Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Ethernet card suggestions

0 views
Skip to first unread message

John Klos

unread,
Apr 11, 2003, 1:03:13 PM4/11/03
to tech...@netbsd.org
Hi,

Could someone recommend some good ethernet cards for me? I need a few 4
port 10/100 ethernet cards which will work fine in an interrupt starved
(ie, x86) system, and a low cost, yet hopefully low overhead, gigabit
ethernet card or two.

For instance, does someone know which of a Netgear (GA302T) or Intel (Pro
1000/MT) is faster / generates less overhead?

If you have suggestions which include both 32 bit and 64 bit PCI options,
that would be helpful, too.

Thanks,
John Klos
Sixgirls Computing Labs

Jason Thorpe

unread,
Apr 11, 2003, 2:26:14 PM4/11/03
to John Klos, tech...@netbsd.org

On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 10:02 AM, John Klos wrote:

> For instance, does someone know which of a Netgear (GA302T) or Intel
> (Pro
> 1000/MT) is faster / generates less overhead?

I have had terrific luck with the Intel Gig-E boards, and you can get
them in the $50-$60 price range.

-- Jason R. Thorpe <tho...@wasabisystems.com>

Jonathan Stone

unread,
Apr 11, 2003, 2:52:43 PM4/11/03
to John Klos, Jason Thorpe, tech...@netbsd.org, jona...@pescadero.dsg.stanford.edu

I too have had very good luck with the Intel cards. I've had equally
good luck with Broadcom-derived cards. Which one I'd use depends on
several factors (jumbo frames required? checksum assist needed? vlan
support *and* checksum assist? 3.3v 64-bit slot available
[required for pro/1000MT, iirc]).

Personally, I'd probably buy an Netgear GA-302T over a new ``brand
name'' 10/100 card, the Pro/1000MT if I had a free 3.3v slot and
didn't have a current requirement for jumbo frames; and a 3c996B-T or
bvm5703 solution otherwise.

Unless Jason added jumbo frames to if_wm, and I missed it?

Jason Thorpe

unread,
Apr 11, 2003, 3:06:33 PM4/11/03
to Jonathan Stone, John Klos, tech...@netbsd.org, jona...@pescadero.dsg.stanford.edu

On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 11:47 AM, Jonathan Stone wrote:

> Unless Jason added jumbo frames to if_wm, and I missed it?

No, not yet -- it's still on my list.

Thor Lancelot Simon

unread,
Apr 11, 2003, 5:13:02 PM4/11/03
to tech...@netbsd.org
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:28:31AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>
> I have had terrific luck with the Intel Gig-E boards, and you can get
> them in the $50-$60 price range.

If four ports in one slot are required, Intel now makes a quad
Gig-E card which can be had in the $400 price range. Works just
fine as a quad-100 card, too.

Thor

Manuel Bouyer

unread,
Apr 12, 2003, 2:40:59 PM4/12/03
to John Klos, tech...@netbsd.org
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 01:02:57PM -0400, John Klos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone recommend some good ethernet cards for me? I need a few 4
> port 10/100 ethernet cards which will work fine in an interrupt starved
> (ie, x86) system, and a low cost, yet hopefully low overhead, gigabit
> ethernet card or two.
>
> For instance, does someone know which of a Netgear (GA302T) or Intel (Pro
> 1000/MT) is faster / generates less overhead?

As 4-port adapters, avoid at all cost the dlink 580. I couldn't get
it working properly at 100Mbs, the PCI-PCI bridge on this board just
can't get datas out of the adapter quick enouth (or the buffer on the
chip is too small - it's only 2k, so it can't get more than one
full packet). They are usable at 10Mbs though.
As others have said, the Intel Gig-e adapters are good. I'm using the
mono and dual port versions.

--
Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org>
NetBSD: 24 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--

0 new messages