#Ted McMillan, Is Ted Seeber the antichrist?!?
Cindy
You used to not answer questions because you claimed that if Satan himself
asked you questions you would not be inspired to answer, yet you judge
others because they don't answer your questions. Why should they feel any
differently than you? Why should they be inspired to answer you?
I have alot of questions, why don't you lead by example. You surely can
follow your own rules right? What is it you always say? " A child of the
antichrist makes rules and then breaks them himself like he was born without
a conscience" "In order to expose people they must be bound by their own
rules" right? I personally do not agree with this method, because:
" Our watchword is to be "To the law and to the testimony: if they speak
not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them." We
have a Bible full of the most precious truth. It contains the alpha and the
omega of knowledge. The Scriptures, given by inspiration of God, are
"profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto
all good works" (2 Tim. 3:16, 17). Take the Bible as your study book. All
can understand its instruction.
Christ calls upon His people to believe and practice His Word. Those
who receive and assimilate this Word, making it a part of every action, of
every attribute of character, will grow strong in the strength of God. It
will be seen that their faith is of heavenly origin. They will not wander
into strange paths. Their minds will not turn to a religion of
sentimentalism and excitement. Before angels and before men, they will stand
as those who have strong, consistent Christian characters.
In the golden censer of truth, as presented in Christ's teachings, we
have that which will convict and convert souls. Proclaim, in the simplicity
of Christ, the truths that He came to this world to proclaim, and the power
of your message will make itself felt. ***Do not advocate theories or tests
that Christ has never mentioned, and that have no foundation in the Bible.
***We have grand, solemn truths for the people. "It is written" is the test
that must be brought home to every soul."
Lift Him Up p.125 EGW
BUT as you do, be bound then by your own rules... answer the questions or
prove yourself a Jesuit according to your own test.
Did Jesus teach others by accusing them first?
Do you know how many times the word compassion is used in reference to
Jesus?
When he did call people names, such as liar and hypocrite, was it when he
was evangelizing, or when he was being attacked? Explain please.
How is Exposing different than accusing?
Is it true that by their fruits you shall know them?
If we know them by their fruits, is it necessary to then announce this
person is a Christian, or that person is a child of the antichrist?
If it is necessary, is that because the readers are stupid? If that is not
the reason, what is?
Is it possible to teach what the fruits are, and let people recognize others
by themselves?
Is it possible to fake the fruits?
Is it evidence of being a child of God, when you are attacked?
Does that mean everyone who is attacked is a child of God?
Since you *seem* to only want to talk about Ted Seeber, is that why it
*appears*you assume that everyone on the NG has him in mind when they talk
to you?
If someone does not approve of your methods, does that mean they are
defending Ted Seeber?
Is it possible to have a conversation with you that doesn't involve Ted
Seeber? How? or Why not?
Do you believe that everyone who disagrees with you on the NG's does so
because they have a problem with uncivil posts?
Have you judged me by what others have done to you in the past?
Is that the reason why you call me a liar, when I say that I do not make
uncivil posts an issue and never have, (proven ironically enough by you, and
by the fact that you are constantly accusing me of not noticing uncivil
posts.)
Is that why you claim I said they disturb and irritate me and cause me to
lose my peace in Christ, although I have never said anything remotely
resembling that?
Is that why you can not copy and paste a quote from me saying so, although
you can copy and paste everything else?
How many times have I told you your message is not being heard because of
your methods? How many times have I said I agree with your doctrines? How
many times have I told you that you have a important work to do?
Have I told you, I understand you, but others can not because of the way you
represent yourself?
Have I told you I know that you are loving, and that you respect life?
Why do you not understand that is what my concern is, and I could careless
about uncivil posts as there are much more important things to worry about.
If you saw a demon doing wrong would you be surprised? Would you offer to
help it? Would it listen?
If you saw a brother in Christ in error, would you try to point out his
error and help him get back on track?
Do you realize that you have been instrumental in showing me further light?
If you were acting in a wrong manner would you want those who care about you
to point it out?
Is it possible for you to be mistaken?
If someone refuses to talk about Ted Seeber does that mean that they are a
murderer, and a child of the antichrist? Is that the evidence Satan accuses
us night and day with?
How are Ted Seeber's statements more important than anything else?
WHY IS TED SEEBER SUCH A BIG DEAL WITH YOU? HE WAS WRONG, but many people
are wrong, for example:
[Dolf has said that the people of NY deserved to die,more than once. He
prays God will strike people dead and remove their part out of God's book of
life. He curses( Literally casts Curses at people) and attacks everyone but
you and Kabatoff. Wants the SDA church to not only allow him to be a member
but to condone homosexuality and promote his teachings as doctrines, which
are: that the bible teaches homosexuality,and that marriage is a man made
belief, and that is why the Church of Philadelphia is the church of
*brotherly love*and he is calling for the death penalty against everyone who
had a part of denying him his membership, as well as everyone else who did
not. He is planning on suing the SDA church because they won't allow him to
be a member, although he claims they are hymeneal mystic's, and yet half his
copy and paste posts are mysticism. You clasp him to your bosom and expose
Ted Seeber. He follows your example, as if he catches your moods, check out
the NG??? Notice his posts? I don't get it. Can you explain? ( Perhaps you
could lead him by example, in another direction~ like in "Look! the lamb of
God went this way!!"
Are Ted and Dolf both wrong, or are there degree's of being wrong? If you
offend in one part of the law aren't you guilty of breaking it all? They
have both claimed that people deserved to die because they weren't following
God according to their beliefs. Are there shades of Gray in being wrong, or
is it all black and white? This whole part is rhetorical, I do not want to
hear the answer to this one! I don't really want to hear about Dolf, nor am
I asking you to publicly judge him. I am just writing statements that he has
made repeatedly on this NG, because I want you to think...]
Are there prophesies about Ted Seeber in the Bible or Ellen White's
writings, and is that why it appears you are promoting him as the *ultimate
and only* example of evil?
Does Ted Seeber officially Represent Rome, or is he just one of the many,
who's statements and beliefs are representative of Rome?
Is Ted Seeber just being exposed, or is he being overexposed? Think!!
Does Overexposure leads to a lack of sensitivity and indifference?
Do you realize that the brain makes new grooves as it records information,
and it doesn't distinguish between true and false, so if you hear something
repeatedly such as "liberty is useless" you will come to believe this? The
more you hear this fact the deeper the groove becomes.
Can you think of any examples of how Satan uses this as a tool, through our
government, the media, etc... ?
Does the bible define being a child of God or the antichrist by whether or
not you
attack and accuse Ted Seeber?
Is Ted Seeber the antichrist?
Does Ted Seeber's name add up to six-hundred threescore and six?
Did Ted Seeber change times and laws?
Is Ted Seeber responsible for our current calendar system?
Did Ted Seeber decree that the day begins and ends at midnight contrary to
how God created the days to begin and end at sunset?
Did Ted Seeber Change God's Holy Sabbath (the 7th day) to the day of the sun
(1st day)?
By doing so, did Ted Seeber change the commandment of God into a commandment
of man?
Does Ted Seeber claim that Sunday worship, is the MARK of his authority by
the fact that he changed it without scriptural authority, and the majority
of the world allow this, and follow him and so prove his authority?
Did Ted Seeber become strong with a small people?
Did Ted Seeber take away the daily and place the abomination that maketh
desolate?
Were the Saints given into Ted Seebers hands for a time and times and the
dividing of time?(1260 years)?
Is Ted Seeber a little horn that uprooted three others horns on his rise to
power?
Did Ted Seeber rise to power in 538 according to Justinians decree, when the
last of the 3 horns was uprooted?
(WAS) ~ For 1260 years
Did Ted Seeber receive a deadly wound in 1798 when he was made a prisoner in
the Vatican, and stripped of his lands?
(IS NOT)
Did Ted Seebers deadly wound begin to heal in 1929 when He came back into
power as both a church and a State according to a concordat signed by
Mussolini, and Cardinal Gaspari?
(YET IS...)
Did the World wonder after Ted Seeber when this happened?
Did Ted Seeber commit Blasphemy by doing the following?
1.Sit in the temple of God, claimed to be God.
2.Profaned God's sanctuary
3. Claims the power to forgive sins
4. exalts and magnifies himself above every God
5. Puts his commandments and his traditions before God.
6. Speaks against God
Does Ted Seeber rule a whore? (The Mother of apostate religions, A church
who hold a chalice of blood in her hands, and is drunken on the blood of the
saints and martyrs?)
Does Ted Seeber rule this church which emerged from the fourth Kingdom on
earth, a city on 7 hills. (Rome)?
Has Ted Seeber ruled over the kings of the earth?
Has Ted Seeber come in peace to deceive many, so that he can take the
Kingdom with flatteries and then start a time of trouble such as never was
since there was a nation?
Will the whole world worship Ted Seeber?
Is God calling *his people* to come out of Ted Seeber?
Will those who don't follow Ted Seeber be persecuted and killed between the
time the Sunday laws pass, and the time of the death penalty that he will
enforce.
Will the whole world ask who is like Ted Seeber and who is
able to make war with him?
Will people who refuse Ted Seeber's mark lose the power to buy and sell?
Will Ted Seeber cause the death penalty to be passed on those who keep God's
commandments and the testimony of Jesus, as he wages war upon them?
Will those who refuse Ted Seeber's mark receive the Seal of the Almighty God
and be unable to be hurt by the plagues or by Ted Seeber?
Will all that shall dwell upon the earth worship Ted Seeber who are
not written in the Lamb's book of life?
Will those who receive Ted Seeber's mark be the victims of the seven last
plagues?
Will those who receive Ted Seeber's Mark cry for the rocks and Mountains to
fall on them?
Will those who receive Ted Seeber's Mark be destroyed by the brightness of
Jesus Christ's second coming?
How old is Ted Seeber anyway? Was he around when Paul said the mystery of
iniquity was already at work within the church?
Is Ted Seeber a man of sin or *THE MAN OF SIN*?
Thank You in advance for your answers.
Your Sister in Christ,
Cindy
Ted McMillan
> Ted,
>
> You used to not answer questions because you claimed that if Satan himself
> asked you questions you would not be inspired to answer, yet you judge
> others because they don't answer your questions. Why should they feel any
> differently than you? Why should they be inspired to answer you?
Antichrist Cindy has promised to ignore me for a long time now. She
has been away devising more supremely deceitful and accusative posts.
> I have alot of questions, why don't you lead by example.
Antichrist Cindy has basically not answered one of my questions. Her
constant posts are teaching me how not to attack. She has
consistently attacked and said nothing against a man who condemned all
non-Catholics to persecution and death. Can Antichrist Cindy,
Caillean and the others lead in teaching all how not to attack and
accuse by example? Watch the no-Conscience princess continue to
condemn herself here:
> You surely can
> follow your own rules right? What is it you always say? " A child of the
> antichrist makes rules and then breaks them himself like he was born without
> a conscience" "In order to expose people they must be bound by their own
> rules" right? I personally do not agree with this method, because:
>
> " Our watchword is to be "To the law and to the testimony: if they speak
> not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them."
The Protestant have given us definite ways to locate workers of the
Antichrist. One of the supreme ways of detecting them stems from the
fact that they are completely unscrupulous like Antichrist Cindy.
Read the works of J. A. Wylie, who was an expert on the armies of the
Pope and see if his volumes of works were to detect Jesuits in the way
Antichrist Cindy says. People can be in error and even in wrong
religions that would vehemently defend error. I am not talking about
those: I AM TALKING ABOUT THE WORKERS OF THE ANTICHRIST: Antichrist
Lamarr, Cindy, Caillean, Nordy, Andrew, etc.
In history there were the Pharisees. Christ gave them certain
questions that made such common sense, the Pharisees were dumbfounded
and had to shut up. That is not the case with these workers of the
Papacy. If these were there, they would divert, keep on talking,
accuse Christ of hate, teach Him how not to accuse and all such.
These are much more wicked than the Pharisees. I am not talking about
just false prophets or even just wicked people: I am talking about the
bottom of the barrel: the extremely unscrupulous children of the
Antichrist who are here to do ANYTHING against the truth in any way
possible.
> We
> have a Bible full of the most precious truth. It contains the alpha and the
> omega of knowledge.
But it couldn't teach Antichrist Cindy that a person who is a
super-terrorist needs much more help than someone who would point him
out. What is the point that someone like Antichrist Cindy can point
out the bible to us?
> The Scriptures, given by inspiration of God, are
> "profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
> righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto
> all good works" (2 Tim. 3:16, 17).
Can it teach the workers of the Antichrist that it is worse to be a
super-terrorist than to point one out?
> Take the Bible as your study book. All
> can understand its instruction.
But does a person need the bible to know that it is worse to be a
super-terrorist than to point one out?
Now here are more of the amazing talents of deceit from Antichrist
Cindy:
> Christ calls upon His people to believe and practice His Word. Those
> who receive and assimilate this Word, making it a part of every action, of
> every attribute of character, will grow strong in the strength of God. It
> will be seen that their faith is of heavenly origin. They will not wander
> into strange paths. Their minds will not turn to a religion of
> sentimentalism and excitement. Before angels and before men, they will stand
> as those who have strong, consistent Christian characters.
<snip the distortions from the daughter of blasphemy...>
Now watch as, since Antichrist Cindy has not answered my questions,
she issues some and naturally expects me to answer:
> BUT as you do, be bound then by your own rules... answer the questions or
> prove yourself a Jesuit according to your own test.
>
>
> Did Jesus teach others by accusing them first?
Did Christ tell Antichrist Cindy to help me by coming on the NGs
telling the world the Lord showed you I had a problem with love?
> Do you know how many times the word compassion is used in reference to
> Jesus?
Do you know where the word says to have compassion on a
super-terrorist and then to hang someone who points him out and don't
have compassion on him?
> When he did call people names, such as liar and hypocrite, was it when he
> was evangelizing, or when he was being attacked? Explain please.
When did you call Ted McMillan unloving, vindictive, and a hatemonger.
Was it when you were evangelizing to make everyone else have a
terrible respect for human life, or was it when you were exposed?
Explain please? I saw you attack me in every phase of your satanic
ministry.
> How is Exposing different than accusing?
Well viewing all your posts were geared to tell the world how mean I
was, I would figure you knew the answer to this question without
having to ask.
> Is it true that by their fruits you shall know them?
How do you think I know you are a worker for the Antichrist,
Antichrist Cindy? How do I know that Super-terrorist Seeber is a
reincarnate from the Dark Ages? He argued against every principle of
liberty and privacy and then shot his mouth off by gloating how Rome
persecuted and murdered the Protestants because they didn't live the
bible.
> If we know them by their fruits, is it necessary to then announce this
> person is a Christian, or that person is a child of the antichrist?
It must be since you announced in most all of your posts that I was
mean, unforgiving a hatemonger and other things. Do you really think
that the stupid Protestants here are really that stupid Antichrist
Cindy???
> If it is necessary, is that because the readers are stupid? If that is not
> the reason, what is?
You believe they are stupid obviously. I don't know what you think
you are talking about!
> Is it possible to teach what the fruits are, and let people recognize others
> by themselves?
Have you let them recognize that Ted McMillan is hateful and mean by
themselves as compared to "kind and courteous" Ted Seeber who
condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and death?
> Is it possible to fake the fruits?
LOOK IN THE MIRROR, CHILD!
> Is it evidence of being a child of God, when you are attacked?
> Does that mean everyone who is attacked is a child of God?
Does someone notice that Ted McMillan is attacked? Does someone
preach that we should not attack? When that someone noticed everyone
else attacking Ted McMillan while preaching to him against attacking,
what did she do to calm the attacks?
