#ANTICHRIST NORDMEYER's PARAANOIA AND ACCUSATIONS AGAINST LOVE!
Ted McMillan
attacks:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=3ca37f91%241_2%40news5.uncensored-news.com
I see more namecalling and snipped the irrational and incoherent rants
about a "superterrorist" ... your rants are meaningless Ted. You
seem
to call anyone who doesn't agree with you "antichrist ___", "vatican
___" or a superterrorist. The simple fact is Ted, you are NOT
Christlike in your actions, or behavior.
I, and I'm sure many others, will continue to pray for you... your
hatred is quite disturbing.
---------------
As we can see, Antichrist Nordy writes: "You seem
to call anyone who doesn't agree with you "antichrist ___", "vatican
___" or a superterrorist." Obviously this is a worker for the Pope!
The problem is that Will Nordy doesn't SEEM to be a worker for the
Antichrist. It is crystal clear and plain that he is.
Remember, the constant paranoia and concern of the Antcihrist, as we
have seen with the false postings of "Teddy McMillan" is on the issue
of what they claim are uncivil postings. Remember that uncivil
postins have constantly been posted against me, yet these who are
showing their prayers and concerns for me that I surrender and
disrespect all non-Catholic life can't notice it.
Knowing that the prime concern of all the workers of the Antichrist is
what they claim is name-calling and uncivil postings ONLY for the
purpose of covering up their worse deeds of murder and ALSO for
destroying Protestantism by labeling PROTESTING as criticism,
Antichrist Will Nordmeyer has constantly set up himself to school me
on how not to attack people while showing me how to attack them
because he constantly attacks me. He kept posting in the usual despot
fashion that my posts are unchristian leaving no room to disagree with
a despot.
Now again it is time to present evidence and to watch him and the
other workers of the Antichrist ignore it so that they can attack me
and preach more against making attacks. Here are the words of Christ
when Christ encountered far more innocent workers of Satan. This is
what Christ said to them:
John 8:54 Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my honour is nothing:
it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that he is your
God:
55 Yet ye have not known him; but I know him: and if I should say, I
know him not, I shall be a liar like unto you: but I know him, and
keep his saying.
-----------
Therefore to Antichrist Nordy I say:
I am a loving person and I believe in the sanctity of human life both
Catholic and non-Catholic. If I say that I am like you and do not
love nor have respect for human life, I shall be a natural liar like
unto you.
Christ said further:
---------------
John 8:39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father.
Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the
works of Abraham.
40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth,
which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.
41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not
born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.
42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me:
for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but
he sent me.
43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my
word.
44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye
will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the
truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he
speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
-------------------
Antichrist Nordy and the other murderers of the Papacy:
Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will
do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth,
because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh
of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
There you go:
Christlike postings for the love of the human race!
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Will Nordmeyer
"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...
> Paranoid Antichrist Bill Nordy wrote against Ted McMillan in vicious
> attacks:
>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=3ca37f91%241_2%40news5.uncens
ored-news.com
>
> I see more namecalling and snipped the irrational and incoherent rants
> about a "superterrorist" ... your rants are meaningless Ted. You
seem
> to call anyone who doesn't agree with you "antichrist ___", "vatican
> ___" or a superterrorist. The simple fact is Ted, you are NOT
> Christlike in your actions, or behavior.
>
> I, and I'm sure many others, will continue to pray for you... your
> hatred is quite disturbing.
>
>
> ---------------
>
> As we can see, Antichrist Nordy writes: "You seem
> to call anyone who doesn't agree with you "antichrist ___", "vatican
> ___" or a superterrorist." Obviously this is a worker for the Pope!
>
Snipped the rest of the rant. Ted, you REALLY should stop calling
people names.
______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
With NINE Servers In California And Texas - The Worlds Uncensored News Source
Ted McMillan
> "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> news:c9dac66d.02032...@posting.google.com...
> > Paranoid Antichrist Bill Nordy wrote against Ted McMillan in vicious
> > attacks:
> >
> >
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=3ca37f91%241_2%40news5.uncens
> ored-news.com
> >
> > I see more namecalling and snipped the irrational and incoherent rants
> > about a "superterrorist" ... your rants are meaningless Ted. You
> seem
> > to call anyone who doesn't agree with you "antichrist ___", "vatican
> > ___" or a superterrorist. The simple fact is Ted, you are NOT
> > Christlike in your actions, or behavior.
> >
> > I, and I'm sure many others, will continue to pray for you... your
> > hatred is quite disturbing.
> >
> >
> > ---------------
> >
> > As we can see, Antichrist Nordy writes: "You seem
> > to call anyone who doesn't agree with you "antichrist ___", "vatican
> > ___" or a superterrorist." Obviously this is a worker for the Pope!
> >
> Yep, I'm a Roman Catholic...
Then don't rant when I call you Antichrist Nordy. What's the problem!
> Snipped the rest of the rant. Ted, you REALLY should stop calling
> people names.
I called you names fitting your situation and talent. What therefore
is the problem? I called Osama Bin Laden names fitting also. Is
there a problem? What is the definition of people? Yes, I called
super-terrorist Seeber names for condemning all non-Catholics to
persecution and death. Of course, that doesn't bother you a bit for
more reasons other than that you are Catholic.
You have called me names and all your postings are attacks. Remember:
sticks and stones can break my bones but names can never hurt me.
Your ancestors and your brothers even today are skilled in
persecution, torture and murder. The issue I was talking about was
persecution and murder. You workers for the antichrist are trying to
cover over that concern with another: that of being called names. You
all have called names also.
Let us switch now. We are Protestants. We want you workers of the
Antichrist to consent to us utilizing criminals to torture and murder
you all. We will agree that you can all continue to call us names in
return.
I am waiting for an answer from any of you workers for the Antichrist.
What do you all say about the proposition?
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Will Nordmeyer
Your lies, your namecalling and assocation with me and the antichrist.
My name isn't Nordy, anti-christ is not a title for me. You rant on
about others calling you names, and yet, what is the first thing you do
when someone confronts you, challenges your claims, and asks you to back
up ANY of it? You start calling them names.
I have news for you Ted. The Roman Catholic Church is not the
antichrist... The Pope is not the antichrist... The Roman Catholic
Church worships GOD. We look to JESUS for our salvation.
> > Snipped the rest of the rant. Ted, you REALLY should stop calling
> > people names.
>
> I called you names fitting your situation and talent. What therefore
is the problem?
You called me names fitting your judgemental (in opposition to Matthew
7:1-5) views. Snipped the rest as usual, since there is nothing factual
or relevant...
> I called Osama Bin Laden names fitting also. Is there a problem?
> What is the definition of people? Yes, I called
> super-terrorist Seeber names for condemning all non-Catholics to
> persecution and death. Of course, that doesn't bother you a bit for
> more reasons other than that you are Catholic.
>
Actually, yes, it bothers me that you lie like this... it bothers me
that you feel that you don't need to obey Christ, speak with Love and
turn the other cheek... it bothers me that you feel the need to ignore
Matthew 7:1 and judge others repeatedly. Yes, SOME of the Church
history bothers me as well. Yes, IF Ted Seeber (noted your namecalling
again by the way) actually condemned all non-Catholics to persecution
and death, that bothers me as well
> You have called me names and all your postings are attacks.
What names have I called you Ted? I call you Ted. All my postings to
you are challenges to your behavior - challenges to your name calling
judgmental attitude that is certainly NOT Christian.
> Remember: sticks and stones can break my bones but names can never
hurt me.
Yes, but namecalling makes it easier to dehumanize someone so they can
throw sticks and stones. Look at Jesus, they came at him as they would
a brigand... with swords and clubs, yet they KNEW that Jesus wasn't that
sort... they labeled him with a name so then they could Crucify him.
So, names CAN hurt.
> Your ancestors and your brothers even today are skilled in
> persecution, torture and murder.
> The issue I was talking about was persecution and murder.
No, that was not the issue you were talking about... you started
claiming I'm paranoid (nope, just find your conspiracy theories
ridiculous, I don't believe the world is out to get me, or the Church...
You, however seem to think that anyone who disagrees with you is
involved in a big conspiracy)...
> You workers for the antichrist are trying to cover over that concern
with another: that of being called names.
I'm not a worker for the antichrist. I'm a worker for Jesus Christ...
> You all have called names also.
>
Turn the other cheek Ted... Do unto others as you would have them do
unto you. etc. Did you ever read those passages in the Bible Ted?
> Let us switch now. We are Protestants.
You are 7th Day Adventists..
> We want you workers of the Antichrist to consent to us utilizing
criminals to torture and murder
> you all.
Well, you'd have to take it up in a different newsgroup, Roman Catholics
are workers for Jesus Christ. Perhaps try the satanist newsgroups if
you would like to speak to some workers for the antichrist.
> We will agree that you can all continue to call us names in return.
>
But that's not very Christian... on either side.
> I am waiting for an answer from any of you workers for the Antichrist.
Well, since I don't work for the antichrist, you'd have to take it up
with someone who does. And, I sincerely doubt you'll find one here.
> What do you all say about the proposition?
>
I say it's even more of your judgemental condemning non-Christian
behavior.
>
> Ted McMillan
> tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Ted McMillan
"Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message news:<3ca9ab60$1...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...
> Your lies, your namecalling and assocation with me and the antichrist.
> My name isn't Nordy, anti-christ is not a title for me. You rant on
> about others calling you names, and yet, what is the first thing you do
> when someone confronts you, challenges your claims, and asks you to back
> up ANY of it? You start calling them names.
OK then when are you going to start challenging my claims? You are a
worker for the Antichrist and you can therefore naturally lie. Every
post of yours is an attack and you haven't answered one of my
questions. Show me where you have challenged my claims by evidence.
