(fwd) Please Terminate Newsfeed for Corecomm LTD
Howard Knight
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 17:32:57 -0700 (MST)
From: how...@primenet.com (Howard Knight)
To: ab...@erols.net, ab...@fnsi.net, ab...@good.net, ab...@he.net,
ab...@xnet.com, ab...@enteract.com, ab...@cwnet.com,
ab...@newsnet.com, ab...@onecall.net
Cc: ab...@core.com
********************************************************************
NOTE: This letter is being emailed to the following organizations:
EROLS.NET - Residential Communications Network
FNSI.NET - Fiber Network Solutions, Inc.
GOOD.NET - WinStar-PNC
HE.NET - Hurricane Electric
XNET.COM - XNet Information Systems, Inc.
ENTERACT.COM - EnterAct, L.L.C.
CWNET.COM - SBI Computer Warehouse
NEWSNET.COM - Newsnet.com Pty Ltd
ONECALL.NET - One Call Communications
Also, this letter will be posted to the news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
newsgroup.
********************************************************************
Dear Usenet provider,
You are receiving this email because you are providing a Usenet
newsfeed, or are peering with CoreComm LTD (CORECOMM.NET/MEGSINET.NET).
Unfortunately, CoreComm has become one of the most spam friendly sites
on Usenet. For instance, they are harboring two of the most notorious
spamming operations in the history of Usenet: Steve Repsis (Pheromones
Spammer) and Tom Saylor (WORLD-PREMIERE.COM). Please see this article
that I posted regarding the Steve Repsis spam:
<http://www.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=654914162&fmt=text>
According to Andrew Gierth's "Cancelled Spam Statisitics" reports, here
is a weekly breakdown of CoreComm spam:
week rank posts
----------------------- ----- -----
08/09/2000 - 08/15/2000 5 26235
08/02/2000 - 08/08/2000 ? ?
07/26/2000 - 08/01/2000 2 22328
07/19/2000 - 07/25/2000 1 52550
07/12/2000 - 07/18/2000 2 22978
07/05/2000 - 07/11/2000 ? ?
06/28/2000 - 07/04/2000 3 42568
06/21/2000 - 06/27/2000 12 8783
06/14/2000 - 06/20/2000 12 9674
06/07/2000 - 06/13/2000 11 10716
05/31/2000 - 06/06/2000 9 14336
05/24/2000 - 05/30/2000 9 11327
Here is a daily breakdown:
day posts
---------- ------
08/17/2000 10613
08/16/2000 3304
08/15/2000 3790
08/14/2000 5663
08/13/2000 4555
08/12/2000 3136
08/11/2000 3495
08/10/2000 3420
08/09/2000 2176
08/08/2000 2419
08/07/2000 1567
08/06/2000 1597
08/05/2000 ?
08/04/2000 4782
08/03/2000 5363
08/02/2000 2498
08/01/2000 2807
07/31/2000 1955
07/30/2000 2266
07/29/2000 2307
07/28/2000 1492
07/27/2000 6537
07/26/2000 4964
07/25/2000 6453
07/24/2000 6089
07/23/2000 22671
07/22/2000 10104
07/21/2000 1321
07/20/2000 2646
07/19/2000 3266
07/18/2000 1285
07/17/2000 4118
07/16/2000 5319
07/15/2000 680
07/14/2000 4396
07/13/2000 2422
07/12/2000 4758
07/11/2000 2691
07/10/2000 2730
07/09/2000 3532
07/08/2000 3503
07/07/2000 1037
07/06/2000 1352
07/05/2000 1537
07/04/2000 888
07/03/2000 9689
07/02/2000 10620
07/01/2000 5681
06/30/2000 6268
Despite reports, complaints, phone calls, offers of help from me and
others, CoreComm is unable or unwilling to deal with this problem.
Needless to say, the spam continues to spew day after day after day.
Until CoreComm is able and willing to be a good Usenet neighbor and
cooperate with the rest of the Usenet community, please consider
suspending/terminating your Usenet peering arangement that you have
with them.
Regards,
Howard
Bloxy's
Yes, resort to virtual terrorism and sabotage of global information
streams, affecting vast majority of the people, having not even a
clue of what you are talking about.
Secondly, who are you?
Did I authorize you to make such demands to disconnect the providers
on my behalf?
Do you have a certificate or evidence, giving you the authority
to make such representations on behalf of entire newsnet?
Do you have the results of the general newsnet vote, giving
you such authorities?
Do you have a determination or authorization by the courts
to conduct such massive disruptions to the network traffic?
Do you consider a vigilante type of acitivity more appropriate
than the ways and means provided by the law?
What DO you have?
This kind of material?
http://howardk.moonfall.com/scrotum/
http://members.aol.com/sputart2/slack/ursula.html
Is THIS your mentality?