> Since you *seem* to only want to talk about Ted Seeber, is that why it
> *appears*you assume that everyone on the NG has him in mind when they talk
> to you?
Since you all have a terrible agenda to protect the super-terrorist
since he has proven that your Antichrist has not changed and he is a
reincarnate from the Dark Ages, is that why it *appears* you assume
that anyone who exposes him is incomprehensible, mean and hateful?
> If someone does not approve of your methods, does that mean they are
> defending Ted Seeber?
If a group of people witness a reincarnate scoundrel telling the world
that non-Catholics must die, and then someone points out that
super-terrorist and that group of people become so insensed to silence
the person who pointed the man out that they even teach him against
insulting and attacking others but then move upon him to attack and
insult him, then YES, not only is that group defending Ted Seeber, but
that group is also a bunch of super-terrorists.
That group of "kind and courteous" unscrupulous people would have
known that the Bush Administration and the American people have the
same methods of exposing terrorists that I have exposing a
super-terrorist. There is a definite problem when I keep bringing
this up, but workers of the Antichrist like you keep ignoring this
question.
> Is it possible to have a conversation with you that doesn't involve Ted
> Seeber? How? or Why not?
I did not know Antichrist Cindy, Angelo or Caillean till Ted Seeber
shot off his big mouth and exposed that he was a super-terrorist. I
then exposed the man and certain strange and unscrupulous people
couldn't go to bed at nights. They are even now doing everything to
defend the duplicate monster and I am making it clear that Ted Seeber
is not the only monster from the Dark Ages here.
Every conversation Antichrist Cindy had with me was for that agenda:
to stop it being pointed out that Ted Seeber is an authentic
super-terrorist and should be condemned to death by the present laws
of the United States. And now we know that many people posting here
should share his fate!
Antichrist Cindy came first to tell us the Lord showed her I have a
problem with love because I pointed out Ted Seeber's great mistake.
She then moved to conversations about love. Not a conversation or
question I had yet with Antichrist Cindy did not in some way involved
Super-terrorist Ted Seeber. Antichrist Cindy, Lamarr, Angelo, and
even Nicholas II literally ordered me not to bring up the
super-terrorist anymore.
> Do you believe that everyone who disagrees with you on the NG's does so
> because they have a problem with uncivil posts?
Did you claim you can't stand uncivil posts and yet never condemned
any posts that were uncivil: you only condemned those of Ted McMillan?
Why did you lie?
> Have you judged me by what others have done to you in the past?
Have you judged me PERIOD, and, like all the other workers of the
Antichrist, taught me how I am not to judge? Did you judge me because
I pointed out an authentic super-terrorist trained at Rome and you
were also trained by that institution?
> Is that the reason why you call me a liar, when I say that I do not make
> uncivil posts an issue and never have, (proven ironically enough by you, and
> by the fact that you are constantly accusing me of not noticing uncivil
> posts.)
By what premise did Antichrist Cindy first approach me to tell me the
Lord showed her that I had a problem with love because I pointed out
someone who condemned all non-Catholic (which is supposed to include
her also) to persecution and death?
> Is that why you claim I said they disturb and irritate me and cause me to
> lose my peace in Christ, although I have never said anything remotely
> resembling that?
You work for the Antichrist, so naturally you would lie. What then
was Antichrist Cindy's problem with me? Why was her Antichrist peace
disturbed and she then moved from nowhere to attack me? What was the
premise?
> Is that why you can not copy and paste a quote from me saying so, although
> you can copy and paste everything else?
Where have you copied and paste my words where I confessed that I was
mean, and "an ASS?"
I can't copy your words because you can't answer my questions. You
have presented these other questions because you can't afford to
answer mine.
> How many times have I told you your message is not being heard because of
> your methods?
How many times have you told me not to attack others? How many times
have you told me you would ignore my posts? How many times have you
shown your unparalleled skill in lying?
> How many times have I said I agree with your doctrines?
How many times have I told you that the Adventist Church is filled
with Jesuits who outwardly agree with my doctrines? How many times
have I told you to answer my questions instead of ignoring them and
claiming that you have answered them?
> How
> many times have I told you that you have a important work to do?
How many times have I told you that by exposing Seeber, you, and the
other workers of the Antichrist, I am doing a great work that will
save lies ultimately?
> Have I told you, I understand you, but others can not because of the way you
> represent yourself?
You mean that's why you have not said a single ill-word against
someone who condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and death, but
you have been constantly attacking me from day one?
Yes, but you lie. You told me I am an ass! You said you don't like
unloving posts and that they move you to frustration, and so you
accused and attacked me constantly. When others submitted the most
insulting posts against me, you couldn't notice. Obviously you are a
daughter of the Antichrist.
> Have I told you I know that you are loving, and that you respect life?
Your whole mission since I exposed the super-terrorist Ted Seeber was
to make it look that by even pointing him out and calling him what he
is (a super-terrorist) I am mean, evil, incomprehensible, etc.
Vatican Angelo did that also, and constantly called me, "evil Ted."
You, naturally would not have a problem with that and will not say a
single word against fellow Antichrist Angelo.
> Why do you not understand that is what my concern is, and I could careless
> about uncivil posts as there are much more important things to worry about.
I don't understand it because you are a child of the Antichrist and
have lied too much for me to believe a single thing you say. What are
those important things? Check your postings, Antichrist Cindy? You
have wasted countless hours on post after post attacking Ted McMillan.
Were you doing those important things in the meantime? You said not
a thing against a man who proved scripture and prophecy. The man told
us that he is working even to change the American Constitution so that
it can speak as a dragon. The man then told us that all non-Catholics
should be persecuted and killed. You spend ZERO hours correcting that
situation!
Here now are really stupid questions coming from Vatican curriculum:
> If you saw a demon doing wrong would you be surprised?
> Would you offer to
> help it? Would it listen?
>
> If you saw a brother in Christ in error, would you try to point out his
> error and help him get back on track?
Well viewing that Super-terrorist Ted Seeber condemned all
non-Catholics, and have since been defended by other super-terrorists,
it is quite unlikely that his thirst for blood has abated a single
bit. When Ted McMillan pointed out the Super-terrorist, he got a
slight change to rethink his terrorist connections and sever all ties
to his Pope.
But how can Antichrist Cindy get Ted McMillan back on track? What
track should he be on since he has been attacked constanly the first
day he pointed out a super-terrorist?
> Do you realize that you have been instrumental in showing me further light?
Like the Dark Ages, it sure didn't do any good! You have learned more
from the Vatican how to resist that light.
> If you were acting in a wrong manner would you want those who care about you
> to point it out?
That's what I did to super-terrorist Ted Seeber, and you other
super-terrorists acted like I doused you all with holy water!
> Is it possible for you to be mistaken?
Is it possible for you and your despot clan to be mistaken? Realize
your mistake first and change your ways. At least get hotflashes when
any American points out Osama Bin Laden! You have avoided that issue
from the first like all the other workers of the Antichrist.
> If someone refuses to talk about Ted Seeber does that mean that they are a
> murderer, and a child of the antichrist? Is that the evidence Satan accuses
> us night and day with?
YES! If they refuse to talk about Ted Seeber, but can't stop talking
about the CRIME Ted McMillan did in pointing out the super-terrorist,
we have a problem. If they then move upon Ted McMillan to teach him
how not to attack and accuse and then formulate a barrage of posts
calling him mean, evil, hateful, incomprehensible, etc., then YES that
is a child of the Antichrist just like Antichrist Cindy!
> How are Ted Seeber's statements more important than anything else?
Ted McMillan statement pointing out that Ted Seeber is a
super-terrorist forced so much concern out of the other
super-terrorists like Antichrist Cindy, that Christ certainly took the
back-burner!
> WHY IS TED SEEBER SUCH A BIG DEAL WITH YOU?
Will Antichrist Cindy be with those Protestants who were brutally
murdered by people in history and even the present who thinks just
like terrorist Ted Seeber?
Antichrist Cindy has a message for President George Bush:
> WHY IS OSAMA BIN LADEN SUCH A BIG DEAL WITH YOU?
Obviously, Antichrist Cindy is doing everything she can to protect Ted
Seeber. Antichrist Nicholas II followed suit!
> HE WAS WRONG, but many people
> are wrong, for example:
For example, OSAMA BIN LADEN is wrong!! The Inquisitors of history
were wrong! Were they? Antichrist Cindy? TED MCMILLAN IS WRONG??
What is your problem, Antichrist Cindy, and all the other workers of
the Antichrist piling on him, new ones coming in watching him being
outnumbered, and they then attack him also to then play the violin
about how they were meanly victimized by him?
> [Dolf has said that the people of NY deserved to die,more than once. He
> prays God will strike people dead and remove their part out of God's book of
> life. He curses( Literally casts Curses at people) and attacks everyone but
> you and Kabatoff.
You all are the workers of the Antichrist, and the scriptures point
you out and curses you also. So what is the problem with that?
Dolf is not my issue. Stop being paranoid. I am not giving or
breaking my struggle to make the super-terrorist known because someone
else is paranoid that Dolf will eclipse Christ. You have a real
problem with your preoccupation against others who are not as
dangerous as members of your super-terroristic clan.
> Are there prophesies about Ted Seeber in the Bible or Ellen White's
> writings, and is that why it appears you are promoting him as the *ultimate
> and only* example of evil?
GOOD! Then you never noticed I declared all too often that you also,
along with Caillean, Angelo, Lamarr, Nordy, Andrew and others work for
the Antichrist.
> Does Ted Seeber officially Represent Rome, or is he just one of the many,
> who's statements and beliefs are representative of Rome?
I answered that all too often. YES, Ted Seeber represents Rome. He
made statements confirmed by historic quotes from Rome that stood fast
for centuries. None of the other Vaticanites pointed out his
misrepresentation.
> Is Ted Seeber just being exposed, or is he being overexposed? Think!!
Viewing all the vultures swarming around me to protect him and to make
for naught the truth I am telling about him, NO! I need to scream
more till his fellow super-terrorist buddies are drowned in proof that
he and they are all super-terrorists from the Antichrist. Even
Antichrist Nicholas II ordered me to stop talking about the
Super-terrorist and ignores my points, one of which is the fact that
Super-terrorist Ted Seeber greatly boosted his ministry by proving
that Rome has not changed.
> Does Overexposure leads to a lack of sensitivity and indifference?
Does overdefense of a super-terrorist lead to suspicion that others
were trained at the same place?
> Do you realize that the brain makes new grooves as it records information,
> and it doesn't distinguish between true and false, so if you hear something
> repeatedly such as "liberty is useless" you will come to believe this? The
> more you hear this fact the deeper the groove becomes.
What then when all brains see people ordering Ted McMillan not to say
anything against Super-terrorist Ted Seeber, because it is a much
worse crime to point out a super-terrorist than to be one? What is
happening to brains here? When will Antichrist Cindy and the
super-terrorist barrage teach the world that President Bush is evil
and Osama Bin Laden is good?
> Can you think of any examples of how Satan uses this as a tool, through our
> government, the media, etc... ?
You have missed a great deal of blotches on your face in the mirror!
> Does the bible define being a child of God or the antichrist by whether or
> not you
> attack and accuse Ted Seeber?
Let's try it again:
YES! If they refuse to talk about Ted Seeber, but can't stop talking
about the CRIME Ted McMillan did in pointing out the super-terrorist,
we have a problem. If they then move upon Ted McMillan to teach him
how the bible says not to attack and accuse and then formulate a
barrage of posts calling him mean, evil, hateful, incomprehensible,
etc., then YES that is a child of the Antichrist just like Antichrist
Cindy!
> Is Ted Seeber the antichrist?
You ought to know. You are also one of the workers of the Antichrist.
> Does Ted Seeber's name add up to six-hundred threescore and six?
The name of his and your organization does!
> Did Ted Seeber change times and laws?
His and your organization did.
> Is Ted Seeber responsible for our current calendar system?
His organization probably is.
> Did Ted Seeber decree that the day begins and ends at midnight contrary to
> how God created the days to begin and end at sunset?
Your organization probably did.
> Did Ted Seeber Change God's Holy Sabbath (the 7th day) to the day of the sun
> (1st day)?
His and your organization did.
> By doing so, did Ted Seeber change the commandment of God into a commandment
> of man?
His and your organization did.
> Does Ted Seeber claim that Sunday worship, is the MARK of his authority by
> the fact that he changed it without scriptural authority, and the majority
> of the world allow this, and follow him and so prove his authority?
His and your organization does.
> Did Ted Seeber become strong with a small people?
His and your organization did.
> Did Ted Seeber take away the daily and place the abomination that maketh
> desolate?
His and your Antichrist did.
> Were the Saints given into Ted Seebers hands for a time and times and the
> dividing of time?(1260 years)?
Were they led into Ted McMillan's hands since Ted McMillan is so
incomprehensibly evil to you, he forces you to give God's message this
way?
> Is Ted Seeber a little horn that uprooted three others horns on his rise to
> power?
His and your Antichrist did. Enough of the Antichrist games here...
> Did the World wonder after Ted Seeber when this happened?
Ted Seeber said that he secretly works within the government in order
to change it and destroy liberty. Ted Seeber is indeed working on it.
He is working for the US to give prominence to the Papacy.
<snip more of the deceitful stalling questions given to prevent
Antichrist Cindy from answering mine.>
Ted Seeber is a worker for the Antichrist. He has shown that the same
mind possessed by the Inquisitors of history are in his unscrupulous
skull cap.
But does Ted McMillan have the number 666 on his name since he makes
Antichrist Cindy and the rest of the papal super-terrorists
infiltrated to Adventism go nuts instead of preaching the Revelation?
Did Ted McMillan waste the Saints; change times and law, etc.? He
sure keeps Antichrist Cindy up at nights instead of preaching the
message!
>
> Thank You in advance for your answers.
>
>
> Your Sister in Christ,
> Cindy
Sister from the Antichrist!
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Cindy
Ted McMillan is attacking me again. ( he calls it exposing)Why does he
continue to do so? because he believes that my words to him about
witnessing, are actually attacks of him, and a defense of Ted Seeber. As he
often points out I always refused to talk about Ted Seeber before. That is
because that was not my issue, my issue was his methods. I actually told him
to post to Ted Seeber if he had a problem, so this would not seem to jive
with his statement that I was trying to get him to stop, at least to anyone
with the brains God gave us.
I also refuse to comment on uncivil posts, yet Ted insists that is my
concern, and says that is why I originally posted to him. As stated above
that was not the reason. He screams at me constantly because I refuse to
comment on uncivil posts. Why should I make it my concern because he jumped
to the wrong conclusion based on a faulty premise?
He also demands answers to questions and claims my lack of acceptable
answers to him prove I am a Jesuit. Seeing that he is constantly preaching
about the need to answer questions, He has been given questions to answer.
He is showing an immense talent to evade them just like he says all the
other workers of the Antichrist do. He is struggling to cover over his duty
to address the questions with his constant shouting of how much of a liar
and a worker of the antichrist I am,( as he believes.) While we do indeed
see Ted McMillan preaching the need to answer questions, he then evades
questions directed at him by asking other questions, issuing further attacks
and and then supplying his own questions and answers, and all the while he
preaches at me about how I need to answer questions. Do you see me preaching
the need to answer questions? Why then should I have to answer his
questions?
Where did Ted McMillan (as he would describe the situation) catch the
symptoms of this strange Jesuit disease? He demands questions be answered,
and then refuses to answer questions while preaching about it, like he was
born without a conscience.
I did supply an answer to one question he says I avoid in the title of the
post, let us see if Ted can practice what he preaches...