You have challenged my claims, but only as you are doing here. I will
show you how I have challenged your claims and you have not given an
answer to my point. You told me that my posts are not Christian, let
me show you what I have posted in response waiting for an answer which
you have evaded.
For those who are reading these attacks against Antichrist Nordy go to
the following link:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=c9dac66d.0203292048.2e824d23%40posting.google.com
Antichrist Nordy ACCUSED me of being unchristian and he called me
names. I don't mind being called names: that is practically an
exclusive Antichrist concern. I have already told Antichrist Nordy
that I am willing to, if he agrees, hire criminals to slowly put his
kind to persecution and death as they have done for so long while he
and them can delightfully call me all the names he wants. He has
evaded the wonderful proposition to date. When I speak against
name-calling I am doing that in behalf of their Vatican paranoia only.
It is what they are only always concerned about because they don't
want to be exposed as the super-terrorists of mankind.
In the link above I demonstrated that my posts exposing him and
super-terrorist Seeber and his Ustashis and Nazis and all was
Christlike. I am still waiting for an answer, but all Antichrist
Nordy's posts are just like this with nothing but attacks.
Let us wait no more Antichrist Nordy. Answer the question. I am
showing that I am Christlike. Show me that I am not from the evidence
given in the link above.
> I have news for you Ted. The Roman Catholic Church is not the
> antichrist... The Pope is not the antichrist... The Roman Catholic
> Church worships GOD. We look to JESUS for our salvation.
I have news for you Antichrist Nordy. Ted McMillan is not unloving.
He is not hateful. He worships GOD. It is even proven that he is at
least human because he is upset with another super-terrorist by the
name of Ted Seeber who condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and
death. I can't help it if you hate non-Catholics enough to kill them.
It is your choice you work for the Antichrist.
> > > Snipped the rest of the rant. Ted, you REALLY should stop calling
> > > people names.
Obviously Ted McMillan doesn't agree with Antichrist Nordy.
> > I called you names fitting your situation and talent. What therefore
> is the problem?
>
> You called me names fitting your judgemental (in opposition to Matthew
> 7:1-5) views. Snipped the rest as usual, since there is nothing factual
> or relevant...
Obviously Ted McMillan doesn't agree with Antichrist Nordy. Pray for
him and one day he will find peace in Christ if he reconsiders and
stops working for the Antichrist.
> > I called Osama Bin Laden names fitting also. Is there a problem?
> > What is the definition of people? Yes, I called
> > super-terrorist Seeber names for condemning all non-Catholics to
> > persecution and death. Of course, that doesn't bother you a bit for
> > more reasons other than that you are Catholic.
> >
> Actually, yes, it bothers me that you lie like this... it bothers me
> that you feel that you don't need to obey Christ, speak with Love and
> turn the other cheek...
Why should I follow the example of Germany in WWII? Why shouldn't I
warn the world that Nazis now preach about love? Let me show you
someone else who didn't turn the other cheek so that murderers can
murder the human race:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=c9dac66d.0203292048.2e824d23%40posting.google.com
> it bothers me that you feel the need to ignore
> Matthew 7:1 and judge others repeatedly.
But it doesn't bother you that you are saying good things about me
here. It doesn't bother you that you are teaching others against
judging while posts like this come out. That is why we know you work
for the antichrist.
Now, about Matthew 7, here are more scriptures you need to look at.
Now answer the questions and stop evading the issues:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=c9dac66d.0203292048.2e824d23%40posting.google.com
> Yes, SOME of the Church
> history bothers me as well.
You mean as far back as December 5, 2001 when Ted Seeber condemned all
non-Catholics? I am just trying to see if people can recognize a
natural born liar when they see one.
> Yes, IF Ted Seeber (noted your namecalling
> again by the way)
Poor paranoid worker for the Antichrist!
> actually condemned all non-Catholics to persecution
> and death, that bothers me as well.
Ted McMillan is loving. When he learned about what Ted Seeber had
done, he reproved the monster. You speak telling us that you care.
Consistent with all your postings. That is why you work for the
Antichrist.
> > You have called me names and all your postings are attacks.
> What names have I called you Ted?
You said that I call people Jesuits just because they disagree with
me. You have therefore called me a bigot, Nazi and many other names.
You know I explain this to you low-IQed workers for the Antichrist so
much, why even try? Is there something in your brain that makes you
so dunce why you are intent others catch it? You have called me
judgmental, mean, evil. How can I help your extremely and
intentionally low IQ Antichrist Nordy?
> I call you Ted. All my postings to
> you are challenges to your behavior - challenges to your name calling
> judgmental attitude that is certainly NOT Christian.
You mean like this wonderful post here that didn't call me names, was
jut judgmental and was Christian?
I can't help it if you chose to be an unscrupulous son of the
Antichrist.
Now, in the link below I am demonstrating that exposing you murderous
super-terrorists for the lives of innocent people is Christlike. I
want your answer:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=c9dac66d.0203292048.2e824d23%40posting.google.com
> > Remember: sticks and stones can break my bones but names can never
> hurt me.
>
> Yes, but namecalling makes it easier to dehumanize someone so they can
> throw sticks and stones.
Why then do you do these things?
> Look at Jesus, they came at him as they would
> a brigand... with swords and clubs, yet they KNEW that Jesus wasn't that
> sort... they labeled him with a name so then they could Crucify him.
> So, names CAN hurt.
And you and your band of Antichristians call us paranoid? Ted Seeber
condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and death and gloated at
the millions that already suffered that fate. Just like Antichrist
Cindy who emotionally attacked me and complained about uncivil
postings but then sees them everywhere posted by others and they don't
bother her, so you are presented with literal killings and genocide,
but it doesn't bother you.
Please tell us why you have sold your soul to damnation by joining
with the Antichrist. We are waiting Antichrist Nordy!
> > Your ancestors and your brothers even today are skilled in
> > persecution, torture and murder.
>
>
> > The issue I was talking about was persecution and murder.
> No, that was not the issue you were talking about... you started
> claiming I'm paranoid (nope, just find your conspiracy theories
> ridiculous, I don't believe the world is out to get me, or the Church...
That is not in comparison to your belief that Ted McMillan is out to
get you, now is it Paranoid Antichrist Nordy?
> You, however seem to think that anyone who disagrees with you is
> involved in a big conspiracy)...
But you DEFINITELY work for the Antichrist. Does Ted McMillan agree
with you? Why do you only attack him Antichrist Nordy? Why can't you
go back to your Antichrist and stop emotionally posting here about the
fact that the peace of Christ has left you with Antichrist?
> > You workers for the antichrist are trying to cover over that concern
> with another: that of being called names.
>
> I'm not a worker for the antichrist. I'm a worker for Jesus Christ...
I am a very loving person. I am sorry you work for the Antichrist and
you are horribly unscrupulous. Why are you constantly sending attack
postings against me Antichrist Nordy? Is this God's method of
evangelization? Ask Antichrist Nick.
> > You all have called names also.
> Turn the other cheek Ted... Do unto others as you would have them do
> unto you. etc. Did you ever read those passages in the Bible Ted?
Can you show me how this can be done with your future posts Antichrist
Nordy? Are you showing me this principle with this post? or are you
showcasing your gift from the Vatican: no conscience?
> > Let us switch now. We are Protestants.
> You are 7th Day Adventists..
>
> > We want you workers of the Antichrist to consent to us utilizing
> criminals to torture and murder
> > you all.
>
> Well, you'd have to take it up in a different newsgroup, Roman Catholics
> are workers for Jesus Christ.
I am not talking about Roman Catholics. I am talking about you
Vaticans oathed and trained for deceit, treason and murder.
> Perhaps try the satanist newsgroups if
> you would like to speak to some workers for the antichrist.
Go back to that group and take the other super-terrorists here
constantly teaching me against being judgmental with posts like these.
> > We will agree that you can all continue to call us names in return.
> >
> But that's not very Christian... on either side.
Non-Catholics being murdered doesn't bother you inspite of your lying
babbling claims. You all post far more about being insulted than
about non-Catholics being viciously murdered to the extreme. Your
brand of Christianity is totally Antichristian.
STOP SENDING THESE JUDGMENTAL POSTS, O UNSCRUPULOUS ONE! Go back to
Pope John Paul!
> > I am waiting for an answer from any of you workers for the Antichrist.
>
> Well, since I don't work for the antichrist, you'd have to take it up
> with someone who does. And, I sincerely doubt you'll find one here.
You need to stop your emotional and judgmental paranoid postings
against Ted McMillan and find people who are unloving and don't regard
human life especially in your mirror!
Cut your ties to the Antichrist Vatican Nordy!
> > What do you all say about the proposition?
> >
> I say it's even more of your judgemental condemning non-Christian
> behavior.
Well teach me how not to by sending in civil posts that are not
judgmental and despotic. CUT YOUR TIES TO THE ANTICHRIST. YOU ARE
GOING TO BE DAMNED!!
I love you O unscrupulous, super-terrorist, treacherous Antichrist
Nordy! I love you!! Don't you love me??
The Lord bless you and keep you.
The Lord let his face shine upon you, and be gracious to you.
The Lord look upon you kindly and give you peace.
Numbers 6: 24-26
Even for an unscrupulous despot of the Antichrist! Isn't he
wonderful!!
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Ted McMillan
> In article <3ca9ab60$1...@news5.uncensored-news.com>, "Will Nordmeyer"
> <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> writes:
>
> >Yes, IF Ted Seeber (noted your namecalling
> >again by the way) actually condemned all non-Catholics to persecution
> >and death, that bothers me as well
>
> merely Ted McMillan's spin on a statement made by Ted Seeber.
Why confirm that he did condemn all non-Catholics to persecution and
death by Antichrist MSiciliana despot babbling that he didn't?
> Come on, folks!
> Look at how McMillan twists everything else he claims! Why would you believe
> that he was correct on this one issue, just because he keeps repeating the lie?
