Could someone help with the following doubt I have?
The context: a toast at a wedding.
The toast starts "From your family and friends"
I thought "familY and friends" made it sound as if the toast was coming from
one of the couple's families rather than both families as I think the
intention was.
For that I was had a go at by someone saying that "family and friends" is an
idiom that already means plurality (i.e: the members of the family, not just
a person in the family).
I tried to argue that if anything, family was a collective or group name
meaning the plurality of the members in that one family, but it still sounds
to me as it should be familIES if the intention is for the toast to come
from both the groom's and the bride's families (and their friends).
Am I completely wrong? Does the idiom "family and friends" mean any number
of families connected to the persons it relates to?
E
m.
Two thoughts :
1. "Family and friends" probably comes into the category of phrases
that are too well known and need an occasional variant, so "families and
friends" might be better.
2. [PEDANT] Assuming that the toast is at the reception, which is after
the ceremony, then what has just happened has made the two families one
(by marriage!), so "family and friends" would still technically be
correct. If it were me making the speech, I might even make that point.
[/PEDANT]
--
Mike Stevens, narrowboat Felis Catus II
Web site www.mike-stevens.co.uk
No man is an island. So is Man.
And:
> 2. [PEDANT] Assuming that the toast is at the reception, which is after
> the ceremony, then what has just happened has made the two families one
> (by marriage!), so "family and friends" would still technically be
> correct. If it were me making the speech, I might even make that point.
> [/PEDANT]
Jeeeeezz... It must be that I was brought up in an environment that made the
Montagues and Capulets look like amateurs, but I would never think of a
wedding making one family of two!
My family and my husband's (not that I have one - could that be why???)
would be connected by our marriage, but they'd still be two different
entities.
Thanks for your answers :)
E
m.
Well, yes, but with my cousins there is a blood line. For my children my
family of origin and their father's family of origin would count as one as
there are blood lines both ways, but that is not the case between me and my
husband's family of origin and viceversa.
Anyway, this is now going too OT, happy to continue in private if you like.
E
Is this a trick question? Toasts start "To..." not "From..."
Adrian
Paul
Proposing a toast tends to involve two stages. First, introductory words by
the proposer - which might easily start "From...", second, the actual words
to be repeated by the guests which will indeed be "To...".
I may have been mistaken, but I assumed that "From family and friends" was
the start of the proposal, rather than that of the toast itself.
>Secondly what is included in the proposer's
>notion of the family is entirely an individual concept and would depend on
>the composition of the assembly. If they were all of the same family, he
>would use the singular; if they were not, he ought to use the plural.
>
--
Peter Duncanson
UK
(posting from u.c.l.e)
Lol, I don't know, the full "toast" was:
From your family and friends,
Love, health and happiness
For all your days.
E
"Family" here is a group noun (like "money" or "milk"), and shouldn't be
pluralised. Also, at a wedding the two families make one big happy family.
:-)
Adrian