Here are the questions again:
You used to not answer questions because you claimed that if Satan himself
asked you questions you would not be inspired to answer, yet you judge
others because they don't answer your questions. Why should they feel any
differently than you? Why should they be inspired to answer you?
I have alot of questions, why don't you lead by example. You surely can
follow your own rules right? What is it you always say? " A child of the
antichrist makes rules and then breaks them himself like he was born without
a conscience" "In order to expose people they must be bound by their own
rules" right? I personally do not agree with this method, because:
" Our watchword is to be "To the law and to the testimony: if they speak
not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them." We
have a Bible full of the most precious truth. It contains the alpha and the
omega of knowledge. The Scriptures, given by inspiration of God, are
"profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto
all good works" (2 Tim. 3:16, 17). Take the Bible as your study book. All
can understand its instruction.
Christ calls upon His people to believe and practice His Word. Those
who receive and assimilate this Word, making it a part of every action, of
every attribute of character, will grow strong in the strength of God. It
will be seen that their faith is of heavenly origin. They will not wander
into strange paths. Their minds will not turn to a religion of
sentimentalism and excitement. Before angels and before men, they will stand
as those who have strong, consistent Christian characters.
In the golden censer of truth, as presented in Christ's teachings, we
have that which will convict and convert souls. Proclaim, in the simplicity
of Christ, the truths that He came to this world to proclaim, and the power
of your message will make itself felt. ***Do not advocate theories or tests
that Christ has never mentioned, and that have no foundation in the Bible.
***We have grand, solemn truths for the people. "It is written" is the test
that must be brought home to every soul."
Lift Him Up p.125 EGW
BUT as you do, be bound then by your own rules... answer the questions or
prove yourself a Jesuit according to your own test.
Did Jesus teach others by accusing them first?
Do you know how many times the word compassion is used in reference to
Jesus?
When he did call people names, such as liar and hypocrite, was it when he
was evangelizing, or when he was being attacked? Explain please.
How is Exposing different than accusing?
Is it true that by their fruits you shall know them?
If we know them by their fruits, is it necessary to then announce this
person is a Christian, or that person is a child of the antichrist?
If it is necessary, is that because the readers are stupid? If that is not
the reason, what is?
Is it possible to teach what the fruits are, and let people recognize others
by themselves?
Is it possible to fake the fruits?
Is it evidence of being a child of God, when you are attacked?
Does that mean everyone who is attacked is a child of God?
Since you *seem* to only want to talk about Ted Seeber, is that why it
*appears*you assume that everyone on the NG has him in mind when they talk
to you?
If someone does not approve of your methods, does that mean they are
defending Ted Seeber?
Is it possible to have a conversation with you that doesn't involve Ted
Seeber? How? or Why not?
Do you believe that everyone who disagrees with you on the NG's does so
because they have a problem with uncivil posts?
Have you judged me by what others have done to you in the past?
Is that the reason why you call me a liar, when I say that I do not make
uncivil posts an issue and never have, (proven ironically enough by you, and
by the fact that you are constantly accusing me of not noticing uncivil
posts.)
Is that why you claim I said they disturb and irritate me and cause me to
lose my peace in Christ, although I have never said anything remotely
resembling that?
Is that why you can not copy and paste a quote from me saying so, although
you can copy and paste everything else?
How many times have I told you your message is not being heard because of
your methods? How many times have I said I agree with your doctrines? How
many times have I told you that you have a important work to do?
Have I told you, I understand you, but others can not because of the way you
represent yourself?
Have I told you I know that you are loving, and that you respect life?
Why do you not understand that is what my concern is, and I could careless
about uncivil posts as there are much more important things to worry about.
If you saw a demon doing wrong would you be surprised? Would you offer to
help it? Would it listen?
If you saw a brother in Christ in error, would you try to point out his
error and help him get back on track?
Do you realize that you have been instrumental in showing me further light?
If you were acting in a wrong manner would you want those who care about you
to point it out?
Is it possible for you to be mistaken?
If someone refuses to talk about Ted Seeber does that mean that they are a
murderer, and a child of the antichrist? Is that the evidence Satan accuses
us night and day with?
How are Ted Seeber's statements more important than anything else?
WHY IS TED SEEBER SUCH A BIG DEAL WITH YOU? HE WAS WRONG, but many people
are wrong, for example:
[Dolf has said that the people of NY deserved to die,more than once. He
prays God will strike people dead and remove their part out of God's book of
life. He curses( Literally casts Curses at people) and attacks everyone but
you and Kabatoff. Wants the SDA church to not only allow him to be a member
but to condone homosexuality and promote his teachings as doctrines, which
are: that the bible teaches homosexuality,and that marriage is a man made
belief, and that is why the Church of Philadelphia is the church of
*brotherly love*and he is calling for the death penalty against everyone who
had a part of denying him his membership, as well as everyone else who did
not. He is planning on suing the SDA church because they won't allow him to
be a member, although he claims they are hymeneal mystic's, and yet half his
copy and paste posts are mysticism. You clasp him to your bosom and expose
Ted Seeber. He follows your example, as if he catches your moods, check out
the NG??? Notice his posts? I don't get it. Can you explain? ( Perhaps you
could lead him by example, in another direction~ like in "Look! the lamb of
God went this way!!"
Are Ted and Dolf both wrong, or are there degree's of being wrong? If you
offend in one part of the law aren't you guilty of breaking it all? They
have both claimed that people deserved to die because they weren't following
God according to their beliefs. Are there shades of Gray in being wrong, or
is it all black and white? This whole part is rhetorical, I do not want to
hear the answer to this one! I don't really want to hear about Dolf, nor am
I asking you to publicly judge him. I am just writing statements that he has
made repeatedly on this NG, because I want you to think...]
Are there prophesies about Ted Seeber in the Bible or Ellen White's
writings, and is that why it appears you are promoting him as the *ultimate
and only* example of evil?
Does Ted Seeber officially Represent Rome, or is he just one of the many,
who's statements and beliefs are representative of Rome?
Is Ted Seeber just being exposed, or is he being overexposed? Think!!
Does Overexposure leads to a lack of sensitivity and indifference?
Do you realize that the brain makes new grooves as it records information,
and it doesn't distinguish between true and false, so if you hear something
repeatedly such as "liberty is useless" you will come to believe this? The
more you hear this fact the deeper the groove becomes.
Can you think of any examples of how Satan uses this as a tool, through our
government, the media, etc... ?
Does the bible define being a child of God or the antichrist by whether or
not you
attack and accuse Ted Seeber?
Is Ted Seeber the antichrist?
Does Ted Seeber's name add up to six-hundred threescore and six?
Did Ted Seeber change times and laws?
Is Ted Seeber responsible for our current calendar system?
Did Ted Seeber decree that the day begins and ends at midnight contrary to
how God created the days to begin and end at sunset?
Did Ted Seeber Change God's Holy Sabbath (the 7th day) to the day of the sun
(1st day)?
By doing so, did Ted Seeber change the commandment of God into a commandment
of man?
Does Ted Seeber claim that Sunday worship, is the MARK of his authority by
the fact that he changed it without scriptural authority, and the majority
of the world allow this, and follow him and so prove his authority?
Did Ted Seeber become strong with a small people?
Did Ted Seeber take away the daily and place the abomination that maketh
desolate?
Were the Saints given into Ted Seebers hands for a time and times and the
dividing of time?(1260 years)?
Is Ted Seeber a little horn that uprooted three others horns on his rise to
power?
Did Ted Seeber rise to power in 538 according to Justinians decree, when the
last of the 3 horns was uprooted?
(WAS) ~ For 1260 years
Did Ted Seeber receive a deadly wound in 1798 when he was made a prisoner in
the Vatican, and stripped of his lands?
(IS NOT)
Did Ted Seebers deadly wound begin to heal in 1929 when He came back into
power as both a church and a State according to a concordat signed by
Mussolini, and Cardinal Gaspari?
(YET IS...)
Did the World wonder after Ted Seeber when this happened?
Did Ted Seeber commit Blasphemy by doing the following?
Thank You in advance for your answers.
Your Sister in Jesus Christ,
Cindy
Ted McMillan
"Cindy" <synt...@localline.com> wrote in message news:<3cd48408$1...@news.teranews.com>...
> Greetings~
>
> Ted McMillan is attacking me again. ( he calls it exposing)Why does he
> continue to do so? because he believes that my words to him about
> witnessing, are actually attacks of him, and a defense of Ted Seeber. As he
> often points out I always refused to talk about Ted Seeber before. That is
> because that was not my issue, my issue was his methods. I actually told him
> to post to Ted Seeber if he had a problem, so this would not seem to jive
> with his statement that I was trying to get him to stop, at least to anyone
> with the brains God gave us.
The Bush Administration has an argument with a more innocent terrorist
by the name of Osama Bin Laden. The two are in combat. Antichrist
Cindy comes along and is asked why she spends all her time attacking
George Bush with much emotion as hateful and mean and doesn't say a
single word against Osama Bin Laden.
Antichrist Cindy tells us that the reason is because she doesn't
approve of George Bush's methods. George Bush then goes beyond
name-calling. He sends tanks and people. Antichrist Cindy doesn't go
out of her satanic mind.
Clearly again, Antichrist Cindy is one of the abandoned and highly
unscrupulous super-terrorists of the Antichrist.
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Ted McMillan
her exempt it may slow down her false claims a bit. She is trained by
the Vatican to infiltrate the Adventist Church from which she now
claims membership. Angelo Braz is another one. We have seen what he
can do also in ignoring the hateful words of a super-terrorist in Ted
Seeber and then moving forward to attack me telling the world that I
don't have love.
This message is to warn you that most of your national leaders are
EXACTLY the same as these two and Ted Seeber. That is why Ted Seeber
has shown hatred for the founding fathers of the United States, but
shows great favor to the present leaders. Remember that Seeber has
told us that the Albigenses deserved to be exterminated because they
did not LIVE THE BIBLE unlike the victims of September 11th. When we
bring this up about his organization in Italy, he also has the
reflexes to tell us that we hate Catholics. Now you should think that
something is deadly wrong if a mind like Seeber's shows favor to our
current national leaders of America!
Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, November 22, 1906, paragraph 6
Article Title: Even at the Door
The Lord calls upon those who believe in him to be workers together
with
him. While life shall last, they are not to feel that their work is
done.
Shall we allow the signs of the end to be fulfilled without telling
people of
what is coming upon the earth? Shall we allow them to go down in
darkness
without having urged upon them the need of a preparation to meet their
Lord?
Unless we ourselves do our duty to those around us, the day of God
will come
upon us as a thief. Confusion fills the world, and a great terror is
soon to
come upon human beings. The end is very near. We who know the truth
should be
preparing for what is soon to break upon the world as an overwhelming
surprise.
Ellen G. White: Review and Herald, Nov. 22, 1906
My website again shows the agenda for why the words LOVE and HATE are
very important for the infiltrants of the Vatican to continue to
bombard the minds of their victim people of the free world. They
attribute HATE to me, and LOVE to Ted Seeber who has also shown a
marked disrespect not only for human life, but for lives of
bible-believing Christians:
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/Betrayed.html
This article shows that these words: LOVE and HATE will be used to
manipulate and forward the ecumenical movement so that Rome can take
dominance over the entire world. LOVE will always be tacked on to the
word UNITE, and HATE will always be tacked on to the word DIVIDE, or
anything that means the status quo in liberty and freedom must be
maintained. Therefore, our generations that new better and refused to
unite with Cindy's pope are hateful and damned! Cindy here speaks:
September 28, 2001
Cindy:
>God and Satan are oposites. God, loves, he unites, he is truth, he is
>our creator, and our savior. He is Life. Satan, hates, divides,
>deceives, and tries to take Gods place, while he works to accuse us,
>and destroy us. He is Death.
-------------------------------------------------------
My comment:
Matthew 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came
not to send peace, but a sword.
35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her
mother in law.
36 And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
Now, Lamarr Edwards posts one of his supremely insultive posts that
passes by the eyes of Cindy... BY ACCIDENT?? You are about to see the
fruits of the spirit Cindy is talking about that by her lack of
response she subscribes to:
From: Lamarr Edwards (shmo...@webtv.net)
Search Result 1
Subject: Re: THE AFTERMATH OF TERROR!
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist
View: Complete Thread (33 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-16 21:45:48 PST
Ted M.- You are one wacko dullard aren't you? Of course the
government let this plot go forward and kill all these
people,so they could bug your bedroom! Look out the window right
now,did you see'um? They want ya Ted,they want to know everything
about you. The CIA,the Cosa Nostra Adventista,and the Popes personal
hit squad
watch you all the time Ted, they follow you everywhere,they have
machines to read your thoughts,the whole world is against you,your
mother was one of them,aaaarrghh!!!
Get a life or some medicine,dummy.
LE
--------------------------------------------------------
My comment: Just think that these papal despots do worse when we
bring up Ellen White! How can a dead prophet cause so much panic
among these "Christians?" Then naturally they become the
self-appointed expositors on how to be calm. They murdered like no
other people or religion in all the world! If they want to take over
and do the same things again, they have to self-appoint themselves to
be the ultimate expositors on LOVE!
But look now as Cindy posts to Lamarr Edwards. Take note that no one
can bring her attention to the fact that Lamarr Edwards has made the
most insultive posts against me or in this newsgroup:
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 20
Subject: Re: LAMARR EDWARDS REQUIRES SPECIFIC PROOF FROM HIS ENEMIES!
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist
View: Complete Thread (7 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-18 17:14:38 PST
Lamarr,
You get to be called all kinds of names, I only get called the same
one, repeatedly.
I thought I was unique, but now you're a despot too. So much for that
theory.
Welcome to my world, :)
Cindy
What if,... there are despots everywhere? :)
--------------------------------------------------------
Cindy saw the names that Lamarr gave to me. Those names were purely
insultive and plainly not true. I have said that LE is a papal
despot. That is true and not insultive like dummy, ass, idiot, and
the like. But how come Cindy preached all about love or the absence
of it defined by words, and she couldn't notice the purely insultive
and hateful posts of Lamarr against me? This is not a discussion for
science folks! It is obvious why! She has already shown that she is
ecumenical, and yet she claims to be Adventist!
Lamarr Posts more insults against Cindy's false preaching about Christ
and the fruits of the Spirit. Will Cindy notice? Lamarr here posts
to the terrorist called Ted Seeber: the man who told us that
multitudes of Christians who were exterminated in the grossest of ways
during the Reformation deserved what they received BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T
LIVE THE BIBLE, UNLIKE THE VICTIMS OF SEPTEMBER 11!
From: Lamarr Edwards (shmo...@webtv.net)
Search Result 1
Subject: Re: SEEBER'S HATRED OF LIBERTY!
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist
View: Complete Thread (18 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-22 21:45:45 PST
Ted Seeber- Your pal sure shoots his mouth off about liberty. If he
is old enough to have been around in the viet nam era,I guarantee
you he was a "contientious objector",they love liberty,as long as you
have to pay the price for it. He couldn't find his own butt with both
hands,let alone have any
understanding of the law. He is an ass.LE
--------------------------------------------------------
Notice that Lamarr put there that I am an ass? That was the very same
insult that Cindy later emailed to me. Here now is another supremely
insultive post by Lamarr that Cindy will always refuse to see:
From: Lamarr Edwards (shmo...@webtv.net)
Search Result 42
Subject: Re: SECURITY VS. PRIVACY??