And why should you believe Antichrist MSiciliana who defended the
Ustashis of WWII telling us that picture evidence can be faked? She
didn't bring up this startling new discovery that picture evidence
doesn't compare to the reliability of her babblings when she condemned
Adventists for starting tribal warfare in Africa.
C'mon folks! How can you be so fooled? WHY NOT LET TED SEEBER
HIMSELF DEFEND HIMSELF?? WHY NOT ASK WHY TED SEEBER DUCKED OUT AFTER
A WHOLE MONTH TO DENY MY CLAIMS AND HE DIDN'T? How come Antichrist
MSicliana does not have a good enough IQ to realize that Seeber is
supposed to defend himself instead of someone with his same dark mind?
I love you O unscrupulous Antichrist MSiciliana! I love you! Don't
you love me??
The Lord bless you and keep you.
The Lord let his face shine upon you, and be gracious to you.
The Lord look upon you kindly and give you peace.
Numbers 6: 24-26
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com
Mike
--
Mike
[139] "Grace: I ask for the gift of being able to recognize the false lights
of Lucifer and for the help not to be lead astray; I also ask for what I
desire: a graced knowledge of true human living exemplified in Jesus Christ,
my Lord and my God, and the grace to live my life in His way." Amen! (St.
Ignatius)
"Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net>
bam
"Mike" <hope2b...@justice.com> wrote
> DON"T FEED THE TROLLS...
I wouldn't have the slightest idea what this one eats!
BAM
Robert A. Walker
Still can't contain your lunacy, eh?
Will Nordmeyer
"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com...
>
> "Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message
news:<3ca9ab60$1...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...
>
> > Your lies, your namecalling and assocation with me and the
antichrist.
> > My name isn't Nordy, anti-christ is not a title for me. You rant on
> > about others calling you names, and yet, what is the first thing you
do
> > when someone confronts you, challenges your claims, and asks you to
back
> > up ANY of it? You start calling them names.
>
> OK then when are you going to start challenging my claims?
> You are a worker for the Antichrist and you can therefore naturally
lie.
I am not a worker for the Antichrist Ted... therefore your first claim
has been challenge.d
> Every post of yours is an attack and you haven't answered one of my
> questions.
You haven't asked any questions Ted. You've ranted on meaninglessly
about others.
> Show me where you have challenged my claims by evidence.
You must provide evidence for your claims first Ted.
> You have challenged my claims, but only as you are doing here.
Now you admit that I HAVE challenged your claims.
> I will show you how I have challenged your claims and you have not
given an
> answer to my point.
What claims? That you aren't behaving in a Christian manner Ted? that's
obvious by your namecalling and hateful actions.
> You told me that my posts are not Christian, let me show you what I
have posted in response waiting for an answer which
> you have evaded.
>
They aren't... your name calling and hateful spiteful actions are NOT
Christian.
> For those who are reading these attacks against Antichrist Nordy go to
> the following link:
>
More non-Christian behavior from Ted.
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=c9dac66d.0203292048.2e824d23%
40posting.google.com
>
> Antichrist Nordy ACCUSED me of being unchristian and he called me
> names.
Where did I call you names Ted... Not in that post above...
> I don't mind being called names: that is practically an
> exclusive Antichrist concern. I have already told Antichrist Nordy
> that I am willing to, if he agrees, hire criminals to slowly put his
> kind to persecution and death as they have done for so long while he
> and them can delightfully call me all the names he wants. He has
> evaded the wonderful proposition to date. When I speak against
> name-calling I am doing that in behalf of their Vatican paranoia only.
> It is what they are only always concerned about because they don't
> want to be exposed as the super-terrorists of mankind.
>
Nope... no questions there...
> In the link above I demonstrated that my posts exposing him and
> super-terrorist Seeber and his Ustashis and Nazis and all was
> Christlike. I am still waiting for an answer, but all Antichrist
> Nordy's posts are just like this with nothing but attacks.
>
You exposed nothing but your own non-Christian behavior...
> Let us wait no more Antichrist Nordy. Answer the question. I am
> showing that I am Christlike. Show me that I am not from the evidence
> given in the link above.
>
By calling people names and making things up? That's not Christian
behavior Ted.
> > I have news for you Ted. The Roman Catholic Church is not the
> > antichrist... The Pope is not the antichrist... The Roman Catholic
> > Church worships GOD. We look to JESUS for our salvation.
>
> I have news for you Antichrist Nordy.
> Ted McMillan is not unloving.
Then stop calling names...
> He is not hateful.
Then stop making hateful posts...
> He worships GOD.
Not by your actions.
> It is even proven that he is at least human because he is upset with
another super-terrorist by the
> name of Ted Seeber who condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and
death.
I never said you weren't human Ted. Just not acting in a Christian
manner.
> I can't help it if you hate non-Catholics enough to kill them.
I don't... I'm engaged to a non-Catholic... Many of my friends are
non-Catholic
> It is your choice you work for the Antichrist.
>
Fortunately I don't work for the Antichrist.
> > > > Snipped the rest of the rant. Ted, you REALLY should stop
calling
> > > > people names.
>
> Obviously Ted McMillan doesn't agree with Antichrist Nordy.
>
> > > I called you names fitting your situation and talent. What
therefore
> > is the problem?
> >
> > You called me names fitting your judgemental (in opposition to
Matthew
> > 7:1-5) views. Snipped the rest as usual, since there is nothing
factual
> > or relevant...
>
> Obviously Ted McMillan doesn't agree with Antichrist Nordy. Pray for
> him and one day he will find peace in Christ if he reconsiders and
> stops working for the Antichrist.
>
Your namecalling shows you have not found peace in Christ. As for me, I
don't work for the Antichrist. I frequently find myself at peace in
Christ... when I relax and trust HIM to guide me... somedays I do
better at that than others, but that's the magnificence of GOD... when I
stop and let Him take over again, He's right there waiting patiently for
me.
Snipped the rest of the rant.
______________________________________________________________________
Will Nordmeyer
"Mike" <hope2b...@justice.com> wrote in message
news:pCsq8.2632$lA6.1...@news2.east.cox.net...
> DON"T FEED THE TROLLS...
>
Ted McMillan
>
>
> Still can't contain your lunacy, eh?
Dear workers for the Antichrist:
I know that it may be somewhat torturous to know that someone is
exposing your treachery, conspiracy and wickedness. Unlike your
practice of murder, I can tell you there are some things you can do to
prevent the names that can always hurt you.
When you come back to post, stop attacking and accusing and then
teaching us not to attack and accuse. Some questions are asked of you
and you all keep attacking, making uncivil posts and leaving nothing
to touch the evidence.
Therefore Antichrist Mike asks me if I am luney. To the workers of
the Antichrist, to consider evidence above hypocrisy is looney. I am
not likely therefore to consider respecting your Antichrist prayers to
become also bloodthirsty and incredibly deceitful. Read the
originating post again proving that Ted Seeber, like yourselves is a
reinarnate from the Dark Ages and is not only guilty of mass-murder,
but very much capable of repeating it as many times as would delight
his hate-filled soul.
------
Again Antichrist MSiciliana dares to tell us that Ted Seeber did not
condemn all non-Catholics back on December 5, 2001. I have brought up
issues to prove that he did exactly that, but there is a certain bent
a person's IQ would take when he or she works for the Antichrist.
Here now again is the actual conversation and where you can find it
posted on the newsgroups. Here is the evidence every worker for the
Antichrist, be they sabbathkeepers or even witches, have ignored in
favor over their paranoia that uncivil posts are being submitted to
the newsgroups. Being workers for the Antichrist, their solution to
this problem was to submit more uncivil postings:
I reprove despot Seeber for gloating over the dead bodies of the
Protestants! The following is the actual statement and reply:
Ted McMillan:
> > But you did understand how to hang people in chains. And your
> > founding Fathers also can't tell the difference between shedding the
> > blood of millions of bible-believers in the most unbelievable ways for
> > their descendants to now presume upon the world to teach them what is
> > the definition of love, hate and plagiarism.
>
Ted Seeber:
> Can you really be said to be believing in the Bible if you don't live it?
> NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible.
------------------
FREEZE!
In this simple statement, Ted Seeber acknowledges not only that
Catholics have persecuted and killed Protestants, but he states why.
He speaks clearly with approval as if he is expressing an eternal
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. I,
being infuriated, respond:
------------------
Ted McMillan:
NO WONDER YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT ME BRINGING BACK YOUR RECORD OF
HORRIBLE ATROCITIES! They were not even living the bible! Why even
worry about them! Were the 5 to 6 thousands who were killed by the
terrorist attacks living by the bible? You don't have any consistent
principles, if you even know the meaning of the word! Your principles
change only for you to even look like you are winning an argument.
------------------
Ted Seeber was clearly telling the world that people deserve to die or
should even be persecuted and killed if they don't live the bible
according to his standards. My reply to him continues:
------------------
Your statement is incredibly insensitive and you constantly reveal
that what is written by your uncomparably bloody religion is true.
All I know is that you people murdered millions in the most horrible
ways. I DON'T CARE IF YOU MURDERED ATHEISTS!! I am not that
inhumanly insensitive for an animal like you to be worried about me
having guns!
Again, despot: WHY IS THE POPE APOLOGIZING!! You have just sent us
your bigoted despot opinions without providing any MAYBEES! Why not
try to prove what you are saying against me using the scriptures then?
How often have you even answered my questions?
Thousands of people lost their lives in the World Trade Center
disaster. How many of them lived by the bible? They were not even in
rural settings nor under persecution. All those in the WTC were
products of the modern revolution. I would even say that most of them
believe that homosexual activity is acceptable behavior. They all
lived in the modern age and are products of it. I can bet you that
homosexuality was not a problem for those who were slain by Rome!
I don't care whether or not they lived by the bible according to a
murderous despot!
