opt-in document

[Randy Bush]

even though opt-in did not gain consensus in the wg, it would be
good to have a permanent document record. the iesg discussed this
recently in the context of a transport area document, and the idea
is something like the following:

o publish opt-in as an informational rfc for the historical
record

o with a clear warning on the front of it that this is recording
a protocol that did NOT gain ietf consensus, it documents an
idea that was considered and not adopted

o the ADs do have expressed concerns to the chairs about when it
gets published; after DS+2535bis would be best. this doesn't
prevent folk from finishing the document now and it can queue
(in the wg or at the AD) on hold until DS+2535bis finishes.

randy and olafur

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppe...@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>