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist
View: Complete Thread (35 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-23 16:45:30 PST
Teddy boy- If you are "the last word on Adventist truth",then
Adventism
has gone the way of Jim Jones,and David Koresh,it has been consumed by
insanity and evil,to become a theological dead end to be laughed at by
all
Christendom. Of course,you are not "the last word on Adventist
truth",you are just a
mentally ill fool who spreads your message of corrupted Christianity
to
other lost souls of insecurity,inferiority and stupidity,like an AIDS
carrier blithely liasing with anyone who will respond. Your father
satan must be so proud of you.LE
--------------------------------------------------------
Cindy adds to the insultive postings of Lamarr with her arrogance:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=c20cba56.0109230715.5b6cd55b%40posting.google.com
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Subject: Re: ###SEEBER AGAIN MAKES EARTH-SHATTERING ADMISSIONS!
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.baptist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
View: Complete Thread (11 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-23 08:15:12 PST
Ted
Have you ever seen the cartoon Pinky and the brain? LOL, I'm sorry,
sometimes little things amuse me.
Cindy
-------------------------------------------------------
TED SEEBER POSTS THAT THE ALBIGENSES DESERVED TO BE EXTERMINATED, AS
THEY WERE BY ROME IN THE MOST BARBAROUS MANNER, BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T
LIVE THE BIBLE LIKE THE VICTIMS OF SEPTEMBER 11 DID!
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=Lsqv7.29125%24xi5.1438277%40sjcpnn01.usenetserver.com
Cindy here in defending the awesomely insensitive and bloodthirsty
words of Ted Seeber tells me that I have taken Seeber's words out of
context, but she didn't take mine out of context. She does everything
to oppose me:
-------------------------------------------------------
Seeber told us we must give up our liberties. One example:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=lxyr7.16142%24ey1.651789%40sjcpnn01.usenetserver.com
If there is any reason to see why Cindy can attack me and not Seeber,
take a look at this:
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 10
Subject: Re: SECURITY VS. PRIVACY??
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist
View: Complete Thread (35 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-23 09:28:48 PST
.. You may read it above :) I would just like to add, my own thought.
I wonder how many people on
the planes involved in our recent tragedy, if they had been asked to
give up a little of their privacy, to save lives, would have refused.
Cindy
---------------------------------------------------
A Fox News commentator even said that Americans are agreeing to give
up their liberties so that they can at least "LIVE." The American
public has therefore become dumbed-down and desensitized. Did anyone
who faced oppressions, slavery and tyranny realize the meaning of the
words:
GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH??
Now look at Cindy claiming that she never attacked me. She claimed
that me thinking they were attacks were naturally just in my head and
that she is not a despot even though she has been trained in
techniques to exalt her views above all others even though yet
claiming that everyone should have a right to disagree:
Now, here is Cindy's false and very revealing apology to me where she
confesses that she had malice in her heart and that she did in fact
attacked me. It states that she should not have used the words that
she did even though she later told us there was no problem with her
words, her words were only expressions of love. The problem, she
claims was in her heart which she knows I can't see. That is the
object of the technique:
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 1
Subject: I was wrong Ted McMillan.
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.baptist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
View: Complete Thread (11 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-27 17:26:16 PST
Ted, When I wrote the previous post, I was angry. That does not excuse
my behavior. I knew when I wrote the things I did, that I shouldn't be
writing them, I ignored those feelings, and wrote what I did anyway.
Once I posted it, and it was too late to take back those words, it hit
me, how wrong I've been. I prayed before going to sleep, but it was
hard, to not continue trying to justify my behavior to God. You are
right, I talked about the fruits of the spirit, and then didn't show
them myself.
I woke up this morning, not feeling right, I was running late to
work, unusual for me,I usually wake up before my alarm goes off. Part
of a bible verse was in my head, I couldn't look it up, because I
didn't have time, I didn't take time to pray, because I thought I
didn't have time.
All day long, the same line kept running through my head, "
whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest...think on
these things." I couldn't remember the rest of the verse, or where it
came from, also unusual for me. When I finally did pray, while I was
working, suddenly another partial verse popped into my head, " avoid
strivings.." I kept trying to put both of these out of my head,
because it was like listening to a broken record. A thought came to me
in the midst of this struggle. Another reason for not judging others,
is because in your judgement of them, you are committing a wrong,and
by doing that, it becomes easier to do other wrongs. In judging you, I
started being guilty, of the same things I was accusing you of. I
don't feel very good about that. I felt better after I acknowledged
this.
It is better to focus on God's love. When you begin to focus on
hatred, even if it's someone elses, and you do it with the best of
intentions, you lose sight of what is important, and it happens so
gradually, you don't even realize it's happening till it's almost too
late.
I pray you understand what I am saying. Your sister in christ,
Cindy
---------------------------------------------------
Cindy refuses to reprove Lamarr Edwards for his supremely insultive
and hateful posts AFTER HER FALSE APOLOGY. She tells us she can't
attack anymore because of her repentance:
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 2
Subject: Re: I was wrong Ted McMillan.
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.baptist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
View: Complete Thread (11 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-28 17:53:15 PST
...
>
> Cindy:
>
> For the last time to get through your Christ-centered thick despot
> skull:
>
> The problem was not that you attacked, BUT THAT YOU ATTACKED ONE
> PERSON AND WAS ONE-SIDED. Ted:
I have said I was wrong for attacking you, attacking others will not
make that better.
---------------------------------------------------
Remember when Cindy told us that she was never attacking me? She
asked me why I view her expressions of love as attacks and told
everybody that I was just imagining things. In this post she is
telling us that she was attacking me, and her posts are now just the
same as before her false apology?
The result of all this is that she has qualified herself to teach us
about love, the fruits of the Spirit, Christ, and all that Christ does
for a person. But she continues:
---------------------------------------------------
>attacking others will not
>make that better. Perhaps you don't understand, that all the people
>you group together, have had disagreements, we've all had words in
the
>past, and probably will continue to do so, however we do it in a
>christian spirit, and respect each other. You have never claimed to
>feel bad about attacking me, or anyone else.
>*I WON'T REPEAT THIS AGAIN AGAIN*,
>if you do not understand, then that is your choice. I forgive
>you Ted, I have always forgiven you. If you can't treat me with
love,
>Please, leave me alone.
>Cindy
-------------------------------------------------------
After refusing to reprove Lamarr for his hate-filled posts, Cindy
winds up complimenting and supporting Lamarr Edwards:
From: Cindy Ford (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 28
Subject: Re: My "attack" on Ted M.
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist
View: Complete Thread (7 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-28 16:35:53 PST
Referring to his supremely insultive post against me, Lamarr writes:
"Lamarr Edwards" <shmo...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:12941-3BB...@storefull-291.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
> IF any of you feel like commenting on my post to Ted,feel free to do
> so,I allowed him to bait me into a response in kind....
>
> Say to me whatever you choose,I assure you,it will be no problem.
>
> ....
Go with God Lamarr :) Your words show there is no problem.
Cindy
--------------------------------------------------------
Now look closely at her insults and compare it with her continuing
false words today:
From: Cindy Ford (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 4
Subject: Re: to Ted McMillan
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist
View: Complete Thread (30 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-28 16:20:40 PST
"EW..." <ewy...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:9p2qb8$g1hhq$5...@ID-36342.news.dfncis.de...
>
> "Lamarr Edwards" <shmo...@webtv.net> wrote in message
> news:12941-3BB...@storefull-291.iap.bryant.webtv.net...
> > Donna,Cindy,Larry,Ted S.,et al-
> >
> > All good tries at trying to be
> > logical,kind,Christian,reasonable,forgiving with Ted M., unforunately
> > nothing will work. There are others of us who over the years have tried
> > these approaches,nothing works to get through to him.
> >
>
> LE,
>
> Like Larry said (I think it was Larry), TM may just be yanking our chains
> for certain responses which he/she enjoys. Think about it. "He" could be a
> homely little 19 year old college sweetheart who can't get a date, but is
> otherwise a cuddly little fur-ball at heart. He/she just enjoys raising
> emotions because it's the only way it works for him/her. Not possible??
> Sure it is! :-))
>
> EW
>
>
LOL EW.
Anything is possible. It is possible, he is alive and well, and living
in
FL, over double that age, and has a group of followers, who all have
tunnel
vision. Regardless, he consistently shows up here, although his
webpage
denounces this NG as a hotbed of papal infiltration. Follows people
around,
and then claims the opposite. Most likely he shows up when interest in
his
webpages die down, to try to recruit new followers.
CU, Cindy
---------------------------------------------------
It was this same Cindy Ford, the papal infiltrator to Adventism, who
posted in that she has my personal information and by emailing her,
she will give it away for you all to teach me some more how to love
and how to be American! Americans always seek the personal
information of others to publish it around!
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
Tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
show me why she exclusively attacked me for exposing another
super-terrorist from the Vatican who condemned all non-Catholics
(including her unscrupulous, loving Vatican soul). She now tells me
that Ted Seeber is not the Antichrist and I therefore should not in
any way focus upon him.
Why has all the condemnations of Antichrist Cindy been focusing on Ted
McMillan again? Why is she focusing on me? Am I the Antichrist?
Have I murdered the Saints? I am even screaming that they have been
murdered, and she cannot notice!
She therefore follows Antichrist Nick to tell the world that God does
not approve of my methods of "Evangelization" as if that was what I
was doing, but then they attack me and will not answer how God
approves of their terroristic methods of evangelization. The very
attack they claim I am doing they are doing freely. What are they
folks!
But let me address her many machine gun questions designed to evade my
questions again. She will naturally repeat them. She is a worker for
the Antichrist:
According to Antichrist Cindy, if you are reproving a super-terrorist,
and you are an Adventist preaching the Three Angels Message to the
world, you are more guilty and "incomprehensible" than the
super-terrorist. She had to find a reason why she matched all the
Antichristians here in condemning, attacking and hating me only
because I objected to a man who condemned all non-Catholics to
persecution and death. For that, she and all the other workers of the
Antichrist have been saying that I was spueing hate. I brought up
what kind of children of Satan would view such a situation and only
have an issue with the person who reproved the super-terrorist
ESPECIALLY IF THEY ALL ALSO CLAIM TO BE NON-CATHOLICS AND ARE
CONDEMNED BY TED SEEBER! Here now is the answer from Antichrist Cindy
in the subject header:
President George Bush is not trying to preach the 3 Angels Messages to
Osama Bin Laden, THEREFORE, THE CONSTANT OBSESSION, CONDEMNATION AND
INSULTS ISSUE TO OSAMA BY THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION AND ALL AMERICANS
ARE NOT EXPRESSIONS OF HATE!
"Cindy" <synt...@localline.com> wrote in message news:<3cd48408$1...@news.teranews.com>...
> Greetings~
>
> Ted McMillan is attacking me again. ( he calls it exposing)Why does he
> continue to do so?
Antichrist Cindy has been attacking me ever since I exposed another
super-terrorist who condemned all non-Catholic life. Why does she
continue to do so? Now Antichrist Cindy, normally asking questions
and playing innocent, will naturally give the answers for my heart:
> because he believes that my words to him about
> witnessing, are actually attacks of him, and a defense of Ted Seeber.
Go to the following link and you will witness Antichrist Cindy
attacking me. After a while, she comes back and asks why I believe
her "expressions of love" are attacks when all she wants to do is
Vatican love me. Later, I show her apologizing FOR ATTACKING ME:
Antichrist Cindy continues:
>As he
> often points out I always refused to talk about Ted Seeber before. That is
> because that was not my issue, my issue was his methods.
Antichrist Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and
death. I reproved the super-terrorist, Antichrist Cindy then had an
issue because she something dreadfully wrong. She then only attacks
me, claims she is loving me, apologizes for attacking me, and now
tells me again she is Vatican loving me. Millions of Christians have
already been Vatican loved! Ted Seeber gave proof of that!
> I actually told him
> to post to Ted Seeber if he had a problem, so this would not seem to jive
> with his statement that I was trying to get him to stop, at least to anyone
> with the brains God gave us.
I have been posting to Ted Seeber alone. I did not know Antichrist
Cindy till Antichrist Cindy came to attack me since she saw a terrible
and only singular problem on the newsgroups: ME. She has promised
over and over again to ignore me, but when consciences were given out,
where were these papal people to be found? She then gets upset since
I made it my issue to expose that she also is a infiltrating
super-terrorist from Rome.
> I also refuse to comment on uncivil posts, yet Ted insists that is my
> concern, and says that is why I originally posted to him.
Just like I inssisted that Antichrist Cindy attacked me. Antichrist
Cindy came to ask me why I believed her expressions of Vatican love
were attacks. In the following link, she confessed earlier that she
attacked me:
> As stated above
> that was not the reason.
And that statement has just the same amount of truth as many other
statements made by Antichrist Cindy. Here is the thesis as Antichrist
Cindy and Angelo were attempting to explain why to them, a
super-terrorist is far more innocent than one who points them out:
> He screams at me constantly because I refuse to
> comment on uncivil posts.
How can that be true when she has constantly been raving that my posts
are uncivil and therefore spue hate?
> Why should I make it my concern because he jumped
> to the wrong conclusion based on a faulty premise?
First, why does Antichrist Cindy has a tremendous talent for lying
shown above. Next, why did Antichrist Cindy make Ted McMillan her
concern because she doesn't understand that a person who points out a
super-terrorist is justified and not a criminal compared to the actual
super-terrorist?
> He also demands answers to questions and claims my lack of acceptable
> answers to him prove I am a Jesuit.
Part of the agenda of Jesuits is to evade simple questions when they
are too convicting to answer. Antichrist Cindy is very skillful on
that. The last simple question she refused to answer was, how come
she posts so kindly and snuggly to Ted Seeber after Ted Seeber
condemned all non-Catholics, which is supposed to include her
unscrupulous soul. She has issue not a single attack or ill word to
Antichrist Ted Seeber, but even offered to pray for him because of his
unemployment problem over the graves of the millions he has condemned.
That is supposed to include the unscrupulous Vatican person in her
mirror.
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Ted McMillan
> Greetings~
>
> Ted McMillan is attacking me again. ( he calls it exposing)Why does he
> continue to do so? because he believes that my words to him about
> witnessing, are actually attacks of him, and a defense of Ted Seeber. As he
> often points out I always refused to talk about Ted Seeber before. That is
> because that was not my issue, my issue was his methods. I actually told him
> to post to Ted Seeber if he had a problem, so this would not seem to jive
> with his statement that I was trying to get him to stop, at least to anyone
> with the brains God gave us.
I have been posting only to Seeber until other super-terrorists came
to join him in attacking me. One of those super-terrorists from the
Vatican is Cindy.
Look closely now so we can catch Antichrist Cindy in more lies. What
is her concern? She says methods. She has attacked ONLY me, and then
claimed that her attacks were love. The time came when she made a
very false apology and then assured me she had repented and cannot
attack anything anymore. Soon Antichrist Lamarr issued the most
hateful posts, but Antichrist Cindy couldn't notice it. She then told
me that since she had Vatican repented, she cannot attack anything
anymore. Since that time Vatican Cindy has been attacking me. Check
out some of the dialogue here:
------------
Cindy refuses to reprove Lamarr Edwards for his supremely insultive
and hateful posts AFTER HER FALSE APOLOGY. She tells us she can't
attack anymore because of her repentance:
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 2
Subject: Re: I was wrong Ted McMillan.
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.baptist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
View: Complete Thread (11 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-28 17:53:15 PST
...
>
> Cindy:
>
> For the last time to get through your Christ-centered thick despot
> skull:
>
> The problem was not that you attacked, BUT THAT YOU ATTACKED ONE
> PERSON AND WAS ONE-SIDED. Ted:
I have said I was wrong for attacking you, attacking others will not
make that better.
