information (Very Illegal and Unethical Too!) aka Re: Yale F. Edeiken's
Six Inescapable Lies aka Re: fun with scottie
Date: 05/17/2000
Author: Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>
[...]
On Tue, 16 May 2000 01:14:29 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
<Vh1U4.3322$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3920996d...@news.flash.net...
>> On Mon, 15 May 2000 23:32:01 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>> >news:39208100...@news.flash.net...
>>
>> Lurkers please note the "news:39208100...@news.flash.net"
>> it's very pertinent.
[...]
>> And you distributed it via your e-mailing list.
:.
> Liar. I have no e-mailing list.
How do you explain what you have posted in the recent past included once
again below?
>> >> and then illegally distributed it via your own personal mailing list!
:.
>> > Incorrect. There is no such mailing list.
How do you explain what you have posted in the recent past included once
again below?
>> If that is so then why did you delete the following from the post to which
>> you now reply?
:.
> Because your continued frantic lies are boring.
Here once again and all compared to your claims above let us count your
lies. You claim above: "I have no e-mailing list.... There is no such
mailing list."
You did mention these key words in a previous posting you made didn't you ol'
criminal pathological liar you: "As all the recipients of the e-mail... ...I
gave the information to a list of people..." Looks like I've caught you in even
more lies doesn't it Yale? Once again from the top criminal-- did you or did you
not say the following?
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Andrew spams again
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:26:56 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: atmax-9-4.enter.net
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: atmax-9-4.enter.net
Message-ID: <385e...@news3.enter.net>
X-Trace: 20 Dec 1999 11:27:29 -0500, atmax-9-4.enter.net
Organization: Enter.Net
Fergus McClelland <re...@perdrix.demon.co.uk > wrote in message
news:faxdOHnEHgDROZ...@4ax.com...
> "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
:.
> >Fergus McClelland <re...@perdrix.demon.co.uk > wrote in message
> >news:J7pZOIj+KpQFqo...@4ax.com...
:.
> >> I think it wrong to give Tavish's details to a list, (though I can understand the
> >> pressure that may have led him to do so)
(Edeiken speaks):
> > Save it for the next time you are running for office.
<<Tavish comment May 15, 2000-- Notice Edeiken did not deny giving my
details to a list as shown above. <<Lie #1 Exposed>>>>
> It seems the best mitigation for your action to me.
(Edeiken speaks now in his "current" reply):
Nope. The best defense is the complete one. That it went to people
who had been victimized by Bradbury.
In fact, McVay's nonsense is just that. As all the recipients of the
e-mail except Ken knew was that there were then motions pending including
barring Bradbury from obtaining such material from me because of his
invasions of privacy and threats.
<<Tavish comment May 15, 2000-- Notice Edeiken said precisely: "As all the
recipients of the e-mail..." Who sent the e-mail to the list? Yale F.
Edeiken <<Lie #2 Exposed>>>>
(Edeiken speaks):
> >I gave the information to a list of people who, almost without exception have
> >been the vicitims of threats of violence or criminal harassment from Bradbury. If
> >you ahve a problem with that, I could care less.
<<Tavish comment May 15, 2000-- Notice Edeiken said precisely: "I gave the
information to a list of people" yet he now claims: "There is no such
mailing list.." <<Lie #3 Exposed>>>>
> --YFE
~~~End of Edeiken Admission to Passing Out Confidential Information~~~ The
above from my: Message-ID: <39208100...@news.flash.net>
Please compare the headers to see how Edeiken dodges disseminating
subpoenaed information via his personal mailing list! Why did you delete
your admission to distributing confidential information obtained via a
subpoena to your mailing list Yale?
[...]
> --YFE
~~~End~~~
BTW here's Ken McVay even giving evidence about how "Nazihunter" got my
unlisted telephone number and unlisted address:
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC)
Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Andrew spams again
Date: 16 Dec 1999 18:41:58 GMT
Organization: The Nizkor Project
Message-ID: <83bbpm$2jk4$1...@news.tht.net>
References: <38570B78...@btinternet.com>
X-Trace: news.tht.net 945369718 85636 216.126.72.25
(16 Dec 1999 18:41:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: scr...@hub.org
Cc: ya...@enter.net,david.e...@btinternet.com
[...]
To be fair, one should also ask how nazihunter got the name and
address in the first place, shouldn't one?
Yale Edeiken distributed it to a holocaust-history.org mailing list, and
to a few, including me, outside the list. If you are going to condemn
nazihunter, as you properly are, then should you not also ask what Yale
hoped to achieve by distributing the address in the first place?
~~~End of Archival Excerpt~~~
Recent addition:
This recently transpired:
Concerning my confidential info I charged:
>> And you distributed it via your e-mailing list.
:.
> Liar. I have no e-mailing list.
:.
>> >> and then illegally distributed it via your own personal mailing list!
:.
>> > Incorrect. There is no such mailing list.
Now Yale has stated:
On Wed, 17 May 2000 03:28:14 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
<iloU4.3589$v%5.26...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3921f38a....@news.flash.net...
>> On Wed, 17 May 2000 00:48:50 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
>> <S%lU4.7966$LM4.5...@monger.newsread.com> wrote:
:.
>> >> Thanks for posting another death threat. It has already been
>> >> established that you got my address from Yale F. Edeiken as an "e-mail list
>> >> recipient." BTW how's the weather in Toronto and the campus life at the
>> >> university?
:.
>> > Another actionable lie from Defendant....
:.
>> No matter how g-d damned hard you try psycho you will NOT be able to
>> distance yourself from distributing my confidential information via YOUR
>> mailing list!
:.
> I have no such "private mailing list."
>
> It is, therefore, you who are the liar.
The facts as archived at DejaCom say otherwise!
>> You are forever archived here with your lies about your subpoena issued to
>> get my ulisted telephone number and unlisted address and your lies about
>> YOUR mailing list. All admissable in court--- your recent words too!
:.
> None of which mean what you state they mean. Mailing something to a
>group of people is NOT"a private mailing list."
So now I do have you on record admitting to: "Mailing something to a group
of people..."
Thanks for the final admission asswipe!
~~End of DejaCom URL <http://x76.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=624379718>~~
I now honestly ask: HOW MANY LIES DID I EXPOSE YALE aka TUBBY EDEIKEN IN?
Every thing I presented above is fully documented and cross indexed with
URLs for anyone who doubts the accuracy of the quoted archives!
Need I show more? ;-)
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Jeffrey G. Brown is the next in the thread and he claims I forged the e-mail:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=jg_brown-3008002131010001%40cvg-27-166-171.cinci.rr.com
Subject: Re: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale F.
"Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Message-ID: <jg_brown-300...@cvg-27-166-171.cinci.rr.com>
References: <jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 01:28:00 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.27.166.171
In article <jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com>, Poor Ol' Gutless
Scottie "BOOGERMAN" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>I now honestly ask: HOW MANY LIES DID I EXPOSE YALE aka TUBBY EDEIKEN IN?
None. You're well-known for forging emails, Cockroach Boy. Your claims are
worthless.
JGB
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Me replying to Jeffrey G. Brown's false accusation I forged the e-mail:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=s8drqscsl6aija0cfbtarkipbl8eng3gpo%404ax.com
Subject: Re: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale F.
"Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Message-ID: <s8drqscsl6aija0cf...@4ax.com>
References: <jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com>
<jg_brown-300...@cvg-27-166-171.cinci.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 01:41:33 GMT
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 01:28:00 GMT,
jSPAMSTOPg_b...@my-deSPAMSTOPja.coSPAMSTOPm wrote:
>In article <jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com>, Poor Ol' Gutless
>Scottie "BOOGERMAN" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
Still name call and childish attacks is all Jeffrey can do when facts are
presented!
>>I now honestly ask: HOW MANY LIES DID I EXPOSE YALE aka TUBBY EDEIKEN IN?
:.
>None. You're well-known for forging emails, Cockroach Boy. Your claims are
>worthless.
I'll bet that you won't see your pal Yale going on public record claiming
the following was forged:
From: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Message ID: <001501bfc9d5$2ddae340$d99c10cf!oemcomputer>
To: Dxxx...@aol.com
References: <e8.501626...@aol.com
Subject: Re: Edeiken v. Bradbury
Date: Mon, May 29 2000 21:20:00 -0400
[...]
> Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
> any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney.
> Please refrain from having any contact with Mr. Bradberry.
If this confirms your representation I certainly will.
If so I expect to hear an explanation of why you advised
a client to defy a court order. As you well know that constitutes
a flagrant violation of the disciplinary rules, Furter, should you
actually be representing this creature, I expect a check for the
sanctions already imposed to be forwarded to me immediately.
-- Yale F. Edeiken
<end>
Still another stooge in denial.
I hope Tubby makes a denial! I hope he accuses me of forging the above and
he'll see how god damned fast his denial makes it to Allentown! I love to
expose Tubby's lies, his unprofessionalism, his unethical and sleazy ways!
Now will Jeffrey count the lies Tubby told as shown here and based on the
above e-mail communique? No! Jeffrey is about as honest as Tubby! For the record
and for the record only here are Tubby's lies exposed again for all to see and
for all time!
Now for Tubby Edeiken's current lies concerning the above e-mail excerpt:
(Let us count the lies Tubby has told!)
http://x60.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=663768955
Subject: Re: Attn Pat Blakely - Please Read and Send Reply if One is Made
by The Liar and Miscreant
Date: 08/29/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
> For the record Pat I wonder if Yale would deny in public:
> 1) I have an attorney in Allentown representing me.
Absolutely. You have no attorney of record in the action against you.
<<Lie #1 exposed. Yale acknowledged in the above e-mail that I was being
represented after my attorney referred to me as his "client.">>
<<Tavish comment May 15, 2003: If I didn't have an attorney named Daylin Leach
prior to YOUR temporary judgment against me on August 25, 2000 then why did you
issue a subpoena on him concerning your kook lawsuit in July 2000? I have the
docket printout and BTW my attorney referred to me as HIS client in his May 29,
2000 e-mail to you! I had paid him the advance money too so he would represent
me!!>>
[...]
Gurther the arrorney who contacted me in your name was asked directly
whether he represented you in this matter. He denied such representation;
in fact, he did not even know your name referring to you as "Bradberry."
<<Lie #2 exposed. My attorney said precisely: "with my client as long as
he has an attorney." More than adequately shows I am being represented!>>
[...]
I had posted previously:
> 2) He made a written agreement via e-mail to my attorney dated
> May 29, 2000 under "Disciplinary Rules" to not make any more direct
> contact with me. (My attorney sent me a printout of the e-mail dialogue
> and Yale's agreement.)
Dirst, thre is no such document as the "Disciplinary Rules."
<<Lie #3 exposed. Yale denies that Disciplinary Rules exist yet in his
e-mail agreement with my attorney he stated: "..as you well know that
constitutes a flagrant violation of the disciplinary rules.." and
furthermore he agreed to no longer make direct contact with me
which is Lie #4 exposed because he keeps sending me stuff in violation
to his written agreement on file!!>>
----end----
Back into your hole you shall go rat till you pop up again from your sewer
dwelling!
Doc Tavish
--
"For I will give you a mouth and wisdom, which none of your adversaries
will be able to withstand or contradict." Son of Man {Luke 21:15 RSV}
>JGB
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
If the e-mail was forged then why does Yale admit to communicating with my
attorney who had e-mailed him!?
Here is Jeffrey G. Brown's reply to the post above which should make it obvious
the e-mail was not forged BUT here is the continual denial Yale F. Edeiken is a
lying shyster bastard who is unethical and who doesn't keep a written agreement
such as to no longer make ANY contact with me! (That is why I hired Daylin
Leach!!)
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=jg_brown-3008002157580001%40cvg-27-166-171.cinci.rr.com
Subject: Re: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale F.
"Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Message-ID: <jg_brown-300...@cvg-27-166-171.cinci.rr.com>
References: <jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com>
<jg_brown-300...@cvg-27-166-171.cinci.rr.com>
<s8drqscsl6aija0cf...@4ax.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 01:54:57 GMT
In article <s8drqscsl6aija0cf...@4ax.com>, Poor Ol' Gutless
Scottie "BOOGERMAN" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 01:28:00 GMT,
>jSPAMSTOPg_b...@my-deSPAMSTOPja.coSPAMSTOPm wrote:
>
>>In article <jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com>, Poor Ol' Gutless
>>Scottie "BOOGERMAN" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>
>Still name call and childish attacks is all Jeffrey can do when facts are
>presented!
:.
>>>I now honestly ask: HOW MANY LIES DID I EXPOSE YALE aka TUBBY EDEIKEN IN?
:.
>>None. You're well-known for forging emails, Cockroach Boy. Your claims are
>>worthless.
:.
>I'll bet that you won't see your pal Yale going on public record claiming
>the following was forged:
Mr. Edeiken doesn't have to say a thing. You're a forger. Your claims are
worthless.
JGB
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Here is "Pat Blakely" (next in the thread) replying to Jeffrey G. Brown:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=39adbdf6%241%40post.usenet.com
From: "P.W. Blakely" <pwbla...@gmx.net>
References: <jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com>
<jg_brown-300...@cvg-27-166-171.cinci.rr.com>
<s8drqscsl6aija0cf...@4ax.com>
<jg_brown-300...@cvg-27-166-171.cinci.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale F.
"Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 22:25:03 -0400
Message-ID: <39adbdf6$1...@post.usenet.com>
**** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
And as usual, Brown presents zero proof of Tavish forging Criminal Edeiken.
--
--Pat W Blakely--
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Here is Yale replying to "Pat Blakely" as was quoted at the very top and we come
around full circle as I repeat Yale's lie that I admitted to forging the e-mail
between my attorney and himself:
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
References: <jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com>
<jg_brown-300...@cvg-27-166-171.cinci.rr.com>
<s8drqscsl6aija0cf...@4ax.com>
<jg_brown-300...@cvg-27-166-171.cinci.rr.com>
<39adbdf6$1...@post.usenet.com>
Subject: Re: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale F.
"Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Message-ID: <dglr5.3384$V67.1...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 04:35:21 GMT
P.W. Blakely <pwbla...@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:39adbdf6$1...@post.usenet.com...
> **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
>
> And as usual, Brown presents zero proof of Tavish forging Criminal
> Edeiken.
He has already admitted that he has.
--YFE
The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
The Einsatzgruppen page is at http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/
The Cybrary of the Holocaust is at http://www.remember.org/
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Funny thing about Yale being a pathological liar. He claimed I forged the e-mail
and he and his minions claimed I had no attorney YET if the e-mail was forged
as Yale claims I admitted to doing then why did he put back in my attorney's
e-mail address which I had XXXed out!? See how easy it is to catch that lying
bastard in lies?
Here he is and remember everyone-- he claimed the e-mail was a forgery by me and
that it did not exist and he and his minions claimed I had no attorney prior to
his (August 25, 2000) judgment against me!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=Xplr5.3387%24V67.157073%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=2
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
References: <jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
<<Tavish comment May 15, 2003: Everyone take notice of that Message ID. It is my
post Yale replied to and I had deleted my attorney's (who Yale had claimed
didn't exist and that the e-mail was forged) e-mail address BUT Yale restored it
in his reply. If the e-mail was forged and I didn't have an attorney then why
would Yale add back the e-mail address though he erred slightly? Yale is an evil
and malicious liar who won't keep his word and I have it in writing too!>>
Subject: Re: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale F.
"Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Message-ID: <Xplr5.3387$V67.1...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 04:45:43 GMT
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> To all who have been aware of Tubby Edeiken's frivolous lawsuit
> against me here is an extract from an e-mail dialog that he had with my
> Allentown attorney. Tubby Edeiken and his poltroons who listen to him and
> believe him deny "disciplinary rules" exist
A lie. I stated that there are no "Disciplinary Rules" which you
continaully claimed exist.
> I have said before that I do have in my possession the hardcopy of
> the e-mailings between my attorney and Tubby Edeiken. I'd imagine that all
> of Tubby's snail mails I've FWD to my attorney will be presented to court
> within a day or so showing Tubby Edeiken agreeing to not make direct
> contact with me.
Read it again, Bradshit. It says nothing of the kind.
> From: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
> Message ID: <001501bfc9d5$2ddae340$d99c10cf!oemcomputer>
> To: Dyali...@aol.com
> References: <e8.501626...@aol.com
> Subject: Re: Edeiken v. Bradbury
> Date: Mon, May 29 2000 21:20:00 -0400
>
> [...]
>
> > Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
> > any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney.
> > Please refrain from having any contact with Mr. Bradberry.
:.
> If this confirms your representation I certainly will.
You will note that I make no such promise. I stated that I would IF
there wsa confirmation of such representation. Daylin Leach replied in the
negative. There wsa, therefore, no undertaking on my p[part.
> If so I expect to hear an explanation of why you advised
> a client to defy a court order. As you well know that constitutes
> a flagrant violation of the disciplinary rules, Furter, should you
> actually be representing this creature, I expect a check for the
> sanctions already imposed to be forwarded to me immediately.
Note that there was no response to this.
> Please God in the Heavens above let Yale deny publicly the authenticity
> of the above communication! I will be a very good boy too!
Why should I deny it. It proves you have been lying.
[...]
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Notice now Yale admits the e-mail exists YET he implied previously that I forged
it and then he names the attorney I paid an advancement to in May 2000 and
restores (in error) my former attorney's e-mail address I deleted as I prove
here:
References: <jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale F.
"Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Message-ID: <jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com>
[...]
Now from Tubby's very own reply and in his exact words and poor
spelling I show:
From: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Message ID: <001501bfc9d5$2ddae340$d99c10cf!oemcomputer>
To: Dxxx...@aol.com
References: <e8.501626...@aol.com
Subject: Re: Edeiken v. Bradbury
Date: Mon, May 29 2000 21:20:00 -0400
[...]
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
For the record (and to expose another Edeikenite lie) I did have an attorney
prior to Yale's judgment against me.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=oghmnt40ao9l6brg2vigq5f6p7i1ci1o4s%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Once Again I Prove I had an Attorney Prior to August 25, 2000 aka Re:
Bradbury Fakes It Again, was Re: NAZIHUNTER THREATS REVISITED aka Re: I Read the
Article on Sara
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 23:18:20 -0500
Message-ID: <oghmnt40ao9l6brg2...@4ax.com>
References: <o9Kd7.3900$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>
<20010813022144...@mb-fm.aol.com>
<Sc3e7.4068$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>
<9lciee$g0m$1...@slb6.atl.mindspring.net> <f9t5OxK6dOJ0dc...@4ax.com>
<Csme7.4225$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 03:59:30 GMT, <Csme7.4225$5d4.1...@monger.newsread.com>
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
>
>Paul Kneisel <tall...@nyct.net> wrote in message
>news:f9t5OxK6dOJ0dc...@4ax.com...
