Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

JMS: no Medusa logo?

1 view
Skip to first unread message

JBONETATI

unread,
Jun 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/19/99
to
JMS,

Perhaps this is a miniscule point but I wondered why there didn't seem to be a
logo for the Medusa the way there have been for all of the other mythologically
named EA ships?

I've always enjoyed all of the logos in your universe.

Jan


Jms at B5

unread,
Jun 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/19/99
to
It was there, it was just never in-shot.

jms

(jms...@aol.com)
B5 Official Fan Club at:
http://www.thestation.com

Adam Bailey

unread,
Jun 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/20/99
to
jbon...@aol.com (JBONETATI) wrote:
> Perhaps this is a miniscule point but I wondered why there didn't
> seem to be a logo for the Medusa the way there have been for all of
> the other mythologically named EA ships?

It was there, I remember trying to get a good look at it (and failing,
it was barely ever on screen).

--
Adam Bailey | Chicago, Illinois
ad...@lull.org | Finger/Web for PGP
ada...@aol.com | http://www.lull.org/adam/


Brian Watson

unread,
Jun 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/20/99
to
Adam Bailey wrote:

> jbon...@aol.com (JBONETATI) wrote:
> > Perhaps this is a miniscule point but I wondered why there didn't
> > seem to be a logo for the Medusa the way there have been for all of
> > the other mythologically named EA ships?
>
> It was there, I remember trying to get a good look at it (and failing,
> it was barely ever on screen).

If it was onscreen, wouldn't it have turned all the viewers to stone?


Thomas McCambley

unread,
Jun 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/20/99
to
Adam Bailey (ad...@lull.org) writes:
> jbon...@aol.com (JBONETATI) wrote:
>> Perhaps this is a miniscule point but I wondered why there didn't
>> seem to be a logo for the Medusa the way there have been for all of
>> the other mythologically named EA ships?
>
> It was there, I remember trying to get a good look at it (and failing,
> it was barely ever on screen).

During Galen and Gideon's first briefing, the (out-of-focus) logo is
visible over Gideon's head, on the wall. That was the best shot IMHO.

Cheers,
Tom McCambley
--
at...@ncf.ca | <This space reserved for witty saying>
RPGA #363956 |
J-1 / Ca-2 / Cl-2 |
Thomas McCambley |


JBONETATI

unread,
Jun 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/21/99
to

<<
> It was there, I remember trying to get a good look at it (and failing,
> it was barely ever on screen).

If it was onscreen, wouldn't it have turned all the viewers to stone?>>

Ah. Good point. I'd forgotten. Whew!

Jan

Adam Bailey

unread,
Jun 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/21/99
to

Brian Watson <ke...@cris.com> wrote:

> Adam Bailey wrote:
> > jbon...@aol.com (JBONETATI) wrote:
> > > Perhaps this is a miniscule point but I wondered why there didn't
> > > seem to be a logo for the Medusa the way there have been for all of
> > > the other mythologically named EA ships?
> >
> > It was there, I remember trying to get a good look at it (and failing,
> > it was barely ever on screen).
>
> If it was onscreen, wouldn't it have turned all the viewers to stone?

Well, it seems to have worked on the TNT execs.

Brian Watson

unread,
Jun 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/21/99
to
Adam Bailey wrote:

> Brian Watson <ke...@cris.com> wrote:
> > Adam Bailey wrote:
> > > jbon...@aol.com (JBONETATI) wrote:
> > > > Perhaps this is a miniscule point but I wondered why there didn't
> > > > seem to be a logo for the Medusa the way there have been for all of
> > > > the other mythologically named EA ships?
> > >
> > > It was there, I remember trying to get a good look at it (and failing,
> > > it was barely ever on screen).
> >
> > If it was onscreen, wouldn't it have turned all the viewers to stone?
>
> Well, it seems to have worked on the TNT execs.

No, the sufficiently stupid are immune to it's effects.

0 new messages