---------------------------------------------------
As you can see here, she admits that she has attacked me. Remember
when she approached and asked me why her Vatican expressions of love
were attacks when all such thoughts were only in my head? Here she is
Vatican confessing that she had attacked me. Above, after her false
apology and repentance, she tells us that she cannot attack anything
anymore. Since that time her behavior has been consistent in ONLY
attacking Ted McMillan instead of preaching the 3 Angels Messages.
Will Antichrist Nicholas II notice that?
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Cindy
Ted McMillan obviously thinks you are stupid, I apologize. I have never
answered this question till now because I thought the answer was obvious.
President Bush is obviously not teaching the three angels message to Osama
Bin Laden. therefore Ted's comparison of himself, and his methods to
President Bush and his methods is beyond ridiculous.
Furthermore, where do you see President Bush singling out one solitary
minion of Osama's and holding him up as a example of Osama? How far would he
get in this war against terrorism if he only exposed that one man repeatedly
despite the fact that he was nowhere to be found? Would he then expose and
call his advisors minions who were out to protect Osama, if they began to
counsel him as to the futility of continuing to focus on this one absent
soldier?
What would be the result of this type of plan by President Bush?
Answer: Osama would be in the clear to move ahead with all his other minions
and wreck havoc!
What would happen to the people that president Bush was supposed to be
protecting?
They would be left to DIE!!
It is clear that the Remnant church has an enemy, but where in scripture are
we told to use the tactics of President Bush against them? Where are we told
to send tanks against them ?!? I know it is ridiculous, but Ted will keep
bringing up the question of Osama.
We are to be warning the people, not attacking them! We are to be
identifying the system of Babylon and her characteristics, so that people
can recognize if they are a part of either her or her daughters, and COME
OUT OF HER.!!!
We are to spreading the everlasting Gospel!!
We are described as soldiers, but these are our weapons to fight on the
Almighty God's side in this war:
Eph 6:10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of
his might.
Eph 6:11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand
against the wiles of the devil.
Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against
principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this
world, against spiritual wickedness in high [places].
Eph 6:13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be
able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
Eph 6:14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and
having on the breastplate of righteousness;
Eph 6:15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace;
Eph 6:16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able
to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.
Eph 6:17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit,
which is the word of God:
Eph 6:18 Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and
watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints;
Eph 6:19 And for me, that utterance may be given unto me, that I may open my
mouth boldly, to make known the mystery of the gospel,
Eph 6:20 For which I am an ambassador in bonds: that therein I may speak
boldly, as I ought to speak.
All the World will wonder after the beast EXCEPT those who's name are
written in the Lamb's book of life. Those are the ones described in Rev 14
as following the lamb wherever he leads. They are the ones who worship the
Creator, and keep the commandments of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ.
There is no guile in their mouth, and they stand blameless before the throne
of God, although they have been persecuted and reviled and called every name
in the book, by the enemy. They have the seal of God, his name is in their
foreheads, they have his character.
They are overcomers!!! They are the redeemed from among the earth and they
sing a song that has never been sung before, that song is a song of Victory,
it is a song of experience because never before has anyone gone through what
these children of God have to go through, and they are proof positive that
God is the Almighty God, the One and Only, Just and merciful, Awesome, and
everlasting. His Character of love has been vindicated and proven in the
face of all Satan's accusations, and they are God's soldiers who helped him
win the war.
Are you ready? The Latter rain will fall soon, are you taking part in the
early rain?
Pray and study and seek God as never before people, he WILL lead you, he
WILL guide you to ALL Truth, He WILL work his will within you and through
you. He wants you to be with him always, how badly do you want to be with
him?
~ Cindy
P.S.
Answer the questions TED
Here's a new one: Why are you attacking one of the minions instead of Osama?
"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02050...@posting.google.com...
Ted McMillan
> Greetings~
>
> Ted McMillan is attacking me again. ( he calls it exposing)Why does he
> continue to do so? because he believes that my words to him about
> witnessing, are actually attacks of him, and a defense of Ted Seeber. As he
> often points out I always refused to talk about Ted Seeber before. That is
> because that was not my issue, my issue was his methods. I actually told him
> to post to Ted Seeber if he had a problem, so this would not seem to jive
> with his statement that I was trying to get him to stop, at least to anyone
> with the brains God gave us.
Antichrist Cindy overlooks a super-terrorist who condemns the lives of
all non-Catholics (Antichrist Cindy claims to be Protestant) because
she is so concerned about the "Methods" of Ted McMillan exposing that
Ted Seeber is a super-terrorist. I do post more and more that Ted
Seeber is a reincarnate super-terrorist from the Inquisition because
it is true, AND BECAUSE THERE ARE SO MANY OTHER EVEN INFILTRATING
SUPER-TERRORIST REINCARNATES FROM THE INQUISITIONS WHO ARE DOING
EVERYTHING TO DEFEND HIM AND TO PRETEND THAT IS NOT SO. Antichrist
Cindy is one of them.
So here again, Antichrist Cindy promised often not to post to me
anymore, but she will ignore me. She has declared publicly since her
Vatican apology and confession that she cannot attack anything
anymore. This was after she approached me asking me why I view her
Vatican love towards me as attacks. This was said after she already
apologized FOR ATTACKING ME!
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Cindy
conscience and their jesuit inability to answer questions is showing the
same tactics he says the workers of the antichrist use to avoid his
questions; evasion, no proofs offered, lies, attacks, supplying and
answering his own questions, or just plain avoiding them. Why is he doing
so? it's as if he has no conscience. I have provided him with an opportunity
to show his conscience, his honesty, his love, and further explain his
reasoning, and instead of doing so he (as he would, and has described it)
shows the strange symptoms of the Jesuit disease. When did he aquire this
disease? Or has he? We will see, if he can answer the questions with no
further evasive tactics:
Here they are again:
are wrong, (All the world except those who will have the seal of god)
(IS NOT)
(YET IS...)
Your Sister in Christ,
Cindy
Cindy
conscience and their jesuit inability to answer questions is showing the
same tactics he says the workers of the antichrist use to avoid his
questions; evasion, no proofs offered, lies, attacks, supplying and
answering his own questions, or just plain avoiding them. Why is he doing
so? it's as if he has no conscience. I have provided him with an opportunity
to show his conscience, his honesty, his love, and further explain his
reasoning, and instead of doing so he (as he would, and has described it)
shows the strange symptoms of the Jesuit disease. When did he aquire this
disease? Or has he? We will see, if he can answer the questions with no
further evasive tactics:
Here they are again:
are wrong, (All the world except those who will have the seal of god)
Are there prophesies about Ted Seeber in the Bible or Ellen White's
(IS NOT)
(YET IS...)
Your Sister in Christ,
Cindy
Cindy
conscience and their jesuit inability to answer questions is showing the
same tactics he says the workers of the antichrist use to avoid his
questions; evasion, no proofs offered, lies, attacks, supplying and
answering his own questions, or just plain avoiding them. Why is he doing
so? it's as if he has no conscience. I have provided him with an opportunity
to show his conscience, his honesty, his love, and further explain his
reasoning, and instead of doing so he (as he would, and has described it)
shows the strange symptoms of the Jesuit disease. When did he aquire this
disease? Or has he? We will see, if he can answer the questions with no
further evasive tactics:
Here they are again:
are wrong, (All the world except those who will have the seal of god)
Are there prophesies about Ted Seeber in the Bible or Ellen White's
(IS NOT)
(YET IS...)
Your Sister in Christ,
Cindy
Cindy
conscience and their jesuit inability to answer questions is showing the
same tactics he says the workers of the antichrist use to avoid his
questions; evasion, no proofs offered, lies, attacks, supplying and
answering his own questions, or just plain avoiding them. Why is he doing
so? it's as if he has no conscience. I have provided him with an opportunity
to show his conscience, his honesty, his love, and further explain his
reasoning, and instead of doing so he (as he would, and has described it)
shows the strange symptoms of the Jesuit disease. When did he aquire this
disease? Or has he? We will see, if he can answer the questions with no
further evasive tactics:
Here they are again:
are wrong, (All the world except those who will have the seal of god)
Are there prophesies about Ted Seeber in the Bible or Ellen White's
Ted McMillan
> Ted McMillan: a man who constantly preaches about people's lack of
> conscience and their jesuit inability to answer questions is showing the
> same tactics he says the workers of the antichrist use to avoid his
> questions; evasion, no proofs offered, lies, attacks, supplying and
> answering his own questions, or just plain avoiding them. Why is he doing
> so? it's as if he has no conscience.
As you can see, Antichrist Cindy is attacking again here after even
promising to ignore me, she is back again. Desperation has set in and
she forgot about preaching the 3 Angels Messages. She told me I
cannot point out or expose or reprove super-terrorist Ted Seeber
because I have to preach the 3 Angels Message. This was the same
claim Antichrist Nicholas II was giving to me. Apparently the two of
them have colluded. Now look at all her posts preaching the 3 Angels
Messages when it comes to freely attacking Ted McMillan!
Let's see more of her Vatican trained ability at deceit:
Now look at Cindy claiming that she never attacked me. She claimed
that me thinking they were attacks were naturally just in my head and
that she is not a despot even though she has been trained in
techniques to exalt her views above all others even though yet
claiming that everyone should have a right to disagree:
Now, here is Cindy's false and very revealing apology to me where she
confesses that she had malice in her heart and that she did in fact
attacked me. It states that she should not have used the words that
she did even though she later told us there was no problem with her
words, her words were only expressions of love. The problem, she
claims was in her heart which she knows I can't see. That is the
object of the technique:
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 1
Subject: I was wrong Ted McMillan.
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.baptist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
View: Complete Thread (11 articles) | Original Format
Cindy
---------------------------------------------------
Cindy refuses to reprove Lamarr Edwards for his supremely insultive
and hateful posts AFTER HER FALSE APOLOGY. She tells us she can't
attack anymore because of her repentance:
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 2
Subject: Re: I was wrong Ted McMillan.
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.baptist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
View: Complete Thread (11 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-28 17:53:15 PST
...
>
> Cindy:
>
> For the last time to get through your Christ-centered thick despot
> skull:
>
> The problem was not that you attacked, BUT THAT YOU ATTACKED ONE
> PERSON AND WAS ONE-SIDED. Ted:
Antichrist Cindy:
I have said I was wrong for attacking you, attacking others will not
make that better.
---------------------------------------------------
Remember when Cindy told us that she was never attacking me? She
asked me why I view her expressions of love as attacks and told
everybody that I was just imagining things. In this post she is
telling us that she was attacking me, and her posts are now just the
same as before her false apology?
The result of all this is that she has qualified herself to teach us
about love, the fruits of the Spirit, Christ, and all that Christ does
for a person. But she continues:
---------------------------------------------------
>attacking others will not
>make that better. Perhaps you don't understand, that all the people
>you group together, have had disagreements, we've all had words in
the
>past, and probably will continue to do so, however we do it in a
>christian spirit, and respect each other. You have never claimed to
>feel bad about attacking me, or anyone else.
>*I WON'T REPEAT THIS AGAIN AGAIN*,
>if you do not understand, then that is your choice. I forgive
>you Ted, I have always forgiven you. If you can't treat me with
love,
>Please, leave me alone.
>Cindy
What is all these posts she submitted created for and are doing?
Cindy is DEFINITELY one of the scoundrelous workers of the Antichrist!
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Ted McMillan
> Ted McMillan: a man who constantly preaches about people's lack of
> conscience and their jesuit inability to answer questions is showing the
> same tactics he says the workers of the antichrist use to avoid his
> questions; evasion, no proofs offered, lies, attacks, supplying and
> answering his own questions, or just plain avoiding them. Why is he doing
> so? it's as if he has no conscience.
Cindy
---------------------------------------------------
Antichrist Cindy:
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Cindy is DEFINITELY one of the scoundrelous workers of the Antichrist!
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Ted McMillan
>We are to be warning the people, not attacking them! We are to be
>identifying the system of Babylon and her characteristics, so that
people
>can recognize if they are a part of either her or her daughters, and
COME
>OUT OF HER.!!!
This is the NEW excuse she uses now for emotionally attacking someone
who exposed a super-terrorist who condemned all non-Catholics to
persecution and death, and said or did absolutely nothing against the
actual super-terrorist. After a long time of no more attacks even
according to a promise long broken that Antichrist Cindy promised to
ignore me, here she is again violating her own principles.
She promised to ignore me, and told me after her false Vatican apology
that she can no longer attack anything. ALL of these unscrupulous
workers of the Vatican have a terrible agenda to get me to stop
exposing the super-terrorist Ted Seeber who condemned all
non-Catholics to death as if the Inquisitions never ended!
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Tom A.
Cindy wrote:
>
> Dear Readers:
>
> All the World will wonder after the beast EXCEPT those who's name are
> written in the Lamb's book of life.
That's interesting. I've read lots from people who appear to wonder
about the beast. They've wondered if it was Gorbachev (sp?), Putkin,
Bush (either one) Reagan, this one, that one. Similar to the heretics
who claim Christ Jesus has already returned to earth.
I'll be on watch for His return, but I won't speculate on the time or
the hour. Nor will I worry about the beast; God's plan doesn't depend
on me knowing or worrying about it - there are worries enough for
today. The anti-Christ is easy to spot - "It is the man who denies that
Jesus is the Christ."
> ~ Cindy
"Now is the acceptable hour." There is no other time but now.
--
Tom A.
There's nothing like cooking and eating outside, unless you like
comfort. - Henny Youngman
Deja mail is gone. Look for me at raugost at yahoo . com
Cindy
"Tom A." <tar...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3CD688AC...@my-deja.com...
> Just one thing that struck me
>
> Cindy wrote:
> >
> > Dear Readers:
> >
>
> > All the World will wonder after the beast EXCEPT those who's name are
> > written in the Lamb's book of life.
>
> That's interesting. I've read lots from people who appear to wonder
> about the beast. They've wondered if it was Gorbachev (sp?), Putkin,
> Bush (either one) Reagan, this one, that one. Similar to the heretics
> who claim Christ Jesus has already returned to earth.
Even more interesting is the fact that the words say " wonder after the
beast" meaning follow the beast. We are not left to wonder who it is, the
description is plain as day in the bible. The beast is Rome, that is the
only answer that matches every single prophesy about it.
>
> I'll be on watch for His return, but I won't speculate on the time or
> the hour. Nor will I worry about the beast; God's plan doesn't depend
> on me knowing or worrying about it - there are worries enough for
> today. The anti-Christ is easy to spot - "It is the man who denies that
> Jesus is the Christ."
Who told you that you are not to worry about the beast? Who told you the
prophesies are not to be understood? The beast? It is interesting also that
In focussing on Jesus, many forget to focus on his words as well. He is the
one who warned about the beast, do you think he did so because it wasn't
important enough to worry about? As he is our Savior, it makes sense to me
that everything he had to say is of the utmost importance, and relevant to
our salvation. Amen?
Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew
unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and
signified [it] by his angel unto his servant John:
Rev 1:2 Who bare record of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus
Christ, and of all things that he saw.
Rev 1:3 Blessed [is] he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this
prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein: for the time [is]
at hand.
Be blessed Tom, he is talking to you here.
Also, there are some very scary words for those who try to change the
message or take away from it, if you say it is not important, you are taking
away from his words. Think about it...
Rev 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the
prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add
unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this
prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of
the holy city, and [from] the things which are written in this book.
Rev 22:20 He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly.
Amen.
> In His Grace,
Ted McMillan
>
> Cindy wrote:
> >
> > Dear Readers:
> >
>
> > All the World will wonder after the beast EXCEPT those who's name are
> > written in the Lamb's book of life.