>>
>> If I recall, a court determined that Bradbury himself was "Nazihunter." If
>> the court did not set damages it was because the court determined it had
>> no jurisdiction, not that its conclusions were wrong.
:.
> No. What happened was that he was served with "Request for Admission."
>Failure to answer constitutes an admission of the truth of the statements.
>Bradshit never responded,
<<Tavish comment May 15, 2003: Neither I nor my attorney was ever served with
the trumped up fabricated accusations as proven in this link:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=aomv4vofhbl2q46bqk2lvf3k7q0umn1l4l%404ax.com
Subject: RE Dismissal of 1999-C-2786 Edeiken Vs Bradbury R_0216
Message-ID: <aomv4vofhbl2q46bq...@4ax.com> END of comment>>
You were required by your written agreement and by the disciplinary rules to
send all materials to the attorney who contacted you telling you I was his
client BUT you didn't and it is on record too that your told my attorney "FUCK
YOU" each time he tried to get a copy of your complaints. Don't try to say I did
not have an attorney prior to August 25, 2000 because the docket shows you
issuing a subpoena to him re: 1999-C-2786 in July!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=6345ctceth31duniv70l4hafon88sdu3gq%404ax.com
From: NIZKOR WATCH (doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO_SPAM)
Subject: Re: Did I or Did I Not Have An Attorney Prior to August 25, 2000? YES I
Did! - Also Motions To Compel Answers To Discovery
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-03-28 17:32:03 PST
[...]
From: Sara (cata...@concentric.net)
(EXCERPT)
In article <dnmabtgedpcv2hbfa...@4ax.com>,
DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com wrote:
[...]
> The ONLY reason Yale got that default judgment on August 25, 2000 was
> because he did NOT follow the written agreement he made with my attorney,
> which is on file, in which Yale F. Edeiken agreed to cease and desist
> from making ANY direct contact with me and that was on May 29, 2000 almost
> three months before Yale got his judgement against me.
Except you didn't HAVE an attorney. See below.
<<Doc Tavish Comment March 27, 2001: Yes I did have an attorney because
why would he have referred to me as his client in the May 29, 2000 e-mail
which Yale first denied and then later admitted existed?>>
> ~~~~~~~~~Proof of the May 29, 2000 Agreement~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> See this post:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=May+29,+2000&hl=&rnum=3&seld=945856619&ic=1
> From: Doc Tavish (doc_tavi...@my-deja.com)
> Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Attorney - Allentown, PA (Supreme Court ID#
> 40290) Recent Lies Documented UPGRADED R 2
> Date: 2000-12-30 18:30:42 PST
>
> >>> I have said before that I do have in my possession the hardcopy of
> >>> the e-mailings between my attorney and Tubby Edeiken. I'd imagine
> >>> that all of Tubby's snail mails I've FWD to my attorney will be presented
> >>> to court within a day or so showing Tubby Edeiken agreeing to not
> >>> make direct contact with me.
:.
> >> Read it again, Bradshit. It says nothing of the kind.
<<Doc Tavish comment March 27, 2001: If the e-mail had not existed then
why would Yale say read it again?>>
> >>> From: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
> >>> Message ID: <001501bfc9d5$2ddae340$d99c10cf!oemcomputer>
> >>> To: xxx...@aol.com <(just deleted my attorney's e-mail address)
> >>> References: <e8.501626...@aol.com
> >>> Subject: Re: Edeiken v. Bradbury
> >>> Date: Mon, May 29 2000 21:20:00 -0400
> >>> [...] My attorney did in fact say:
> >>> > Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
> >>> > any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney.
> >>> > Please refrain from having any contact with Mr. Bradberry.
:.
> Yale did in fact reply:
> >>> If this confirms your representation I certainly will.
To which Daylin Leach responded in the negative.
<<Daylin Leach did NOT reply in the negative! He had already said:
"Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney." How is
that replying in the negative? He referred to me using "my client" which
proves you to be a liar! Remember Yale admitted in this post that
the e-mail existed! Care to stay in denial pig? Here is what you deleted:
From the very post (above) which you gutted:
>>> Please God in the Heavens above let Yale deny publicly the authenticity
>>> of the above communication! I will be a very good boy too!
:.
>> Why should I deny it. It proves you have been lying.
<<Notice that Yale has called me a liar from the beginning concerning an
e-mail communication between my attorney and him and how he denied such
e-mail existed and Yale even suggested that I forged it BUT now he admits
it exists and at the same time calls me the liar!? Does the term
pathological liar ring a bell?)... End of Doc Tavish Comment>>
Therefore, there was no agreement, since Mr. Leach did NOT bother to
file an appearance until AUGUST 28, 2000.
<<Doc Tavish comment March 27, 2001: How could my attorney file an
appearance- he didn't even have a copy of the complaints and when he tried
to get a copy Yale responded with "Fuck You" which has been admitted to in
court! Care to deny that Yale does not furnish his "victims" with copies
of complaints? He did the same thing to David Michael too! Care to deny
it?>>
[...]
Face it, Mr. Bradbury, your so-called attorney didn't EXIST as your
attorney until he FILED HIS APPEARANCE in August. It is not Mr.
Edeiken's responsibility to pretend you have an attorney when the person
you claim is your attorney never bothered to file.
<<Doc Tavish comment March 27, 2001: How could my attorney who told
Edeiken on May 29, 2000 that I was his client file when he had not
received the complaints? Edeiken did my attorney the same way he did
David's! As for me not having an attorney then why did Yale F. Edeiken
on "July 14, 2000 PLTF'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS FOR DISCOVERY UPON DAYLIN LEACH. AFDT OF SERVICE
ATTACHED." This is on the docket of Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
and anyone may obtain the docket for $3.00 and here is how
Andrea Naugle -- Clerk Civil Court
Lehigh County Court House
Room 202
4555 West Hamilton Street
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101-1614
and "Request Docket Printout for Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786"
I did have an attorney as established on July 14, 2000! Why would Yale be
wanting to subpoena my attorney in Edeiken Vs Bradbury if I didn't have an
attorney!? Once again my enemies lie! End of Doc Tavish Comment>>
In fact, on FEBRUARY 7th, 2001, YOUR ATTORNEY TOLD JUDGE REIBMAN THAT
YOU HAD NO REPRESENTATION PRIOR TO AUGUST 28, in other words, you were
NOT represented when the default judgement was handed down.
<<Doc Tavish comment March 27, 2001: Once again you lie because the docket
shows the above intent to serve a subpoena and also Edeiken acknowledged
on May 29, 2000 that I had an attorney!>>
It's in writing, Mr. Bradbury. Perhaps a remedial reading course might
be of some help to you.
<<You acting like a pig doesn't win arguments bitch! How many lies have I
caught you in lately? MANY! You need to take a remedial course concerning
telling the truth and dealing with FACTS>>
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Everyone count all of the lies told by Edeiken and his Accomplices! There are
many!
Here are archives of the perjury and legal system abuse by shyster Edeiken:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=aomv4vofhbl2q46bqk2lvf3k7q0umn1l4l%404ax.com
Subject: RE Dismissal of 1999-C-2786 Edeiken Vs Bradbury R_0216
Message-ID: <aomv4vofhbl2q46bq...@4ax.com>
The complaints which neither I NOR my attorney were ever served with were
filled with numerous libels and outright perjury with "evidence" against me
being manufactured by the plaintiff (who was also his own attorney):
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=d0ic0v81gdhrd1djqe4k4k2mnvq4c4sdi5%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: "Criminally Perjured Sworn Testimony" at the Web Site of Peter
Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel (He Supports Lies So He Can Use Them To Smear Me)
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>
The plaintiff illegally distributed my unlisted telephone number and address
which he had used to make death threats against me. The subpoenaed information
did NOT become "public knowledge" because it was NEVER turned over to the
court-- rather instead the plaintiff posted my newly acquired address etc. to
USENET with the invitation I get beaten with baseball bats!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmi...@4ax.com>
For a fact-- Yale F. Edeiken is:
1) Not a member of his local or state bar association
2) Not in the phone book under attorneys
3) Not associated with any law office though he tried to convince people he was
and those two law offices denied having him as an associate and both claimed he
used them as drops which explains why people can see the "C/O" in Edeiken's
"legal" documents.
As an added bonus:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rhi7cvsotqaj3t6btide56jdi44odj5oip%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Edeikook Follies #6 Yale F. Edeiken Goes on a Rampage at His County
Courthouse Message-ID: <rhi7cvsotqaj3t6bt...@4ax.com>
Need I say more other than Yale F. Edeiken still has not been brought to
justice! Neither his local District Attorney NOR the Disciplinary Board of the
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania NOR Penn State Attorney General will do one thing
which proves if you are a favored ethnicity you can screw over anyone and abuse
the legal system for your own personal vendettas!
Tavish
Patrick Keenan
> On 15 Jul 2003 17:39:45 GMT,
> <catamont-1EDD05...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >The answer to this is quite simple. He didn't HAVE an attorney at that
> >time. In fact, if I remember correctly, he did not bother to engage an
> >attorney until after Yale had received a judgment against him.
>
> More lies you are caught in. I had an attorney May 29, 2000 and he had an
> exchange with Yale advising him I was his client and that Yale was to no
longer
> make any direct contact with me and Yale later accused me of forging the
> but he was exposed as being a lying Jew bastard when he later admitted the
> e-mail did exist!!!!!!!!
You have this in *email*? Sure, email may exist, but it's also quite
forgeable.
Why didn't your attorney use registered mail? Then there would be hard
proof of writing, sending, and receipt, proof that is accepted in any court.
You *really* need a better attorney.
-pk
Patrick Humphrey
>"Larry Mondello" <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> wrote in message
>news:rro8hvokakrg7vfrm...@4ax.com...
>> On 15 Jul 2003 17:39:45 GMT,
>> <catamont-1EDD05...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> >The answer to this is quite simple. He didn't HAVE an attorney at that
>> >time. In fact, if I remember correctly, he did not bother to engage an
>> >attorney until after Yale had received a judgment against him.
>> More lies you are caught in. I had an attorney May 29, 2000 and he had an e-mail
>> exchange with Yale advising him I was his client and that Yale was to no longer
>> make any direct contact with me and Yale later accused me of forging the e-mail
>> but he was exposed as being a lying Jew bastard when he later admitted the
>> e-mail did exist!!!!!!!!
><snip>
>You have this in *email*? Sure, email may exist, but it's also quite
>forgeable.
Why do you think he's pressing that point so hard?
>Why didn't your attorney use registered mail? Then there would be hard
>proof of writing, sending, and receipt, proof that is accepted in any court.
>You *really* need a better attorney.
That's what he gets for calling one that advertises on the UHF indies...;)
-PLH, "have you been WRONGFULLY KILLED? Let the TOUGH, SMART LAWYER get you
MONEY!"
Sara Salzman
Jew Hating T. Cornpone <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> wrote:
[1100+ lines of moronic drivel deleted]
But after all that, you didn't bring charges against Yale to the
"Disciplinary Board," did you? And Yale wasn't disbarred, was he? and
you're an impotent little slug, aren't you?
Eddie Haskell
<catamont-4FBA0A...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <rro8hvokakrg7vfrm...@4ax.com>,
>Jew Hating T. Cornpone <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> wrote:
Smear is all a pig like you has and hyet you wonder why I despise you and your
fellow vile filth!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=u880hv4g1dekc089m...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Doc Tavish's "A-1" Jew -- David Horowitz (Subtitle: Proof I Do NOT Hate
all Jews) Message-ID: <u880hv4g1dekc089m...@4ax.com>
Date: 12 Jul 2003 15:59:42 GMT
>[1100+ lines of moronic drivel deleted]
Can't refute facts can you- you disgusting pig!?
>But after all that, you didn't bring charges against Yale to the
>"Disciplinary Board," did you? And Yale wasn't disbarred, was he? and
>you're an impotent little slug, aren't you?
>
>Sara
How about this you evil little sneering bitch?
Home Page: http://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/index.html
Click the Button in the middle which Says: "Disciplined Attorneys"
http://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/disciplined_attorneys.html
Hit the SEARCH button:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attsearchdcd.php
At the search page- ENTER (as last name): Edeiken
and voila you get:
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID LastName FirstName MiddleNameSuffix City Status
40290 Edeiken Yale F. Allentown ACTIVE
Hit the OPTIONS buttons and you get:
Attorney Registration Information
Attorney Registration Number: 40290
Name: Yale F. Edeiken
Admitted: 03/29/1984
County: LEHIGH
District: 2
Status: ACTIVE
Address
Information not available online
Call Attorney Registration Office
at 717-731-7073 for current
address information
------------------
AND
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District Public Censure Suspended Disbarred Reinstated
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II 04/20/1998 // // // Administered 10/20/98
Looks like someone got your pimp a good spanking!!!
Care to comment?
Even though I wasn't the one it's nice to know they are wise to the bastard--
perhaps if I re-file with the latest info I have and how I am still being
harassed because of his malicious prosecution and David Michael filing at the
same time showing how Yale abuses the legal system to intimidate people then who
knows....
Funny thing though that the two attorneys Edeiken associated himself with--
Todd Miller and Paul Trainor; one has been disbarred and the other attorney does
not show up!
BTW My attorney does not show up because he quit the practice because of his
successful election. Now I ask-- who is the more successful attorney-- Yale of
Daylin? The answer is obvious. Daylin is successful and Yale sneaks around
Allentown like a homeless person who isn't a member of the bat not can you find
him in the phone book under attorneys. tsk tsk tsk
Also BTW I remember your pimp repeating numerous times that there was no such
thing as "disciplinary rules" but the web site I am at now shows this:
http://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/rules.html
Rules
http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/204/chapter81/chap81toc.html
The Rules of Professional Conduct set out the minimum ethical standards for the
practice of law and constitute a set of rules which all lawyers must follow.
These Rules were originally promulgated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on
April 1, 1988. Prior to this time, mandatory standards for Pennsylvania
attorneys were found in the Disciplinary Rules of the Pennsylvania Code of
Professional Responsibility.
Sara-- you do remember your pimp denying such rules existed and how I caught him
in numerous lies and it was hilarious as all get out when he referred to the
above as "disciplinary rules." Your pimp is a pathological liar and here are his
lies about "disciplinary rules":
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=c0rqhtgfidealp02gb2jponk6mjspl3ssk%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Disciplinary Rules of the State of Pennsylvania and Oh So Many Lies!
(Fully Documented) <2>--
Message-ID: <c0rqhtgfidealp02g...@4ax.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 23:34:11 GMT
WHO IS THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR?
Do "Disciplinary Rules for the State of Pennsylvania" exist or do they
not? It will be answered with all objectivity in the following:
http://x56.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=667124433
Subject: Re: NOTICE TO YALE EDEIKEN
Date: 09/08/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
[...]
>YOU are still in violation of the disciplinary rules which
>you have denied exist and caught in a lie about their existence!
Faklse. No such document as yje "Discipplainary Rules"exists..
~~~End of DejaCom Archival Snippet #1 ~~~
http://x56.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=664616664
Subject: Re: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale F.
"Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Date: 08/31/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com...
> To all who have been aware of Tubby Edeiken's frivolous lawsuit
> against me here is an extract from an e-mail dialog that he had with my
> Allentown attorney. Tubby Edeiken and his poltroons who listen to him and
> believe him deny "disciplinary rules" exist
A lie. I stated that there are no "Disciplinary Rules" which you
continaully claimed exist.
~~~End of DejaCom Archival Snippet #2 ~~~
http://x56.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=663768955
Subject: Re: Attn Pat Blakely - Please Read and Send Reply if One is Made by The
Liar and Miscreant
Date: 08/29/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
> 2) He made a written agreement via e-mail to my attorney dated
> May 29, 2000 under "Disciplinary Rules" to not make any more direct
> contact with me. (My attorney sent me a printout of the e-mail dialogue
> and Yale's agreement.)
Dirst, thre is no such document as the "Disciplinary Rules."
~~~End of DejaCom Archival Snippet #3 ~~~
Who is lying? Is Yale F. Edeiken an attorney in Allentown, Pennsylvania,
Supreme Court ID# 40290 who is advertised in public domain with this link:
http://www.enter.net/walker.html telling the truth and that all the other
sources below are lying such as Cornell University? Be honest now! How much
honesty and integrity does Yale F. Edeiken have?
Here is an official Cornell University web page link:
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/pa-code/query=*/doc/{t2}?
"Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct (1999 edition)"
Here is what GOOGLE.COM turns up using DISCIPLINARY RULES PENNSYLVANIA
Labor and Employment Law Section Quarterly, Vol. 13, #1
...Rule 5.4 of the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules; Rule...
...violates ethical canons and disciplinary rules governing a...
www.calbar.org/2sec/3lab/4qtly/v13n104.htm
Annotated Links to Legal Ethics Web Sites
...Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of...
www.abanet.org/cpr/links.html
Table of Contents
...Judicial Employees Appendix E Pennsylvania Rules of Judicial...
...conscientious judge. In contrast, disciplinary rules are...
www.abanet.org/ceeli/assessments/Lithuania/Lithuaniaethics4judges.htm
Professional Conduct Links
...Opinions Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of Professional...
www.cardozo.yu.edu/library/netpubs/ethics.html
[PaSupreme] Office of Disciplinary Counsel pet. v. Philip A. Valentino
...of Pennsylvania [ ] get Official versions OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY...
...Respondent's violation of disciplinary rules. As to the...
www.dpg-law.com/opinions/pa-suprm/9905/0975-valentino.html
The above are just a tip of the iceberg! At 12:49am csdst Sept.18,2000
GOOGLE Returned: Google results 1-10 of about 10,800 for DISCIPLINARY RULES
PENNSYLVANIA
Now in all good conscience I ask one and all-- who is lying?
Yale F. Edeiken Attorney at Law Allentown, Pennsylvania or Cornell
University and all the thousands of web links pointed to by Google?
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Sara, did you see your pimp in denial above YET your pimp referred to
"disciplinary rules" and notice how he later admitted the e-mail agreement he
made with my attorney to no longer "bother" me existed in this post!
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.revisionism,alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white
References: <jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale F.
"Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Message-ID: <Xplr5.3387$V67.1...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 04:45:43 GMT
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com...
<<Tavish comment July 15, 2003: How is it your alcohol shriveled brain
interprets: " my client as long as he has an attorney" as being a negative
response? Also why didn't you honor a written agreement you made with my
attorney when he plainly told you: "Finally as you know the disciplinary rules
prohibit you from having any direct contact with my client as long as he has an
attorney.