------------------
What I was saying here was that the Protestants viewed homosexual
behavior as intolerable and abominable. Likely most of the victims of
911 did not view matters that way. Since they likely did not live the
bible according to Seeber's standards, what should be their fate?
So here we see the issues and prove that Rome has not changed. These
statements of Seeber did not just come like a bolt of lightning. This
was the last leg of a series of emotional ramblings between us both as
I was defending human liberty, privacy and the American Constitution
while Seeber was condemning all of these and demanding change under
the false pretext that the terror attacks require a police state for
security. Seeber told us boldly that he works against the
Constitution to change it to be interpreted opposite from what it
currently is under "acceptable confines" from the INSIDE! This is
just what people like Jack Chick WERE SAYING FOLKS!!
Interestingly, although he was even telling us that privacy was
NOWHERE to be found in the American Constitution, go to his website
and you will find something strange. Would you like to have an email
account given to you by Ted Seeber? Well go to his website and you
can get one. What's more is, according to him, IT'S FREE! Want to
get a free email account from a man arguing against basic human
privacy? You go right ahead!
For a long time he was spitting upon the principles of human liberty
as had ALL those brutal regimes that easily took the lives of people
and committed atrocities. He even told me that the current American
system respecting privacy was "increibly stupid" and "outdated." He
told me the current principles were as old as Martin Luther during the
Reformation. When I asked him the date his contrary principles were
created, he behaved just like Antichrist MSiciliana, Cindy, Nicholas
and so many others.
You can view this evidence in much of the war that took place between
Ted Seeber and myself on the following webpage:
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/TSeeber.htm
After I demonstrated his terrible responsibility for saying words like
that on the newsgroups directly in the climate of September 11th
fulfilling the stated definition of a terrorist, Ted Seeber ducked out
from dialoguing with me even though he had been trailing my postings
and wrangling with me tit-for-tat.
I then kept raving and raving about what Ted Seeber had said. NONE OF
THE OTHER WORKERS FOR THE ANTICHRIST DARED TO TAKE NOTICE OVER WHAT
TED SEEBER HAD SAID OR DONE. They came to attack me telling me that I
insulted the man, and I therefore was an "incomprehensible" and "evil"
man sending in uncivil postings. Antichrist Lamarr told us that I was
not human as I dared to respect the lives of millions of men, women
and little children who were not just ordinary people, but were the
very saints of God! All of them attacked me taking turns and telling
the world I am the only problem on the newsgroups. Through this we
discover that Rome has not changed. It shows they are not to use the
claim that Ted Seeber was not representing Rome here. His words did
not offend them.
That is why you notice all claims that Seeber did not do what I said
he did, are just a squeak and from among the most unscrupulous of them
all, Antichrist MSiciliana. I have told Antichrist MSiciliana to LET
THE MAN SPEAK FOR HIMSELF many times over. The advice sounds logical,
does it NOT? From day one, TED SEEBER COULD NOT DENY WHAT I HAD SAID
ABOUT WHAT HE HAD DONE. FROM DAY ONE HE HAD NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT MY
CLAIMS AGAINST WHAT HE HAD DONE. He had been posting on the
newsgroups for almost two months afterward and then ducked out at the
end of January.
Just like Antichrist MSiciliana was the only one trying to show the
world I taught that Ellen White was the Antichrist, so she is the only
one now trying to babble to us that Ted Seeber did not boldly condemn
the lives of all non-Catholics on the basis of Vatican principle!
Although Antichrist MSiciliana claims that Ted Seeber did not condemn
all non-Catholics, with all my ravings about what was done, she is the
only one unscrupulous enough to claim Seeber did not do it. All the
rest of them acknowledge that he did. The Pope should give Antichrist
MSiciliana an award or elect her the next pope!
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
Let me show you one who is just as much an eternal criminal as you:
Ted McMillan
> "Mike" <hope2b...@justice.com> wrote in message
> news:pCsq8.2632$lA6.1...@news2.east.cox.net...
> > DON"T FEED THE TROLLS...
> >
> SORRY... he looked hungry... I had some leftovers... :-)
Address the points. Get some conscience. Stop preaching to others to
stop things you freely do. Stop attacking, condemning and criticizing
just because I disagree with you and I provide questions and points
that prove you all are the children of the Antichrist.
Here are those points again about your fellow super-terrorist murderer
by the name of Antichrist Ted Seeber:
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
> With NINE Servers In California And Texas - The Worlds Uncensored News Source
Again Antichrist MSiciliana dares to tell us that Ted Seeber did not
Will Nordmeyer
"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com...
news:<uakobu...@corp.supernews.com>...
> > "Mike" <hope2b...@justice.com> wrote
> >
> > > DON"T FEED THE TROLLS...
> >
> > I wouldn't have the slightest idea what this one eats!
> >
> > BAM
>
> Let me show you one who is just as much an eternal criminal as you:
>
irrelevant rant about others snipped.
Will Nordmeyer
"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com...
news:<3cab0785$1...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...
> > "Mike" <hope2b...@justice.com> wrote in message
> > news:pCsq8.2632$lA6.1...@news2.east.cox.net...
> > > DON"T FEED THE TROLLS...
> > >
> > SORRY... he looked hungry... I had some leftovers... :-)
>
> Address the points. Get some conscience.
I have addressed the points.
> Stop preaching to others to stop things you freely do.
Please document my namecalling...
> Stop attacking,
Not attacking...
> condemning
You're the one calling people superterrorists, workers for the
antichrist, antichrists, criminals, etc.
> and criticizing just because I disagree with you
If you were JUST disagreeing that'd be one thing... BUT, you're calling
people names, making up things that are not true, not providing proof to
back up your claims, and generally showing a very NON-Christian
attitude.
> and I provide questions and points
You provide meaningless rants about things that others supposedly said.
Actually, you provide meaningless rants about what you make up about
what other people said. You do not provide questions. Your points you
"provide" are entirely lacking in proof. (millions killed for example,
criminals for example)...
> that prove you all are the children of the Antichrist.
>
You have proved nothing except your own ignorance of Christianity and
Christian behavior Ted.
When have you provided proof of me calling you names?
> Here are those points again about your fellow super-terrorist murderer
> by the name of Antichrist Ted Seeber:
>
Stick to topic Ted. I'm not Ted Seeber, you've claimed that I called
you names. Please prove it. You are calling Ted Seeber "antichrist",
you started this thread by calling me antichrist, and lying about me
accusing you of things... when, in fact, I simply asked you to consider
your non-Christian behavior with the name calling, etc.
bam
"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote
> Here are those points again about your fellow super-terrorist murderer
> by the name of Antichrist Ted Seeber:
Teddie, Teddie, Teddie....... isn't this just a tad harsh?
BAM
Ted McMillan
> I see more namecalling and snipped the irrational and incoherent rants
> about a "superterrorist" ... your rants are meaningless Ted.
He says he sees name-calling. Let me show you something else he saw
that he cannot comment about. There are issues in what I am about to
show. The workers of the Antichrist cannot deal with the issues, so
they resort to name-calling and personal attacks. Watch the issues
here as I'm about to show you the words of an actual super-terrorist
on the newsgroups. This upsets the other super-terrorists such as
Will Nordy, that's why they are always only posting attacks against
Ted McMillan and will not post on the issues:
----------
Ted McMillan
> In article <c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com>,
> tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com (Ted McMillan) writes:
>
> >Again Antichrist MSiciliana dares to tell us that Ted Seeber did not
> >condemn all non-Catholics back on December 5, 2001.
>
> witness against others and his namecalling of others, specifically, his calling
> Ted Seeber a "superterrorist." Ted McMillan is bearing false witness against
> others. Period. Be prepared for another rant, folks.
AntiChrist MSiciliana attacks, but does she present evidence? Here is
evidence of what her fellow murderer cult-member has done against the
blood of all non-Catholics. You will have evidence here:
Ted McMillan
> In article <c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com>,
> tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com (Ted McMillan) writes:
>
>
> for the next rant, folks!
Ted McMillan
> In article <c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com>,
> tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com (Ted McMillan) writes:
>
> back on December 5, 2001. >>
>
> state that Ted Seeber did not condemn all non-Catholics ever.
------------------
FREEZE!
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. And
why were the 5 to 6 thousand people killed in the WTC terrorist
disaster of September 11 again? You can see that Osama can speak
similar words!
Ted McMillan
> In article <c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com>,
> tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com (Ted McMillan) writes:
>
> >condemn all non-Catholics back on December 5, 2001.
>
> who has repeated the same lie several times a day for several months now trying
> to get people to believe his deliberate falsehood.
>
> Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
That obviously translated means that Ted McMillan tells the truth.
Here is her fellow super-terrorist cult-member condemning all
non-Catholics:
------------------
FREEZE!
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. And
why were the 5 to 6 thousand people killed in the WTC terrorist
disaster of September 11 again? You can see that Osama can speak
similar words!
I, being infuriated, respond:
Caillean McMahon
Theodore; dear Sir;
Protestants have killed Catholics in large numbers as well. The killing
on both sides was a blasphemy in and of itself.
Let this tiresome issue go. No one thinks that Protestants ought to be
killed. Mr Seeber is gone.
Brightest Blessings;
Caillean `aSiobhan, Lady Carrigaholt
Paul
"Caillean McMahon" <cail...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3CABDFA8...@yahoo.com...
It is kind of ironic I guess that everyone tried to kill witches and I don't
think witches tried to kill anyone.
Caillean McMahon
Paul;
First of all, thank you for remembering. No, Witches were simply
midwives, mediums, and herbal healers. Hardly a threat to Christianity
except for the power of womyn, which could not be tolerated.
Ted McMillan
Caillean McMahon <cail...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<3CABDFA8...@yahoo.com>...
> Theodore; dear Sir;
> Protestants have killed Catholics in large numbers as well. The killing
> on both sides was a blasphemy in and of itself.