"S.P.U.T.U.M. Net.War Operational Taskforce Working Advisory Document"
http://www.radix.net/~revjack/snotwad/snotwad0.htm
or this?
"Up, Up and Awayyy, in our
beautiful...Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles!"
http://www.sputum.com/sputart1.html
BEAUTIFUL?
Yes, does not get much more beautiful than this indeed.
Especially this one with the picture of the heads of
famous people and political leaders with the bullet
holes in their heads and blood on their face.
PURE beauty.
http://member.newsguy.com/~sputum/severed.jpeg
What kind of credit do you think one gets with it?
>Regards,
>
>Howard
>
Bloxy's
>In news.admin.net-abuse.usenet Bloxy's <Bloxy's...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>: In article <8nkknf$3i$1...@nnrp02.primenet.com>, how...@primenet.com (Howard
And it is NONE of your business ANY way you cut it, jack.
>:>Unfortunately, CoreComm has become one of the most spam friendly sites
>:>on Usenet.
Unfortunately, you are one of the biggest pests on usenet,
making mis-representations regarding who you are and whose
interests you serve.
All you are making is sucking sounds.
>:> For instance, they are harboring two of the most notorious
>:>spamming operations in the history of Usenet: Steve Repsis (Pheromones
>:>Spammer) and Tom Saylor (WORLD-PREMIERE.COM).
Go sue them in the COURT.
That is how it werks.
Or you are here to establish a new "law", and new "rule"?
Ok,
and who da funk you think you are?
>:> Please see this article
>:>that I posted regarding the Steve Repsis spam:
Uhu.
And then?
>:>According to Andrew Gierth's
Andrew Gierth is full up to his ears.
>:> "Cancelled Spam Statisitics" reports, here
>:>is a weekly breakdown of CoreComm spam:
>:>
[...]
>:>
>:>Here is a daily breakdown:
Ok, and you are serving here what and who?
>:>Despite reports, complaints, phone calls,
Now, why would one waste his life, following ANY of it,
and never even conceving of dedicating his energy to
pursuing this matter via LEGAL means?
Why?
You mean you spend major time doing all this and
you are all doing it for the benefit of who again?
>:> offers of help
HELP?
From YOU?
You think the mankind is totally braindead?
You think all that is left is perfectly programmed bio-robots,
UTTERLY unable to comprehend what is what?
>:> from me and others,
Yeaaaah,
yaaaaah,
Yaaaaah,
others.
How exciting!
>:> CoreComm is unable or unwilling to deal with this problem.
And what if they just don't see you under the microscope?
Could it be something that simple?
Now, did you present them with your licence number?
A certificate of authority?
Now, you didn't, did you?
Zo...
On what basis ANY legal commercial entity should even bother
you exist on the first place?
You are the supreme court of perversion on newsnet?
How exciting!
And then?
>:>Needless to say,
TOTALLY needless indeed.
>:> the spam continues to spew day after day after day.
YOU spew.
Yes, ALL you do is spew this vomit,
pretening you are the angel,
who came upon this planet
to save life on Earth.
You came here to do what again?
Destroy, anihilate, terminate, pervert, fabricate,
lie, suppress and dominate?
Or control and oppress?
Which one is it?
Oh public servant,
sitting on a donkey,
backwards,
holding an old rusty sword in his hand,
with a heavy duty helmet.
Little did he know
that sword is made out of paper.
And the fools believed this power hungry lunatic.
>:>Until CoreComm is able and willing to be a good Usenet neighbor and
>:>cooperate with the rest of the Usenet community,
One more time:
You have no authority, WHATSOEVER, to make statements on
behalf of usenet community.
NONE.
Zero, zip, zilch.
>:> please consider
>:>suspending/terminating your Usenet peering arangement that you have
>:>with them.
>
>: Yes, resort to virtual terrorism and sabotage of global information
>: streams, affecting vast majority of the people, having not even a
>: clue of what you are talking about.
>
>Oh bullshit, Bloxy. Fucking moron.
Gary.
As I told you before, and I tell you again:
Lucky you, lucky you.
But...
>: Secondly, who are you?
>
>Shows what you know.
>
>: Did I authorize you to make such demands to disconnect the providers
>: on my behalf?
>
>Nope. He doesn't need your authorization. He has mine.
Go suck a black hole, mr. megalomaniac.
With the reputation you got, you better sit with your ears
flat.
All you are is but a megalomaniac, hwo harassed so many people
on usenet for YEARS, sitting here making the hisssing sounds,
thinking he is somebody, whose "authority", which is pure
delusion, overrides anybody elses.
>: Do you have a certificate or evidence, giving you the authority
>: to make such representations on behalf of entire newsnet?