Please refrain from having any contact with Mr. Bradberry [sic]." Leach referred
to me as "my client on May 29, 2000!! YOU CERTAINLY DID NOT HONOR THAT AGREEMENT
AND THAT IS WHY HE TOLD ME TO SEND ALL OF YOU CRAP BACK UNOPENED.>>
> If so I expect to hear an explanation of why you advised
> a client to defy a court order. As you well know that constitutes
> a flagrant violation of the disciplinary rules, Furter, should you
> actually be representing this creature, I expect a check for the
> sanctions already imposed to be forwarded to me immediately.
<<Tavish comment July 15, 2003: Everyone notice that Sara's pimp mentions
"disciplinary rules"?>>
Note that there was no response to this.
> Please God in the Heavens above let Yale deny publicly the authenticity
> of the above communication! I will be a very good boy too!
Why should I deny it. It proves you have been lying.
[...]
~~End of Post~~
Yet Sara's pimp earlier in thread accused me of posting a forgery thus implying
the e-mail and my attorney didn't exist! I Xed out my attorney's e-mail address
in my first posting so if the e-mail didn't exist then how would Yale know my
attorney's e-mail address even though he got it slightly wrong as I prove here
to show what a lying fat bastard Yale is:
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=38c4hv4b615oe2si2737c5fh6e8afnol1q%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Legal System Abuse by a Pathological Liar Named Yale F. Edeiken Who
Lied About a May 29, 2000 E-Mail R_0713
Message-ID: <38c4hv4b615oe2si2...@4ax.com>
Funny thing about Yale being a pathological liar. He claimed I forged the e-mail
and he and his minions claimed I had no attorney YET if the ep-mail was forged
as Yale claims I admitted to doing then why did he put in my attorney's e-mail
address which I had XXXed out!? See how easy it is to catch that lying bastard
in lies?
Here he is and remember everyone-- he claimed the e-mail was a forgery by me and
that it did not exist nd he and his minions claimed I had no attorney prior to
his judgment against me!
~~End of Excerpt~~
Everyone notice the line:
> To: Dyali...@aol.com
Why would Yale put in an e-mail address I did not post? He got two letters
reversed though BUT if that ve-mail hadn't existed and didn't have an attorney
then how would he have known?
Here is how I posted what Yale replied to:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale F.
"Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Message-ID: <jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com>
From: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Message ID: <001501bfc9d5$2ddae340$d99c10cf!oemcomputer>
To: Dxxx...@aol.com
References: <e8.501626...@aol.com
Subject: Re: Edeiken v. Bradbury
Date: Mon, May 29 2000 21:20:00 -0400
[...]
> Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
> any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney.
> Please refrain from having any contact with Mr. Bradberry.
If this confirms your representation I certainly will.
If so I expect to hear an explanation of why you advised
a client to defy a court order. As you well know that constitutes
a flagrant violation of the disciplinary rules, Furter, should you
actually be representing this creature, I expect a check for the
sanctions already imposed to be forwarded to me immediately.
-- Yale F. Edeiken
<End of EXACT copy of a small portion of the e-mail>
Did anyone count all the lies I caught Pimp Daddy Edeiken in YET the NIZKOOK's
defend him and malign my former attorney which speaks volumes about them being
worthless dishonest filthy shit!
Shyster Watch
AND
Care to comment?
Tavish
Ken McVay
ejaculation is the inability to delay ejaculation to when it is mutually
desirable for both partners. For this reason it is hard to define a case of
premature ejaculation. Some have trouble controlling their orgasm after
entry and others consider 5-10 minutes of intercourse too little time. How
long someone is able to last is not the important factor in diagnosing
premature ejaculation.
Premature ejaculation is a problem that most men have experienced at some
point in their life. It was believed that drugs or certain infections such
as urethritis caused premature ejaculation, but it is more psychological in
nature. The exact cause of the condition still remains a mystery.
Premature ejaculation often occurs during the first experience with
intercourse due to anxiety. The majority of men learn to control their
orgasm and have no lasting effect. Some will develop a long-term anxiety
toward sex, which causes a prolonged experience with premature ejaculation.
Another factor is sexual behavior. The longer someone goes with out sex, the
quicker men typically reach orgasm. Young adults tend to ejaculate more
quickly as experience seems to be associated with ejaculatory control.
Learn how to control premature ejaculation with a proven 8-Step program.
Call or email MSD Institute today to set up your free consultation.
1-800-788-2873
Sara Salzman
Shyster Watch <shyster...@001tavish-central.net> wrote:
> On 15 Jul 2003 23:47:02 GMT,
> <catamont-4FBA0A...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> >In article <rro8hvokakrg7vfrm...@4ax.com>,
> >Jew Hating T. Cornpone <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> wrote:
>
> Smear is all a pig like you has and hyet you wonder why I despise you and
> your
> fellow vile filth!
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=u880hv4g1d
> ekc089m0g2a4...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Once again: YOU didn't file charges and YOU didn't get Mr Edeiken
"disciplined," did you? And Mr. Edeiken is STILL practising law, isn't
he?
Sara
By the way, did your DA REALLY tell you that you were behaving in an
appropriate manner and just "responding to a bully"?
Fred Rutherford
<catamont-32ADEE...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <1dc9hv4hejr3v8hnu...@4ax.com>,
> Shyster Watch <shyster...@001tavish-central.net> wrote:
>
>> On 15 Jul 2003 23:47:02 GMT,
>> <catamont-4FBA0A...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> >In article <rro8hvokakrg7vfrm...@4ax.com>,
>> >Jew Hating T. Cornpone <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> wrote:
:.
>> Smear is all a pig like you has and hyet you wonder why I despise you and
>> your fellow vile filth!
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=u880hv4g1d
>> ekc089m0g2a4...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
>> Subject: Doc Tavish's "A-1" Jew -- David Horowitz (Subtitle: Proof I Do NOT
>> Hate all Jews) Message-ID: <u880hv4g1dekc089m...@4ax.com>
>> Date: 12 Jul 2003 15:59:42 GMT
>>
>> >[1100+ lines of moronic drivel deleted]
>>
>> Can't refute facts can you- you disgusting pig!?
:.
>> >But after all that, you didn't bring charges against Yale to the
>> >"Disciplinary Board," did you? And Yale wasn't disbarred, was he? and
>> >you're an impotent little slug, aren't you?
>> >
>> >Sara
:.
:.
>Once again: YOU didn't file charges and YOU didn't get Mr Edeiken
>"disciplined," did you? And Mr. Edeiken is STILL practising law, isn't
>he?
He still got disciplined and I wonder what for! Care to tell us?
>Sara
>
>By the way, did your DA REALLY tell you that you were behaving in an
>appropriate manner and just "responding to a bully"?
Why don't you come to my jurisdiction and file a complaint that I post where the
shit live who made it possible for me to get harassed only as a REPLY for it
being done to me first and see what you're told.
Tavish
sailor57
> In article <rro8hvokakrg7vfrm...@4ax.com>,
> Jew Hating T. Cornpone <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> wrote:
>
> [1100+ lines of moronic drivel deleted]
>
> But after all that, you didn't bring charges against Yale to the
> "Disciplinary Board," did you? And Yale wasn't disbarred, was he? and
> you're an impotent little slug, aren't you?
>
> Sara
Fatboy's forte is endless futile babble. Action is beyond his reach.He
has neither the intestinal fortitude nor the attention span to
actually do something real.
He has threatened to sue you numerous times.
He has threatened to report me to the police numerous times
What came of all those threats?
Here is his record of reliability:
sailor57
Prosecutor:Objection-irrelevant.Defendant Bradbury has no balls
Judge-sustained
sailor57
> On 15 Jul 2003 23:47:02 GMT,
> <catamont-4FBA0A...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>
You are mentally retarded and functionally illiterate. You wouldn't
recognize a fact if it bit your dick off.
sailor57
Fatboy is a member of the Belleville BAR association-that stands for
"Bullshit and Ranting".
Jerome G.
Likewise, your attempts to derail a respected lawyer's political career
also failed.
[snip]
J.
Jerome G.
> In article <rro8hvokakrg7vfrm...@4ax.com>,
> Jew Hating T. Cornpone <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> wrote:
>
> [1100+ lines of moronic drivel deleted]
>
> But after all that, you didn't bring charges against Yale to the
> "Disciplinary Board," did you? And Yale wasn't disbarred, was he? and
> you're an impotent little slug, aren't you?
>
> Sara
2 years later and you and Mr Bradbury are still saying exactly
the same things to each other.
Really Sara, you have become exactly what you despise.
J.
Fred Rutherford
sailor...@yahoo.com (sailor57) wrote:
>Fatboy is a member of the Xxxxxxxxxx
Seeing how people like to post where I live then I will post where
the people live who made such info public in the first place!
Sara Salzman
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
4015 S Killarney Way
Aurora, Colorado 80013
I am being harassed by having my confidential information being posted along
with death threats, forged child porn ads being posted which give out my address
etc., having phoney sex offender lists posted which give out my address, having
magazine and catalog subscriptions forged in my identity etc. FOR A FACT it was
Yale F. Edeiken and Yale F. Edeiken alone who subpoenaed my confidential info
from my ISP and made the subpoenaed info public-- now let him receive justice
under the Law of Moses:
Just as has been done to me and is still being done to me and solely because
of Yale F. Edeiken exclusively I will apply the LAW he claims to observe to him:
Leviticus 24:19-20 :: New International Version (NIV)
19 If anyone injures his neighbor, whatever he has done must be done to him:
20 fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. As he has injured the
other, so he is to be injured.
Yale F. Edeiken
465 W Linden St
Allentown
PA 18102-3453
Tel 610 435-9820
Source: Public Knowledge:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=39A60D74.40A0B998%40israelmail.com.xx&rnum=2
Message-ID: <39A60D74...@israelmail.com.xx>
If Yale does not like getting back in kind what he has dished out in kind
under the Law of Moses then he should either:
1) Re-file his nut case lawsuit in the proper jurisdiction and get charged with
numerous criminal counts of perjury and legal system abuse
OR
2) Encourage his THUG allies to stop harassing me and invading my privacy!
The choice is his!
Sara Salzman
Jew Hating T. Cornpone <fred_ru...@01mayfield.net> wrote:
With our ammunition gone and faced with utter defeat,
Who was it that burned the crops and left us nothing to eat?
Why it was Jubilation T. Cornpone; Old "September Morn - pone."
Jubilation T. Cornpone, the pants blown off his seat!
Ken McVay
news:aca9dd48.0307...@posting.google.com...
[...]
> Prosecutor:Objection-irrelevant.Defendant Bradbury has no balls
>
> Judge-sustained
My apologies to the Bench, My Lord. I had neglected consideration of the
obvious.
sailor57
>
You never got to 7th grade and never went to law school.How the hell
do you know what is proper conduct for an attorney?I had a year of law
school and even I don't know what's in the Bar Association Code of
Ethics.
CPA's have a code of ethics that I was bound by, but the nature of
accounting makes CPA ethics completely different. We are not
advocates-our obligation is to the public.
sailor57
Thanks for the promotion, but we have no royalty here in the USA."Your
Honor" will suffice.American lawyers don't usually apologize when
their submissions are removed from the record-they are more likely to
cuss under their breath.We're not as polished as the Brits are.
Ken McVay
From: kjal...@ouplsun.phon (kjalcock)
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 1995 19:03:59 +0000
Mix
1 cup cornmeal (white, yellow, whatever)
1 tsp baking powder
1/2 tsp baking soda
Rub in
2 tbsp margarine, butter or bacon fat (in increasing order of preference)
until it is crumb-like
Mix in
1/3 - 1/2 cup water or milk (ditto)
until it is at a dropping consistency
Fry in a hot frying pan by spoonfuls in marge, butter or bacon fat
(ditto)
Good with savouries or with honey, jam etc., with or without extra
butter!
Katie Alcock
steve wolk
"Jerome G." <jerome...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8f5c6bb8.0307...@posting.google.com...
As opposed to the Undoctor, who has ALWAYS been exactly what we despise.
Sara Salzman
"steve wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
Oh. things have definitely changed. I have a long series of letters from
Bradbury (not posts, Jerome, e-mails) that discuss in depth your
involvement with Blakely and Ellis.
Gord McFee
Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> typed:
> In article <abicnZtgkaZ...@comcast.com>,
> "steve wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
>
>> "Jerome G." <jerome...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:8f5c6bb8.0307...@posting.google.com...
>>> Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
>> news:<catamont-4FBA0A...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net>...
>>>> In article <rro8hvokakrg7vfrm...@4ax.com>,
>>>> Jew Hating T. Cornpone <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [1100+ lines of moronic drivel deleted]
>>>>
>>>> But after all that, you didn't bring charges against Yale to the
>>>> "Disciplinary Board," did you? And Yale wasn't disbarred, was he?
>>>> and you're an impotent little slug, aren't you?
>>>>
>>>> Sara
>>>
>>> 2 years later and you and Mr Bradbury are still saying exactly
>>> the same things to each other.
>>>
>>> Really Sara, you have become exactly what you despise.
>>>
>>> J.
>>
>>
>> As opposed to the Undoctor, who has ALWAYS been exactly what we
>> despise.
>>
>>
>
> Oh. things have definitely changed. I have a long series of letters
> from Bradbury (not posts, Jerome, e-mails) that discuss in depth your
> involvement with Blakely and Ellis.
Oh....oh. Looks like Screwy Ewie will be heading for the hills.
ROTFL!
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
sailor57
> Larry Mondello <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> writes:
>
> >On 14 Jul 2003 14:23:14 -0500, <szksmp8...@hagbard.io.com> Patrick Humphrey
> ><pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
> >>>Now you are whining and you don't see how hypocrite you are. Yale sued me
> >>>and didn't provide myself nor my attorney his complaints which is grievous
> >>>and which
>
>
>
> >All I sent back where standard envelopes addressed to DEFENDANT CSOTT
> >BRADBURY which was intended to harass and intimidate and the ones I original
> >would have been quite bulky and beside he was bound by a written agreement to
> >contact with me bay any means. Yale was bound to make ALLL communications to
> >my attorney whom I had already paid good money to handle the matter for
> >me. Yale chose instead to avoid my attorney and he told him "FUCK YOU" when
> >my attorney tried to get the complaints. The same thing was done to David's
> >attorney too!
>
> you're not "proving" this particular assertion.
> >You defend liars and criminals and you know what that makes you!
>
> out in the far suburbs. Why don't you head on down to Palacios tonight and
> welcome in the hurricane? After all, it's something you can relate to -- a
> lot of hot air...
>
> -PLH, the Bard foresaw Bradbury
He did. He wrote one play called "Much Ado about Nothing".There is a
passage from MacBeth which goes:
'Tis a tale told by an idiot
Full of sound and fury
Signifying nothing.
Patrick Humphrey
>Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szku19o...@fnord.io.com>...
>> Larry Mondello <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> writes:
[...]
>> >You defend liars and criminals and you know what that makes you!
>> *yawn* Yeah, I'm someone who's hated with a passion by a certified
>> fruitcake out in the far suburbs. Why don't you head on down to Palacios
>> tonight and welcome in the hurricane? After all, it's something you can
>> relate to -- a lot of hot air...
>>
>> -PLH, the Bard foresaw Bradbury
>He did. He wrote one play called "Much Ado about Nothing".There is a
>passage from MacBeth which goes:
>
>'Tis a tale told by an idiot
>Full of sound and fury
>Signifying nothing.
Can I call 'em, or can I call 'em? ;-)
-PLH, methinks Blimpie doth protest too much
sailor57
Methinks he eats too much, too.
Jerome G.
> In article <abicnZtgkaZ...@comcast.com>,
> "steve wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
>
> > "Jerome G." <jerome...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:8f5c6bb8.0307...@posting.google.com...
> > > Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
> news:<catamont-4FBA0A...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net>...
> > > > In article <rro8hvokakrg7vfrm...@4ax.com>,
> > > > Jew Hating T. Cornpone <larry_mondello@mayfield01net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [1100+ lines of moronic drivel deleted]
> > > >
> > > > But after all that, you didn't bring charges against Yale to the
> > > > "Disciplinary Board," did you? And Yale wasn't disbarred, was he? and
> > > > you're an impotent little slug, aren't you?
> > > >
> > > > Sara
> > >
> > > 2 years later and you and Mr Bradbury are still saying exactly
> > > the same things to each other.
> > >
> > > Really Sara, you have become exactly what you despise.
> > >
> > > J.
> >
> >
> > As opposed to the Undoctor, who has ALWAYS been exactly what we despise.
> >
> >
>
> Oh. things have definitely changed. I have a long series of letters from
> Bradbury (not posts, Jerome, e-mails)
A reliable source of information if ever there was one. You might
as well cite Playboy magazine as a reference in a doctoral thesis.
ROTFL
>that discuss in depth your
> involvement with Blakely and Ellis.
"In depth", eh?
A few points you might like to consider:
(1) Blakely and Ellis have done nothing wrong.
(2) Even if they had, my mere association with them is meaningless.
(3) I don't recall having an "in depth" involvement with Blakely or Ellis
other than a few pleasant exchanges in email and IRC.
Get a hobby. Buy some model aircraft kits.
J.
Jerome G.
Actually my return to a.r. has had quite a few of you cowering in a
puddle of your own urine.
J.
Jerome G.
You are so full of hate.
J.
Gord McFee
Brian Blank
wrote:
His computer is leaking...
Regards,
Brian Blank
http://ireland.anglican.org/disclaimer/smythe.html
Gord McFee
I think his brain is leaking too.
Doktor Tavische
<catamont-4FBA0A...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
[...]
>[1100+ lines of moronic drivel deleted]
Can't refute facts can you- you disgusting pig!?
>But after all that, you didn't bring charges against Yale to the
>"Disciplinary Board," did you? And Yale wasn't disbarred, was he? and
>you're an impotent little slug, aren't you?
>
>Sara
How about this you squealing pig?
Home Page: http://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/index.html
Click the Button in the middle which Says: "Disciplined Attorneys"
http://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/disciplined_attorneys.html
Hit the SEARCH button:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attsearchdcd.php
At the search page- ENTER (as last name): Edeiken
and voila you get:
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID LastName FirstName MiddleNameSuffix City
40290 Edeiken Yale F. Allentown
Hit the OPTIONS buttons and you get:
Attorney Registration Information
Attorney Registration Number: 40290
Name: Yale F. Edeiken
Admitted: 03/29/1984
County: LEHIGH
District: 2
Status: ACTIVE
Address
Information not available online
Call Attorney Registration Office
at 717-731-7073 for current
address information
------------------
AND
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
<STOP>
Yale F. Edeiken has also been black listed by a watch group:
Concerning unethical attorneys and judges in the State of Pennsylvania:
Citizens for Legal Responsibility
http://www.clr.org/pa.html (Archived locally as: clr-org_pa)
Judicial/Attorney Misconduct in Pennsylvania
Following are some of the attorneys or judges who have been reported to have
been disciplined by the State of Pennsylvania for unethical conduct, who may be
a resident of the State of Pennsylvania but was disciplined in another
jurisdiction, transferred to inactive status, sued for malpractice,
incarcerated, whom we understand have been charged with unethical conduct, have
engaged in conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or to
bring the courts and the legal business into disrepute, etc.