> Let this tiresome issue go. No one thinks that Protestants ought to be
> killed. Mr Seeber is gone.
> Brightest Blessings;
> Caillean `aSiobhan, Lady Carrigaholt
Antichrist Caillean, listen closely and then go back to your superiors
of the witches and ask for an IQ, ok?
First of all it has been shown that there was a difference in the
example of the Protestants compared to the Catholics. I have
presented this before, and your reasoning demonstrates that you know
this. Rome has killed BY DOCTRINAL MANDATE. At times the Protestants
killed often for self-defense and other things, but you cannot find a
condemnation of Catholics for doctrinal reasons.
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/RomeProtestantsSame.htm
TERRORIST TED SEEBER ON DECEMBER 5, 2001 CONDEMNED ALL NON-CATHOLICS
INCLUDING YOURSELF (IF YOU ARE ONE, AND EVIDENTLY YOU ARE NOT) AND
SHOWED THAT IT IS AN APPROVED PRACTICE TO KILL THEM. Why this doesn't
get to you, but me exposing him does is really very obvious.
Stop letting this, according to you, tiresome issue, strain your peace
with the Pope. Let it go and go back to your rituals, for when you
enter you also attack only one person. I will not let go with a
super-terrorist not recognized wherever he goes. The man has argued
against every vestige of liberty also. Here is again what he has done
contrasted to the terrible crime I am doing in exposing him that gets
to the other super-terrorists posting on the newsgroups:
Ted McMillan
> Paul wrote:
> >
> > It is kind of ironic I guess that everyone tried to kill witches and I don't
> > think witches tried to kill anyone.
>
Caillean responds:
> Paul;
> First of all, thank you for remembering. No, Witches were simply
> midwives, mediums, and herbal healers. Hardly a threat to Christianity
> except for the power of womyn, which could not be tolerated.
> Brightest Blessings;
> Caillean `aSiobhan, Lady Carrigaholt
If what you said were true Paul, Caillean, claiming to be a witch,
would have been on Seeber's terrorist carcass already. Instead, just
like everyone else posting, she only finds irritation that I am
exposing the crime. Then comes the babbling that she doesn't work for
the Antichrist.
Jesuit Andrew has commented that Ted Seeber was a rather nice person,
unlike Ted McMillan he has attacked since day one. Will terrorist
Seeber enter heaven with the people he has condemned to persecution
and death by principle? Is God really as "kind" as these workers of
the Antichrist to admit Ted Seeber to the place where many have been
loyal to the blood-stained banner? How can the shedders of blood be
with those who fell under the blood-stained banner?
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Robert A. Walker
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com (Ted McMillan) wrote in message news:<c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com>...
Robert A. Walker
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com (Ted McMillan) wrote in message news:<c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com>...
Robert A. Walker
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com (Ted McMillan) wrote in message news:<c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com>...
Caillean McMahon
Theodore;
I did decry Seeber's statement. The "crime" is exposed, everyone
knows that he did it.
The continued obsession wth it is irritating, especially when
accompanied by statements like the implication that you just made about
Witches.
Brightest Blessings;
Caillean `aSiobhan, Lady Carrigaholt
"I'm Lilith with a killer kiss..."
> tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Andrew
"Since you cannot discern motive, you are incapable
of judging another. In criticizing (Mr Seeber),
you are passing sentence upon yourself; for you
show that you are a participant with Satan, the
accuser .."
Desire of Ages p. 314
E.G.White
Ted McMillan
> In article <c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com>,
> tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com (Ted McMillan) writes:
>
> >condemn all non-Catholics back on December 5, 2001.
>
> witness against others and his namecalling of others, specifically, his calling
> Ted Seeber a "superterrorist." Ted McMillan is bearing false witness against
> others. Period. Be prepared for another rant, folks.
So we both rant? I will show you the difference. I am going to
provide evidence behind what I say. Here it goes to prove Antichrist
Ted Seeber is a demonic super-terrorist and by definition the US
government should deal with him. By association and the fact that
terrorist activities are not noticed by his fellow super-terrorists,
but they become all paranoid that a loving person can reprove and
expose him to innocent people for the security of their lives, the
government should also deal with his super-terrorist friends posting
here.
Here is part of the evidence again to be revealed:
------------------
FREEZE!
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. And
why were the 5 to 6 thousand people killed in the WTC terrorist
disaster of September 11 again? You can see that Osama can speak
similar words!
I, being infuriated, respond:
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/TSeeber.htm
For the Work Finished!
>
Ted McMillan
> In article <c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com>,
> tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com (Ted McMillan) writes:
>
> back on December 5, 2001. >>
>
Only the children of the Antichrist will show us that only paranoid
people refuse to provide evidence for what they state.
Here is proof that fellow super-terrorist Antichrist Seeber condemned
all non-Catholics. If not, you can ask yourselves what Antichrist
MSiciliana and her band of natural murderers refuse to answer: Why
Antichrist Ted Seeber has refused to even deny what I have said about
him, and why he can't defend himself instead of feeding off of
MSiciliana's toxic breasts:
talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.clinton, misc.activism.militia,
alt.impeach.clinton
Greetings,
I was unfortunate enough to bump into a Dark Ages Catholic person. I
mean a person whose mind is at least just the same as in the Dark
Ages. There are private groups and people now referred to as
"conspiracy kooks" who are revealing that Rome has not changed, and
that she has infiltrated all of society and especially attacked
entities of control, influence and power.with people from her various
not so well known orders. Many of them are reported to have
infiltrated all the Christian Churches pretending to be members just
as Protestant documentation has forewarned. We have found these
reports to be startlingly true!
Typically anyone bringing such things to light would be referred to as
kooks, paranoid, Anti-Catholics, or hatemongers. Well let's take a
look at someone who gave such an accusation so that we can see what we
are up against. I am talking about a man by the name of Ted Seeber.
You are about to see the man confirm everything that has been said.
He is going to argue against most every principle of liberty and the
Constitution. He shows total loyalty to the Pope. Here is a synopsis
of his views against human liberty and the American Constitution:
It is true that some have said that his ideas are not a reliable
indicator of how the Vatican feels. It is interesting to note
however, that though he condemned Protestants to persecution and
death, all such people were not in the least upset at him, but instead
attacked me because I reproved him for his terrible disregard of human
life.
We start the conversation over the current September 11th terrorist
incident I was discussing:
When told how long this terrorist incident took to plan and implement
compared to others that were planned quicker and yet caught, Seeber
said: "There have been plenty of successfull terrorist attacks
against US interests where the terrorists stayed legal until the
attack."
We find this difficult to believe since we know that America had been
considered a haven against terrorism and how this was surely mentioned
by all our news media as they were describing the impact of this
unprecedented act of terrorism.
Seeber tells us that:
The current Constitutional principles of liberty are incredibly
outdated and stupid. He said the principle is as old as the 1500s
with Martin Luther. When did his principles for no liberty or privacy
originate? When Christians reveal the Vatican hatred of religious
liberty of conscience and expose her continual conspiracy through
infiltration of our nation and the nations of the world, despot
Vatican Catholics like Seeber tell the world that we hate the Catholic
people. How long was this practice used? Since he told us that our
principles of liberty are outdated, how outdated is the constant
reflex habit that exposing people who slowly tortured Christians to
death makes one hateful of Catholics and more a criminal than the
people who committed the atrocities themselves? How outdated it is?
Seeber said that the terrorist incident provided a benefit to us in
that, "we found out that privacy is not a luxury we can afford just
yet." Notice that he said "we" volunteering all opinions for us and
not allowing us to disagree. He includes himself among us as if he is
one of us even though he hates liberty for everything else except him
and his church. He doesn't think like us nor agree with us, but he
includes himself in our communion. He gets upset when we say he is a
despot.
AFTER he already told us a year before on the newsgroups that "liberty
is useless and only causes schism." We therefore asked again and
again the question we have for our new American government:
"If the Citizens of America agree to give up their liberties in order
to take out terrorism, what will happen after terrorism is conquered?
Will we get our liberties back? Seeber has indeed answered that
question for us.
Soon Seeber began to lie to us telling us that what he said about
liberty being useless is just and only his opinion and that I should
not get upset about it or believe it. The problem is that there is
documentation showing that his church does believe that liberty is
useless and only causes schism.
Seeber accuses us of aiding and supporting the terrorists because we
believe that liberty and privacy is more important than stopping Bin
Laden. He despots us to believe that Bin Laden will only be caught if
privacy is eliminated.
Seeber tells all that Osama Bin Laden is my Idol because I determined
that the American citizens must retain their liberties.
In Seeber telling us that Privacy is outdated. He tells us that we
should provide all our private information to the government. Our
emails should not be private. Even our apartments that we rent, since
we did not build them, we should allow our landlords the rights to go
in and out as they please and to do what they want. Privacy and
liberty are not inseparable. Those who contend for privacy are
criminals.
Seeber claims that I support the terrorists because I oppose the
citizens giving up their privacy and liberties. He says that I
support those who would destroy liberty. When I replied that I don't
support Seeber (who would destroy liberty), he asked if I support the
American citizens living their lives as if nothing had happened. Well
no I don't. I want the citizens to remember this terrorist attack as
I want them to remember the worst terrorist attacks during the Dark
Ages. But as Seeber told everyone that I support terrorism because I
support the citizens living as if nothing has happened, you can see
that he also condemned President Bush for saying that America should
continue living on their lives and that we will not allow terrorists
to limit the freedoms of Americans.
Others have falsely claimed that Ted Seeber doesn't represent Catholic
thought, but this is not the fact. Although Ted Seeber already has
argued against liberty for all non-Catholics, he has shown just as
Rome has that he believes in a different type of liberty. Check for
example this Catholic statement of her position on this matter:
"The church does not, and cannot accept, or in any degree favor,
liberty IN THE PROTESTANT SENSE OF LIBERTY." -- (Catholic World,
April, 1870.