>
>Yes. He does. I gave it to him. Wanna make something of it?
YOU?
GAVE?
Hahahahahhahaa.
Ok, and then?
>: Do you have the results of the general newsnet vote, giving
>: you such authorities?
>
>No such vote is required.
Ok, go suck a black hole.
--------------------------- end of input ------------------------
>: Do you have a determination or authorization by the courts
>: to conduct such massive disruptions to the network traffic?
>
>No such determination or authorization is required.
>
>: Do you consider a vigilante type of acitivity more appropriate
>: than the ways and means provided by the law?
>
>That's not vigilante. Sorry.
>
>: What DO you have?
>
>Power over you.
>
>
Bloxy's
>In article <399ffea5...@Torrllnews.com>, Wild Bill! <(@П@)>
><Ser...@Databastix.com> wrote:
>:>: What DO you have?
>:>
>:>Power over you.
>
>: As do I.
>
>Is that why you're no longer abusing from alt.net? :) Spank.
Stupid sadomasochist,
filled up to his ears with the ideas of worthlessness.
>--
> for i in databasix primenet ; do ; echo gburnore@$i.com ; done
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> How you look depends on where you go.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Gary L. Burnore | нлГКнГоГКнГнлГКнГоГКнГнГоГКнГннлГ
> | нлГКнГоГКнГнлГКнГоГКнГнГоГКнГннлГ
>Black Helicopter Repair Services | нлГКнГоГКнГнлГКнГоГКнГнГоГКнГннлГ
> Cohort #2 TINCC | нлГ 3 4 1 4 2 нГоГ 6 9 0 6 9 нлГ
>http://www.databasix.com | Official Proof of Purchase
>======================================================================
Liberal Minded Man
gbur...@databasix.com wrote:
> In article <399ffea5...@Torrllnews.com>, Wild Bill! <(@П@)>
> <Ser...@Databastix.com> wrote:
> :>: What DO you have?
> :>
> :>Power over you.
>
> : As do I.
>
> Is that why you're no longer abusing from alt.net? :) Spank.
Is that why you had to be the cunt and say you were going to killfile me
as I am at alt.net? Come on now King Troll of databasesux tell us why a
troll would have to killfile anyone? Flame me loser as you know you want
to. No! Better yet get your pimple faced troops to come and say nasty
things about me. I am sure that will teach me for messing with the King
of Databasesux Trolldumb.
>
>
> --
> for i in databasix primenet ; do ; echo gburnore@$i.com ; done
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> How you look depends on where you go.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary L. Burnore | нлГКнГоГКнГнлГКнГоГКнГнГоГКнГннлГ
> | нлГКнГоГКнГнлГКнГоГКнГнГоГКнГннлГ
> Black Helicopter Repair Services | нлГКнГоГКнГнлГКнГоГКнГнГоГКнГннлГ
> Cohort #2 TINCC | нлГ 3 4 1 4 2 нГоГ 6 9 0 6 9 нлГ
> http://www.databasix.com | Official Proof of Purchase
> ======================================================================
--
"Pooh," said Rabbit kindly, "you haven't any brain." "I know," said Pooh
humbly. -Winnie the Pooh
Liberal Minded Man
AnteD wrote:
> On 19 Aug 2000 05:03:49 GMT, gbur...@databasix.com wrote:
>
> >In article <399ffea5...@Torrllnews.com>, Wild Bill! <(@濃)>
> ><Ser...@Databastix.com> wrote:
> >:>: What DO you have?
> >:>
> >:>Power over you.
> >
> >: As do I.
> >
> >Is that why you're no longer abusing from alt.net? :) Spank.
>
> Your self-gratification at supposed successful outcomes from
> netcoppings is noted.
Netcop and killfile man! LOL
and he thinks he can flame to.
>
>
> AnteD
Ran
>Secondly, who are you?
Howard Knight. If you learned how to work the "cut" function on your
newsreader's editor, you wouldn't wind up forgetting whom you're
replying to by the time you scrolled through all the needlessly-quoted
text.
>Did I authorize you to make such demands to disconnect the providers
>on my behalf?
No, I did: I could see that you were extremely busy wigging out, so I
took care of it for you.
HTH. HAND.
Ran
Liberal Minded
Sergi wrote:
> Now Liberal Minded Man <libera...@email.com> places the lotion in the
> basket:
>
> >tell us why a
> >troll would have to killfile anyone?
>
> Because you're boring?
Please let me know when you have anything of substance to say other than a
one line remark, (and a short line at that). Now please move aside Sergi as
adults are talking.
>
> --
> Sergi, KotAGoR XXX
> Creator of alt.religion.christian.amish
> HL&S Winner 1/00
> http://www.kotagor.org
> PAK CHOOIE UNF
--
When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things,
you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you
is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people
looking at it.