[...]
Yale F. Edeiken --Attorney at Law - Supreme Court ID# 40290
<END>
Why won't my enemies ever comment about their shyster who got a strong rebuke
from the highest legal body of his state?
In coming days I will be posting contact addresses for the Bar Association,
Lehigh County District Attorney, Disciplinary Board etc. with an appeal to
activism that people contact those agencies and ask them why Yale F. Edeiken
still has his law license and why he was allowed to perjure himself, make death
threats etc. and not be prosecuted etc. The shyster has escaped justice long
enough and I am still being harassed and defamed on account of his failed
malicious prosecution against me. Perhaps if I have his means of making a living
removed then perhaps his sycophants will shut their evil lying mouths!
More info on the criminal has yet to be brought to justice:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3921e1e6.182032557%40news.newsguy.com&rnum=1
From: doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
Subject: CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
Date: 2000/05/17
Message-ID: <3921e1e6....@news.newsguy.com>
http://www.mcall.com/cgi-bin/slwebsto.cgi?DBLIST=mc90&DOCNUM=39046
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
Page: B02
Edition: FIFTH
Section: LOCAL/REGION
CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
by KRISTIN CASLER, The Morning Call
Allentown attorney Yale F. Edeiken was found guilty and fined $600 plus
costs for a confrontation with a Lehigh County deputy sheriff and another
man in a courthouse elevator.
During the June 12 incident, Edeiken struck Deputy Brenda Hartman with his
briefcase and allegedly threatened the man by saying he had a gun,
according to District Justice Diane Jepsen, who heard the case. Edeiken
later was found to have a permit for and was carrying a .357 Magnum.
Jepsen ordered Edeiken, whose office is at 39 N. 5th St., to pay the fine
after a hearing Monday on charges of harassment and disorderly conduct
filed by Hartman. Jepsen said Edeiken no longer has a permit for his gun.
According to the complaint, Hartman was in the courthouse side elevator,
which usually is reserved for prisoner transport, with Joanne Keller.
Keller, who was not handcuffed, had just been sentenced and Hartman was
taking her to pay fines and costs before her release.
Also on the elevator were Edeiken, David Raymond, public defender Earl
Supplee and county courier Bill Bichel.
Edeiken told Jepsen that Raymond, a convicted felon who had burglarized
him, pushed his way onto the elevator.
But Jepsen said other witnesses testified that Raymond already was on the
elevator when Edeiken boarded and started a shoving match. Witnesses
varied on what was said.
Witnesses said Edeiken called Hartman a whore, but Edeiken said he was
referring to Keller.
Raymond is a friend of Keller, and Keller once resided at a house owned by
Edeiken. Edeiken was at the courthouse as a character witness for Keller
at her sentencing.
Edeiken swung his briefcase at Raymond, striking him and Hartman,
according to testimony.
Hartman opened the elevator doors on the third floor and ordered Edeiken
to get out. He refused, and as Raymond attempted to exit, Edeiken told
Raymond he had a gun and moved as if he was going to draw it. No weapon
was seen.
Raymond and Supplee then went downstairs for help, and Hartman took
Edeiken and Keller to the bullpen where prisoners are held pending their
proceedings, Jepsen said. Hartman told them to stay until she got help.
When she returned, Edeiken was gone.
---end---
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=6nnnjts00vnb4kfovfuekvejvq8k7pau4j%404ax.com&rnum=5
Subject: How Can I Retract What an Allentown Newspaper Reported and has Been
"Admitted as Fact?" IT'S THEIR WORDS NOT MINE!!!!
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:53:26 -0500
Message-ID: <6nnnjts00vnb4kfov...@4ax.com>
(Excerpted)
Return-Path: <ya...@enter.net>
Received: from mail1.enter.net (sourcenat1.bigmailbox.com [209.132.220.250]) by
mailrecv11.bigmailbox.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f5SH6MI09103 for
<doc_t...@my-deja.com> ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:06:23 -0700
Received: from oemcomputer (mat-4-8.enter.net [207.16.155.156]) by
mail1.enter.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f5SH6LY27630 for
<doc_t...@my-deja.com> ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:06:21 -0400
From: ya...@enter.net
Message-ID: <001601c0fff6$31c67020$9c9b10cf@oemcomputer>
To: <doc_t...@my-deja.com>
Subject: Fw: Allentown Attorney Goes Amuck in County Courthouse and Goes on a
Spree of Violence
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:17:21 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This publication contains defamatory material.
An immediate retraction is demanded.
<<Doc Tavish comment June 28, 2001: Take it up with The Morning Call- they
reported your shoving match and resultant conviction. I am only showing the
link to their archive which has (excerpt) as text...>>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
How the wild man (as depicted above) has abused the legal system against myself
and others and yet is still "practicing" law in Allentown, Pennsylvania:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ht5ucvcf5slhll9gmfpojbsche5090ldm6%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: David Michael Came Very Close to Getting The "TREATMENT" Shyster Yale
F. Edeiken Gave Me! aka Re: Bradbury Misses The Point (Again)
Message-ID: <ht5ucvcf5slhll9gm...@4ax.com>
Date: 24 May 2003 07:09:57 GMT
~~I was sued for allegedly posting an address for a non-existant street~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=29jsbv0cs526ecr9jcul5qtn88ia502h8o%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara Salzman Falls on Her Sword for a Perjurious Lying Shyster...
Message-ID: <29jsbv0cs526ecr9j...@4ax.com>
Date: 11 May 2003 13:33:08 GMT
Examples of perjurious fabrications submitted to a civil court of law by
dishonorable criminally perjurious Yale F. Edeiken:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=d0ic0v81gdhrd1djqe4k4k2mnvq4c4sdi5%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: "Criminally Perjured Sworn Testimony" at the Web Site of Peter
Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel (He Supports Lies So He Can Use Them To Smear Me)
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>
FOR A FACT-- I was NEVER allowed to defend myself from all of the defamatory
accusations made against me by shyster Yale F. Edeiken of Allentown,
Pennsylvania.
These court documents are on file and are obtainable by anyone who wants to know
the truth!
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant. The court has
heard telephone messages left on the defendant's answering machine, in which
the plaintiff admits dedicating himself to making the defendant's life a "living
hell." He refers to the defendant as a "miserable piece of shit" among other
charming epithets. The defendant's private medical information, subpoenaed by
Mr. Edeiken finds its way onto the Internet. Even after the defendant is
represented by counsel, mail is still sent directly to the defendant addressed
to "Defendant Bradbury." ...When attorney Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of
the complaint when he first becomes involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You"
via e-mail. In plain English, this is not a lawsuit, it is a bizarre war waged
by Mr. Edeiken on a man he has never met. The court should not be a party to
this."
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>
Did everyone notice the key phrases: "Since a complaint has never been filed or
served, the defendant is unable to attach a copy of preliminary objections he
would file if the judgment was opened pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a)." AND
"When attorney Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first
becomes involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail." YET my enemies
claim all of the accusations made against me were "accepted as fact" because I
did not oppose them !! How could I when neither my attorney NOR myself ever saw
them EXCEPT after Yale lost his lawsuit and then the accusations were posted as
"fact" by my enemies!!!
Here is the malicious prosecution against me being dismissed:
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
Here is Shyster Yale F. Edeiken suffering another major defeat:
<Start>
September 26, 2001
Yale F. Edeiken
918 N Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104-3759
RE: Yale F. Edeiken, Appellant v. Scott Bradbury et al
1714 EDA 2001
Dear Mr. Edeiken:
This is to advise that the attached Order has been entered in the
above- captioned matters.
A Certified Copy of this Order together with the record will be
sent to the Prothonotary of Lehigh County in due course.
Very truly yours,
(Signed)
David A. Szewczak
Prothonotary
DAS/dag
Attachment
CC: Daylin B. Leach, Esquire
Scott Bradbury
Honorable Edward D. Reibman
The Attachment:
<Start>
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Eastern District Office
Yale F. Edeiken APPELLANT No. 1714 EDA 2001
V.
Scott Bradbury Et Al C.P. Civil Lehigh County
99-C-2786
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2001, the within
appeal is DISMISSED....
PER CURIAM
<STOP>
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
If Yale F. Edeiken wants to sue me again for telling the truth about his
unethical and certainly criminal abuse of the legal system then he should
re-file his failed lawsuit in my home county and then see himself prosecuted
for his death threats and his perjury! After that we will play "Break the Bank"
and see what a civil jury will present me with a punitive damages award for all
the misery he has caused me! Is the fat slob up to it? I think not!
Come on Tubby-- if your lawsuit had any real merit to it you should be jumping
at the chance instead of hiding like you have since you lost your kook lawsuit
against me! Re-file your 1999-C-2768 in my county you fat slob and see what
happens to you!
Tavish
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Compare what Yale said on August 20, 2001 concerning two law firms attitudes
toward his presence with his own words: "they were dealing with someone who was
"mentally unstable" (their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their
description) who they wanted to go away as quckly as possible" to this which was
posted July 4, 2000: "Tubby has no respect from the legal community and as a
whole they wish he'd just waddle away."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=20000704143439.5399.qmail%40nym.alias.net&rnum=4
From: SoloP...@nym.alias.net
Subject: Yale _Tubby_ Edeiken
Date: 2000/07/04
Message-ID: <200007041434...@nym.alias.net>
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
Doktor Tavische
Tavische <Doktor_...@TAVISCHE-GMBH-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:
>http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
>(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
>
> Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
>Attorney ID Case County District
>40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
> ^^^^^^^^^
><STOP>
New addition: A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
You've really been quite a little bastard or should I say a real fat bastard!!
Everyone read the above!! It will shock you all! If enough people will get on
the stick and report Shyster Edeiken to the Disciplinary Board with full
documentation then that criminal bastard will for sure lose his license to
practice law! He is unfit to practice law and no one should ever forget how that
bastard abused the legal system for personal vendettas against many of us! Now
is the time to have justice served!
Here is the address:
From: Xxxxx Xxxxx <xxx...@pabar.org>
Subject: Re: Information Request On How to Report a Lawyer's Abuse of
The Legal System
You can contact the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court at
Two Lemoyne Dr., 2nd Floor
Lemoyne Pa 17043
(717) 731-7073 atty registration
(717) 731-7083 complaints
http://www.pabar.org/
Pennsylvania State Bar Association
100 South Street
P.O. Box 186
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0186
1.717.238.6715 Phone
1.717.238.1204 Fax
David Michael should also let the Disciplinary Board know about 1999-C-3048 and
how Edeiken threatened to give him the same treatment he was giving "Bradshit."
We owe it to the legal community and to justice that Yale F. Edeiken lose his
ability to practice law. Let that bastard get bottles and cans from ditches like
he has threatened others. His wife has already lost her Shaklee account and most
likely because of the consumer fraud complaints filed. Now is the time to give
the slob the old one two!
BTW Yale if you don't like my efforts to have justice served then sue me again
you waddling fat bastard BUT do so in my county and see what happens to you!
Tavish
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ht5ucvcf5slhll9gmfpojbsche5090ldm6%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: David Michael Came Very Close to Getting The "TREATMENT" Shyster Yale
F. Edeiken Gave Me! aka Re: Bradbury Misses The Point (Again)
Message-ID: <ht5ucvcf5slhll9gm...@4ax.com>
Date: 24 May 2003 07:09:57 GMT
_______________________________________________________________________________
Doktor Tavische
denial about "disciplinary rules" existing! What does it tell you that the
highest court in the State of Pennsylvania had to give a severe reprimand
because Yale would not attend his public censure for numerous violations
against "disciplinary rules"? See special text below showing Shyster Edeiken
denying those disciplinary rules. Now we know why!
Home Page: http://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/index.html
Click the Button in the middle which Says: "Disciplined Attorneys"
http://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/disciplined_attorneys.html
Hit the SEARCH button:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attsearchdcd.php
At the search page- ENTER (as last name): Edeiken
and voila you get:
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID LastName FirstName MiddleNameSuffix City
40290 Edeiken Yale F. Allentown
Hit the OPTIONS buttons and you get:
Attorney Registration Information
Attorney Registration Number: 40290
Name: Yale F. Edeiken
Admitted: 03/29/1984
County: LEHIGH
District: 2
Status: ACTIVE
Address
Information not available online
Call Attorney Registration Office
at 717-731-7073 for current
address information
------------------
AND
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
New addition: A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
Believe me-- that PDF document is almost nine pages of Yale's "disciplinary
rules" violations. He violated many and each violation is spelled out too and
the bastard had to be brought in to face censure! The coward wouldn't show up on
his own!!!!!!!! He refused to appear before the Highest Court in his home state!
What does that tell you about that god damned evil bastard?
Everyone who has been harassed by Edeiken abusing the legal system for his own
personal vendettas should contact these people as soon as possible.
REMEMBER-- Be nice!
From: Xxxxx Xxxxx <xxx...@pabar.org>
Subject: Re: Information Request On How to Report a Lawyer's Abuse of
The Legal System
You can contact the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court at
Two Lemoyne Dr., 2nd Floor
Lemoyne Pa 17043
(717) 731-7073 atty registration
(717) 731-7083 complaints
http://www.pabar.org/
Pennsylvania State Bar Association
100 South Street
P.O. Box 186
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0186
1.717.238.6715 Phone
1.717.238.1204 Fax
David Michael should also let the Disciplinary Board know about 1999-C-3048 and
how Edeiken threatened to give him the same treatment he was giving "Bradshit."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ht5ucvcf5slhll9gmfpojbsche5090ldm6%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: David Michael Came Very Close to Getting The "TREATMENT" Shyster Yale
F. Edeiken Gave Me! aka Re: Bradbury Misses The Point (Again)
Message-ID: <ht5ucvcf5slhll9gm...@4ax.com>
Date: 24 May 2003 07:09:57 GMT
We owe it to the legal community and to justice that Yale F. Edeiken lose his
ability to practice law. Let that bastard get bottles and cans from ditches like
he has threatened others. His wife has already lost her Shaklee account and most
likely because of the consumer fraud complaints filed. Now is the time to give
the slob the old one two!
BTW Yale if you read this and don't like don't like my efforts to have justice
served then sue me again you waddling fat bastard BUT do so in my county and see
what happens to you!
Yale and those disciplinary rules which won't go away!
The Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct plainly state
in their preamble:
"A lawyer's conduct should conform to the requirements of the law, both in
professional service to clients and in the lawyer's business and personal
affairs. A lawyer should use the law's procedures only for legitimate
purposes and not to harass or intimidate others. A lawyer should
demonstrate respect for the legal system and for those who serve it,
including judges, other lawyers and public officials."
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/pa-code/query=*/doc/{t2}?
"Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct (1999 edition)"
Yale has obviously used "the law's procedures only to harass or intimidate
others!" No wonder why he denies the Disciplinary Rules of Professional
Conduct exist-- he won't observe them!
Here is Yale denying the rules exist:
Do "Disciplinary Rules for the State of Pennsylvania" exist or do they
not? It will be answered with all objectivity in the following:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=Xplr5.3387%24V67.157073%40newshog.newsread.com
Subject: Re: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale
F. "Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Date: 08/31/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com...
> To all who have been aware of Tubby Edeiken's frivolous lawsuit
> against me here is an extract from an e-mail dialog that he had with my
> Allentown attorney. Tubby Edeiken and his poltroons who listen to him and
> believe him deny "disciplinary rules" exist
A lie. I stated that there are no "Disciplinary Rules" which you
continaully claimed exist.
~~~End of Archival Snippet #1 ~~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=B1Iq5.2901%24V67.112066%40newshog.newsread.com
Subject: Re: Attn Pat Blakely - Please Read and Send Reply if One is Made
by The Liar and Miscreant
Date: 08/29/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
> 2) He made a written agreement via e-mail to my attorney dated
> May 29, 2000 under "Disciplinary Rules" to not make any more direct
> contact with me. (My attorney sent me a printout of the e-mail dialogue
> and Yale's agreement.)
Dirst, thre is no such document as the "Disciplinary Rules."
~~~End of Archival Snippet #2 ~~~
Who is lying? Is Yale F. Edeiken Esq. an attorney in Allentown, Pennsylvania,
Supreme Court ID# 40290 telling the truth and that all the other
sources below are lying such as Cornell University? Be honest now! How
much honesty and integrity does Yale F. Edeiken Esq. have?
Here is an official Cornell University web page link:
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/pa-code/query=*/doc/{t2}?
"Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct (1999 edition)"
Here is a brief excerpt from the link above:
"Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct (1999 edition)
INTRODUCTION - Preamble: A Lawyer's Responsibilities: ...A lawyer's
conduct should conform to the requirements of the law, both in
professional service to clients and in the lawyer's business and personal
affairs. A lawyer should use the law's procedures only for legitimate
purposes and not to harass or intimidate others. A lawyer should
demonstrate respect for the legal system and for those who serve it,
including judges, other lawyers and public officials."
Here is what WWW.GOOGLE.COM turns up using DISCIPLINARY RULES PENNSYLVANIA
as key words:
Labor and Employment Law Section Quarterly, Vol. 13, #1
...Rule 5.4 of the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules; Rule...
www.calbar.org/2sec/3lab/4qtly/v13n104.htm
Annotated Links to Legal Ethics Web Sites
...Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of...
www.abanet.org/cpr/links.html
Table of Contents
...Judicial Employees Appendix E Pennsylvania Rules of Judicial...
...conscientious judge. In contrast, disciplinary rules are...
www.abanet.org/ceeli/assessments/Lithuania/Lithuaniaethics4judges.htm
Professional Conduct Links
...Opinions Pennsylvania Disciplinary Rules of Professional...
www.cardozo.yu.edu/library/netpubs/ethics.html
[PaSupreme] Office of Disciplinary Counsel pet. v. Philip A. Valentino
...of Pennsylvania [ ] get Official versions OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY...
...Respondent's violation of disciplinary rules. As to the...
www.dpg-law.com/opinions/pa-suprm/9905/0975-valentino.html
The above are just a tip of the iceberg! At 12:49am csdst Sept.18,2000
GOOGLE Returned: Google results 1-10 of about 10,800 for DISCIPLINARY
RULES PENNSYLVANIA
Now in all good conscience I ask one and all-- who is lying?
