Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Where is Lorentz? his equation does not hold in reality when discribing velocities............................

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Mathew Orman

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 5:20:43 PM2/6/03
to
OK

1km/sec = 1000m/s

so
vRelativ = (1c + 1c)/(1 + 2c/c^2)
would be

vRelativ = (1000 + 1000) / (1000 + 2000/1000000)
vRelative= 2000 / 1000.002
vRelative= 1,99999600000799999........... c


Mathew Orman


"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:3E42D487...@hate.spam.net...
> Mathew Orman wrote:
> >
> > "Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
> > news:3E42CE8A...@hate.spam.net...
> > > Mathew Orman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Eric Prebys" <pre...@fnal.gov> wrote in message
> > > > news:3E42C9C4...@fnal.gov...
> > > > > Mathew Orman wrote:
> > > > > > Does anyone care to disprove that 1c+1c = 2c?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mathew Orman
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > Obviously 1c+1c=2c; for that matter (19-8)*pi*c = 11*pi*c,
> > > > > but you have failed to relate any of this to any physical
situation.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Eric
> > > > >
> > > > It is about relative speed of light wavefront.
> > > > The sum of to velocities.
> > >
> > > "the sum of to velocities." Yes, I'd say that sums it up. Hey
> > > stooopid troll, phase velocity or group velocity?
> > >
> > > http://www.netspace.net.au/~gregegan/APPLETS/20/20.html
> > >
> > > Hey stooopid troll, have somebody read this to you: Given any
> > > achievable velocities V1 and V2 and *any* finite lightspeed, the sum
> > > of the velocities as viewed by any inertial observer cannot exceed
> > >
> > > (V1 + V2)/[1 +(V1)(V2)/c^2]
> > >
> > > This is transformation of velocities parallel to the direction of
> > > motion. For velocities at an arbitrary angle theta,
> > >
> > > u_parallel = (u'_parallel + v)/(1+(v dot u')/c^2)
> > > u_perp = u'_perp/(gamma_v(1+(v dot u')/c^2))
> > >
> > > Relativistic doppler shift,
> > >
> > > http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-04/2-04.htm
> > > http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/reldop2.html
> > > http://vishnu.mth.uct.ac.za/omei/gr/chap2/node3.html
> > > http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~rfield/PHY2061/images/chp39_2.pdf
> > > http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/ato/Rel/
> > > Empirical test of theory.
> > >
> > > Hey stooopid troll, how may more times need we rub your big stooopid
> > > pimply face in it?
>
> > What is that?
> >
> > (V1 + V2)/[1 +(V1)(V2)/c^2]
> >
> > vRelativ = (1c + 1c)/[1 + 2c/c^2)
> >
> > is this in mile/sec?
>
> You fucking imbecile, furlongs/fortnight or cables/baktun, take your
> pick. The units are irrelevant - as are you.
>
> --
> Uncle Al
> http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
> "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!


Dirk Van de moortel

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 6:34:03 PM2/6/03
to

"Mathew Orman" <or...@nospam.com> wrote in message news:b1un3v$ela$1...@atlantis.news.tpi.pl...

> OK
>
> 1km/sec = 1000m/s
>
> so
> vRelativ = (1c + 1c)/(1 + 2c/c^2)
> would be
>
> vRelativ = (1000 + 1000) / (1000 + 2000/1000000)
> vRelative= 2000 / 1000.002
> vRelative= 1,99999600000799999........... c
>
>
> Mathew Orman

Welcome to
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html#Lorentz
Title: "Where is Lorentz?"

Dirk Vdm


Spaceman

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 6:38:51 PM2/6/03
to

"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:LhC0a.34894$Jd....@afrodite.telenet-ops.be...


Dirk,
You are going to regret that site...
as much as the Queen regretted telling people the World was flat.
<LOL>

Mathew Orman

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 7:10:51 PM2/6/03
to
You've missed on small detail.

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman
ps.I am extremely happy, you are serving my purpose.

"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:LhC0a.34894$Jd....@afrodite.telenet-ops.be...
>

Uncle Al

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 7:59:45 PM2/6/03
to
Mathew Orman wrote:
>
> You've missed on small detail.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Mathew Orman
> ps.I am extremely happy, you are serving my purpose.

Uncle Al is happy to oblige,
http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~kinho/youare.swf

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm
(Do something naughty to physics)

Does it stick in your craw, Orman, does it stick in your pencil neck
craw? Does it BURN?

Mathew Orman

unread,
Feb 6, 2003, 8:11:04 PM2/6/03
to
I was hoping that you would include it on your website.

Mathew Orman
ps. I cannot access this link:
http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~kinho/youare.swf

"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message

news:3E430557...@hate.spam.net...

Dirk Van de moortel

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 4:23:40 AM2/7/03
to

"Spaceman" <agents...@aol.combination> wrote in message news:fmC0a.15651$Ec4....@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net...

http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html#DarkFast

Dirk Vdm


Franz Heymann

unread,
Feb 7, 2003, 5:17:07 PM2/7/03
to

"Mathew Orman" <or...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:b1un3v$ela$1...@atlantis.news.tpi.pl...
> OK
>
> 1km/sec = 1000m/s
>
> so
> vRelativ = (1c + 1c)/(1 + 2c/c^2)

No.

Franz Heymann


0 new messages