>
> That's interesting. I've read lots from people who appear to wonder
> about the beast. They've wondered if it was Gorbachev (sp?), Putkin,
> Bush (either one) Reagan, this one, that one. Similar to the heretics
> who claim Christ Jesus has already returned to earth.
>
> I'll be on watch for His return, but I won't speculate on the time or
> the hour. Nor will I worry about the beast; God's plan doesn't depend
> on me knowing or worrying about it - there are worries enough for
> today. The anti-Christ is easy to spot - "It is the man who denies that
> Jesus is the Christ."
>
> > ~ Cindy
>
> "Now is the acceptable hour." There is no other time but now.
How can Tom A. be worried about the Beast when he spends so much time
in concern about Ted McMillan? The Beast can never terrorize him!
Just watch what happens when someone exposes that Beast and then you
will see coldsweatin'. I doubt that an organization a man willingly
works for can terrorize him.
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Tom A.
Cindy wrote:
>
> "Tom A." <tar...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:3CD688AC...@my-deja.com...
> > Just one thing that struck me
> >
> > Cindy wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Readers:
> > >
> >
> > > All the World will wonder after the beast EXCEPT those who's name are
> > > written in the Lamb's book of life.
> >
> > That's interesting. I've read lots from people who appear to wonder
> > about the beast. They've wondered if it was Gorbachev (sp?), Putkin,
> > Bush (either one) Reagan, this one, that one. Similar to the heretics
> > who claim Christ Jesus has already returned to earth.
>
> Even more interesting is the fact that the words say " wonder after the
> beast" meaning follow the beast.
True, meanings of words change, but "wonder after the beast" fits so
well with the way people keep coming up with various theories of who it
is.
> We are not left to wonder who it is, the
> description is plain as day in the bible. The beast is Rome, that is the
> only answer that matches every single prophesy about it.
Like this theory. Totally wrong, but a theory, like the Putkin,
Gorbachev, etc.
> > I'll be on watch for His return, but I won't speculate on the time or
> > the hour. Nor will I worry about the beast; God's plan doesn't depend
> > on me knowing or worrying about it - there are worries enough for
> > today. The anti-Christ is easy to spot - "It is the man who denies that
> > Jesus is the Christ."
>
> Who told you that you are not to worry about the beast?
Jesus told me not to worry about the future.
> He is the
> one who warned about the beast, do you think he did so because it wasn't
> important enough to worry about? As he is our Savior, it makes sense to me
> that everything he had to say is of the utmost importance, and relevant to
> our salvation. Amen?
Yes. "This is my body." Totally important.
> Be blessed Tom, he is talking to you here.
And I should accept _your_ interpretation of Revelation because?
> Also, there are some very scary words for those who try to change the
> message or take away from it, if you say it is not important, you are taking
> away from his words. Think about it...
Now you are adding words to my mouth - I never said not important - just
not worth violating Jesus' words to worry about it.
> Rev 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the
> prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add
> unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
Isn't that what you do when you claim the beast is Rome - add to the
book?
Ted McMillan
> Cindy wrote:
> >
> > "Tom A." <tar...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> > news:3CD688AC...@my-deja.com...
> > > Just one thing that struck me
> > >
> > > Cindy wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Readers:
> > > >
>
> > > > All the World will wonder after the beast EXCEPT those who's name are
> > > > written in the Lamb's book of life.
> > >
> > > That's interesting. I've read lots from people who appear to wonder
> > > about the beast. They've wondered if it was Gorbachev (sp?), Putkin,
> > > Bush (either one) Reagan, this one, that one. Similar to the heretics
> > > who claim Christ Jesus has already returned to earth.
> >
> > Even more interesting is the fact that the words say " wonder after the
> > beast" meaning follow the beast.
>
> True, meanings of words change, but "wonder after the beast" fits so
> well with the way people keep coming up with various theories of who it
> is.
>
> > We are not left to wonder who it is, the
> > description is plain as day in the bible. The beast is Rome, that is the
> > only answer that matches every single prophesy about it.
>
> Like this theory. Totally wrong, but a theory, like the Putkin,
> Gorbachev, etc.
Like the workers of the Antichrist: come to declare to us the age of
free thought who then proceed to tell us anything they don't agree
with is a theory!
>
>
> > > I'll be on watch for His return, but I won't speculate on the time or
> > > the hour. Nor will I worry about the beast; God's plan doesn't depend
> > > on me knowing or worrying about it - there are worries enough for
> > > today. The anti-Christ is easy to spot - "It is the man who denies that
> > > Jesus is the Christ."
> >
> > Who told you that you are not to worry about the beast?
>
> Jesus told me not to worry about the future.
You forgot to mention Jesus told you there was an exception: Ted
McMillan or anyone who knows about the Vatican conspiracy.
>
> > He is the
> > one who warned about the beast, do you think he did so because it wasn't
> > important enough to worry about? As he is our Savior, it makes sense to me
> > that everything he had to say is of the utmost importance, and relevant to
> > our salvation. Amen?
>
> Yes. "This is my body." Totally important.
What about the bodies that Ted Seeber and your ancestors condemned and
mutilated with joy and glee?
> > Be blessed Tom, he is talking to you here.
>
> And I should accept _your_ interpretation of Revelation because?
Have seminars with your interpretation of the Revelation next to the
Adventist interpretation. Then the whole world would see. "NOW WHY
DIDN'T I THINK O THAT??"
> > Also, there are some very scary words for those who try to change the
> > message or take away from it, if you say it is not important, you are taking
> > away from his words. Think about it...
>
> Now you are adding words to my mouth - I never said not important - just
> not worth violating Jesus' words to worry about it.
Deceiver in action. If Jesus didn't want us to worry about it, He
would not have spent His time to bother Daniel, and then to even save
John the Revelator and visit him to give the message. When
Antichristians teach us things, Christ always looks like an idiot.
Christ takes the time and give the message and Antichristians step by
to tell us Christ said not to worry about it.
> > Rev 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the
> > prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add
> > unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
>
> Isn't that what you do when you claim the beast is Rome - add to the
> book?
Christ said not to worry about it!
> > > In His Grace,
> > > > ~ Cindy
> > >
> > > "Now is the acceptable hour." There is no other time but now.
> > > --
> > > Tom A.
Well, what are you waiting for to sever your connection with the
Antichrist?
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Cindy
>
>
> Cindy wrote:
> >
> > "Tom A." <tar...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> > news:3CD688AC...@my-deja.com...
> > > Just one thing that struck me
> > >
> > > Cindy wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Readers:
> > > >
> > >
> > > > All the World will wonder after the beast EXCEPT those who's name
are
> > > > written in the Lamb's book of life.
> > >
> > > That's interesting. I've read lots from people who appear to wonder
> > > about the beast. They've wondered if it was Gorbachev (sp?), Putkin,
> > > Bush (either one) Reagan, this one, that one. Similar to the heretics
> > > who claim Christ Jesus has already returned to earth.
> >
> > Even more interesting is the fact that the words say " wonder after the
> > beast" meaning follow the beast.
>
> True, meanings of words change, but "wonder after the beast" fits so
> well with the way people keep coming up with various theories of who it
> is.
The meanings of these words have not changed, we still have the Hebrew and
Greek manuscripts and I always study with Strongs exhaustive concordance
which shows all of the Greek and Hebrew words.
It does not fit so well if you are using your own interpretation. People
come up with other theories because they don't actually read the bible, or
they don't read all of it, or they just read what other people have said.
>
> > We are not left to wonder who it is, the
> > description is plain as day in the bible. The beast is Rome, that is the
> > only answer that matches every single prophesy about it.
>
> Like this theory. Totally wrong, but a theory, like the Putkin,
> Gorbachev, etc.
A theory? Totally wrong? How so? Do you have your own theory? Does it match
all of the other information given? Rome does.
An Angel tells Daniel there will only be four kingdoms who rule the world
before Jesus Christ comes and sets up his Kingdom which will never end,
although others will try, they will fail. Then God instructs the Angel to
make Daniel understand. The first kingdom is identified as Babylon, the
second Kingdom is identified as Medio-Persia, and the third kingdom is
identified as Greece, all by name, all within the book of Daniel . Surely
you have heard of the Roman empire? that is the only other Kingdom which has
ruled the world to this day. Do you know of another? It is not a theory, it
is not my interpretation, read a encyclopedia, read your bible, Rome was
ruling the world in Jesus day and beyond. The beast is identified in Daniel
as the 4th Kingdom, the description of it is the same as in the book of
Revelation.
>
>
> > > I'll be on watch for His return, but I won't speculate on the time or
> > > the hour. Nor will I worry about the beast; God's plan doesn't depend
> > > on me knowing or worrying about it - there are worries enough for
> > > today. The anti-Christ is easy to spot - "It is the man who denies
that
> > > Jesus is the Christ."
New Question:
How will you be watching, without reading the prophesies? how will you know
what the signs are? We are definatly told to watch, and Jesus said "And now
I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye
might believe" John 14:29
> >
> > Who told you that you are not to worry about the beast?
>
> Jesus told me not to worry about the future.
Do you have a quote of him saying not to worry about this? I'd be interested
in seeing your proof.
>
> > He is the
> > one who warned about the beast, do you think he did so because it wasn't
> > important enough to worry about? As he is our Savior, it makes sense to
me
> > that everything he had to say is of the utmost importance, and relevant
to
> > our salvation. Amen?
>
> Yes. "This is my body." Totally important.
Interesting.. that seems to be another subject.
>
> > Be blessed Tom, he is talking to you here.
>
> And I should accept _your_ interpretation of Revelation because?
I just told you it is not my interpretation, don't go by my words, or anyone
else's, check it out for yourself.
>
> > Also, there are some very scary words for those who try to change the
> > message or take away from it, if you say it is not important, you are
taking
> > away from his words. Think about it...
>
> Now you are adding words to my mouth - I never said not important - just
> not worth violating Jesus' words to worry about it.
And now you are adding to Jesus' words, because you will never find one
verse in Scripture where Jesus tells you not to worry about the prophecies,
in fact everything he says about it confirms the importance of it, so how
can you violate something he never said?
Try going to www.blueletterbible.com I do not promote their doctrines or
bible studies, but they have an excellent search engine for the bible and a
strongs concordance online, and you can look up any word or phrase you
want. Also they have Greek, Hebrew, and Latin and about 5 different
translations of the bible, I don't know what they are, because I only use an
authorized King James version, but you can check it out.
>
>
> > Rev 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the
> > prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall
add
> > unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
>
> Isn't that what you do when you claim the beast is Rome - add to the
> book?
No, :-) I would not want to take part in the plagues, the explanation is
above, check it out~ for your own sake.
Cindy
< Snip>
You can't seem to help yourself either, can you?
Nice work Ace.
In His Grace,
Cindy
Ted McMillan
You can't attack anyone! You repented! Attacking others would not
make anything better! You are too busy preaching the 3 Angels
messages that tells us the Antichrist is obviously he who says Christ
is not God in the flesh!
-----------
The Revelation of the unscrupulousness of Cindy Ford will not affect
her exempt it may slow down her false claims a bit. She is trained by
the Vatican to infiltrate the Adventist Church from which she now
claims membership. Angelo Braz is another one. We have seen what he
can do also in ignoring the hateful words of a super-terrorist in Ted
Seeber and then moving forward to attack me telling the world that I
don't have love.
This message is to warn you that most of your national leaders are
EXACTLY the same as these two and Ted Seeber, but they are hiding that
fact for their own purposes. We were unfortunate enough to meet many
of them on the internet attacking the last truly free means of
communication in the United States. A marvelous rundown of some of
their major tactics can be found at the following link:
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/DiversityI.html
Ted Seeber has shown hatred for the founding fathers of the United
States, but shows great favor to the present leaders. Remember that
Seeber has told us that the Albigenses AND ALL NON-CATHOLICS deserved
to be exterminated because they did not LIVE THE BIBLE unlike the
victims of September 11th. When we bring this up about his
organization in Italy, he also has the reflexes to tell us that we
hate Catholics. Now you should think that something is deadly wrong
if a mind like Seeber's shows favor to our current national leaders of
America! Yet we are trying to show that his brainwaves are EXACTLY
the same as the horrible Inquisitors of history and the Communists and
Nazis!
Article Title: Even at the Door:
The Lord calls upon those who believe in him to be workers together
with him. While life shall last, they are not to feel that their work
is done. Shall we allow the signs of the end to be fulfilled without
telling people of what is coming upon the earth? Shall we allow them
to go down in darkness without having urged upon them the need of a
preparation to meet their Lord? Unless we ourselves do our duty to
those around us, the day of God will come upon us as a thief.
Confusion fills the world, and a great terror is soon to come upon
human beings. The end is very near. We who know the truth should be
preparing for what is soon to break upon the world as an overwhelming
surprise.
Ellen G. White: Review and Herald, Nov. 22, 1906
My website again shows the agenda for why the words LOVE and HATE are
very important for the infiltrants of the Vatican to continue to
bombard the minds of their victim people of the free world. They
attribute HATE to me, and LOVE to Ted Seeber who has also shown a
marked disrespect not only for human life, but for lives of
bible-believing Christians:
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/Betrayed.html
This article shows that these words: LOVE and HATE will be used to
manipulate and forward the ecumenical movement IN CRISIS so that Rome
can take dominance over the entire world. LOVE will always be tacked
on to the word UNITE, and HATE will always be tacked on to the word
DIVIDE, or anything that means the status quo in liberty and freedom
must be maintained. Therefore, our generations that knew better and
refused to unite with the Papacy are hateful and damned! Cindy here
speaks:
September 28, 2001 Cindy:
-------------------------------------------------------
Adventista,and the Popes personal hit squad watch you all the time
Ted, they follow you everywhere,they have machines to read your
thoughts,the whole world is against you,your mother was one of
them,aaaarrghh!!!
Get a life or some medicine,dummy.
LE
--------------------------------------------------------
My comment: Just think that these papal despots do worse when we
bring up Ellen White! How can a dead prophet cause so much panic
among these "Christians?" Then naturally they become the
self-appointed expositors on how to be calm. They murdered like no
other people or religion in all the world! If they want to take over
and do the same things again, they have to self-appoint themselves to
be the ultimate expositors on LOVE!
But look now as Cindy posts to Lamarr Edwards. Take note that no one
can bring her attention to the fact that Lamarr Edwards has made the
most insultive posts against me or in this newsgroup:
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
Cindy of course, didn't show any objection to these very insultive
words. Instead, Cindy actually adds to the insultive postings of
Lamarr with her arrogance:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=c20cba56.0109230715.5b6cd55b%40posting.google.com
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Subject: Re: ###SEEBER AGAIN MAKES EARTH-SHATTERING ADMISSIONS!
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.baptist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
View: Complete Thread (11 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-23 08:15:12 PST
Ted Have you ever seen the cartoon Pinky and the brain? LOL, I'm
sorry, sometimes little things amuse me.
Cindy
-------------------------------------------------------
TED SEEBER POSTS THAT THE ALBIGENSES DESERVED TO BE EXTERMINATED, AS
THEY WERE BY ROME IN THE MOST BARBAROUS MANNER, BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T
LIVE THE BIBLE LIKE THE VICTIMS OF SEPTEMBER 11 DID!