Yale F. Edeiken Attorney at Law Allentown, Pennsylvania or Cornell
University and all the thousands of web links pointed to by Google?
HERE IS WHY YALE DENIES SUCH RULES EXIST:
www.dpg-law.com/opinions/pa-suprm/9905/0975-valentino.html
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,
Petitioner
v.
PHILIP A. VALENTINO,
Respondent
[J-14-1999]
No. 306 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
No. 26 DB 97 Disciplinary Board
Attorney Registration No. 37959
(Philadelphia)
ARGUED: February 2, 1999
DECIDED: MAY 20, 1999
OPINION
MR. JUSTICE ZAPPALA
This disciplinary matter arises from a Petition for Discipline charging
Respondent, Philip Valentino, Jr., with a violation of Pa.R.D.E.
203(b)(1), based upon his conviction of one count of mail fraud, 18 U.S.C.
1341. The Disciplinary Board has recommended that Respondent be disbarred.
[...]
In any disciplinary case arising from a criminal conviction, the events
surrounding the criminal charge must be taken into account when
determining an appropriate measure of discipline. Office of Disciplinary
Counsel v. Eilberg, 497 Pa. 388, 441 A.2d 1193 (1982). Consideration is to
be given to any mitigating factors that are present. Id. Moreover, we
recognize that the sentence imposed by the federal court has already
provided Respondent with punishment for his misconduct. Disciplinary
sanctions, in contrast, are not designed for their punitive effects, but
rather are intended to protect the public from unfit attorneys and
maintain the integrity of the legal system. Office of Disciplinary Counsel
v. Christie, 536 Pa. 394, 639 A.2d 782 (1994).
~~~~~End of Excerpt~~~~~~
The key sentence in the above: "Disciplinary sanctions.. are not designed
for their punitive effects, but rather are intended to protect the public
from unfit attorneys and maintain the integrity of the legal system."
FOR A FACT-- YALE F. EDEIKEN IS UNFIT TO PRACTICE LAW ANYWHERE!!!
In FACT here is Yale F. Edeiken himself referring to "Disciplinary Rules" in his
own e-mail to my attorney which I posted to USENET which he denied at first
existing (he accused me of forging it AND then he admitted it was true! How is
this as proof that this attorney has a very major problem with truth and ethics?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=2&selm=Xplr5.3387%24V67.157073%40newshog.newsread.com
From: Yale F. Edeiken (ya...@enter.net)
Subject: Re: Disciplinary Rules and a Bold Faced Pathological Liar -- Yale F.
"Tubby" Edeiken <Corrections Made Release 2>
Date: 2000/08/31
EXCERPT
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn5rqs0ft4u7cjum9...@4ax.com...
> To all who have been aware of Tubby Edeiken's frivolous lawsuit
> against me here is an extract from an e-mail dialog that he had with my
> Allentown attorney. Tubby Edeiken and his poltroons who listen to him and
> believe him deny "disciplinary rules" exist
A lie. I stated that there are no "Disciplinary Rules" which you
continaully claimed exist.
> I have said before that I do have in my possession the hardcopy of
> the e-mailings between my attorney and Tubby Edeiken. I'd imagine that all
> of Tubby's snail mails I've FWD to my attorney will be presented to court
> within a day or so showing Tubby Edeiken agreeing to not make direct
> contact with me.
Read it again, Bradshit. It says nothing of the kind.
> From: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
> Message ID: <001501bfc9d5$2ddae340$d99c10cf!oemcomputer>
> To: Dyali...@aol.com
> References: <e8.501626...@aol.com
> Subject: Re: Edeiken v. Bradbury
> Date: Mon, May 29 2000 21:20:00 -0400
>
> [...]
>
> > Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
> > any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney.
> > Please refrain from having any contact with Mr. Bradberry.
:
> If this confirms your representation I certainly will.
You will note that I make no such promise. I stated that I would IF
there wsa confirmation of such representation. Daylin Leach replied in the
negative. There wsa, therefore, no undertaking on my p[part.
<<Scott Bradbury comment July 23, 2001: My attorney referred to me as his
"client" which I would say pretty well says he's representing me! My attorney
also said: "the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having any direct contact
with my client as long as he has an attorney. Please refrain from having any
contact with Mr. Bradberry" but Yale kept sending US Parcel Post mailings
addressed to Defendant Scott Bradbury in large letters on the envelopes in order
to start rumors in my small town I'd imagine!>>
> If so I expect to hear an explanation of why you advised
> a client to defy a court order. As you well know that constitutes
> a flagrant violation of the disciplinary rules, Furter, should you
> actually be representing this creature, I expect a check for the
> sanctions already imposed to be forwarded to me immediately.
<<Scott Bradbury comment July 23, 2001: Notice that Yale F. Edeiken says exactly
as shown above: "As you well know that constitutes a flagrant violation of the
disciplinary rules" yet he told me numerous times (as even shown in the top of
this example!): " A lie. I stated that there are no "Disciplinary Rules" which
you continaully claimed exist." Now everyone should see why I call
Yale F. Edeiken Esq. a pathological liar! This attorney is a disgrace to the
legal profession!>>
Note that there was no response to this.
> Please God in the Heavens above let Yale deny publicly the authenticity
> of the above communication! I will be a very good boy too!
Why should I deny it. It proves you have been lying.
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
In fact Yale proved he lied! He lied about disciplinary rules exoisting and he
lied about an e-mail exchange between himself and MY attorney!!
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=m2lomv4fd4cj890nijgplm4c1ocke3j894%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: Edeikook Follies #5 Yale F. Edeiken Lied About Making a Written
Agreement with My Attorney to no Longer Make Direct Contact With Me R_0920
Message-ID: <m2lomv4fd4cj890ni...@4ax.com>
I won't state what I am working on now but I am going to seek justice again
against a bastard whose kook lawsuit is still being used to defam e m e. Perhaps
if I cause Yale to have his law license revoked then his fans will see reality!
BTW Yale's wife lost her Shaklee account and most likely because of legitimate
complaints relating to false advertising.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=u4hhjvkf952ekuh5ugh3iof5oci3o43u90%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Re: Wendy Edeiken and shaklee = bankrupt
Message-ID: <u4hhjvkf952ekuh5u...@4ax.com>
Date: 12 Aug 2003 10:59:19 GMT
Too bad the Law of Moses can 't be enforced on Yale I would love to see the
state drag the block out and give Yale his much deserved forty strokes as
prescibed in Mosaic Law:
Deuteronomy 25:1-3 :: New International Version (NIV)
1 When men have a dispute, they are to take it to court and the judges will
decide the case, acquitting the innocent and condemning the guilty.
2 If the guilty man deserves to be beaten, the judge shall make him lie down and
have him flogged in his presence with the number of lashes his crime deserves,
3 but he must not give him more than forty lashes. If he is flogged more than
that, your brother will be degraded in your eyes.
Deuteronomy 25:1-3 :: King James Version (KJV)
1 If there be a controversy between men, and they come unto judgment, that the
judges may judge them; then they shall justify the righteous, and condemn the
wicked.
2 And it shall be, if the wicked man be worthy to be beaten, that the judge
shall cause him to lie down, and to be beaten before his face, according to his
fault, by a certain number.
3 Forty stripes he may give him, and not exceed: lest, if he should exceed,
and beat him above these with many stripes, then thy brother should seem vile
unto thee.
Special Note: Pharisees (Jews) do not view non-Jews as their "brothers" or
equals and these scriptures prove so:
Deuteronomy 15:2,3 :: New International Version (NIV)
2 This is how it is to be done: Every creditor shall cancel the loan he has made
to his fellow Israelite. He shall not require payment from his fellow Israelite
or brother, because the LORD's time for canceling debts has been proclaimed.
3 You may require payment from a foreigner, but you must cancel any debt your
brother owes you.
FOREIGNER=GENTILE
Need I say motre other than Yale needs to be bfrought to jsutice for all of the
criminal acts he perpetrated against me and enabled others to perpetrate against
me.
I.E.
What Yale F. Edeiken's fellow brothers of Satan won't tell you all:
1) I won that lawsuit- the judgment against me was overturned and the lawsuit
was dismissed in my favor. Also I was NEVER served with the lawsuit's
"complaints" against me! (Neither myself NOR my attorney ever got copies of the
complaints filed against me by Yale F. Edeiken the plaintiff.) How could I have
possibly answered the accusations when I was never served with them? I was not
given my day in court. The victory Yale got was only temporary and the fact he
was unethical and very dishonest proves what sort of scoundrel it was who abused
the legal system for a personal vendetta against someone (Me) who daily made him
look stupid and showed him for the liar he is.)
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=aomv4vofhbl2q46bqk2lvf3k7q0umn1l4l%404ax.com
Subject: RE Dismissal of 1999-C-2786 Edeiken Vs Bradbury R_0216
Message-ID: <aomv4vofhbl2q46bq...@4ax.com>
2) The complaints which neither I NOR my attorney were ever served with were
filled with numerous libels and outright perjury with "evidence" against me
being manufactured by the plaintiff (who was also his own attorney):
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=d0ic0v81gdhrd1djqe4k4k2mnvq4c4sdi5%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: "Criminally Perjured Sworn Testimony" at the Web Site of Peter
Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel (He Supports Lies So He Can Use Them To Smear Me)
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>
3) The plaintiff illegally distributed my unlisted telephone number and address
which he had used to make death threats against me. The subpoenaed information
did NOT become "public knowledge" because it was NEVER turned over to the
court-- rather instead the plaintiff posted my newly acquired address etc. to
USENET with the invitation I get beaten with baseball bats!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmi...@4ax.com>
For a fact-- the attorney whose failed lawsuit against me is:
1) Not a member of his local or state bar association
2) Not in the phone book under attorneys
3) Not associated with any law office though he tried to convince people he was
and those two law offices denied having him as an associate and both claimed he
used them as drops which explains why people can see the "C/O" in Edeiken's
"legal" documents.
Tavish
Axesbowledaslove
<Doktor_...@TAVISCHE-GMBH-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:
Scott --
Instead of what you are doing, take $20 and go give it to the most
miserable person you can find. Say a prayer for him or her. Destroy
your computer, it isn't helping anything. Honestly, do you want anyone
to follow you where you have ended up? Who are you trying to convince?
What do you expect anyone to do or say?
Make some peace for yourself. Your writing is so tortured.
A prayer to Almighty God for you.
"It's easy to pretend you don't care when you don't."
DL
david_michael
It tells me that he's about as nutty as the rest of the
anti-revisionists. Let's do a quick summary:
Edeiken -- lawyer who engages in misconduct.
McVay -- man who has an unhealthy interest in young girls and whose
representations of Nizkor's financial doings and of his own career
are, to say the least, questionable.
Ragland -- man who boasts in a public newsgroup about his exotic
erotic interests.
Murphy -- man who took an interest in necrophilia (!) (I jest not,
lurkers . . .)
Salzman -- woman who published her sado-masochistic fantasies . . .
I believe we've also had a Kevin someone-or-other who turned out to be
a Satanist!
Such are the people who come here to argue against revisionism!
David
http://www.nationalanarchist.com
PS -- good bit of research, Bradbury. You're improving.
Steven Mock
news:b7fe1abc.0310...@posting.google.com:
> It tells me that he's about as nutty as the rest of the
> anti-revisionists. Let's do a quick summary:
>
> Edeiken -- lawyer who engages in misconduct.
> McVay -- man who has an unhealthy interest in young girls and whose
> representations of Nizkor's financial doings and of his own career
> are, to say the least, questionable.
> Ragland -- man who boasts in a public newsgroup about his exotic
> erotic interests.
> Murphy -- man who took an interest in necrophilia (!) (I jest not,
> lurkers . . .)
> Salzman -- woman who published her sado-masochistic fantasies . . .
>
> I believe we've also had a Kevin someone-or-other who turned out to be
> a Satanist!
>
> Such are the people who come here to argue against revisionism!
<sigh> If revisionists actually had any arguments left, do you think
they'd be resorting to such obvious and baseless smear tactics?
Steven Mock
Doktor Tavische
david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote:
Remember how Edeiken gloated about us being too coward to show up for his kook
lawsuits and YET that fat bastard had to be reprimanded numerous times and then
forced to take his discipline from the highest court of his state! I am
re-filing complaints ASAP! It is my mission to have his law license revoked. I
still remember that kike bragging about how he was going to break me
financially!
>> What does that tell you about that god damned evil bastard?
>
>It tells me that he's about as nutty as the rest of the
>anti-revisionists. Let's do a quick summary:
>
>Edeiken -- lawyer who engages in misconduct.
>McVay -- man who has an unhealthy interest in young girls and whose
>representations of Nizkor's financial doings and of his own career
>are, to say the least, questionable.
BTW Edeiken was his attorney too and Edeiken had a role in that S.A.A.F. Nizkor
Fund scam too!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=07qc8vguuom77pvmugliksb3dmdf8pp82r%404ax.com&rnum=6
Subject: Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He
Denies Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund
Message-ID: <07qc8vguuom77pvmu...@4ax.com>
Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:49:22 GMT
Look for Shyster Edeiken making a fool of himself with his "damage control."
>Ragland -- man who boasts in a public newsgroup about his exotic
>erotic interests.
Fully documented in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=04fdedf62f64b5d2e1502b5dbe5ce280%40dizum.com&rnum=1
Subject: Michael Ragland: NUTCASE
Message-ID: <04fdedf62f64b5d2...@dizum.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:30:08 +0100 (CET)
>Murphy -- man who took an interest in necrophilia (!) (I jest not,
>lurkers . . .)
Fully documented in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=c8jbntkiib18tfhra8as5lef48pkg74hrr%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: MUST READ!! Scot Murphy aka Buck Turgidson's Documented Perversions and
Necrophiliac Sympathies
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 20:18:38 -0500
Message-ID: <c8jbntkiib18tfhra...@4ax.com>
>Salzman -- woman who published her sado-masochistic fantasies . . .
Fully documented in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
>I believe we've also had a Kevin someone-or-other who turned out to be
>a Satanist!
>
>Such are the people who come here to argue against revisionism!
>
>David
>http://www.nationalanarchist.com
>
>PS -- good bit of research, Bradbury. You're improving.
Thank you. BTW I can't reveal my plans for the future regarding Edeiken but I
will give you a chance for input if you so desire.
Tavish
From: Sara "The Fist" Salzman
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Fist Fucking
:
By the way... Elbow Grease IS WATER SOLUABLE.
Says so right on the label.
We've found for MANY things, it is "wetter" and slicker than KY.
Your mileage may, of course, vary.
Perrrfect
--
It never rains under my umbrella
~~End~~
From: Sara "The Fist" Salzman
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
Doktor Tavische
Can't deal with the FACT that your man is a shyster can you and that he got
spanked by the highest court in his state and that he has yet to be brought to
justice for his criminal acts against myself and others. You are intellectually
dishonest as well as being shit!
Tavish
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Compare what Yale said on August 20, 2001 concerning two law firms attitudes
toward his presence with his own words: "they were dealing with someone who was
"mentally unstable" (their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their
description) who they wanted to go away as quckly as possible" to this which was
posted July 4, 2000: "Tubby has no respect from the legal community and as a
whole they wish he'd just waddle away."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=20000704143439.5399.qmail%40nym.alias.net&rnum=4
From: SoloP...@nym.alias.net
Subject: Yale _Tubby_ Edeiken
Date: 2000/07/04
Message-ID: <200007041434...@nym.alias.net>
Doktor Tavische
Steven Mock <sm...@nizkor.org> wrote:
>david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote in
>news:b7fe1abc.0310...@posting.google.com:
What Steve Mock left out because of his being in denial:
AND
Everyone who has been harassed by Edeiken abusing the legal system for his own
personal vendettas should contact these people as soon as possible.
REMEMBER-- Be nice!
From: Xxxxx Xxxxx <xxx...@pabar.org>
Subject: Re: Information Request On How to Report a Lawyer's Abuse of
The Legal System
You can contact the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court at
Two Lemoyne Dr., 2nd Floor
Lemoyne Pa 17043
(717) 731-7073 atty registration
(717) 731-7083 complaints
http://www.pabar.org/
Pennsylvania State Bar Association
100 South Street
P.O. Box 186
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0186
1.717.238.6715 Phone
1.717.238.1204 Fax
>> It tells me that he's about as nutty as the rest of the
>> anti-revisionists. Let's do a quick summary:
>>
>> Edeiken -- lawyer who engages in misconduct.
All true and fully documented with:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ht5ucvcf5slhll9gmfpojbsche5090ldm6%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: David Michael Came Very Close to Getting The "TREATMENT" Shyster Yale
F. Edeiken Gave Me! aka Re: Bradbury Misses The Point (Again)
Message-ID: <ht5ucvcf5slhll9gm...@4ax.com>
Date: 24 May 2003 07:09:57 GMT
~~I was sued for allegedly posting an address for a non-existant street~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=29jsbv0cs526ecr9jcul5qtn88ia502h8o%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara Salzman Falls on Her Sword for a Perjurious Lying Shyster Jew...
Message-ID: <29jsbv0cs526ecr9j...@4ax.com>
Date: 11 May 2003 13:33:08 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=aomv4vofhbl2q46bqk2lvf3k7q0umn1l4l%404ax.com
Subject: RE Dismissal of 1999-C-2786 Edeiken Vs Bradbury R_0216
Message-ID: <aomv4vofhbl2q46bq...@4ax.com>
The complaints which neither I NOR my attorney were ever served with were
filled with numerous libels and outright perjury with "evidence" against me
being manufactured by the plaintiff (who was also his own attorney):
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=d0ic0v81gdhrd1djqe4k4k2mnvq4c4sdi5%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: "Criminally Perjured Sworn Testimony" at the Web Site of Peter
Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel (He Supports Lies So He Can Use Them To Smear Me)
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>
The plaintiff illegally distributed my unlisted telephone number and address
which he had used to make death threats against me. The subpoenaed information
did NOT become "public knowledge" because it was NEVER turned over to the
court-- rather instead the plaintiff posted my newly acquired address etc. to
USENET with the invitation I get beaten with baseball bats!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmi...@4ax.com>
>> McVay -- man who has an unhealthy interest in young girls and whose
>> representations of Nizkor's financial doings and of his own career
>> are, to say the least, questionable.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=07qc8vguuom77pvmugliksb3dmdf8pp82r%404ax.com&rnum=6
Subject: Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He
Denies Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund
Message-ID: <07qc8vguuom77pvmu...@4ax.com>
Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:49:22 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=453fevk7jgu8ctdt45a4coabbfgo9k5dns%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Article on Ken McVay _mc...@internet.fighter_ (Also Helps Prove He's a
Liar) R_0611
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 15:20:32 -0500
Message-ID: <453fevk7jgu8ctdt4...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rhao2v4fbuij94mcmi6sicj73sa4eifsns%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nizkor LHR Fund; Just Another Self Serving FUND Like the Nizkor
Endowment and Trust Funds?