---Winnie the Pooh
Liberal Minded
Sergi wrote:
> Now Liberal Minded <libera...@email.com> places the lotion in the
> basket:
>
> >
> >
> >Sergi wrote:
> >
> >> Now Liberal Minded Man <libera...@email.com> places the lotion in the
> >> basket:
> >>
> >> >tell us why a
> >> >troll would have to killfile anyone?
> >>
> >> Because you're boring?
> >
> >Please let me know when you have anything of substance to say other than a
> >one line remark, (and a short line at that). Now please move aside Sergi as
> >adults are talking.
>
> Something of substance? Like this: <39A19880...@email.com>? 40
> lines of quoted text with "u kEwL dOOd" added at the end?
I took a cue from your sorry ass dude. I do love that you follow each post I
make though as that is almost cute in a juvenile sort of way.
> Is this what
> adults with something of substance to talk about should post, in your
> little world?
I knew it would get a rise out of you so yes you are in my world dude.
> Or would "look, you're dancing" be better?
which u are but why state the obvious.
> I suppose that
> has a bit more substance to it that "u kEwL d00d."
>
> Either way you're a cunt, though.
They say you are what you eat PRICK.
Liberal Minded
Sergi wrote:
> Now Liberal Minded <libera...@email.com> places the lotion in the
> basket:
>
> >
> >
> >Sergi wrote:
> >
>
> >> Something of substance? Like this: <39A19880...@email.com>? 40
> >> lines of quoted text with "u kEwL dOOd" added at the end?
> >
> >I took a cue from your sorry ass dude. I do love that you follow each post I
> >make though as that is almost cute in a juvenile sort of way.
>
> Um, no. I don't even *read* 90% of the posts you make, let alone follow up
> to them.
Well I can say I never look for one of yours but you sure do find mine when they
are never addressed to you. I hope you don't leave me anytime soon as I look
forward to your two or three small replies each day and if you missed but one day
I will worry so badly something nasty had happened to you.
>
>
> >> Is this what
> >> adults with something of substance to talk about should post, in your
> >> little world?
> >
> >I knew it would get a rise out of you so yes you are in my world dude.
>
> No, actually, you haven't gotten a rise out of me at all. My blood
> pressure and heart rate don't jump a bit when I read your posts. You
> greatly overestimate your own abilities as a troll/flamer.
I am happy you make that claim and hope that it is true.
>
>
> >> Or would "look, you're dancing" be better?
> >
> >which u are but why state the obvious.
>
> So, do you go into comp.lang.perl.misc, post an on topic question, then say
> "HA! You danced!" when someone follows up to you?
Since I am in alt.liberalminded your point is ___________?
>
>
> Let me spell this out for you. This is UseNet. You post something.
> Someone else reads it. Sometimes they will post a reply. This is how the
> medium works, and this is how you are participating in it. This does not
> make you a master manipulator or a social engineering genius.
Now now poor Sergi. Everyone knows you have tried your little one line shit with
me in several ng's now and with the same failure each time. Go find someone who
fears your name and quit trying to convince me you are somebody. In some other
place talking about some other topic I am sure I would find you interesting but
here and now you are just a small diversion.
>
>
> Is any of this sinking in?
as in the level you will stoop to?
>
>
> >> I suppose that
> >> has a bit more substance to it that "u kEwL d00d."
> >>
> >> Either way you're a cunt, though.
> >
> >They say you are what you eat PRICK.
>
> Don't be too disappointed when that line doesn't show up in all the UPA
> archives.
Anyone who wants anything any greater out of Usenet other than to simply send a
post is a fool
-= Hawk =-
>Now Liberal Minded <libera...@email.com> places the lotion in the
>basket:
>
>>
>>
>>Sergi wrote:
>>
>
>>> Something of substance? Like this: <39A19880...@email.com>? 40
>>> lines of quoted text with "u kEwL dOOd" added at the end?
>>
>>I took a cue from your sorry ass dude. I do love that you follow each post I
>>make though as that is almost cute in a juvenile sort of way.
>
>Um, no. I don't even *read* 90% of the posts you make, let alone follow up
>to them.
>
>>> Is this what
>>> adults with something of substance to talk about should post, in your
>>> little world?
>>
>>I knew it would get a rise out of you so yes you are in my world dude.
>
>No, actually, you haven't gotten a rise out of me at all. My blood
>pressure and heart rate don't jump a bit when I read your posts. You
>greatly overestimate your own abilities as a troll/flamer.
That's Dana's standard tactic, if you reply, you've been trolled, mighty
pitiful actually.
>>> Or would "look, you're dancing" be better?
>>
>>which u are but why state the obvious.
>
>So, do you go into comp.lang.perl.misc, post an on topic question, then say
>"HA! You danced!" when someone follows up to you?