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=Lsqv7.29125%24xi5.1438277%40sjcpnn01.usenetserver.com
Cindy here in defending the awesomely insensitive and bloodthirsty
words of Ted Seeber tells me that I have taken Seeber's words out of
context, but she didn't take mine out of context. She does everything
to oppose me:
-------------------------------------------------------
Seeber told us we must give up our liberties. One example:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=lxyr7.16142%24ey1.651789%40sjcpnn01.usenetserver.com
If there is any reason to see why Cindy can attack me and not Seeber,
take a look at this:
From: Cindy (synt...@iei.net)
Search Result 10
Subject: Re: SECURITY VS. PRIVACY??
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist
View: Complete Thread (35 articles) | Original Format
Date: 2001-09-23 09:28:48 PST
.. You may read it above :) I would just like to add, my own thought.
I wonder how many people on the planes involved in our recent tragedy,
if they had been asked to give up a little of their privacy, to save
lives, would have refused.
Cindy
---------------------------------------------------
A Fox News commentator even said that Americans are agreeing to give
up their liberties so that they can at least "LIVE." The American
public has therefore become dumbed-down and desensitized. Did anyone
who faced oppressions, slavery and tyranny realize the meaning of the
words:
GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH??
Now look at Cindy claiming that she never attacked me. She claimed
Ted,
Cindy
---------------------------------------------------
She replies:
Ted: I have said I was wrong for attacking you, attacking others will
not make that better.
---------------------------------------------------
Remember when Cindy told us that she was never attacking me? She
asked me why I viewed her expressions of love as attacks and told
everybody that I was just imagining things. In this post she is
telling us that she was attacking me, and her posts are now just the
same as before her false apology?
The result of all this is that she has qualified herself to teach us
about love, the fruits of the Spirit, Christ, and all that Christ does
for a person. But she continues:
---------------------------------------------------
>attacking others will not make that better. Perhaps you don't
understand, that all the people
>you group together, have had disagreements, we've all had words in
the
>past, and probably will continue to do so, however we do it in a
>christian spirit, and respect each other. You have never claimed to
>feel bad about attacking me, or anyone else.
>*I WON'T REPEAT THIS AGAIN AGAIN*,
>if you do not understand, then that is your choice. I forgive
>you Ted, I have always forgiven you. If you can't treat me with
love,
>Please, leave me alone. >Cindy
-------------------------------------------------------
Cindy
--------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Ted McMillan
Ted McMillan
I never promised I would ignore the sons and daughters of the
Antichrist O unscrupulous one! You forgot that I can be paranoid?
You forgot you and the other workers of the Antichrist always teach
people who know of your infiltration and treason that they must not be
paranoid? I don't mind you thinking I am paranoid, but I know what
happens when I post the truth around here: You all break all your
promises as if you were never given consciences to make attack posts.
You swarm and you cannot dare to remain away.
Since you didn't teach me the 3 Angels messages, but took the time to
do otherwise than would have been used to preach it, here is more
showing how unscrupulous you people are:
Tom A.
And when the fourth kingdom came to be, Jesus came, set up His kingdom
and it will never end.
Or are you saying Jesus didn't come? Or that He didn't build a Church
on Peter? or that He lied when He said "I will be with you always,
until the end of the age"? or that He lied when He said of the Church
"the gates of hell will not prevail against it."
> > > > I'll be on watch for His return, but I won't speculate on the time or
> > > > the hour. Nor will I worry about the beast; God's plan doesn't depend
> > > > on me knowing or worrying about it - there are worries enough for
> > > > today. The anti-Christ is easy to spot - "It is the man who denies
> that
> > > > Jesus is the Christ."
>
> New Question:
> How will you be watching, without reading the prophesies? how will you know
> what the signs are? We are definatly told to watch, and Jesus said "And now
> I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye
> might believe" John 14:29
Like the wise maidens.
The foolish did nothing, and their light ran out.
There is much in the NT of what we should do.
> > > Who told you that you are not to worry about the beast?
> >
> > Jesus told me not to worry about the future.
>
> Do you have a quote of him saying not to worry about this? I'd be interested
> in seeing your proof.
"Let tomorrow worry about tomorrow. There are worries enough for
today."
Is the beast here? Maybe, maybe not, but in either case how should I
act? Jesus answers that one too.
"Feed the orphans, clothe the naked, visit the sick, and the
imprisoned." James calls this true religion.
And "Love God with all your heart, all your mind, all your soul, and all
your strength. ANd love your neighbor as yourself."
It's a matter of importance - the beast isn't. If I continue in my
pilgrimage whether the beast is here or not, I should still arrive at my
destination.
> > > Be blessed Tom, he is talking to you here.
> >
> > And I should accept _your_ interpretation of Revelation because?
>
> I just told you it is not my interpretation, don't go by my words, or anyone
> else's, check it out for yourself.
I have. I come to different conclusions than you. Maybe we should
check what other Christians had to say about Revelation? Do they have
any input in the discussion?
> > > Also, there are some very scary words for those who try to change the
> > > message or take away from it, if you say it is not important, you are
> taking
> > > away from his words. Think about it...
> >
> > Now you are adding words to my mouth - I never said not important - just
> > not worth violating Jesus' words to worry about it.
>
> And now you are adding to Jesus' words, because you will never find one
> verse in Scripture where Jesus tells you not to worry about the prophecies,
> in fact everything he says about it confirms the importance of it, so how
> can you violate something he never said?
What does He say about it? "There will be wars and rumors of wars" "It
will be like the time of Jonah, people eating and drinking, marrying and
giving in marriage, right up until the rains came." in other words -
the end will not be appreciatively different than what went before.
But when Jesus comes back, it will be lightning flashing across the sky
from east to west. ANd the sky will roll up like a scroll. I don't
think anyone will overlook that.
> Try going to www.blueletterbible.com I do not promote their doctrines or
> bible studies, but they have an excellent search engine for the bible and a
> strongs concordance online, and you can look up any word or phrase you
> want. Also they have Greek, Hebrew, and Latin and about 5 different
> translations of the bible, I don't know what they are, because I only use an
> authorized King James version, but you can check it out.
Carlos too only uses the authorized version, and bases his whole
theology on the verse about "rightly dividing the word of God" not
realizing that it doesn't mean to cut up the word of God. Not that you
fall into the same error, just an interesting data point.
> > > Rev 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the
> > > prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall
> add
> > > unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
> >
> > Isn't that what you do when you claim the beast is Rome - add to the
> > book?
>
> No, :-) I would not want to take part in the plagues, the explanation is
> above, check it out~ for your own sake.
I have. I find the Catholic Church to be the same Church that Jesus
built on Peter; that collected the Bible under the Holy Spirit at the
end of the fourth century; that has taught the same morals and preached
the same gospel since the first century; that has encouraged the
greatest minds of humanity in the study of the gospels, and given haven
to the saints whose holiness shines down through centuries to inspire
us; that has been a city on a hill and light to the world for 20
centuries - the Church that in 108 AD was first named Catholic by St.
Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch, who tradition tells us was the child Jesus
set in the middle of the desciples.
> > > > In His Grace,
> > > > > ~ Cindy
> > > >
> > > > "Now is the acceptable hour." There is no other time but now.
> > > > --
Tom A.
--
Tom A.
"The first thing I do when I write is throw out time." Charles Williams
deja mail is gone. Look for me at raugost at yahoo . com
Stephen Quist
"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02050...@posting.google.com...
You Jesuit you!
Stev
Ted McMillan
Name-calling O man from the Antichrist?
Here is some information you probably missed:
Greetings,
Yes, not only did a super-terrorist condemn all non-Catholics to death
on these newsgroups, but more super-terrorists are defending the man
telling us how "courteous" and "kind" he is UNLIKE ME. These tell us
they are non-Catholics, but their behavior proves Jack Chick and
others absolutely correct! What is shown here reveals just the tip of
the iceberg about the terrible infiltration of our society by the
orders of the Papacy.
I was unfortunate enough to bump into a Dark Ages Catholic person. I
mean a person whose mind is at least just the same as in the Dark
Ages. There are private groups and people now referred to as
"conspiracy kooks" who are revealing that Rome has not changed, and
that she has infiltrated all of society and especially attacked
entities of control, influence and power.with people from her various
not so well known orders. Many of them are reported to have
infiltrated all the Christian Churches pretending to be members just
as Protestant documentation has forewarned. We have found these
reports to be startlingly true! They would apply for high positions
AND POSITIONS THAT CONTROL EMPLOYMENT in institutions all over our
fair land. Soon others of their numbers would apply for position,
and, controlling employment, they would select their infiltrators over
regular Americans.
Typically anyone bringing such things to light would be referred to as
kooks, paranoid, Anti-Catholics, or hatemongers. Well let's take a
look at someone who gave such an accusation so that we can see what we
are up against. I am talking about a man by the name of Ted Seeber.
You are about to see the man confirm everything that has been said.
He is going to argue against most every principle of liberty and the
Constitution. He shows total loyalty to the Pope. Here is a synopsis
of his views against human liberty and the American Constitution:
It is true that some have said that his ideas are not a reliable
indicator of how the Vatican feels. It is interesting to note
however, that though he condemned Protestants to persecution and
death, all such people were not in the least upset at him, but instead
attacked me because I reproved him for his terrible disregard of human
life.
We start the conversation over the current September 11th terrorist
incident I was discussing:
When told how long this terrorist incident took to plan and implement
compared to others that were planned quicker and yet caught, Seeber
said: "There have been plenty of successfull terrorist attacks
against US interests where the terrorists stayed legal until the
attack."
We find this difficult to believe since we know that America had been
considered a haven against terrorism and how this was surely mentioned
by all our news media as they were describing the impact of this
unprecedented act of terrorism.
Seeber tells us that:
The current Constitutional principles of liberty are incredibly
outdated and stupid. He said the principle is as old as the 1500s
with Martin Luther. When did his principles for no liberty or privacy
originate? When Christians reveal the Vatican hatred of religious
liberty of conscience and expose her continual conspiracy through
infiltration of our nation and the nations of the world, despot
Vatican Catholics like Seeber tell the world that we hate the Catholic
people. How long was this practice used? Since he told us that our
principles of liberty are outdated, how outdated is the constant
reflex habit that exposing people who slowly tortured Christians to
death makes one hateful of Catholics and more a criminal than the
people who committed the atrocities themselves? How outdated it is?
Seeber said that the terrorist incident provided a benefit to us in
that, "we found out that privacy is not a luxury we can afford just
yet." Notice that he said "we" volunteering all opinions for us and
not allowing us to disagree. He includes himself among us as if he is
one of us even though he hates liberty for everything else except him
and his church. He doesn't think like us nor agree with us, but he
includes himself in our communion. He gets upset when we say he is a
despot.
AFTER he already told us a year before on the newsgroups that "liberty
is useless and only causes schism." We therefore asked again and
again the question we have for our new American government:
"If the Citizens of America agree to give up their liberties in order
to take out terrorism, what will happen after terrorism is conquered?
Will we get our liberties back? Seeber has indeed answered that
question for us.
Soon Seeber began to lie to us telling us that what he said about
liberty being useless is just and only his opinion and that I should
not get upset about it or believe it. The problem is that there is
documentation showing that his church does believe that liberty is
useless and only causes schism.
Seeber accuses us of aiding and supporting the terrorists because we
believe that liberty and privacy is more important than stopping Bin
Laden. He despots us to believe that Bin Laden will only be caught if
privacy is eliminated.
Seeber tells all that Osama Bin Laden is my Idol because I determined
that the American citizens must retain their liberties.
In Seeber telling us that Privacy is outdated. He tells us that we
should provide all our private information to the government. Our
emails should not be private. Even our apartments that we rent, since
we did not build them, we should allow our landlords the rights to go
in and out as they please and to do what they want. Privacy and
liberty are not inseparable. Those who contend for privacy are
criminals.
Seeber claims that I support the terrorists because I oppose the
citizens giving up their privacy and liberties. He says that I
support those who would destroy liberty. When I replied that I don't
support Seeber (who would destroy liberty), he asked if I support the
American citizens living their lives as if nothing had happened. Well
no I don't. I want the citizens to remember this terrorist attack as
I want them to remember the worst terrorist attacks during the Dark
Ages. But as Seeber told everyone that I support terrorism because I
support the citizens living as if nothing has happened, you can see
that he also condemned President Bush for saying that America should
continue living on their lives and that we will not allow terrorists
to limit the freedoms of Americans.
Others have falsely claimed that Ted Seeber doesn't represent Catholic
thought, but this is not the fact. Although Ted Seeber already has
argued against liberty for all non-Catholics, he has shown just as
Rome has that he believes in a different type of liberty. Check for
example this Catholic statement of her position on this matter:
"The church does not, and cannot accept, or in any degree favor,
liberty IN THE PROTESTANT SENSE OF LIBERTY." -- (Catholic World,
April, 1870.
Ted Seeber, in another occasion talks about "fake liberty" after
telling us that liberty itself is useless and "only causes schism." He
is therefore showing that he supports a different kind of liberty even
though he has before condemned the concept entirely.
Ted Seeber charges Ted McMillan with aiding terrorists through his
support of the rights of the citizens of America to keep their
liberties. He says that by Ted McMillan's determination along this
line, he provides, "Aid and comfort to the enemy, is what you said and
did." But he gets upset if people say he's a despot.
Ted McMillan asked if we are entering a government now when those who
tell us that "liberty is useless and only causes schism" are freedom
lovers and those who are apalled by such words are terrorists? Seeber
replies, "Yep. Been that way for 40-odd years now." Why then is he
calling for change to that setting if he now tells us it is and has
already been like that?
After Ted McMillan said that those who believe "liberty is useless and
only causes schism" are the ones who believe in depopulation, Seeber
said, "Really? You don't believe in depopulation? Then what are all
those guns for?" He is against the rights to bear arms which was
instituted as a last resort to the Citizens of America in case they
find themselves suddenly confronting a tyrannical United States
government through infiltration, having people who think like Seeber
all throughout it as it is today. But Seeber well knows that the US
military and the UN has lots of guns and far more devices of
destruction INCLUDING STICKY STRIPS. These are spread along highways
and arteries where people can enter or leave populated areas. They
get stuck there and can't move. The criteria Seeber gave was that if
you own guns or support the ownership of it, you believe in
depopulation. But Seeber gets upset when we say he is a despot. Why
is the government planning a depopulation of the citizenry?
Seeber says:
I know you have a Jihad against America because you support an
outdated and incredibly stupid interpretation of the Constitution,
[the "interpretation that always was] and because you support the
taking up of arms against your own government even in times of war.
Ted McMillan:
Ted Seeber knows the following very well, but he is working to
deliberately deceive the readers here. The framers of the
Constitution allowed for the citizens of America to be armed in case,
through infiltration, the American Government turns into a tyrannical
government. I assure all of you that the framers of the Constitution
do not have a Jihad against America. The guns are for the citizens to
protect themselves against despots like Seeber who would at times
claim themselves that they would infiltrate the government and work to
change it till it hates and outlaws liberty. Seeber even admitted
this very thing concerning himself.
Ted McMillan:
> Yes, I am on the side of those who love liberty. Where have I said
> whose side I was or was not on?
Ted Seeber:
In fighting for privacy rights (which aren't in the
constitution-ANYWHERE) against neccessary rules needed to fight
against the Terrorists, you've chosen the wrong side.
Ted McMillan's comment:
Take note folks that he told us we shouldn't have rights to privacy
"just yet" when he was in deceive mode. He now again shows us we were
to NEVER have it, for he claims it is nowhere in the Constitution.