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:56:49 -0600
Message-ID: <rhao2v4fbuij94mcm...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e060868_1%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Is NIZKOR Running a Self Serving Endowment Fund Scam?
Message-ID: <3e060...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 22 Dec 2002 18:46:15 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=p6qc8v4546g3bl9ds3kns5pk297kpgn2k2%404ax.com&rnum=3
Subject: NIZKOR.ORG and B'nai Brith's Apparent Funding Kick Backs and Tax Scam
Message-ID: <p6qc8v4546g3bl9ds...@4ax.com>
Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:49:27 GMT
>> Ragland -- man who boasts in a public newsgroup about his exotic
>> erotic interests.
Fully documented in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=04fdedf62f64b5d2e1502b5dbe5ce280%40dizum.com&rnum=1
Subject: Michael Ragland: NUTCASE
Message-ID: <04fdedf62f64b5d2...@dizum.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:30:08 +0100 (CET)
>> Murphy -- man who took an interest in necrophilia (!) (I jest not,
>> lurkers . . .)
Fully documented in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=c8jbntkiib18tfhra8as5lef48pkg74hrr%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: MUST READ!! Scot Murphy aka Buck Turgidson's Documented Perversions and
Necrophiliac Sympathies
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 20:18:38 -0500
Message-ID: <c8jbntkiib18tfhra...@4ax.com>
>> Salzman -- woman who published her sado-masochistic fantasies . . .
Fully documented in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
And don't forget these admissions:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=apbjcvg26ov1u9lf2ombh65t8depv2btg7%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Did Sara "The Fist" Salzman's S&M/Drug HomeLife Result in Two "GIFTED"
Children? I.E. Genetics/Lifestyles?...
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 00:13:21 -0500
Message-ID: <apbjcvg26ov1u9lf2...@4ax.com>
~~Sara Salzman on record as admitting she's retarded?~~
On 07 Jul 2003 01:31:53 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
"How many times do I have to tell you-- I AM RETARDED!!!"
<catamont-548CA8...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=catamont-548CA8.19314906072003%40spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net&output=gplain
Date: 07 Jul 2003 01:31:53 GMT
>> I believe we've also had a Kevin someone-or-other who turned out to be
>> a Satanist!
>>
>> Such are the people who come here to argue against revisionism!
>
><sigh> If revisionists actually had any arguments left, do you think
>they'd be resorting to such obvious and baseless smear tactics?
Smear tactics? Where's the smear? It ain't smear if if is true! OTOH it is your
side who uses out of context quotes and out right fabrications and lies!
I.E.
(Care to count all the out right perjurious accusations made in a civil court of
law?)
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
BTW I wasn 't even allowed to defend myself from such accusations either!
I.E.
The above document should be easily obtained from the Lehigh County Office of
Court Clerks! IOW I was NEVER allowed to defend myself against numerous perjured
false accusations as detailed in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=ja362v4amltqohp97uo053rju5erbf80qr%404ax.com
Subject: Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:23:54 -0600
Message-ID: <ja362v4amltqohp97...@4ax.com>
Andrea E. Naugle
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
You speak of smear well what about the people who still thrust that failed
lawsuit up to my face as if it had any validity. McVay ET AL claim all of the
above was "accepted as fact" YET it was totally dismissed when the court waqs
made aware that I wasn't given a chance to refute it! SUCH ARE THE WAYS OF SHIT
LIKE YOIU STEVE MOCK!
>Steven Mock
Tavish
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=66afnv0e8q6h7m3g7k086el6rsbp6otg5m%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: B'nai Brith Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge Against
America, Capitalism, and Christianity R_0928
Message-ID: <66afnv0e8q6h7m3g7...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Sep 2003 03:38:45 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=4hqc8vk12rdfbqn575samfs4bf85sqji3r%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Why Does B'nai Brith Ally Itself With THUGS Even its Stooge Ken McVay
Condemns?
Message-ID: <4hqc8vk12rdfbqn57...@4ax.com>
Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:49:45 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=p0afnvchj52pcuh6c0dk78f9bs7ngfetac%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: NIZKOR.ORG Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge Against
America, Capitalism, and Christianity R_0928
Message-ID: <p0afnvchj52pcuh6c...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Sep 2003 03:38:54 GMT
Sara Salzman
Doktor Tavische <Doktor_...@TAVISCHE-GMBH-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:
FORGED headers, altered headers, deleted information DELETED.
You really can't help youserlf, can you, Mr. Bradbury?
Have you checked on the DATES of the information you referred Dr.
Homeland to?
Idiot.
Sara
--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
Doktor Tavische
<catamont-DF8081...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>Have
We all know that you fist your worm infested vagina and probably your rectum but
have you ever tried fisting your big mouth?
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
Perhaps your husband will get carried away with his torture on you and strangle
you to death and then the world will be less one crackpot neurotic slut pig!
I.E.
Sara "The Fist" Salzman on Safe Torture
Subject: Re: What is power? (was Re: Power Imbalance v. Power Exchange)
In article <3gv6bm$4...@crl9.crl.com>, ver...@crl.com (Janet W. Hardy) wrote:
> Quick straw poll here: How many people have ever felt totally,
> completely safe during any S/M scene -- safeword or no, light or heavy,
> D/S or sensation-only?
Verdant:
I hate to muddle the semantics further, but... safe? You mean safe that my
Master won't break my leg or suffocate me to the point of death in a scene?
100%. Period. I know my Master would never cause tha kind of damage.
Safe, as in not getting hurt, or not getting hurt MORE thn I'd LIKE to accept?
Certianly not 100%. Mastercat is always pushing limits, and pushing me to
the edge or slightly farther.
But safe in terms of not getting killed or left in bondage to die alone?
Absolutely 100%. And not only with my own Master, but I feel equally safe
with those other Dom(mes) he has had me play with. Perrrfect <END>
You never know that your Master just may slip! Here's hoping for a miracle!
From: (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: Edeiken v. Bradbury: Affidavit
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-A2.01
Last-Modified: 2001/02/07
AFFIDAVIT
I, Sara Salzman, being duly sworn, state as follows:
[...]
15. That Daylin Leach refused to act to halt the campaign of harassment
and stated that if Deponent wished to avoid such harassment, that she
should "stop bothering" Defendant Bradbury...
16. That in response to her complaint and concerns for the safety of
her immediate and extended family, Daylin Leach informed Deponent that she
was a "crackpot" and that the activities of Deponent and other Jews on the
Internet was a "big joke."... <END>
Now get a life you hysterical crackpot and stop bothering me!
Tavish
Now go fist yourself you repulsive pig slob!
Sara Salzman
Doktor Tavische <Doktor_...@TAVISCHE-GMBH-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:
FORGED headers, altered headers, deleted information DELETED.
--
Steven Mock
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:44:27 GMT,
> <Xns94248190DFB9...@140.99.99.130> Steven Mock
> <sm...@nizkor.org> wrote:
>
>>david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote in
>>news:b7fe1abc.0310...@posting.google.com:
>
> What Steve Mock left out because of his being in denial:
Or because I don't care.
Do you have any idea how boring you are?
<snip>
Steven Mock
steve wolk
"david_michael" <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:b7fe1abc.0310...@posting.google.com...
And the psycho-psychotherapist, antisemitic, thuggish, stalking,
bigotted,Nazi sympathizer and apologist who lies as naturally as he draws
breath isn't fit to kiss the feet of any of them.
.
Doktor Tavische
<catamont-4BD634...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>FORGED headers, altered headers
I forged no headers you stupid slob! You made those posts and there is no
denying it! Care to deny you made those posts I quoted?
BTW I will make this one concession to you now:
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Fist Fucking
:
By the way... Elbow Grease IS WATER SOLUABLE.
Says so right on the label.
We've found for MANY things, it is "wetter" and slicker than KY.
Your mileage may, of course, vary.
Perrrfect
--
It never rains under my umbrella
~~End~~
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
Now do you want to address some real FORGERIES? For a fact you made those posts
detailed above and also for a FACT Yale F. Edeiken took other people's postings
and then signed them as Doc Tavish in his sworn statements he made against me in
a civil court.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
Excerpt:
>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
>Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
>
>IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
>
>CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
>
>YALE F. EDEIKEN :
> :
>Plaintiff :
> :
>vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
> :
>
>SCOTT BRADBURY
> 24. That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>"You only want to blow Joe
>You want to suck Joe's Aryan cock, don't you Yale?
> Doc Tavish"
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-1."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=1201801624195636%40unribbed.net&rnum=1
From: earlt...@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Vapor, Fatelvis, Bull Conner & B9Predator. Prepare for the worst.
Date: 1999/01/08
Message-ID: <12018016...@unribbed.net>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915759892 24.65.203.77
(Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT)
Organization: @Home Network Canada
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT
Newsgroups: soc.culture.african.american,alt.flame.niggers
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: PIN JOE DOWN AND SUCK HIS COCK
> > Isn't strange that Yale has only two little harmless posts to offer
> >in his insane attempts to slander?
>
> If they are harmless why are your associates so upset. Indeed you
> admit that. If they were "harmless" they could not be "slander" (they
> aren't, of course).
>
> > REMEMBER: THEY ONLY SMEAR THE ONES THEY FEAR.
>
> But I neither fear you or smear you.
you only want to blow joe
you want to suck joes aryan cock dont you yale
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Not sent by me, not signed "Doc Tavish" and it's from a regular ISP too!
That is perjury submitting falsified evidence!
> 31 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
> "So why do you still want to suck his cock?
>Do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood?
>
> Doc Tavish"
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=0901801802535739%40hexer.org&output=gplain
From: Laz <hell...@home.com>
Subject: I'm targeted for what? damn.
Date: 1999/01/05
Message-ID: <09018018...@hexer.org>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915502345 24.2.101.226 (Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25
PDT)
Organization: @Home Network
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
> It is now 8 days since this lying nazi bragged that he would have my
> service with enter.net discontinued.
>
> My e-mail address is still ya...@enter.net,
>
> He is still a nazi.
>
> He is still a liar.
>
> He is still a punk.
>
>
> --YFE
so why do you still want to suck his cock
do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Yale got the author and date wrong too and the post was not signed
Doc Tavish as he claimed in his perjured statement.
> 34 That on December 8, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>All Nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
>custody until a final solution can be made.
>
> Doc Tavish"
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A11."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1B209C3CD.7C009BBF34A90591%40library-proxy.airnews.net&output=gplain
From: Pee Kitty <Pki...@mariner.cris.com>
Subject: Re: Furmanski is lame
Date: 1998/12/20
Message-ID:
<84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1...@library-proxy.airnews.net>#1/1
X-Orig-Message-ID: <20129820...@grinding.net>
NNTP-Posting-Time: Sun Dec 20 21:15:30 1998
Organization: Digital Highway (using Airnews.net!)
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library3
Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at dhc.net to report improper postings
Newsgroups: alt.slack,alt.newsangels
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Nizkook Band
> References: <19981207212932...@ng-cb1.aol.com>
> X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> Message-ID: <366ca...@news3.enter.net>
> Date: 7 Dec 1998 22:57:39 +0500
all nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
custody until a final solution can be made
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Once again a post Yale admitted in a sworn statement signed "Doc Tavish"
when it is obvious another person posted it! PERJURY!!!!!
THE FOLLOWING IS THE CROWN OF MANUFACTURING EVIDENCE AND REMEMBER ALL OF THIS
FALSE TESTIMONY WAS SUBMITTED TO A CIVIL COURT AS SWORN STATEMENTS BY CRIMINAL
PERJURER NAMED YAL F. EDEIKEN OF ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA!!
The following false contrived accusation is the pinnacle of perjury or
manufacturing of evidence to be submitted as sworn testimony in a court of law
and this was done by a Plaintiff (who was his own attorney and who is an
attorney) against the Defendant; me. I will slam dunk this criminality in full
just below!
> 39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
>buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
>assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
>with an ice pick Yale!"
>
> --digsig
> Authentic Doc Tavish
>
> 191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
> qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
> 4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
Positive proof 100% that the Plaintiff willfully and most maliciously lied to a
civil court with the above accusation:
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=d0ic0v81gdhrd1djqe4k4k2mnvq4c4sdi5%404ax.com&output=gplain
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>
39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken
<end>
Notice what was said in an anonymous post (shown just below) and the date of the
post and compare it to what Yale F. Edeiken charges just above! Remember Yale
claimed I e-mailed the above to him and he claimed I signed it and had my
digital signature and this was done in a sworn document admitted to a civil
court of law!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=199902171515.KAA08970%40domains.invweb.net
From: Anonymous (nob...@openpgp.net)
Subject: Re: Joe Bellinger, Proven Liar
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Date: 1999/02/17
> > >>It is thus established that:
> > >>
> > >> - Joe Bellinger stated that he does, in fact, "post deliberate
> > >>misinformation".
> > >> - Joe Bellinger denied having made said statement.
> > >> - Joe Bellinger is, therefore, a liar.
> > >>
> > >>To coin a phrase: GAME, SET, MATCH.
> > >Did anyone expect any different result?
> > LOL! For grown men, you are all so childish.
:
> Expecting some minimal level of honesty -- a low standard which
> you seem incapable of meeting -- is hardly "childish."
>
> It frightens me that, with attitudes like this, you are raising a
> child.
>
> In article <19990112213243...@ng31.aol.com>,
> deb...@aol.com
> (Debunks) wrote: "I post deliberate misinformation . . ."
>
> --YFE
You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!
~~End of GOOGLE aka DejaCom Archive~~
Notice the above was an anonymous post. It was not an e-mail and notice that it
had no digital signature signed by me! Also notice the big difference in dates
the above was posted February 17, 1999 yet Yale accuses me: "That on November
11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an electronic communication stating in
pertinent part (the above EXACT quoted text)"
Witness this:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=6&ic=1&selm=osjdbt41kq8ov7moqagjivihjnda67vadt%404ax.com
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:07:41 -0600
Message-ID: <osjdbt41kq8ov7moq...@4ax.com>
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish,alt.conspiracy
Subject: "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 05:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <96fnp3$2bar$1...@news.tht.net>
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
<stop>
Crypto Kong does not insert blank lines in between "Authentic Doc Tavish"
and the crypto-text as confirmed by the software's author to both myself
and my attorney!
Here is the official reply to my inquiry:
X-Sender: jam...@shell11.ba.best.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:51:20 -0800
To: Scott Bradbury <xx...@flash.net>
From: "James A. Donald"
Subject: Re: Inquiry on Crypto-Kong Signatures
Cc: "Daylin B. Leach - Attorney at Law" <xxx...@aol.com>
--
At 0412 AM 2/23/2001 -0600, Scott Bradbury wrote
> The above forged digital signataure is verbatim and is exactly which was
> presented to the court.
To be presented to the court, it must be alleged to have signed
something. A digital signature without the text that it signed is of no
significance.
(Note: I did not include Yale's fabricated e-mail- I just sent Mr. Donald
the forged digital signature.)
> The digsig also has a blank line in between "Authentic Doc
> Tavish" and the bogus crypto-text. Your software does not do this in
> ANY example I've ever seen.
That is perfectly true. My program does not emit such blank lines, which
suggest fabrication, but not strong evidence of anything much, since the
blank line could have arisen from various accidents in transferring text
from one program to another.
> I do this for the benefit of my attorney. -)
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
GnwV4rmsIA8faEZwt0YOXUiSSJflZjiLd/kTrWIn
4F1jg73LTqhfLPw9BVz2uDGwa7v2WYBG0wNGHSkoM
<END>
--
As for Mr. Donald's statement: "the blank line could have arisen from
various accidents in transferring text from one program to another"-
the above fabricated signature from Edeiken's complaint is verbatim in the
group of false accusations known as "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE
DEEMED ADMITTED." Notice Mr. Donald's digsig? No spaces and blank lines!
Notice my digsig made on this paragraph alone?
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
ejnWmIh1JCyv0DNQedTMFE/cAfXBLuqdxSAkk9w/
4O0CysIswhm2G04W2mJFeW7C7K5RHQkNr3oFBzH6X
NO BLANK LINES AND SPACES!
What are the penalties for submitting manufactured evidence?
[...]
Here is Yale making his false accusation in public forum:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3920d160.112256232%40news.flash.net&rnum=1
Subject: Yale's Anonymous Post Signed By Me?! What an Oaf! aka Re: Bradbury
Caught in a Psychotic Delusional Rage
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <3920d160....@news.flash.net>
On Tue, 16 May 2000 04:12:22 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
<GU3U4.3347$v%5.24...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=GU3U4.3347%24v%255.242633%40newshog.newsread.com&output=gplain
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3920c22c....@news.flash.net...
[...]
>> > Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who write anonumus
>> >notes to others like:
>> >
>> > " You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your
>> >butt buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and
>> >character assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly
>> >work you over with an ice pick Yale!"
>> The above is just exactly what you said it is Yale, "anonumus" your word!
>> Just because you are a paranoid and have a psychotic dislike of me does
>> not mean every thing you imagine comes from me.
:
> It came from you
Then why didn't you show the headers which would show so Yale?
>and was signed by you.
Then why didn't you show my signature? If I signed it and it was from me
as you claim why do you call it "anonumus"? It would not be so if were
truly from me as headers would show and it actually had my signature!
What did you say in just another post about the "e-mail" above Yale? Your
own words again: "Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who
write anonumus notes to others like:" It's ANONYMOUS Yale! You've said so!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=Ms1U4.3324%24v%255.238968%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=1
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Nradbury Goes Off the Deep End
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <Ms1U4.3324$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
(Exact quote for the record)
" I think you need a good psychiatirc examination. Perhaps you should ask
your shrink about people who write anonumus notes to others like: " You
are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt buddy
Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!""
No headers and no signature.
I guess the above is fair proof that Yale likes to forge e-mail even if it
is in his word "anonumus."
>> Your failure to do the same is noted. And will be by the judge.
>> --YFE
~~End of GOOGLE Archive Excerpt (With updated GOOGLE links)~~
PERJURY!!
REMEMBER ALL OF THE ABOVE CRIMINAL FALSIFICATION CAME FROM A BASTARD WHO HAS
ALREADT BEEN PUBLICLY CENSURED BY THE HIGHEST COURT IN HIS STATE!!
I.E.