More than likely.
>Let me spell this out for you. This is UseNet. You post something.
>Someone else reads it. Sometimes they will post a reply. This is how the
>medium works, and this is how you are participating in it. This does not
>make you a master manipulator or a social engineering genius.
>
>Is any of this sinking in?
You'd have better luck teaching a rock to tango.
>>> I suppose that
>>> has a bit more substance to it that "u kEwL d00d."
>>>
>>> Either way you're a cunt, though.
>>
>>They say you are what you eat PRICK.
>
>Don't be too disappointed when that line doesn't show up in all the UPA
>archives.
--
Want to propose a newsgroup? Browse these links for help:
http://www.faqs.org/usenet/alt/
http://www.gweep.bc.ca/~edmonds/usenet/good-newgroup.html
http://nylon.net/alt/newgroup.htm
For information on moderating a newsgroup:
http://www.swcp.com/~dmckeon/mod-faq.html
For help with Deja keyword search:
http://www.deja.com/help/help_lang.shtml
For Deja power search:
http://www.exit109.com/~jeremy/news/deja.html
Details on doing a Deja power search:
http://skyscraper.fortunecity.com/skylon/1307/index.html
For proposing WebTV alt.discuss groups:
http://www.munitions.com/~advotes/ad-voterules.html
Tale discusses control messages:
ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/CONFIG/README
Liberal Minded
-= Hawk =- wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2000 16:30:44 -0500, Sergi <se...@databasix.com> scribbled:
>
> >Now Liberal Minded <libera...@email.com> places the lotion in the
> >basket:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>Sergi wrote:
> >>
> >
> >>> Something of substance? Like this: <39A19880...@email.com>? 40
> >>> lines of quoted text with "u kEwL dOOd" added at the end?
> >>
> >>I took a cue from your sorry ass dude. I do love that you follow each post I
> >>make though as that is almost cute in a juvenile sort of way.
> >
> >Um, no. I don't even *read* 90% of the posts you make, let alone follow up
> >to them.
> >
> >>> Is this what
> >>> adults with something of substance to talk about should post, in your
> >>> little world?
> >>
> >>I knew it would get a rise out of you so yes you are in my world dude.
> >
> >No, actually, you haven't gotten a rise out of me at all. My blood
> >pressure and heart rate don't jump a bit when I read your posts. You
> >greatly overestimate your own abilities as a troll/flamer.
>
> That's Dana's standard tactic, if you reply, you've been trolled, mighty
> pitiful actually.
When I want to hear your opinion I will send a email to Jay asking him what you
will say.
--
Liberal Minded
Sergi wrote:
> Now Liberal Minded <libera...@email.com> places the lotion in the
> basket:
>
> >
> >
> >Sergi wrote:
> >
> >> Now Liberal Minded <libera...@email.com> places the lotion in the
> >> basket:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Sergi wrote:
> >> >
> >>
> >> >> Something of substance? Like this: <39A19880...@email.com>? 40
> >> >> lines of quoted text with "u kEwL dOOd" added at the end?
> >> >
> >> >I took a cue from your sorry ass dude. I do love that you follow each post I
> >> >make though as that is almost cute in a juvenile sort of way.
> >>
> >> Um, no. I don't even *read* 90% of the posts you make, let alone follow up
> >> to them.
> >
> >Well I can say I never look for one of yours but you sure do find mine when they
> >are never addressed to you.
>
> Yes, I do read posts that aren't directly addressed to me. This seems to
> amaze you to no end.
That you can read does amaze me yes.
>
>
> >I hope you don't leave me anytime soon as I look
> >forward to your two or three small replies each day and if you missed but one day
> >I will worry so badly something nasty had happened to you.
>
> I'm probably going out of town for a few days soon. Try not to miss me too
> much.
Thanks. Can you please have someone post as you during your absence? Give the person
50 one liners and that should cover about 500 posts from you.
>
>
> >> No, actually, you haven't gotten a rise out of me at all. My blood
> >> pressure and heart rate don't jump a bit when I read your posts. You
> >> greatly overestimate your own abilities as a troll/flamer.
> >
> >I am happy you make that claim and hope that it is true.
>
> It is true that you have delusions of adequacy.
Wow!! Something actually troll worthy.
>
>
> >> So, do you go into comp.lang.perl.misc, post an on topic question, then say
> >> "HA! You danced!" when someone follows up to you?
> >
> >Since I am in alt.liberalminded your point is ___________?
>
> Over your head.
>
> >> Let me spell this out for you. This is UseNet. You post something.
> >> Someone else reads it. Sometimes they will post a reply. This is how the
> >> medium works, and this is how you are participating in it. This does not
> >> make you a master manipulator or a social engineering genius.
