-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
That's right. More than mere claims as the facts
in evidence prove the whole thing was a big fake.
Flags fluttering in the high-desert breeze, sand
buggies & actors running along in their deflated
monkeysuits-obviously recorded on highspeed film,
conspicuous absence of blast craters, impossibly
silent running under invisible exhaust emissions,
laughably obvious backdrops that contrast sharply
against the nearby high-desert terrain, etc. etc.
Plainly, the directors & producers of nasa's "men
to the moon" movies went to great lengths to make
certain that anyone who watches their movies, and
scrutinizes their photographs, also considers the
intense radiation of the Van Allen belt and up to
TWO- MILLION MILE-PER-HOUR RADIOACTIVE SOLAR WIND
beyond the safety of the Van Allen belt, they made
sure anyone can see the whole thing was a big fake.
I'm reminded of the song "might as well be walking
on the Sun"--i.e. the radiation would've fried 'em!
Be sure to bookmark & study these fact-filled links.
The evidence proves irrefutably that NASA are liars,
and not very good liars at that. They are found out:
http://internet.ocii.com/~dpwozney/apollo1.htm
http://www.aulis.com/nasa.htm
http://www.grade-a.com/moon/
http://www.apollohoax.com/
http://www.moonmovie.com/
http://www.futuresunltd.com/sudarshan/MoonShadows/MoonShadows.htm
http://www.geocities.com/nasascam/
http://www.ari.net/b2m/0198.html
http://myspeedtest.net/backwards/moon.html
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/2666/MoonHoax2.html
http://advweb.com/kw/forum/misc/messages/689.shtml
http://clydelewis.com/dis/gorsky/gorsky.html
http://galactic-guide.com/articles/8S12.html
http://geocities.com/bradguth/moon-02.htm
***********************************************
NASA NEVER sent men to the Moon. "They couldn't
make it so they faked it". That's what they did.
***********************************************
*Min's Scientific Tarot & Star Charts Homepage:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=95f8e368393c65e4...@dizum.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBPUBeIJljD7YrHM/nEQKFMwCgmRTw+52GqlrYe3jsySOLwD/fMmQAnA2A
lylRxeSw81xUXC/CSfwDynAb
=UbMQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Sir Jimo
"Nomen Nescio" <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:b98cf42e767c9fa2...@dizum.com...
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=95f8e368393c65e458c801ab44abc281@dizum.
> I fart in your general direction.
But I see no dust being blown up, and that flag - why is it waving... oh no.
http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/FOX.html
"The dust is clearly visible flying out at high speed away from the LM prior
to touchdown in all of the lunar landing films taken from the LM cabin
windows during approach and landing. Given that the descent stage engine
bell is about 5 feet across at the bottom, and that thrust of the engine at
touchdown was about 3,000 pounds, that blast pressure of the rocket exhaust
was only about 1 pound per square inch."
***
The flags "wave in the breeze" of an astronaut touching and manipulating the
flag and flagpole. Notice in each example of the flag waving, the astronaut
is still moving it or has just finished adjusting the flag. The flag wobbles
for a moment as the force applied to the flag and pole damps out and then it
comes to rest. There is a film from one of the liftoffs from the LM cabin
which shows the flag waving in the breeze of the rocket exhaust as well (and
perhaps you can see the flags move in the rocket exhaust from the rover TV
cameras, but those are far away and the cameras tried to follow the ascent
stage...).
The flags look as if they are waving in the breeze when not being adjusted
or blown by the ascent engine thanks to a metal rod that runs along the top
of the flag that holds it out as if being blown in the breeze. This is a
well documented piece of equipment.
***
I therefoe refute your solar wind argument on the basis that the sun would
be blow the horizon when going to the moon.
Hope this sets the record straight, Dave
"Nomen Nescio" <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:b98cf42e767c9fa2...@dizum.com...
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=95f8e368393c65e458c801ab44abc281@dizum.
<much debunking>
Please raise your right hand bring it sharply to your forehead and say
"duh!".
I was talking about James Orberg's directional flatulence.
"Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries!"
> <Tiresome repost clipped>
>
> "Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries!"
Subscribe!!
-- Richard
http://www.astropro.com/
NetPager = http://wwp.mirabilis.com/1710868
phone/fax = 480-753-6261
"Astrology is about time . . . what else is there?"
Your mother was NOT a hamster!
"Stamatios Tsigos" <tsig...@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:3d40182e$0$16944$afc3...@news.optusnet.com.au...
My bad, I have a poor sense of smell.
To both: 1) that the Moon hoax blather is tiresome, and 2) the delightful description of the
screedposter's parentage.