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
BTW Sara-- even though you as a pathological bitch liar keep claiming that
lawsuit was truthful and was "accepted as fact" and all based upon me not
replying and Yale getting a judgment against me was completely overturned and
dismissed!
Care to deny these FACTS?
The above document should be easily obtained from the Lehigh County Office of
Court Clerks! IOW I was NEVER allowed to defend myself against numerous perjured
false accusations!
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
BTW don't forget these:
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
IOW for the dull witted; I WON!! CASE CLOSED!! MOVE ON!!!
BTW don't overlook this document either!!
<Start>
September 26, 2001
Yale F. Edeiken
918 N BAYARD ST
Allentown, PA 18104-3759
Dear Mr. Edeiken:
Very truly yours,
The Attachment:
<Start>
V.
ORDER
PER CURIAM
<STOP>
HARDLY LOOKS LIKE THE COURTS STILL ACCEPTED YAL'S LIES AS FACTS DOES IT!?
I have been advised that I can still take action against Yale, you, and the rest
of the vermin who smear me with those lies and especially so seeing how you
shits know the truth but persist in your lies. Yale won't think it is so damned
funny when he loses his law license! I am pressing for more action and once I
harpoon that fat whale then I am going to hold you accountable for your perjury
you lying whore!
Now go fist yourself you disgusting pig and know sooner or later you are going
to be held accountable! BTW you should download that file the Disciplinary Board
has on your pimp!
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
You will notice the initial complaint again st you pimp was filed May 254, 1996
BUT it was April 20, 1998 that yale was CENSURED by the highest court in his
state and if you read the report he had to be forced to attend his disciplinary
action by a special court order and remember that fat bastard was the one who
said others were cowards for not showing up at depositions not agreed to!
Sooner or later that fat bastard will get precisely what he deserves and I am
filing new complaints detailing all of legal system abuse and hopefully he will
lose his law license. Too bad the bastard can't make a living with SHAKLEE. It
appears the complaints about false advertising were acted upon and the op was
shut down!
Let us count the victories and losses:
1) Yale lost lawsuit against me
2) Yale lost his appeal against me
3) Yale lost his lawsuit against David Michael
4) Wendy Edeiken lost her SHAKLEE franchise (due to legit complaints about false
advertising and the threats of lawsuits against me for exposing it?)
5) Patrick L. Humphrey fired from Rice University for stalking people
a) Patrick lost his pension
b) Patrick lost his medical insurance
Truly deserving outcomes for all the shit who gloated with glee about Yale
getting a judgment against me and that is was "Bradburied who was going to get
busted and wind up living under a bridge and collecting cans for scrap"
No wonder why you vermin hate me so much BUT you all had it coming!
I haven't had any losses really to speak and don't forget-- sooner or later
McVay will be compelled to account for that $50,000+ tax share he cheated the
CCRA out of!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=07qc8vguuom77pvmugliksb3dmdf8pp82r%404ax.com&rnum=6
Subject: Did NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Pay Tax On Those $50k+ Donations He
Denies Receiving From the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund
Message-ID: <07qc8vguuom77pvmu...@4ax.com>
Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:49:22 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=453fevk7jgu8ctdt45a4coabbfgo9k5dns%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Article on Ken McVay _mc...@internet.fighter_ (Also Helps Prove He's a
Liar) R_0611
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 15:20:32 -0500
Message-ID: <453fevk7jgu8ctdt4...@4ax.com>
The whole lot of you belong behind bars!
YOU ARE A CRIMINAL SARA!! MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS TO A CIVIL COURT IS A CRIMINAL
OFFENSE!! YOU HAVE MUTIPLE COUNTS AGAINST YOU TOO!
Tavish
---Undeniable proof Patrick "Peeping Tom" Humphrey has a mental disorder:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=50ht24%24l0g%40anarchy.io.com
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960808...@omni.cc.purdue.edu>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey
Here is what some experts say about Patrick's behavior:
http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/db/issues/99/10.28/news.peeping.html
Voyeurism at root of Peeping Tom incidents
CRIME: Cases uncommon on campus; recent arrest one of seven since 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Linh Tat Daily Bruin Contributor Although everyone has heard the term
"Peeping Tom" before, most people may still be in the dark when it comes to
understanding the nature of this criminal offense. Many people may label a
person who secretly observes another undressing or in the nude as a Peeping Tom,
but they do not always consider that those who repeatedly commit this offense
may suffer from a psychological disorder.... <END>
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/0responses/2000-0919.resp.html
...In November 1997, after reviewing police reports that implicated petitioner
as a suspect in a "Peeping Tom" incident that occurred in the vicinity of the
rape, NCIS reopened its investigation. Pet. App. 23a. Thereafter, the NCIS
office in Hawaii asked NCIS Special Agent John McNutt, assigned to the NCIS
office in Memphis, Tennessee, to interrogate petitioner, who was living in
Memphis, and to ask him to provide NCIS with a sample of his blood. Id. at 24a.
After learning that petitioner was receiving medical treatment at the
Veteran's Administration (VA) Hospital in Memphis, McNutt contacted the VA and
was allowed to review petitioner's medical records. Pet. App. 24a. During that
review, McNutt learned that petitioner was being treated for diabetes and a
mental disorder.... <END>
Did everyone notice "Peeping Tom" and mental disorder were used in the police
report? Notice the source? Did everyone note Patrick wants to PEEP on a male
which would make him a GAY Peeping Tom as well!
Doktor Tavische
Steven Mock <sm...@nizkor.org> wrote:
>Doktor Tavische <Doktor_...@TAVISCHE-GMBH-CENTRAL.NET> wrote in
>news:qse2qv8cg41a1hvh8...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:44:27 GMT,
>> <Xns94248190DFB9...@140.99.99.130> Steven Mock
>> <sm...@nizkor.org> wrote:
>>
>>>david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote in
>>>news:b7fe1abc.0310...@posting.google.com:
>>
>> What Steve Mock left out because of his being in denial:
Home Page: http://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/index.html
AND
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
REMEMBER-- Be nice!
>Or because I don't care.
You don't care that an attorney who has done legal work for The Nizkor Project
was censured by the highest court in his state and had to be forced to appear?
What does one of your pals have to do before you will condemn them as criminal
elements?
>Do you have any idea how boring you are?
Only to shit like you who won't accept their pals are criminals and con men.
><snip>
You won't address the issue because you won't deal in facts and the facts are--
the majority of your fellow travelers are liars, con men, and just plain common
criminals!
BTW you will always be in denial about your cohorts and their criminal activity.
Tavish
>Steven Mock
Steven Mock
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:23:50 GMT,
> <Xns9424D9A93F3E...@140.99.99.130> Steven Mock
> <sm...@nizkor.org> wrote:
<snip>
>>Or because I don't care.
>
> You don't care that an attorney who has done legal work for The Nizkor
> Project was censured by the highest court in his state and had to be
> forced to appear?
>
> What does one of your pals have to do before you will condemn them as
> criminal elements?
Is that what your post was about? I have to admit, I didn't read it. But
then again, I very rarely read anything by you anymore, seeing as its
almost invariably off-topic, inconsequential and - as I have already
explained - very, very boring.
>>Do you have any idea how boring you are?
>
> Only to shit like you who won't accept their pals are criminals and
> con men.
Shall I take that as a "no", then?
Steven Mock
Gord McFee
<news:s3c3qvcrngu2lliek...@4ax.com>, Doktor Tavische wrote:
"My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong you dirty
filthy lying Jew bastard!"
"I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of my
posts prove so! You can't discern the difference. BTW my name is not
Fatboy you stupid kike."
-- Scott Bradbury, who never calls people names and is an expert in irony
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Gord McFee
Gord McFee
<news:vb93qv4ao5h1h4kpj...@4ax.com>, Doktor Tavische wrote:
> I forged no headers you stupid slob!
"My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong you dirty
filthy lying Jew bastard!"
"I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of my
posts prove so! You can't discern the difference. BTW my name is not
Fatboy you stupid kike."
-- Scott Bradbury, who never calls people names and is an expert in irony
Sara Salzman
Doktor Tavische <Doktor_...@TAVISCHE-GMBH-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:42:11 -0700,
> <catamont-4BD634...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >FORGED headers, altered headers
>
> I forged no headers you stupid slob! You made those posts and there is no
> denying it! Care to deny you made those posts I quoted?
Yes, you disgusting tub of lard, I do deny it. You have FORGED headers,
ALTERED headers, DELETED information from headers.
That's why I said:
FORGED headers, altered headers, deleted information from headers, you
brain dead moron.
>
> BTW I will make this one concession to you now:
>
> Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
FORGED HEADER
> From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
> Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
> Subject: Fist Fucking
DELETED INFORMATION FROM HEADER
> :
> By the way... Elbow Grease IS WATER SOLUABLE.
> Says so right on the label.
> We've found for MANY things, it is "wetter" and slicker than KY.
> Your mileage may, of course, vary.
> Perrrfect
> --
> It never rains under my umbrella
> ~~End~~
And once again, please explain why a discussion about whether a
lubricant is water-soluable is such a problem for you.
>
> Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
FORGED HEADERF
> From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
> Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
> Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
DELETED INFORMATION FROM HEADER
> In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
> Antoniou) wrote:
> > Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> > of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> > all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> > suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> > on to say *exactly that*.
> In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
> just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
> I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
> fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
> impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
> Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
> and "fisting" herself!
> http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
> http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
Please explain:
1. Where ANYONE said anything about "assuming" a "duck position"?
2. Where ANYONE said anything about people "fisting themselves"?
3. WHy you are obsessed with fisting?
4. Why you are obsessead with your fantasy me "fisting myself," which,
if nothing else, is about as physically possible as YOU fucking yourself?
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404
> ax.com&rnum=1
> Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
> Works and Opinions
> Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
> Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
This is merely YOUR compilation of the same things, FORGED headers,
ALTERED HEADERS, and INFORMATION DELETED from headers.
>
> Now do you want to address some real FORGERIES? For a fact you made those
> posts
> detailed above and also for a FACT Yale F. Edeiken took other people's
> postings
> and then signed them as Doc Tavish in his sworn statements he made against me
> in
> a civil court.
Nope, that's a lie, too. Face it, Mr. Bradbury, you're a lair and a
forger.
[crap snipped]
I couldn't give a rat's ass about your feud with Yale. Take it up with
your DA, he needs a good laugh, I'm sure.
And just remember, when you finally get off your ass and try to do
something, all those hundreds of times YOU have posted my address, all
those hundreds of times YOU have posted the aobve altered and forged
posts, will come back to bite you in the ass.
Once again, you're going to die a very lonely, hateful old man.
Sara
Patrick Keenan
news:Xns94259F9AE59...@140.99.99.130...
I personally find it more amusing to see Mr. Bradbury scrambling to give
support to the people who laud the attacks on his own country... *nothing*
is as important to him as his personal issues. Now we'll see him deny
this, but in a while he'll be back supporting them again.
-pk
>
> Steven Mock
National Front
>Edeiken Disciplined by The Disciplinary Board
>From: david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael)
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>Date: 30 Oct 2003 04:32:14 -0800
>Organization: http://groups.google.com
>Message-ID: <b7fe1abc.0310...@posting.google.com>
>References: <q5u6hvshtk3bjqj6d...@4ax.com>
><i537hvg6vgq59g55p...@4ax.com>
><5MTQa.1588$ym.4...@news20.bellglobal.com>
><catamont-1EDD05...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
><rro8hvokakrg7vfrm...@4ax.com>
><catamont-4FBA0A...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
><11a9hvoh7jarecmhd...@4ax.com>
><ln40qv0nimor169n0...@4ax.com>
><gs80qv02fg2241ds2...@4ax.com>
><1rk0qvk1r5igq1isi...@4ax.com>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.78.121.51
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>X-Trace: posting.google.com 1067517134 21984 127.0.0.1 (30 Oct 2003 12:32:14
>GMT)
>X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:32:14 +0000 (UTC)
I didn't discover alt.revisionism until after Eideken abandoned AR for
being exposed as a shyster, but I still agree with you.
>McVay -- man who has an unhealthy interest in young girls and whose
>representations of Nizkor's financial doings and of his own career
>are, to say the least, questionable.
Agreed.
>Ragland -- man who boasts in a public newsgroup about his exotic
>erotic interests.
Agreed, I read one of his posts wherein he comments about viewing women
having sex with animals via the Internet.
>Murphy -- man who took an interest in necrophilia (!) (I jest not,
>lurkers . . .)
And has a "Bizarre Penguin Lust" homepage with penguins in anthropomorphic
BDSM poses -- including necrophilia with penguins. See for yourself:
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/deppitybob/PENGUINS/peng7.html
>Salzman -- woman who published her sado-masochistic fantasies . . .
>
Not to mention giving advice to others on how to whip one's self with a
ceiling fan and leather strips.
>I believe we've also had a Kevin someone-or-other who turned out to be
>a Satanist!
Never heard of him but, I am not surprised considering how many nuts there
are on the anti-Revisionist side.
>Such are the people who come here to argue against revisionism!
>
>David
>http://www.nationalanarchist.com
>
>PS -- good bit of research, Bradbury. You're improving.
>
Doc Tavish does a great job in exposing the corruption in Nizkor's
organization. The San Antonio trust fund's existence was acknowledged by
ex-Nizkorite Jamie McCarthy, but Ken McVay still denies its existence and that
he received $50,000.00 -- which probably leaves Hilary Ostrov wondering:
"where's my cut?" Does McVay take Hilary Ostrov for a fool?
NF
--
"OK, I see we're you're confused."
--Charles Don Hall, Licensed Philosopher
Reginald H. C. McTavish
<catamont-4BD634...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>FORGED headers, altered headers
I forged no headers you stupid slob! You made those posts and there is no
denying it! Care to deny you made those posts I quoted?
BTW I will make this one concession to you now:
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Fist Fucking
:
By the way... Elbow Grease IS WATER SOLUABLE.
Says so right on the label.
We've found for MANY things, it is "wetter" and slicker than KY.
Your mileage may, of course, vary.
Perrrfect
--
It never rains under my umbrella
~~End~~
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
Now do you want to address some real FORGERIES? For a fact you made those posts
detailed above and also for a FACT Yale F. Edeiken took other people's postings
and then signed them as Doc Tavish in his sworn statements he made against me in
a civil court.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
Excerpt:
PERJURER NAMED YALE F. EDEIKEN OF ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA!!
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
<end>
digital signature and this was done in a sworn document admitted to a civil
court of law!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=199902171515.KAA08970%40domains.invweb.net
Witness this:
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
<stop>
<END>
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Nradbury Goes Off the Deep End
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <Ms1U4.3324$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
(Exact quote for the record)
" I think you need a good psychiatirc examination. Perhaps you should ask
your shrink about people who write anonumus notes to others like: " You
are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt buddy
Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!""
No headers and no signature.
I guess the above is fair proof that Yale likes to forge e-mail even if it
is in his word "anonumus."
>> Your failure to do the same is noted. And will be by the judge.
>> --YFE
~~End of GOOGLE Archive Excerpt (With updated GOOGLE links)~~
PERJURY!!
REMEMBER ALL OF THE ABOVE CRIMINAL FALSIFICATION CAME FROM A BASTARD WHO HAS
ALREADY BEEN PUBLICLY CENSURED BY THE HIGHEST COURT IN HIS STATE!!
I.E.
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
BTW Sara-- even though you as a pathological bitch liar keep claiming that
lawsuit was truthful and was "accepted as fact" and all based upon me not
replying and Yale getting a judgment against me was completely overturned and
dismissed!
Care to deny these FACTS?
Filed September 22, 2000
The above document should be easily obtained from the Lehigh County Office of
Court Clerks! IOW I was NEVER allowed to defend myself against numerous perjured
false accusations!
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
BTW don't forget these:
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
IOW for the dull witted; I WON!! CASE CLOSED!! MOVE ON!!!
BTW don't overlook this document either!!
<Start>
September 26, 2001
Yale F. Edeiken
918 N BAYARD ST
Allentown, PA 18104-3759
Dear Mr. Edeiken:
Very truly yours,
The Attachment:
<Start>
V.
ORDER
PER CURIAM
<STOP>
HARDLY LOOKS LIKE THE COURTS STILL ACCEPTED YALE'S LIES AS FACT DOES IT!?
Tavish
--Dean Wormer's advice would apply to Sara "The Fist" Salzman
"Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life..."
Dean Wormer to Flounder in the movie _Animal House_
http://www.uselessmoviequotes.com/umq_a005.htm
(Archived locally as: FatDrunk)
wav file archived=sarafatdrunk
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=apbjcvg26ov1u9lf2ombh65t8depv2btg7%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Did Sara "The Fist" Salzman's S&M/Drug HomeLife Result in Two "GIFTED"
Children? I.E. Genetics/Lifestyles?...
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 00:13:21 -0500
Message-ID: <apbjcvg26ov1u9lf2...@4ax.com>
Sara "The Fist" Salzman: Quintessential homeliness in the flesh:
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif <Sitting and authoring S&M<
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif <Standing Medusa look<
Sara Salzman
Reginald H. C. McTavish <RHCMc...@TAVISH-CENTRAL001.NET> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:42:11 -0700,
> <catamont-4BD634...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >FORGED headers, altered headers
>
> I forged no headers you stupid slob! You made those posts and there is no
> denying it! Care to deny you made those posts I quoted?
>
Yes.
I have responded to your "care to denyt it?" many times already.
Yes.
I deny what you continue to repost hundreds of times, and I have denied
it in the past.
YOU forged headers. YOU changed information. YOU deleted information.
There is no such person as "Sara the Fist." Therefore, ANYTHING YOU
continue to cut and paste that contains that phrase is a FORGERY.
By the way, where are the DATES of these posts, Mr. Bradbury?
And WHY is the water-soluability of a lubricant so offensive to you?
And why are discussions of consesual sex IN THE APPROPRIATE newsgroups
so offensive to you?
YOU are the one who continues to re-post them in inappropriate
newsgroups. YOU are the one abusing Usenet.
LIVE WITH IT.
Sara
Reginald H. C. McTavish
<catamont-BA8D3A...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>And why are discussions of consesual sex
Since when is "fisting" your big fat twat having consensual sex you fat pig?
Stay stupid you swine!
Gord McFee
GMT, Reginald H. C. McTavish <RHCMc...@TAVISH-CENTRAL001.NET> wrote:
"My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name
call is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me
wrong you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!"
"I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of
my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference. BTW my name is not
Fatboy you stupid kike."
-- Scott Bradbury, who never calls people names and is an expert in
Sara Salzman
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 20:08:26 -0700,
<catamont-BA8D3A...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> And why are discussions of consensual sex
>
> Since when is "fisting" your big fat twat having consensual sex
>you fat pig?