> >
> >Now now poor Sergi. Everyone knows you have tried your little one line shit with
> >me in several ng's now and with the same failure each time.
>
> Yeah, last time you were slurping me to come troll with you in alt.config
> within three reply cycles.
Since I need no silly troll groups to get my kicks I reached out to see you had
snaggled teeth. At least I did not talk libertarian or gun control.
>
>
> > Go find someone who
> >fears your name and quit trying to convince me you are somebody.
>
> Really? Have I said anything about that? You seem to be the only one
> talking about "fearing my name" and what not. Thanks for the compliment.
You are welcome.
>
>
> > In some other
> >place talking about some other topic I am sure I would find you interesting but
> >here and now you are just a small diversion.
>
> Right then. We've had "Dance for me", now it's "you're boring." It seems
> you've cycled through all your material. I guess it's time to bring in one
> of the UTB wankers for a slurp fest now.
UTB? Please!!!! Is the best you can do is always to bring up some UTB thing when I
don't even know who they are. Someone said they all died in a fire. I have no idea.
>
>
> >> Don't be too disappointed when that line doesn't show up in all the UPA
> >> archives.
> >
> >Anyone who wants anything any greater out of Usenet other than to simply send a
> >post is a fool
>
> Sour grapes.
still can make wine.
>
> --
> Sergi, KotAGoR XXX
> Creator of alt.religion.christian.amish
> HL&S Winner 1/00
> http://www.kotagor.org
> PAK CHOOIE UNF
--
Liberal Minded
Sergi wrote:
> Now Liberal Minded <libera...@email.com> places the lotion in the
> basket:
>
> >
> >
> >Sergi wrote:
>
> >> Yes, I do read posts that aren't directly addressed to me. This seems to
> >> amaze you to no end.
> >
> >That you can read does amaze me yes.
>
> You can't write, but that doesn't amaze me.
lol
>
>
> >> I'm probably going out of town for a few days soon. Try not to miss me too
> >> much.
> >
> >Thanks. Can you please have someone post as you during your absence? Give the person
> >50 one liners and that should cover about 500 posts from you.
>
> Hmm. 50 one liners = 500 posts? Math really isn't your strong point, is
> it?
maybe getting a clue isn't yours. I S A I D Y O U S A Y
T H E S A M E O L
D S H
I T T E N
T I M E
S O V E R.
Better?
>
>
> >> Yeah, last time you were slurping me to come troll with you in alt.config
> >> within three reply cycles.
> >
> >Since I need no silly troll groups to get my kicks I reached out to see you had
> >snaggled teeth.
>
> Whoo-kay. Whatever that means.
Its a sekrit dude
>
>
> >At least I did not talk libertarian or gun control.
>
> Yes, you did, actually.
duh
>
>
> >> Really? Have I said anything about that? You seem to be the only one
> >> talking about "fearing my name" and what not. Thanks for the compliment.
> >
> >You are welcome.
>
> Don't expect anything in return.
I know you are not evolved enough for that yet but I love you anyway.
>
>
> >> Right then. We've had "Dance for me", now it's "you're boring." It seems
> >> you've cycled through all your material. I guess it's time to bring in one
> >> of the UTB wankers for a slurp fest now.
> >
> >UTB? Please!!!! Is the best you can do is always to bring up some UTB thing when I
> >don't even know who they are. Someone said they all died in a fire. I have no idea.
>
> Liar. Come on, where's "Serial #?" It's time for you two to have your
> nightly slurp-a-thon.
Post one thing showing I am UTB. Just post one.
>
>
> >> >Anyone who wants anything any greater out of Usenet other than to simply send a
> >> >post is a fool
> >>
> >> Sour grapes.
> >
> >still can make wine.
>
> YM "Whine."
i c ya finally had someone give you a clue.
tm
<se...@databasix.com> wrote:
>Now Liberal Minded <libera...@email.com> places the lotion in the
>basket:
>
>>
>>
>>Sergi wrote:
>>
>
>>> You can't write, but that doesn't amaze me.
>>
>>lol
>
>Case in point.
>
>>> Hmm. 50 one liners = 500 posts? Math really isn't your strong point, is
>>> it?
>>
>>maybe getting a clue isn't yours. I S A I D Y O U
S A Y
>>T H E S A M E O L
>>D S H
>>I T T E N
>>T I M E
>>S O V
E R.
>
>I have this great mental picture of you pounding on your keyboard with both
>fists. Did you go and kick your cat across the room right after you wrote
>that?
>
>>> Whoo-kay. Whatever that means.
>>
>>Its a sekrit dude
>
>No, you're just inarticulate.
>
>>> >At least I did not talk libertarian or gun control.
>>>
>>> Yes, you did, actually.