Ted Seeber, in another occasion talks about "fake liberty" after
telling us that liberty itself is useless and "only causes schism." He
is therefore showing that he supports a different kind of liberty even
though he has before condemned the concept entirely.
Ted Seeber charges Ted McMillan with aiding terrorists through his
support of the rights of the citizens of America to keep their
liberties. He says that by Ted McMillan's determination along this
line, he provides, "Aid and comfort to the enemy, is what you said and
did." But he gets upset if people say he's a despot.
Ted McMillan asked if we are entering a government now when those who
tell us that "liberty is useless and only causes schism" are freedom
lovers and those who are apalled by such words are terrorists? Seeber
replies, "Yep. Been that way for 40-odd years now." Why then is he
calling for change to that setting if he now tells us it is and has
already been like that?
After Ted McMillan said that those who believe "liberty is useless and
only causes schism" are the ones who believe in depopulation, Seeber
said, "Really? You don't believe in depopulation? Then what are all
those guns for?" He is against the rights to bear arms which was
instituted as a last resort to the Citizens of America in case they
find themselves suddenly confronting a tyrannical United States
government through infiltration, having people who think like Seeber
all throughout it as it is today. But Seeber well knows that the US
military and the UN has lots of guns and far more devices of
destruction INCLUDING STICKY STRIPS. These are spread along highways
and arteries where people can enter or leave populated areas. They
get stuck there and can't move. The criteria Seeber gave was that if
you own guns or support the ownership of it, you believe in
depopulation. But Seeber gets upset when we say he is a despot. Why
is the government planning a depopulation of the citizenry?
Seeber says:
I know you have a Jihad against America because you support an
outdated and incredibly stupid interpretation of the Constitution,
[the "interpretation that always was] and because you support the
taking up of arms against your own government even in times of war.
Ted McMillan:
Ted Seeber knows the following very well, but he is working to
deliberately deceive the readers here. The framers of the
Constitution allowed for the citizens of America to be armed in case,
through infiltration, the American Government turns into a tyrannical
government. I assure all of you that the framers of the Constitution
do not have a Jihad against America. The guns are for the citizens to
protect themselves against despots like Seeber who would at times
claim themselves that they would infiltrate the government and work to
change it till it hates and outlaws liberty. Seeber even admitted
this very thing concerning himself.
Ted McMillan:
> Yes, I am on the side of those who love liberty. Where have I said
> whose side I was or was not on?
Ted Seeber:
In fighting for privacy rights (which aren't in the
constitution-ANYWHERE) against neccessary rules needed to fight
against the Terrorists, you've chosen the wrong side.
Ted McMillan's comment:
Take note folks that he told us we shouldn't have rights to privacy
"just yet" when he was in deceive mode. He now again shows us we were
to NEVER have it, for he claims it is nowhere in the Constitution.
He tells us privacy rights aren't in the constitution, yet he is just
one of a vast army working to change the Constitution so that it can
take away the privacy rights. Where else have we seen thinking like
Seeber's? Have any of you studied the Communists? Have any of you
studied the Nazis? If Seeber's principles are so great, please show
us how these regimes were great throughout history. Where is the
benefit of them compared to America? Let us see if Vatican
Inquisitors, Communists, Facists, Nazis or Seeber can learn anything
even in lessons over the span of thousands of years! How come you
can't see that the sources which told us there is an indelible
connection between Communism, Fascism, Nazism and every other horrible
regime to the Vatican is fact?? "Well Seeber doesn't speak for the
Catholic Church" the "Ends Justifies the Means" people would say.
Well then why not then get upset at Seeber? Instead all emotion is
only on Ted McMillan. That is VERY revealing!
Seeber says that he destroys communities and builds them:
He says that he works against the government in order to reform it
from the inside in "acceptable confines", but though Ted McMillan is
in agreement with the present makeup of government, he is in a Jihad
against it. Anyone who repeats this fact about Seeber as Jack Chick
and others tell us, will be charged with being "Anti-Catholic" and
with hating Catholics. How come Seeber is not being charged here?
All this shows that ROME HAS NOT CHANGED! Despot Catholics like
Seeber would never think of providing such unlimited power to the free
American government throughout its history. Why are they so eager and
determined that that be done now? That is because most of those in
government are secretly loyal to the Pope and would break any American
or Constitutional principle in a heartbeat at his command irregardless
of any oath that they have made. They could not do this so readily
historically because there were many true Americans who also held
posts side them and who would either stop them or report what they
were doing. As prophecy is about to be fulfilled, NOW THAT POPULATION
OF TRUE AMERICANS IS ALMOST NON-EXISTENT. They have retired, have
been dismissed, have been killed, or otherwise just are not there
anymore. Some have resigned in protest of the new outlaw movements.
I reprove despot Seeber for gloating over the dead bodies of the
Protestants! The following is the actual statement and reply:
Ted McMillan:
> > But you did understand how to hang people in chains. And your
> > founding Fathers also can't tell the difference between shedding the
> > blood of millions of bible-believers in the most unbelievable ways for
> > their descendants to now presume upon the world to teach them what is
> > the definition of love, hate and plagiarism.
>
Ted Seeber:
> Can you really be said to be believing in the Bible if you don't live it?
> NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible.
Ted McMillan:
NO WONDER YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT ME BRINGING BACK YOUR RECORD OF
HORRIBLE ATROCITIES! They were not even living the bible! Why even
worry about them! Were the 5 to 6 thousands who were killed by the
terrorist attacks living by the bible? You don't have any consistent
principles, if you even know the meaning of the word! Your principles
change only for you to even look like you are winning an argument.
Your statement is incredibly insensitive and you constantly reveal
that what is written by your uncomparably bloody religion is true.
All I know is that you people murdered millions in the most horrible
ways. I DON'T CARE IF YOU MURDERED ATHEISTS!! I am not that
inhumanly insensitive for an animal like you to be worried about me
having guns!
Again, despot: WHY IS THE POPE APOLOGIZING!! You have just sent us
your bigoted despot opinions without providing any MAYBEES! Why not
try to prove what you are saying against me using the scriptures then?
How often have you even answered my questions?
Thousands of people lost their lives in the World Trade Center
disaster. How many of them lived by the bible? They were not even in
rural settings nor under persecution. All those in the WTC were
products of the modern revolution. I would even say that most of them
believe that homosexual activity is acceptable behavior. They all
lived in the modern age and are products of it. I can bet you that
homosexuality was not a problem for those who were slain by Rome!
I don't care whether or not they lived by the bible according to a
murderous despot!
--------------------
For making these statements, I have been constantly attacked by
Vatican Cindy Ford, Angelo Braz and Paul Tooley Jr. who all falsely
claim to be Adventists. Their discussion specifically and
intentionally leaves out their fellow soldier of the Pope, Ted Seeber,
and they have even demanded that I not refer to Ted Seeber in any
discussion despite his very revealing comment involving the blood of
the Saints. These all claim to be Adventists. I have asked Vatican
Cindy a simple question. She moves heaven and earth to evade it but
later claims that she has answered it. Below is the question and
check the threads in order to see how she has answered it. She has
moved heaven and earth to evade and avoid it and then finally lied by
telling us that she has answered it. The statement of Ted Seeber not
only condemned the religion Cindy Ford falsely claims to be a part of,
but because of her claims, his statements also condemns her life. The
same is true for Vatican Angelo Braz. They have played the Jesuit and
done everything possible to avoid the very plain and clear question
while claiming that they have answered it.
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
Tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Ted McMillan
> In article <c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com>,
> tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com (Ted McMillan) writes:
>
> >condemn all non-Catholics back on December 5, 2001.
>
> who has repeated the same lie several times a day for several months now trying
> to get people to believe his deliberate falsehood.
>
> Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
Let Ted Seeber speak for himself and answer for his continued silence.
Stop forcing him to feed from your toxic breasts. But here is the
evidence to prove that I wasn't trained by a cult that specializes in
deceit. I will provide what the workers of the Antichrist won't:
proof for what I say. Here is that proof:
talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.clinton, misc.activism.militia,
alt.impeach.clinton
Greetings,
I reprove despot Seeber for gloating over the dead bodies of the
Protestants! The following is the actual statement and reply:
Ted McMillan:
> > But you did understand how to hang people in chains. And your
> > founding Fathers also can't tell the difference between shedding the
> > blood of millions of bible-believers in the most unbelievable ways for
> > their descendants to now presume upon the world to teach them what is
> > the definition of love, hate and plagiarism.
>
Ted Seeber:
> Can you really be said to be believing in the Bible if you don't live it?
> NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible.
Ted McMillan:
NO WONDER YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT ME BRINGING BACK YOUR RECORD OF
HORRIBLE ATROCITIES! They were not even living the bible! Why even
worry about them! Were the 5 to 6 thousands who were killed by the
terrorist attacks living by the bible? You don't have any consistent
principles, if you even know the meaning of the word! Your principles
change only for you to even look like you are winning an argument.
Your statement is incredibly insensitive and you constantly reveal
that what is written by your uncomparably bloody religion is true.
All I know is that you people murdered millions in the most horrible
ways. I DON'T CARE IF YOU MURDERED ATHEISTS!! I am not that
inhumanly insensitive for an animal like you to be worried about me
having guns!
Again, despot: WHY IS THE POPE APOLOGIZING!! You have just sent us
your bigoted despot opinions without providing any MAYBEES! Why not
try to prove what you are saying against me using the scriptures then?
How often have you even answered my questions?
Thousands of people lost their lives in the World Trade Center
disaster. How many of them lived by the bible? They were not even in
rural settings nor under persecution. All those in the WTC were
products of the modern revolution. I would even say that most of them
believe that homosexual activity is acceptable behavior. They all
lived in the modern age and are products of it. I can bet you that
homosexuality was not a problem for those who were slain by Rome!