He tells us privacy rights aren't in the constitution, yet he is just
one of a vast army working to change the Constitution so that it can
take away the privacy rights. Where else have we seen thinking like
Seeber's? Have any of you studied the Communists? Have any of you
studied the Nazis? If Seeber's principles are so great, please show
us how these regimes were great throughout history. Where is the
benefit of them compared to America? Let us see if Vatican
Inquisitors, Communists, Facists, Nazis or Seeber can learn anything
even in lessons over the span of thousands of years! How come you
can't see that the sources which told us there is an indelible
connection between Communism, Fascism, Nazism and every other horrible
regime to the Vatican is fact?? "Well Seeber doesn't speak for the
Catholic Church" the "Ends Justifies the Means" people would say.
Well then why not then get upset at Seeber? Instead all emotion is
only on Ted McMillan. That is VERY revealing!
Seeber says that he destroys communities and builds them:
He says that he works against the government in order to reform it
from the inside in "acceptable confines", but though Ted McMillan is
in agreement with the present makeup of government, he is in a Jihad
against it. Anyone who repeats this fact about Seeber as Jack Chick
and others tell us, will be charged with being "Anti-Catholic" and
with hating Catholics. How come Seeber is not being charged here?
All this shows that ROME HAS NOT CHANGED! Despot Catholics like
Seeber would never think of providing such unlimited power to the free
American government throughout its history. Why are they so eager and
determined that that be done now? That is because most of those in
government are secretly loyal to the Pope and would break any American
or Constitutional principle in a heartbeat at his command irregardless
of any oath that they have made. They could not do this so readily
historically because there were many true Americans who also held
posts side them and who would either stop them or report what they
were doing. As prophecy is about to be fulfilled, NOW THAT POPULATION
OF TRUE AMERICANS IS ALMOST NON-EXISTENT. They have retired, have
been dismissed, have been killed, or otherwise just are not there
anymore. Some have resigned in protest of the new outlaw movements.
I reprove despot Seeber for gloating over the dead bodies of the
Protestants! The following is the actual statement and reply:
Ted McMillan:
> > But you did understand how to hang people in chains. And your
> > founding Fathers also can't tell the difference between shedding the
> > blood of millions of bible-believers in the most unbelievable ways for
> > their descendants to now presume upon the world to teach them what is
> > the definition of love, hate and plagiarism.
>
Ted Seeber:
> Can you really be said to be believing in the Bible if you don't live it?
> NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible.
-------------------
CHECK THESE WORDS CAREFULLY! THEY WERE THE EXACT THOUGHTS OF THE
BRUTAL USTASHI KILLER SOLDIERS OF WWII! THEY WERE THE EXACT THOUGHTS
THAT CAUSED THE PERSECUTION AND DEATH OF MILLIONS THROUGHOUT THE
REFORMATION MANY CATHOLICS ARE TELLING US ISN'T TRUE AND IS WAY IN THE
PAST!!
Amazingly even Nicholas, now viewing that much of his claims were
proven true through Seebers words, moved out to attack me telling me I
have an obsession with a super-terrorist like the US government has
with regular terrorists, and has failed to even address what Seeber
has done. Seeber has condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and
death. Nicholas II claims to be a non-Catholic as most of the other
posters here including Caillean, who claims to be a witch. Witches
are known for being persecuted by everyone. She also sees nothing
wrong with what Seeber has said, but expended all her irritation on
the fact that I have reproved and do expose the super-terrorist!
Claiming to be non-Catholic is not good enough if you follow a Vatican
agenda.
-------------------
Ted McMillan:
NO WONDER YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT ME BRINGING BACK YOUR RECORD OF
HORRIBLE ATROCITIES! They were not even living the bible! Why even
worry about them! Were the 5 to 6 thousands who were killed by the
terrorist attacks living by the bible? You don't have any consistent
principles, if you even know the meaning of the word! Your principles
change only for you to even look like you are winning an argument.
Your statement is incredibly insensitive and you constantly reveal
that what is written by your uncomparably bloody religion is true.
All I know is that you people murdered millions in the most horrible
ways. I DON'T CARE IF YOU MURDERED ATHEISTS!! I am not that
inhumanly insensitive for an animal like you to be worried about me
having guns!
Again, despot: WHY IS THE POPE APOLOGIZING!! You have just sent us
your bigoted despot opinions without providing any MAYBEES! Why not
try to prove what you are saying against me using the scriptures then?
How often have you even answered my questions?
Thousands of people lost their lives in the World Trade Center
disaster. How many of them lived by the bible? They were not even in
rural settings nor under persecution. All those in the WTC were
products of the modern revolution. I would even say that most of them
believe that homosexual activity is acceptable behavior. They all
lived in the modern age and are products of it. I can bet you that
homosexuality was not a problem for those who were slain by Rome!
I don't care whether or not they lived by the bible according to a
murderous despot!
--------------------
For making these statements, I have been constantly attacked by
Vatican Cindy Ford, Angelo Braz and Paul Tooley Jr. who all falsely
claim to be Adventists. Their discussion specifically and
intentionally leaves out their fellow soldier of the Pope, Ted Seeber,
and they have even demanded that I not refer to Ted Seeber in any
discussion despite his very revealing comment involving the blood of
the Saints. These all claim to be Adventists. I have asked Vatican
Cindy a simple question. She moves heaven and earth to evade it but
later claims that she has answered it. Below is the question and
check the threads in order to see how she has answered it. She has
moved heaven and earth to evade and avoid it and then finally lied by
telling us that she has answered it. The statement of Ted Seeber not
only condemned the religion Cindy Ford falsely claims to be a part of,
but because of her claims, his statements also condemns her life. The
same is true for Vatican Angelo Braz. They have played the Jesuit and
done everything possible to avoid the very plain and clear question
while claiming that they have answered it.
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
Tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Cindy
No, but...the words in Daniel 2 are referring to his second coming. If you'd
looked it up, you'd realize that.
Or that He didn't build a Church
> on Peter?
He built a church on himself, the true rock, if you notice in Daniel 2,
Jesus is symbolized as a rock.
or that He lied when He said "I will be with you always,
> until the end of the age"? or that He lied when He said of the Church
> "the gates of hell will not prevail against it."
Depends on your interpretation. Is it biblical or traditional?
>
> > > > > I'll be on watch for His return, but I won't speculate on the time
or
> > > > > the hour. Nor will I worry about the beast; God's plan doesn't
depend
> > > > > on me knowing or worrying about it - there are worries enough for
> > > > > today. The anti-Christ is easy to spot - "It is the man who
denies
> > that
> > > > > Jesus is the Christ."
Yeah Ok, that's why the majority are following him on a broad road to
destruction, he is easy to spot allright.
> >
> > New Question:
> > How will you be watching, without reading the prophesies? how will you
know
> > what the signs are? We are definatly told to watch, and Jesus said "And
now
> > I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass,
ye
> > might believe" John 14:29
>
> Like the wise maidens.
>
> The foolish did nothing, and their light ran out.
>
> There is much in the NT of what we should do.
I am refering to the signs, and the events???
>
> > > > Who told you that you are not to worry about the beast?
> > >
> > > Jesus told me not to worry about the future.
> >
> > Do you have a quote of him saying not to worry about this? I'd be
interested
> > in seeing your proof.
>
> "Let tomorrow worry about tomorrow. There are worries enough for
> today."
Is that a bible verse? I am not familiar with it. ??
> Is the beast here? Maybe, maybe not, but in either case how should I
> act?
A little concerned maybe? if the majority of the world will follow the beast
and be destroyed, doesn't it seem you should figure out who it is and
whether you are one of the ones being fooled?
Jesus answers that one too.
> "Feed the orphans, clothe the naked, visit the sick, and the
> imprisoned." James calls this true religion.
and... keep yourself unspotted from the world??
That is a good chapter it also says:
Do not err my beloved brethren, Every good gift and every perfect gift is
from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no
variableness, neither shadow of turning. James 1: 16 & 17
Jam 1:21 Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness,
and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your
souls.
Jam 1:22 But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your
own selves.
Jam 1:23 For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto
a man beholding his natural face in a glass:
Jam 1:24 For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway
forgetteth what manner of man he was.
Jam 1:25 But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth
[therein], he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man
shall be blessed in his deed.
Jam 1:26 If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his
tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion [is] vain.
Jam 1:27 Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To
visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, [and] to keep himself
unspotted from the world.
> And "Love God with all your heart, all your mind, all your soul, and all
> your strength. ANd love your neighbor as yourself."
"On these two hang all the law and the prophets" You forgot that part.
>
> It's a matter of importance - the beast isn't. If I continue in my
> pilgrimage whether the beast is here or not, I should still arrive at my
> destination.
Old chinese proverb:
" If you don't change your direction, you'll probably end up where you're
headed"
>
> > > > Be blessed Tom, he is talking to you here.
> > >
> > > And I should accept _your_ interpretation of Revelation because?
> >
> > I just told you it is not my interpretation, don't go by my words, or
anyone
> > else's, check it out for yourself.
>
> I have. I come to different conclusions than you. Maybe we should
> check what other Christians had to say about Revelation? Do they have
> any input in the discussion?
Do you have any references at all for your different conclusion? It is
looking like you are giving an opinion based on nothing. Why check out what
other christians have to say, shouldn't you check out what God has to say
first?
>
> > > > Also, there are some very scary words for those who try to change
the
> > > > message or take away from it, if you say it is not important, you
are
> > taking
> > > > away from his words. Think about it...
> > >
> > > Now you are adding words to my mouth - I never said not important -
just
> > > not worth violating Jesus' words to worry about it.
> >
> > And now you are adding to Jesus' words, because you will never find one
> > verse in Scripture where Jesus tells you not to worry about the
prophecies,
> > in fact everything he says about it confirms the importance of it, so
how
> > can you violate something he never said?
>
> What does He say about it? "There will be wars and rumors of wars" "It
> will be like the time of Jonah, people eating and drinking, marrying and
> giving in marriage, right up until the rains came." in other words -
> the end will not be appreciatively different than what went before.
> But when Jesus comes back, it will be lightning flashing across the sky
> from east to west. ANd the sky will roll up like a scroll. I don't
> think anyone will overlook that.
No I don't think so either, the ones who don't care what the warnings are
all about are going to be praying for the rocks and mountains to be falling
on them. Then it gets worse. Kinda hard to miss that.
>
> > Try going to www.blueletterbible.com I do not promote their doctrines
or
> > bible studies, but they have an excellent search engine for the bible
and a
> > strongs concordance online, and you can look up any word or phrase you
> > want. Also they have Greek, Hebrew, and Latin and about 5 different
> > translations of the bible, I don't know what they are, because I only
use an
> > authorized King James version, but you can check it out.
>
> Carlos too only uses the authorized version, and bases his whole
> theology on the verse about "rightly dividing the word of God" not
> realizing that it doesn't mean to cut up the word of God. Not that you
> fall into the same error, just an interesting data point.
Yes interesting, so chopping up God's word is error, so that means you
subscribe to all of it?
>
> > > > Rev 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the
> > > > prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God
shall
> > add
> > > > unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
> > >
> > > Isn't that what you do when you claim the beast is Rome - add to the
> > > book?
> >
> > No, :-) I would not want to take part in the plagues, the explanation is
> > above, check it out~ for your own sake.
>
> I have. I find the Catholic Church to be the same Church that Jesus
> built on Peter; that collected the Bible under the Holy Spirit at the
> end of the fourth century; that has taught the same morals and preached
> the same gospel since the first century; that has encouraged the
> greatest minds of humanity in the study of the gospels, and given haven
> to the saints whose holiness shines down through centuries to inspire
> us; that has been a city on a hill and light to the world for 20
> centuries - the Church that in 108 AD was first named Catholic by St.
> Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch, who tradition tells us was the child Jesus
> set in the middle of the desciples.
You are a fraud you have looked up nothing, you are wasting my time.
Tts 1:10 For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially
they of the circumcision:
Tts 1:11 Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching
things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake.
Tts 1:12 One of themselves, [even] a prophet of their own, said, The
Cretians [are] alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies.
Tts 1:13 This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may
be sound in the faith;
Tts 1:14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that
turn from the truth.
Tts 1:15 Unto the pure all things [are] pure: but unto them that are defiled
and unbelieving [is] nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is
defiled.
Tts 1:16 They profess that they know God; but in works they deny [him],
being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.
Cindy
You are actually the very amusing Man when you don't refer to yourself
in your answers. Common sense and humor, I like it.
BTW Your posts are not all appearing on my server, now that i have
found them here on google groups, I will be continuing to try to help
you :-) I don't want you to somehow think I promised to ignore you or
something.
CU,
Cindy
>
>
> Ted McMillan
> tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Ted McMillan
> You are actually the very amusing Man when you don't refer to yourself
> in your answers. Common sense and humor, I like it.
From your earlier posts telling us how you don't like it you are just
more proving your talent for lying. After all, you did apologize to
me publicly for attacking me, and then you claimed that you never
attacked me: it was all in my head and you were only expressing love
to me. That was odd since you came and publicly told the world the
Lord showed you I have a problem with love because someone condemned
all non-Catholics to and I reproved him for it.
> BTW Your posts are not all appearing on my server, now that i have
> found them here on google groups, I will be continuing to try to help
> you :-) I don't want you to somehow think I promised to ignore you or
> something.
>
> CU,
> Cindy
Someone who would see a man publicly condemn all non-Catholics to
and then see me expose the monster to then come to the conclusion
that you have to help me clearly is certainly another super-terrorist.
Can you provide the same help to the Bush Administration? They are
upset about another ist not as bad as Ted Seeber. Worse than
this, they don't just call him names: they are sending missiles to his
gullet.
Ted McMillan
t-m...@juno.com
Ted McMillan
Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics to . I reproved and
exposed the man for that. Other strange people come to tell me I am
ful. The only reference to the man who condemned others to I
saw came from Andrew, who told us that Ted Seeber was "kind and
courteous."
Who is the Jesuit? You?
Ted McMillan
t-m...@juno.com
Caillean McMahon
Not true Theodore;
I have disagreed with the condemnation of non-Catholics repeatedly.
Brightest Blessings; may the Goddess grant you peace;
Caillean `aSiobhan, Lady Carrigaholt
Stephen Quist
"Ted McMillan" <t-m...@juno.com> wrote in message
news:dfc66dfc.02051...@posting.google.com...
Steve
Ted McMillan
Well no. You see, if someone condemned all non-Catholics to
anywhere, I would be upset with that man. You all have shown that you
won't be. If someone then reproves the man who condemned all
non-Catholics to , I would not be upset with him. See, I am not
a Jesuit. It is the actions vs. the false claims.
Ted Seeber wished condolenses for the victims of 911. He then made
the statement that all non-Catholics deserve to be persecuted and
ed. How many of the victims of 911 were non-Catholics? Even Cindy,
Angelo, even Nicholas II and Caillean the Wiccan have said they were
non-Catholics and acknowledge that Ted Seeber condemned all
non-Catholics. The problem is that, like you, they have literally
said nothing against Ted Seeber. They all claim that I am full of
for pointing him out. All of them advanced upon me for that. All of
them claimed that I am ful and was spueing hatred. No such words
did they use against Ted Seeber. Andrew claimed that Ted Seeber was
"kind and courteous" in his condemnation of all non-Catholics.
I am not the worker for the Pope. You all are by the evidence.
Ted McMillan
t-m...@juno.com
Stephen Quist
You are a jesuit!
Ted McMillan
"Stephen Quist" <qui...@spamfree.msei-co.com> wrote in message news:<tlSE8.1450$B%2.8...@news.uswest.net>...
>
> You are a jesuit!
Uh Oh!
OK Antichrist Nicholas, Cindy, Lamarr and you other super-terrorists!
The man has just name-called!
He posted to me again so then the question has to be asked again:
Go to this link:
Ted McMillan
t-m...@juno.com