After all, his predecessor clapped his hands with glee like a demented
seal, when he read that Spain and Portugal were siding with the United
States, in the War For Oil. Indeed, Shit-For-Brains#1's comments, such as
the following ...
le 11 Mar 2003 08:38:38 GMT, dans l'article <20030311033838...@mb-mp.aol.com>, JIGSAW1695 <jigsa...@aol.com> a dit ...
> France has been spanked again, this time by Spain. It is obvious to all
> (except the French) that Chiaracs motive against the war with Iraq boils
> down to simple, every day, common garden variety French Greed.
... were coupled with loudly-proclaimed claims that France's noble,
dignified and magnificent stance in defiance of immature, warmongering
'American' (sic) foot-stamping, was motivated by 'contracts' that the
former had in Iraq.
Yet here we are, however, months after the end of the war that resulted in
the deaths of hundreds of Iraqi resistance fighters as they sought to repel
the illegal and immoral invasion of their country, as well as over 150
unfortunate members of the unlawful 'American' (sic) army of occupation.
How strange that Shit-For-Brains#2 has yet to report, in one of his
now-famous, infantile, obsessive, 'I Love You, Dezi [sic] !!' posts, that
the 'American' (sic) forces have found any of those contracts.
Does Shit-For-Brains#2 know that the 'American' (sic) army and
'intelligence' (sic) services currently have access to _every_ single
official building in the entire country ?
Does Shit-For-Brains#2 imagine that the 'Americans' (sic) have not found
entire buildings, 'repleat' (sic [1]) with official documents concerning
Iraq's involvement in obtaining conventional weapons and (as the case may
be) banned nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons ?
Does Shit-For-Brains#2 not realise that if any evidence had been found,
that France was not (as ever) showing the world the moral compass, and
being a beacon of hope, glory, and succor for the oppressed of the planet,
then the 'American' (sic) government would have 'utilized' (sic) it to show
the world that France _was_ being dishonest ?
Does Shit-For-Brains#2 not laugh, like the rest of the world, when
'American' (sic) soldiers appear on television to tell the world that 'this
is payback for "9/11" [sic]', or when the unelected 'American' (sic)
'president', barely days ago, tells reporters that 'American' (sic)
presence in Iraq is part of the 'war on terrorism', when in fact, they have
still to produce _one iota of evidence_ that Iraq had _anything_ to do with
the attacks on the World Trade 'Center' (sic) ?
Yet Shit-For-Brains#2 hasn't commented on any of the above.
Does no one else find his silence somewhat curious ?
Does no one else ask why, as he was so sure of his facts, concerning French
'greed', and how we, the Blessèd Ones were apparently in cahoots with
Saddam Hussein, in order to perpetuate the oppression, corruption, and
murder taking place under the Hussein regime, no one has yet provided
documents that prove this fact ?
Does no one else wonder why, if France was supposedly violating UN
sanctions in January of this year, by selling aircraft parts, there has not
been a single piece of corroborated evidence to demonstrate this fact ?
Does no one else wonder aloud why, in fact, _no evidence_ whatsoever has
been brought forward, to cast a single shadow of doubt on the motives
behind France's threat to use her Security Council veto ?
Does no one else give a contented 'sigh', when noting the now almost total
absence of anti-French 'cartoons' in 'American' (sic) newspapers, and that
the 'journalists' who gleefully predicted how the 'American' (sic)
'liberation' (sic) of Iraq would be followed by the discovery of 'proof' of
France's 'double dealing', have suddenly gone as quiet as Shit-For-Brains#2
himself, and that their comments are now as scarce as virgins in
the Shit-For-Brains household ?
Here is the rest of Shit-For-Brains#1's post, dating from 10 and 11 March
(the post below was in fact a follow-up to his earlier post, concerning
Portugal). I for one would like to see Shit-For-Brains#2 'bite the bullet'
and answer this one, but I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for such
integrity from one of only three posters to news:alt.activism.death-penalty
to have sought to have another poster murdered [2]. Integrity is
apparently as absent from Shit-For-Brains#2's makeup, as honesty,
compassion and pity, are from the vocabulary of every deathie worth his
salt. Indeed, Shit-For-Brains#2's only response will either be continued
silence in not answering this post, or one of his typical, moronic,
window-licking ripostes like '<<YAWN>>', or 'Go back to sleep "Dezi"
[sic]', or '"Dezi" [sic], have you be smelling your own "fart's" [sic] ?'
Let's hear it for Shit-For-Brains#2 ... fuckwit, neo-fascist liar, and
dribbling spastic extraordinaire!!
> 10 Mar 2003 23:00
> Spain's Aznar questions French "interests" in Iraq
>
> MADRID, March 10 (Reuters) - Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar, an
> active supporter of the United States on Iraq, on Monday linked the
> "material interests" of France, Russia and China in Iraq to their
> opposition to the use of force there.
>
> Spain, currently on the U.N. Security Council, has joined the United
> States and Britain in backing a tough new resolution giving Iraq little
> time to disarm or face military strikes.
>
> "We don't have any material interests in Iraq...France has material
> interests in Iraq. Russia has material interests in Iraq. China has
> material interests in Iraq. We don't have any," Aznar told Telecinco
> television in drawing a distinction between governments on opposing sides
> within the U.N. Security Council.
>
> Asked by the interviewer if those interests explained the French, Russian
> and Chinese positions on Iraq, Aznar said, "That's a question only they
> can answer."
>
> "Simply, it seems to me they are on the wrong path and should be adding
> more pressure on (Iraqi President) Saddam Hussein...They have the wrong
> orientation," Aznar said.
>
> Russia has longstanding interests in Iraq with extensive cooperation in
> the oil sector dating back to Soviet times while France has traditionally
> been one of Iraq's top trade partners.
>
> Aznar, from the right-of-centre Popular Party, is a personal friend of
> U.S. President George W. Bush.
>
> "What is the alternative to security today that the United States offers
> to the world? ... Can you really think about fighting against terrorism
> without the participation of the United States?" Aznar asked.
>
> Aznar said Iraq was a threat to Spain.
>
> "If in the end military intervention is unavoidable, I will not shed a
> tear for that regime because it is a threat to everyone, Spain included,"
> he said.
[1] ROTFLMAngelicAO !!!
[2] the other two being, of course, FuckWit himself, when he 'wished aloud'
for a contract killing to be carried out against the person of another
poster to news:alt.activism.death-penalty [3], and Scooter-Boy [4],
when he had my flat here in France firebombed, an act which cost him
six months gaol time, his marriage, and access rights to 'Crystal',
thus meaning that the 'love that cannot speak "it's" [sic] name' could
not be practiced
[3] url:http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=fr&lr=&ie=UTF-8&frame=right&th=cbb26c253835af7f&seekm=ubLv9.79686%24r7.1593261%40twister.tampabay.rr.com#link1
[4] url:http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/scooter-boy.jpg
--
Des The Deathie 'Spnaker' (sic)
http://www.zeouane.org/
http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/gimmicks/
http://www.zeouane.org/peinedemort/obsessive_litany.html
__ __ _ __ ____________ ____ _
\ \ / /_ _ _ __ ___ __ _| |__ __ _ \ \ / /__ / ___| | _ \/ |
\ V / _` | '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \ / _` | \ V / / /| |_ _____| |_) | |
| | (_| | | | | | | (_| | | | | (_| | | | / /_| _|_____| _ <| |
|_|\__,_|_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_|\__,_| |_| /____|_| |_| \_\_|