>
>And now, ladies and gentlemen, the pinnacle of Dana's wit:
>
>>duh
>
Oh dear. He's in his 'full Troll Gear and ready for battle' now. Better
watch out...
>>> Don't expect anything in return.
>>
>>I know you are not evolved enough for that yet but I love you anyway.
>
>Do you? That's funny, because I don't have any feelings for you one way or
>another.
>
>>Post one thing showing I am UTB. Just post one.
>
>Post one thing where I said you were UTB.
>
>>> >> >Anyone who wants anything any greater out of Usenet other than to
simply send a
>>> >> >post is a fool
>>> >>
>>> >> Sour grapes.
>>> >
>>> >still can make wine.
>>>
>>> YM "Whine."
>>
>>i c ya finally had someone give you a clue.
>
>Hey dued that wuz a gud flaim! Xelent!
--
'I just came back to save yoou embarassment, to keep you from looking like the complete, total and utter full that you are.'
<Bert Hoff in article <Ebsn5.8464$Ur3....@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com>
Dave Korn
>
>Let me spell this out for you. This is UseNet. You post something.
>Someone else reads it. Sometimes they will post a reply. This is how the
>medium works, and this is how you are participating in it. This does not
>make you a master manipulator or a social engineering genius.
Hallelujah!! I can't count the number of times I've wanted to say this,
but I've never found the right words. May I take this para. for a .sig?
DaveK
--
"Reality is whatever doesn't go away after you stop believing in it."
-- Philip K. Dick
"Reality is whatever doesn't change no matter how many times you
post the same lies over and over again to usenet."
-- DaveK
Anapiel
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet needed to read
<8nsg81$3d4$1...@herekittykitty.databasix.com>:
>Liar. Come on, where's "Serial #?" It's time for you two to have your
>nightly slurp-a-thon.
Last seen posting from some danish uunet server.
SPNAK!!!!!!1!!
--
Anapiel
Proud Member of the Peanut Gallery (TINPG)
Liberal Minded
Sergi wrote:
> Now Liberal Minded <libera...@email.com> places the lotion in the
> basket:
>
> >
> >
> >Sergi wrote:
> >
>
> >> You can't write, but that doesn't amaze me.
> >
> >lol
>
> Case in point.
Point in case.
>
>
> >> Hmm. 50 one liners = 500 posts? Math really isn't your strong point, is
> >> it?
> >
> >maybe getting a clue isn't yours. I S A I D Y O U S A Y
> >T H E S A M E O L
> >D S H
> >I T T E N
> >T I M E
> >S O V E R.
>
> I have this great mental picture of you pounding on your keyboard with both
> fists. Did you go and kick your cat across the room right after you wrote
> that?
alt.databasux.udp-udp-udp.die-die-die.gary-bunhole
>
>
> >> Whoo-kay. Whatever that means.
> >
> >Its a sekrit dude
>
> No, you're just inarticulate.
Unlike the great libertarian Sergi? Maybe if I was someone who really gave a shit what others
have to say this may have meant something to me. Considering I am looking at several awards
for writing that I earned while I type this out to illiterate little Sergi I am not bothered at
all. Isn't it time for you to go back and repeat the 5th grade once again?
>
>
> >> >At least I did not talk libertarian or gun control.
> >>
> >> Yes, you did, actually.
>
> And now, ladies and gentlemen, the pinnacle of Dana's wit:
>
> >duh
>
> >> Don't expect anything in return.
> >
> >I know you are not evolved enough for that yet but I love you anyway.
>
> Do you? That's funny, because I don't have any feelings for you one way or
> another.
zoooooooooooooooooooooooooom
>
>
> >Post one thing showing I am UTB. Just post one.
>
> Post one thing where I said you were UTB.
Post one dude.
>
>
> >> >> >Anyone who wants anything any greater out of Usenet other than to simply send a
> >> >> >post is a fool
> >> >>
> >> >> Sour grapes.
> >> >
> >> >still can make wine.
> >>
> >> YM "Whine."
> >
> >i c ya finally had someone give you a clue.
>
> Hey dued that wuz a gud flaim! Xelent!
I don't try to flame but since I reply to you I guess anything said truthfully to you would be
flame like.
Liberal Minded
Tyrants' Downfall wrote:
> We must hope that Sergi is rejuvenated after his days out of town. His
> wit requires a recharge.
So he will be gone for several years?
Haakon Lugiesson
>
> In article <39ab5f6f...@texas.uncensored-news.com>, Henrietta K. Pinkclitty <snotrag@guns_git_me_hard.co> wrote:
> : On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 10:30:02 -0400, Liberal Minded
> : <libera...@email.com> said:
>
> :>
> :>
> :>Sergi wrote:
> :>
> :>> Now Liberal Minded <libera...@email.com> places the lotion in the
> :>> basket:
> :>>
> :>> >
> :>> >
> :>> >Sergi wrote:
> :>> >
> :>>
> :>> >> You can't write, but that doesn't amaze me.