>
Oh, my GOD. Can you REALLY be this stupid?
I have TRIED to say this subtly.
I have TRIED to point out to you your ignorant and idiotic
misaprehension.
Apparently, you are SO COMPLETELY stupid, that only simple one-syllable
words will do:
IT'S NOT MY FIST.
IT IS THE FIST OF SOME-ONE ELSE.
Got that? A CONSENSUAL partner.
You assume (making an ass of yourself) something else because you have
NO understanding or experience of male-female relationships.
> Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
FORGED AND ALTERED HEADER
> From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
> Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
> Subject: Fist Fucking
> :
Really?! And what was the DATE of this? And why did you DELETE IT?
> By the way... Elbow Grease IS WATER SOLUABLE.
> Says so right on the label.
> We've found for MANY things, it is "wetter" and slicker than KY.
> Your mileage may, of course, vary.
> Perrrfect
> --
> It never rains under my umbrella
> ~~End~~
And for the thousandth time, why are you so obsessed with a discussion
about the water-soluability of Elbow Grease?
> Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
FORGER AND ALTERED HEADER
> From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
> Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
A completely appropriate newsgroup for the discussion below. YOU,
however, continue to re-post it in INAPPROPRIATE groups, such as
alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
Really?! And what was the DATE of this? And why did you DELETE IT?
> In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
> Antoniou) wrote:
> > Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> > of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> > all fingers together.
GOT THAT, IDIOT?!?!? FINGERS. It's a HAND position, you brain-damaged
loony. You automatically assume it's something else because you are a
disgusting piece of offal.
> > What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> > suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> > on to say *exactly that*.
> In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
> just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
> I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that
> fist fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely
> wanted to impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
> Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
Imagine Mr. Bradbury making a complete idiot of himself.
Imagine Mr. Bradbury making assumptions based on his a) complete lack of
experience; b) complete lack of understanding of human anatomy; and c)
complete fixation onthings he has absolutely no comprehension of.
> Stay stupid you swine!
Looks like YOU are the stupid one, Idiot. Your unbelievable stupidity is
only matched by your increible ignorance.
Sara
--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
Ken McVay, OBC
news:catamont-F20D8B...@news-60.giganews.com...
> Ignorant Moron Scott Bradbury wrote:
[Blubbertubby's ignorant twaddle flushed straight down the bradbury]
> Apparently, you are SO COMPLETELY stupid, that only simple one-syllable
> words will do:
Wrong. One-syllable words will only confuse him with their complexity.
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/b/bradbury-scott
Reginald H. C. McTavish
<catamont-F20D8B...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara "The Fist" Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>Ignorant Moron Scott Bradbury wrote:
>
>On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 20:08:26 -0700,
><catamont-BA8D3A...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>>> And why are discussions of consensual sex
>>
>> Since when is "fisting" your big fat twat having consensual sex
>>you fat pig?
>>
>
>Oh, my GOD. Can you REALLY be this stupid?
>
>I have TRIED to say this subtly.
>
>I have TRIED to point out to you your ignorant and idiotic
>misaprehension.
>
>Apparently, you are SO COMPLETELY stupid, that only simple one-syllable
>words will do:
>
>IT'S NOT MY FIST.
>
>IT IS THE FIST OF SOME-ONE ELSE.
Hardly looks that way from your documentation!
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Fist Fucking
:
By the way... Elbow Grease IS WATER SOLUABLE.
Says so right on the label.
We've found for MANY things, it is "wetter" and slicker than KY.
Your mileage may, of course, vary.
Perrrfect
--
It never rains under my umbrella
~~End~~
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
LOOKS LIKE A SOLO ACT!!!!
Now go fist yourself you slob!
SUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEY SUE SUE SUEEEEY PIG PIG PIG PIG SUUUUUUUUUUUEEEEEY
>Sara
Tavish
Sara "The Fist" Salzman on Safe Torture
Subject: Re: What is power? (was Re: Power Imbalance v. Power Exchange)
In article <3gv6bm$4...@crl9.crl.com>, ver...@crl.com (Janet W. Hardy) wrote:
> Quick straw poll here: How many people have ever felt totally,
> completely safe during any S/M scene -- safeword or no, light or heavy,
> D/S or sensation-only?
Verdant:
I hate to muddle the semantics further, but... safe? You mean safe that my
Master won't break my leg or suffocate me to the point of death in a scene?
100%. Period. I know my Master would never cause tha kind of damage.
Safe, as in not getting hurt, or not getting hurt MORE thn I'd LIKE to accept?
Certianly not 100%. Mastercat is always pushing limits, and pushing me to
the edge or slightly farther.
But safe in terms of not getting killed or left in bondage to die alone?
Absolutely 100%. And not only with my own Master, but I feel equally safe
with those other Dom(mes) he has had me play with. Perrrfect <END>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
Sara Salzman
Reginald H. C. McTavish <RHCMc...@TAVISH-CENTRAL001.NET> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 19:50:06 -0700,
> <catamont-F20D8B...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara "The Fist" Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >Ignorant Moron Scott Bradbury wrote:
> >
> >On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 20:08:26 -0700,
> ><catamont-BA8D3A...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> ><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> >
> >>> And why are discussions of consensual sex
> >>
> >> Since when is "fisting" your big fat twat having consensual sex
> >>you fat pig?
> >>
> >
> >Oh, my GOD. Can you REALLY be this stupid?
> >
> >I have TRIED to say this subtly.
> >
> >I have TRIED to point out to you your ignorant and idiotic
> >misaprehension.
> >
> >Apparently, you are SO COMPLETELY stupid, that only simple one-syllable
> >words will do:
> >
> >IT'S NOT MY FIST.
> >
> >IT IS THE FIST OF SOME-ONE ELSE.
>
> Hardly looks that way from your documentation!
Oh, my GOD, He IS that stupid.
And thanks for proving it yet again.
Sara Salzman
"I (and Elf)"
That's TWO people, Moron. Two people who engage in a consensual act
involving a HAND POSITION.
> > > suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> > > on to say *exactly that*.
> > In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
> > just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
> > I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that
> > fist fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely
> > wanted to impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
> > Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
> and "fisting" herself!
>
> Imagine Mr. Bradbury making a complete idiot of himself.
>
> Imagine Mr. Bradbury making assumptions based on his a) complete lack of
> experience; b) complete lack of understanding of human anatomy; and c)
> complete fixation onthings he has absolutely no comprehension of.
>
> > Stay stupid you swine!
>
> Looks like YOU are the stupid one, Idiot. Your unbelievable stupidity is
> only matched by your incredible ignorance.
>
> Sara
And imagine Mr. Bradbury's total response to this is:
"Looks like a solo act."
Of course, anyone with two firing neurons would know that what Mr.
Bradbury's warped and vile imagination conjures up is physically
impossible.
Sort of like Mr. Bradbury having an honest relationship. Physically
impossible.
Doc Tavish
<catamont-4A4866...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>STILL waiting for Mr. Bradbury to address the FACTS....
>
>> Ignorant Moron Scott Bradbury wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 20:08:26 -0700,
>> <catamont-BA8D3A...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> And why are discussions of consensual sex
>> >
>> > Since when is "fisting" your big fat twat having consensual sex
>> >you fat pig?
>> >
>>
>> Oh, my GOD. Can you REALLY be this stupid?
>>
>> I have TRIED to say this subtly.
>>
>> I have TRIED to point out to you your ignorant and idiotic
>> misaprehension.
>>
>> Apparently, you are SO COMPLETELY stupid, that only simple one-syllable
>> words will do:
>>
>> IT'S NOT MY FIST.
>>
>> IT IS THE FIST OF SOME-ONE ELSE.
>>
>> Got that? A CONSENSUAL partner.
Looks like a solo act on YOUR part to me you fat disgusting pig or else why
would it matter what position you take when you fist YOURSELF? Why would you
say: "I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I just stated that
it was the eventual position to achieve. I'm sorry if I did not make that clear
in my post. I *did* state that fist fucking was not something I had done very
often, and merely wanted to impart my own (limited) experience" when all you
would have to do is "...lie face-up on the bed, my body a perfect X. Face up.
Oh, Goddess, he's going to whip my breasts" when your husband (The Master) whips
your fat ugly sagging breasts- which example I also include below?
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
AND
NOTE: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> was, at one time,
<ssch...@infinet.com> Sara Schwartz
From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: My Master Holds The Ropes Just So (poem)
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 114
Message-ID: <sschwartz-050...@p21.infinet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p21.infinet.com
My Master holds the rope just so.
He knows me. Knows my moods. Knows the fear behind my eyes, both real and
imagined.
Those eyes widen as he gently lays the rope down, as he carefully,
methodically, systematically, lays the toys down on the bed.
Soft moans escape from behind gagged lips. I have been told to watch.
To see each and know that soon each will touch me.
He looks up briefly as he lays each down on the bed. Checking reactions.
Watching.
The short whip. A sigh.
The deerskin. The suede.
The small braided thong, the one that stings. A short moan.
The horsehair that stings but never marks.
The canes. The paddles. A pause.
I wait, knowing.
The small velvet bag that holds clamps. Clamps too severe for my breasts,
yet applied anyway.
A gasp. And then his smile.
He knows me. He knows I will take the pain to please him. He knows the
sacrifice I make to his Gods of Pain. He sees the torment in my eyes. The
desire to please. The love. The fear of the pain.
My Master holds the rope just so.
Through his fingers, around my wrists, making delicate rings softer than
steel. Stronger than steel. One on each wrist, a gentle bracelet that is
soon pulled tight, stretched to the bedposts and wrapped tightly. One on
each ankle. No matter how I tighten my muscles as he wraps the rope, still
it is perfectly tight. The circulation moves.
The ankle does not.
I lie face-up on the bed, my body a perfect X. Face up. Oh, Goddess, he's
going to whip my breasts.
But first, two small wooden clothespins bob before my eyes. I turn my
head, remember I am instructed to watch, turn back. The clothespins bite
the delicate flesh of each nipple. Grasp. Sting. Burn. He waits.
My Master knows me. Knows he can whip me, clothespins and all. Knows the
pain, where it will hurt the most, what I can and cannot take.
He waits.
The burning increases as the pins are removed. Ah, he will not whip me
with clothespins in place. But the moment when I was unsure, when the
blood pounded in my temples and the fear covered me like a shroud, then he
watched my eyes.
The whip falls. Which one is it now? I cannot turn my head to see which he
reaches for. But I know them all. I arch my back, try to stay still.
My Master knows me. Knows I will hold position as long as possible, before
the pain forces me to writhe, to turn, to try in vain to shield my
breasts. Knows the moment when I can no longer stay still. And precisely
then, says gently, "Don't move."
My Master holds the rope just so. Gently tugging at the knots, to release
arms and legs from bondage. Gently unwraps each wrist, each ankle. Rubs
each, and kisses the places where the rope has left its mark. The gag is
removed. I swallow.
"Kneel."
I crouch on the bed, head down, ass up, as he mounts the bed behind me.
His hands caress my ass softly, then spank sharply. Slowly, quickly, his
hand falls upon my ass. I wait for the moment, the pain/pleasure as he
will enter me. But not yet. First a gentle tapping, soft touch, as he
marks the place the cane will fall. I brace myself, plead with myself to
hold position, knowing each stroke brings a fire hotter than any flame.
Five strokes. Six. I have not moved. As the pain from each begins to
subside, a soft, half-sob. "Thank you, Master."
Eight. Nine. My knees give out, and I fall to the bed, sobbing. But
immediately back on my knees again. "Thank you, Master."
Ten. I am aware of nothing, save the pain. And his voice, as I am
commanded to orgasm, not from stimulation, not from his fingers or his
cock, but from pain alone. My body responds without hesitation. My
pleasure is screamed out for his pleasure.
Later, I will feel his cock inside me. I will feel the force as he thrusts
deep into me, bruising the tender flesh with his strength. Later I will
come, and come, and come, but only by his command. Later, we will lie
back, exhausted, as he cradles me in his arms, strokes me gently, whispers
in my ear.
But not yet.
Now he rises from the bed, returns to the toys so carefully laid out before
me.
My Master holds the rope just so.
<END>
Need I say more other than Sara is a filthy nasty whore?
Tavish
Sara "The Fist" Salzman on Safe Torture
Subject: Re: What is power? (was Re: Power Imbalance v. Power Exchange)
In article <3gv6bm$4...@crl9.crl.com>, ver...@crl.com (Janet W. Hardy) wrote:
> Quick straw poll here: How many people have ever felt totally,
> completely safe during any S/M scene -- safeword or no, light or heavy,
> D/S or sensation-only?
Verdant:
I hate to muddle the semantics further, but... safe? You mean safe that my
Master won't break my leg or suffocate me to the point of death in a scene?
100%. Period. I know my Master would never cause tha kind of damage.
Safe, as in not getting hurt, or not getting hurt MORE thn I'd LIKE to accept?
Certianly not 100%. Mastercat is always pushing limits, and pushing me to
the edge or slightly farther.
But safe in terms of not getting killed or left in bondage to die alone?
Absolutely 100%. And not only with my own Master, but I feel equally safe
with those other Dom(mes) he has had me play with. Perrrfect <END>
From: Sara "The Fist" Salzman
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Sex slave looking for couple in D.C.
In article <3iajlv$1...@news.cc.geneseo.edu>, (Mindy and Aaron Proietti) wrote:
> Hello Tim. My name is Mindy and I am 23 years old. My husband Aaron and I
> just got married and we are looking for some new excitement in the bedroom. We
> are very interested in your offer, and we would like to get to know you (all of
> you) better. Please write back with a full (and true) description of yourself.
> Hope to hear from you soon. Mindy and Aaron
Mindy:
If you're in Washington, you should join The Power Exchange. It's a local
BBS that's exclusively for SM folks. They're some of the best folks
around. We've met many of the people from the Board personally, and at the
parties they hold. I highly recommend it! Sara <END>
--Sara "The Fist" Salzman comments on the above sig line with:
"And you have a problem with this post ... why?"
-From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
-Subject: Re: Sara "The Fist" Salzman Trying to Distance Herself From Her S&M
-Torture Bondage Lifestyle...
-Date: 19 May 2003 17:37:15 GMT
-Message-ID: <catamont-05928A...@news.spellbndr.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
Joebruno
I doubt that Fatboy is smart enough to realize he's a moron.
Sara Salzman
Doc Tavish <Doc_T...@TAVISH-AMERICAN-CENTRAL.NET> wrote:
Unbelievable. You really are some kind of brain-damaged pinhead, aren't
you?
Just for the sake of closure (because I'm not going to try and enlighten
you about this anymore), let's try once more:
Mature adults having discussions about sex often talk about what they
AND THEIR partners do.
I was discussing with Laura about what she AND HER PARTNER do.
Then I said I didn't have a lot of experience with it.
Where does it say "I do it to myself"?
It doesn't.
Because it is a physical impossibility.
I'd suggest you try to "fist yourself," but you're obviously too stupid
to understand basic anatomy. You would need about a 7' long ARM.
[COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL SNIPPED, along with forged and altered posts]
> Need I say more other than Sara is a filthy nasty whore?
You can say it all you want, but there's not a grain of truth in it. I
engage in consensual sex with my husband. Just like other married
couples do. Of course, you can't understand that, since the only lasting
relationship you've ever had was with your right hand.
SO tell us, Mr. Bradbury:
1. What is wrong with a married couple having sexual relations?
2. What is wrong with discussing a lubricant? I notice that K-Y now
advertises on television. Have you called their company to complain that
they are "perverts"?
3. What is wrong with recommending to interested parties a local BBS?
I'm looking forward to your response.
Doc Tavish
<catamont-4BD634...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>FORGED headers, altered headers
I forged no headers you stupid slob! You made those posts and there is no
denying it! Care to deny you made those posts I quoted?
BTW I will make this one concession to you now:
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Fist Fucking
:
By the way... Elbow Grease IS WATER SOLUABLE.
Says so right on the label.
We've found for MANY things, it is "wetter" and slicker than KY.
Your mileage may, of course, vary.
Perrrfect
--
It never rains under my umbrella
~~End~~
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
Now do you want to address some real FORGERIES? For a fact you made those posts
Excerpt:
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
<end>
Witness this:
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
<stop>
<END>
PERJURY!!
I.E.
<START>
ORDER
[...]
<STOP>
<Start>
September 26, 2001
Dear Mr. Edeiken:
Very truly yours,
The Attachment:
<Start>
V.
ORDER
PER CURIAM
<STOP>
Tavish
--Dean Wormer's advice would apply to Sara "The Fist" Salzman
"Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life..."
Dean Wormer to Flounder in the movie _Animal House_
http://www.uselessmoviequotes.com/umq_a005.htm
(Archived locally as: FatDrunk)
wav file archived=sarafatdrunk
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=apbjcvg26ov1u9lf2ombh65t8depv2btg7%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Did Sara "The Fist" Salzman's S&M/Drug HomeLife Result in Two "GIFTED"
Children? I.E. Genetics/Lifestyles?...
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 00:13:21 -0500
Message-ID: <apbjcvg26ov1u9lf2...@4ax.com>
Sara "The Fist" Salzman: Quintessential homeliness in the flesh:
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif <Sitting and authoring S&M<
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif <Standing Medusa look<
_______________________________________________________________________________
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Doc Tavish wrote
in message <bb59tvg62vsljf1rc...@4ax.com>:
>On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:42:11 -0700,
><catamont-4BD634...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>FORGED headers, altered headers
>I forged no headers you stupid slob! You made those posts and there is no
>denying it! Care to deny you made those posts I quoted?
Yes, you did forge headers.
>BTW I will make this one concession to you now:
>
>Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
>From: ssch...@infinet.com Sara Schwartz
>Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
>Subject: Fist Fucking
>:
>By the way... Elbow Grease IS WATER SOLUABLE.
>Says so right on the label.
>We've found for MANY things, it is "wetter" and slicker than KY.
>Your mileage may, of course, vary.
>Perrrfect
You've never bothered to explain what it is you find objectionable
about this?
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <16227675.WLn02i4exW@FreeBSD>:
>Roger wrote:
>> You've never bothered to explain what it is you find objectionable
>> about this?
>That proves me right when I said Sarra was the Marquis De Sade in woman form
>--- does it not?
>
>The de Sade was Jewish.
Because she was discussing a water based lubricant?
And no, he was not, and you have been corrected on this before. Do
you think that if you go away we forget the lies you've told?
Are you going to actually respond to the "For little tommie" and "Want
to see" threads, or just pretend you didn't see them and can't get to
Google to retrieve them (thereby putting the lie to your l33t sk1llz?)