I don't care whether or not they lived by the bible according to a
murderous despot!
--------------------
For making these statements, I have been constantly attacked by
Vatican Cindy Ford, Angelo Braz and Paul Tooley Jr. who all falsely
claim to be Adventists. Their discussion specifically and
intentionally leaves out their fellow soldier of the Pope, Ted Seeber,
and they have even demanded that I not refer to Ted Seeber in any
discussion despite his very revealing comment involving the blood of
the Saints. These all claim to be Adventists. I have asked Vatican
Cindy a simple question. She moves heaven and earth to evade it but
later claims that she has answered it. Below is the question and
check the threads in order to see how she has answered it. She has
moved heaven and earth to evade and avoid it and then finally lied by
telling us that she has answered it. The statement of Ted Seeber not
only condemned the religion Cindy Ford falsely claims to be a part of,
but because of her claims, his statements also condemns her life. The
same is true for Vatican Angelo Braz. They have played the Jesuit and
done everything possible to avoid the very plain and clear question
while claiming that they have answered it.
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
Tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Ted McMillan
No, they just post constantly and devote hours for their Vatican
health!
I love you Antichrist Walker! I love you!! Don't you love me??
Here again is the evidence that Antichrist Seeber condemned all
non-Catholics as it is evident that his fellow terrorists here also
evidently did:
------------------
FREEZE!
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. And
why were the 5 to 6 thousand people killed in the WTC terrorist
disaster of September 11 again? You can see that Osama can speak
similar words!
I, being infuriated, respond:
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
After I demonstrated his terrible responsibility for saying words like
Ted McMillan
Is a despot speaking for everybody?
Why not then ignore the lunacy? You have provided no evidence again,
but have just attacked and name-called. You called me a lunatic.
Here is that evidence again:
------------------
FREEZE!
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. And
why were the 5 to 6 thousand people killed in the WTC terrorist
disaster of September 11 again? You can see that Osama can speak
similar words!
I, being infuriated, respond:
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
After I demonstrated his terrible responsibility for saying words like
Ted McMillan
Just a repeat Antichrist Andrew! Let Antichrist Seeber speak for
himself! Tell the Vatican to stop pumping out paranoid people.
"Since you cannot discern motive, you are incapable
of judging another. In criticizing (Mr McMillan),
you are passing sentence upon yourself; for you
show that you are a participant with Satan, the
accuser .."
Desire of Ages p. 314
E.G.White
Here again is the evidence that demonstrates the motives of Ted
Seeber. This is proven not just by one incident, but Seeber has done
everything possible to argue against human liberties. Here is the
evidence the other workers of the Antichrist protecting him cannot
submit:
----------
------------------
FREEZE!
I, being infuriated, respond:
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
After I demonstrated his terrible responsibility for saying words like
Ted McMillan
You haven't been reading the posts of Antichrist MSiciliana, have you?
I believe you have. She said that HE DIDN'T do it.
> The continued obsession wth it is irritating, especially when
> accompanied by statements like the implication that you just made about
> Witches.
> Brightest Blessings;
> Caillean `aSiobhan, Lady Carrigaholt
> "I'm Lilith with a killer kiss..."
> > tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Antichrist Caillean, you need to go to the government and tell them
that their obsession with terrorists is irritation. OF COURSE IT'S
IRRITATING TO YOU: YOU ARE ONE OF THEM! You want to be exposed??
Antichrist Caillean: your obsession with people who expose terrorists
is irritating. Can't you let it pass? It is better to have much more
exposing of terrorists than to have terrorists. There is an issue of
blood, and super-terrorist Seeber condemned all non-Catholics. That
would include you, except that you don't act like a person whose life
and whole religion has been condemned. You claim you decry what
Seeber has done just like Vatican Angelo: he said Seeber was wrong
about three time and that was it. He then sent a floury of posts
telling everyone I'm evil and incomprehensible because, believe it or
not, I attack others.
There are alot of GIs that had better drop out of the military! But
here again is the evidence of the crime Ted Seeber has done while his
fellow super-terrorists take turns to try and drown out my posts:
------------------
FREEZE!
I, being infuriated, respond:
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
After I demonstrated his terrible responsibility for saying words like
Ted McMillan
Then don't post to it. I can't help it if I don't work for the
Antichrist!
Here is a man who condemned all non-Catholics boldly on the newsgroups
while the US Government is looking for ways to eradicate terrorists:
------------------
FREEZE!
I, being infuriated, respond:
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
After I demonstrated his terrible responsibility for saying words like
Caillean McMahon
Theodore Dear Sir;
> Antichrist Caillean, you need to go to the government and tell them
> that their obsession with terrorists is irritation. OF COURSE IT'S
> IRRITATING TO YOU: YOU ARE ONE OF THEM!
You have just accused me of being a terrorist. That is untrue and
unjust.
You want to be exposed??
>
> Antichrist Caillean: your obsession with people who expose terrorists
> is irritating. Can't you let it pass? It is better to have much more
> exposing of terrorists than to have terrorists.
There are no terrorists here; they might disagree with you and may have
hatred and evil within, but they do not commit acts of terror.
There is an issue of
> blood, and super-terrorist Seeber condemned all non-Catholics. That
> would include you, except that you don't act like a person whose life
> and whole religion has been condemned.
My religion is condemned by most of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.
You claim you decry what
> Seeber has done just like Vatican Angelo: he said Seeber was wrong
> about three time and that was it. He then sent a floury of posts
> telling everyone I'm evil and incomprehensible because, believe it or
> not, I attack others.
You do perseverate a bit Theodore.
Legatus
<cail...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Ted McMillan wrote:
> > Antichrist Caillean, you need to go to the government and tell them
> > that their obsession with terrorists is irritation. OF COURSE IT'S
> > IRRITATING TO YOU: YOU ARE ONE OF THEM!
> You have just accused me of being a terrorist. That is untrue and
> unjust.
Not the sign of a sane person. Not you, him. Seriously dangerous thing
to do in this climate. Bloody stupid even. Actionable I'd say.
Reportable at the least. As a matter of fact...if you don't do it, I
will. He's gone beyond the usual hurly-burly and is quickly passing
into very dangerous territory.
> You want to be exposed??
He wants to be hauled off in irons.
Dagnabit, I've got him killfiled and you snipped the message id where
he originally wrote that. And a google search of the group doesn't show
that message... but it DOES show that mcmillan has been throwing that
term around wildly.
Aha, got it... Well, carp. It looks like he's posting through Google
(smart man after all) and I don't think their TOS stops him calling
people terrorists... MY provider would for goodness sake.
Phooey.
Steve
ps. *I* don't think you're a terrorist... really. Is there a Weatherwax
in the house? Take care of that bozo. :)
Caillean McMahon
Thank you Steve.
Brightest Blessings;
Caillean `aSiobhan, Lady Carrigaholt
Ted McMillan
> Ted McMillan wrote:
> >
> > Caillean McMahon <cail...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<3CACFB2D...@yahoo.com>...
> > > Ted McMillan wrote:
> > You haven't been reading the posts of Antichrist MSiciliana, have you?
> > I believe you have. She said that HE DIDN'T do it.
> >
> > > The continued obsession wth it is irritating, especially when
> > > accompanied by statements like the implication that you just made about
> > > Witches.
> > > Brightest Blessings;
> > > Caillean `aSiobhan, Lady Carrigaholt
> > > "I'm Lilith with a killer kiss..."
> > > > tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
> >
> Theodore Dear Sir;
>
> > Antichrist Caillean, you need to go to the government and tell them
> > that their obsession with terrorists is irritation. OF COURSE IT'S
> > IRRITATING TO YOU: YOU ARE ONE OF THEM!
> You have just accused me of being a terrorist. That is untrue and
> unjust.
>
> You want to be exposed??
You keep defending a terrorist. It is quite an obsession. You have
not addressed my question about the US Government's obsession with
terrorists. You are following the Jesuit code. You have also accused
me of hatred. That is unjust and downright Jesuit.
Now surprise me and convince me you are a human being. Answer the
questions and don't evade them like Cindy, Andrew, Lamarr and all the
other workers of the Antichrist.
> > Antichrist Caillean: your obsession with people who expose terrorists
> > is irritating. Can't you let it pass? It is better to have much more
> > exposing of terrorists than to have terrorists.
>
> There are no terrorists here; they might disagree with you and may have
> hatred and evil within, but they do not commit acts of terror.
Ted McMillan does not hate. He works from and through love. There
are terrorists here and you are one. You don't have to commit acts of
murder to be a terrorist. I know that and you know that. Someone has
demonstrated that he is bloodthirsty and told us that non-Catholics
should be persecuted and killed. That would mean you also if you were
really and truly a non-Catholic.
> There is an issue of
> > blood, and super-terrorist Seeber condemned all non-Catholics. That
> > would include you, except that you don't act like a person whose life
> > and whole religion has been condemned.
>
> My religion is condemned by most of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.
Well why haven't you defended all those religions that do that like
you have defended Super-terrorist papist Seeber?
> You claim you decry what
> > Seeber has done just like Vatican Angelo: he said Seeber was wrong
> > about three time and that was it. He then sent a floury of posts
> > telling everyone I'm evil and incomprehensible because, believe it or
> > not, I attack others.
>
> You do perseverate a bit Theodore.
But you don't? See all the posts around you and cannot be convinced
that Ted McMillan is not going to heed the cries of the
super-terrorists? You don't persevere? I have an obsession with
life, and you all have it with death.
Let me bring the evidence again that Ted Seeber is a super-terrorist
and has condemned all non-Catholics:
Ted McMillan
man who has condemned all non-Catholics here on the newsgroups.
Viewing that she falsely tells us that she is a witch and nothing
more, a whole lot of people come by in defense of the Super-terrorist,
converging upon me to tell the world how amusing I am.