> :>> >
> :>> >lol
> :>>
> :>> Case in point.
> :>Point in case.
> : Piss in pocket
> Brass in pocket
Mystery achievement
ramalane
HTH
/ramalane
--
This author considers the term "spam" to mean excessive postings of
EMP and/or ECP variety. That is, "spam", is a generic term for several
different things. The term was originally supposed to mean EMPs only,
but most people use "spam" to mean "any excessive posting".
- Tim Skirvin, "FAQ: Current Usenet Spam Thresholds and Guidelines"
The Queen of Cans and Jars
> gbur...@databasix.com wrote:
> >
> > In article <39ab5f6f...@texas.uncensored-news.com>, Henrietta K.
> > Pinkclitty <snotrag@guns_git_me_hard.co> wrote: : On Wed, 23 Aug 2000
> > 10:30:02 -0400, Liberal Minded : <libera...@email.com> said:
> >
> > :>
> > :>
> > :>Sergi wrote:
> > :>
> > :>> Now Liberal Minded <libera...@email.com> places the lotion in the
> > :>> basket:
> > :>>
> > :>> >
> > :>> >
> > :>> >Sergi wrote:
> > :>> >
> > :>>
> > :>> >> You can't write, but that doesn't amaze me.
> > :>> >
> > :>> >lol
> > :>>
> > :>> Case in point.
> > :>
> > :>Point in case.
> > : Piss in pocket
> > Brass in pocket
> Mystery achievement
bad boys get spanked
Haakon Lugiesson
Tracy Lunes
>In article <39ab5f6f...@texas.uncensored-news.com>, Henrietta K. Pinkclitty <snotrag@guns_git_me_hard.co> wrote:
>: On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 10:30:02 -0400, Liberal Minded
>: <libera...@email.com> said:
>
>:>
>:>
>:>Sergi wrote:
>:>
>:>> Now Liberal Minded <libera...@email.com> places the lotion in the
>:>> basket:
>:>>
>:>> >
>:>> >
>:>> >Sergi wrote:
>:>> >
>:>>
>:>> >> You can't write, but that doesn't amaze me.
>:>> >
>:>> >lol
>:>>
>:>> Case in point.
>:>
>:>Point in case.
>: Piss in pocket
>Brass in pocket
Snuh
Love, Tracy
The Queen of Cans and Jars
Bufford L. Hatchett
i got a kid, i'm thirty-three, baby
The Queen of Cans and Jars
> The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
> > Haakon Lugiesson <votm...@bungmunch.com> wrote:
> > > The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
> > > > Haakon Lugiesson <votm...@bungmunch.com> wrote:
> > > > > gbur...@databasix.com wrote:
> > > > > > Henrietta K. Pinkclitty wrote:
> > > > > > Liberal Minded : <libera...@email.com> said:
> > > > > > :>Sergi wrote:
> > > > > > :>> Now Liberal Minded places the lotion in the basket:
> > > > > > :>> >Sergi wrote:
> > > > > > :>> >
> > > > > > :>>
> > > > > > :>> >> You can't write, but that doesn't amaze me.
> > > > > > :>> >
> > > > > > :>> >lol
> > > > > > :>>
> > > > > > :>> Case in point.
> > > > > > :>
> > > > > > :>Point in case.
> > > > > > : Piss in pocket
> > > > > > Brass in pocket
> > > > > Mystery achievement
> > > > bad boys get spanked
> > > it was the talk of the town
> > talk to me darlin
> i got a kid, i'm thirty-three, baby
like brigitte bardot
Bufford
>
>
> > The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
> > > Haakon Lugiesson <votm...@bungmunch.com> wrote:
> > > > The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
> > > > > Haakon Lugiesson <votm...@bungmunch.com> wrote:
> > > > > > gbur...@databasix.com wrote:
> > > > > > > Liberal Minded : <libera...@email.com> said:
> > > > > > > :>Sergi wrote:
> > > > > > > :>> >Sergi wrote:
> > > > > > > :>> >
> > > > > > > :>>
> > > > > > > :>> >> You can't write, but that doesn't amaze me.
> > > > > > > :>> >
> > > > > > > :>> >lol
> > > > > > > :>>
> > > > > > > :>> Case in point.
> > > > > > > :>
> > > > > > > :>Point in case.
> > > > > > > : Piss in pocket
> > > > > > > Brass in pocket
> > > > > > Mystery achievement
> > > > > bad boys get spanked
> > > > it was the talk of the town
> > > talk to me darlin
> > i got a kid, i'm thirty-three, baby
maybe tomorrow. maybe someday.