Antichrist Caillean keeps telling me that I am obsessed with pointing
out the super-terrorist and being paranoid. It is not as if this
super-terrorist is alone now, is it? Only Ted Seeber is a
super-terrorist of the Papacy? Did he misrepresent his Rome? If he
did, who would be the first to point this out?
Here is what Antichrist Ted Seeber did on December 5, 2001 when he
condemned all non-Catholics. He actually didn't condemn Antichrist
Cindy, Angelo, Lamarr, Caillean, Andrew and the others however, even
though they may claim to be non-Catholics:
Caillean McMahon
To the reading persons interested;
I do not generally share much personal information about myself.
Because of the extent of the misreprsentation of my beliefs and life, I
will here this once.
First of all, I am a Wiccan, a Pagan womyn with some interest in
Dryadism(a form of Druidism, but matriarchial). I was formally
excommunicated from the Roman Catholic Church after a series of letters
wih the local ordinary over a year ago.
I am not a solitary Witch, I practice my faith and craft in a
Coven. I like the sense of community, and the opportuity to learn that
it provides.
I was raised as a Catholic. Events occured in my life that cut me
off from Catholicism prior to the excommunication. Despite those events,
I retain a fondness for that faith, indeed for all Christianity when
practiced according to the words of Christ himself(a rare occurance
admittedly) and dislike those who attack members of any faith based upon
inaccuracies, prejudice, or lies.
I disapprove of anyone, including Mr Seeber, who fans any kind of
hatred. At this point that includes, sadly, Mr. McMillan.
I am not a Jesuit, I in fact had only one Jesuit prof in my
life(mostly Franciscans, the hippies of the 13th Century). I do not have
any connection with the Vatican, the Curia, the Magestrium, etc. In
fact, the Church recently condemned the practice of Witchcraft yet again
(as have a number of Protestant faiths). I defend them when under unjust
attack becasue it is the right thing to do and I still believe that
truth, openess and understanding will bring peace
to all faiths.
For those of you on the Adventist news-group, I apologize for the
intrusion but Mr. McMillan has been crossposting these items. Those of
you on the Catholic newsgroup for the most part know me and have learned
that I am indeed harmless, many of you even have blessed me with
thinking well of my attempts at peace.
I am not the Antichrist; I am not Satan, . I admire Christianity and
feel that it is a very valid path to the Divine.
Having shared this I hope that perhaps others might understand and that
Mr. McMillan's fellow Adventists might encourage him to step back,
examine the behaviour, and stop these attacks.
Ted McMillan
below and who she is. We have enough lies coming from those having
Vatican beliefs who are Adventists according to them.
Ted Seeber condemned ALL NON-CATHOLICS on the newsgroups. I reproved
and exposed him for that. All of a sudden a spectrum of different
NON-CATHOLIC religions came on the newsgroups to teach me how not to
condemn or accuse, and they have all exclusively condemned me. They
have posted persistently and relentlessly demonstrating to all that it
is much worse to reprove a super-terrorist than to be one.
Caillean claims to be a witch. As we know, witches have been
extensively persecuted and put to death for ages. You would think
then that any comment about persecution or killing of others would be
the top of her focus. IT HAS NOT BEEN. She has been defending the
man who condemned all non-Catholics and condemning me teaching me (by
precent and example?) how not to condemn.
Caillean works for Rome. Rome is an infiltrating power.
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Caillean McMahon <cail...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<3CB03B51...@yahoo.com>...
Paul
the same vigor. He uses the term Adventist and Adventism, because he thinks
that he has retained the true nature of the church and that Adventists have
apostatized. He feels that he and a few others are the true remnant of
Christ on earth. So your appeal to us Adventists, while sincere, is
misdirected. The power to curb Mr. McMillan lies with in all of us
individually and that is to quit allowing him to "rent" space within our
minds and souls. If no one responds to his hatred the wax and wick of his
candle will fail and he will wink out into darkness. So in a funny sense we
all are indicted by his continued presence and power on these NG's.
In Peace,
Paul
"Caillean McMahon" <cail...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3CB03B51...@yahoo.com...
Caillean McMahon
Ted McMillan wrote:
>
> I don't care what lies Antichrist Caillean has written about herself
> below and who she is. We have enough lies coming from those having
> Vatican beliefs who are Adventists according to them.
>
> Ted Seeber condemned ALL NON-CATHOLICS on the newsgroups. I reproved
> and exposed him for that. All of a sudden a spectrum of different
> NON-CATHOLIC religions came on the newsgroups to teach me how not to
> condemn or accuse, and they have all exclusively condemned me. They
> have posted persistently and relentlessly demonstrating to all that it
> is much worse to reprove a super-terrorist than to be one.
>
> Caillean claims to be a witch. As we know, witches have been
> extensively persecuted and put to death for ages. You would think
> then that any comment about persecution or killing of others would be
> the top of her focus. IT HAS NOT BEEN. She has been defending the
> man who condemned all non-Catholics and condemning me teaching me (by
> precent and example?) how not to condemn.
>
> Caillean works for Rome. Rome is an infiltrating power.
>
> Ted McMillan
> tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
I do not approve of advocating the death or silencing of anyone. I
approve of life and peace.
I have three times now expressed disapproval and or approbation about
what you have quted Mr. Seeber saying.
You have lied about me now.
Three-fold return applies, if you have questions about that, check the
Wiccan Rede.
Caillean McMahon
Paul wrote:
>
> Sadly Mr. McMillan is not an Adventists and in fact attack's Adventists with
> the same vigor. He uses the term Adventist and Adventism, because he thinks
> that he has retained the true nature of the church and that Adventists have
> apostatized. He feels that he and a few others are the true remnant of
> Christ on earth. So your appeal to us Adventists, while sincere, is
> misdirected. The power to curb Mr. McMillan lies with in all of us
> individually and that is to quit allowing him to "rent" space within our
> minds and souls. If no one responds to his hatred the wax and wick of his
> candle will fail and he will wink out into darkness. So in a funny sense we
> all are indicted by his continued presence and power on these NG's.
>
> In Peace,
>
> Paul
Thank you Paul.
I was unsure of how Mr. McMillan was recieved on the other group. I will
bow out of his conflicts permanently.
I was concerned that some Adventists might view him as either reliable
or realistic. No Catholic that I have ever known or spoken to had ever
advocated hurting Protestants of any path. No Witch advocates harming
anyone.
Edward Curtis
> Sadly Mr. McMillan is not an Adventists and in fact attack's Adventists with
> the same vigor. He uses the term Adventist and Adventism, because he thinks
> that he has retained the true nature of the church and that Adventists have
> apostatized. He feels that he and a few others are the true remnant of
> Christ on earth. So your appeal to us Adventists, while sincere, is
> misdirected. The power to curb Mr. McMillan lies with in all of us
> individually and that is to quit allowing him to "rent" space within our
> minds and souls. If no one responds to his hatred the wax and wick of his
> candle will fail and he will wink out into darkness. So in a funny sense we
> all are indicted by his continued presence and power on these NG's.
Or in simpler language, more to the point:
PLEASE DO NOT FEED THE TROLL.
IF YOU FEED THE TROLL, YOU MUST TAKE IT HOME.
HTH,
Edward
Ted McMillan
> In article <3cb095fd$1...@corp-news.newsgroups.com>, Paul says...
> > Sadly Mr. McMillan is not an Adventists and in fact attack's Adventists with
> > the same vigor.
Rome is an infiltrating power. Sadly, Edward Curtis apparently didn't
hear all the Jesuit trash preaching against name-calling and attacking
others. Sadly, if it were pointed out to him he wouldn't see it
either.
> > He uses the term Adventist and Adventism, because he thinks
> > that he has retained the true nature of the church and that Adventists have
> > apostatized.
How does this anti-judgmental person know me so well... especially
when he doesn't?
> > He feels that he and a few others are the true remnant of
> > Christ on earth.
Antichrist Cindy told me I must not tell the world what she thinks.
Other workers for the Antichrist told me not to judge. Even if I
thought that way, is this the method of focusing on Christ? Am I
evill because I am good? Are you angry at me because I sacrifice with
lambs and not with your crab grass?
> > So your appeal to us Adventists, while sincere, is
> > misdirected.
Is my appeal for you Jesuits to heed your own preaching against
condemning and judging others misdirected?
> > The power to curb Mr. McMillan lies with in all of us
> > individually and that is to quit allowing him to "rent" space within our
> > minds and souls.
Ted McMillan will continue to expose your fellow super-terrorist who
condemned all non-Catholics. Osama condemned many because of what he
claimed is a wrong done to him by the United States. Antichrist
Seeber condemned everyone just for not being Catholic. You fellow
terrorists tell us he was kind and courteous. I watch Unsolved
Mysteries on TV and notice many kind and courteous people who brutally
slay young girls.
> > If no one responds to his hatred the wax and wick of his
> > candle will fail and he will wink out into darkness.
But Ted McMillan is not like you. He isn't the sons and daughter of
hate bad enough to be mentioned in the bible. He doesn't work for the
Antichrist. You are the children of hate. You hate Protestants so
much, you forgot that you lied claiming to be them!
> > So in a funny sense we
> > all are indicted by his continued presence and power on these NG's.
Someone noticed that others have been preaching these lies but no one
is heeding it? And you always will be indicted then. Wherever Ted
McMillan is, there will be the awful paranoia of the Children of
Satan. They are in conspiracy. Go to sleep now!
> Or in simpler language, more to the point:
>
> PLEASE DO NOT FEED THE TROLL.
Oh, more of you unchristian name-calling, right unscrupulous Jesuit?
> IF YOU FEED THE TROLL, YOU MUST TAKE IT HOME.
>
> HTH,
> Edward
I fell stronger already Eduardo!
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com