Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Crusade: First Impressions

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Frank Swarbrick

unread,
Jun 9, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/9/99
to
Just finished watching "War Zone." First impression: Better than it may
have been, but worse than it could have been. My main problems, I guess,
are the same as with Babylon 5 at it's worse. Bad acting (in some cases),
and too much expository dialogue. I liked Gideon, Matheson, Dureena(sp?),
and Galen. I didn't care for Trace (but he's not a regular anyway, right?),
nor either of the two main people on Mars. But B5 often had a hard time
getting guest stars who could act; especially during the first season. The
doctor didn't really register with me one way or the other.

And, as I said, there was way too much "here's what happened" type stuff.
Yeah, it was a first episode, but I for one didn't need it.

Still, I did enjoy it fairly well. I don't have anything more specific to
say on that point. We shall see...
--
---
Frank Swarbrick
home: inf...@sprynet.com
work: frank.s...@1stbank.com


Jms at B5

unread,
Jun 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/10/99
to
>And, as I said, there was way too much "here's what happened" type stuff.
>Yeah, it was a first episode, but I for one didn't need it.

Couldn't agree more.

Buckets of exposition were what they asked for.

jms

(jms...@aol.com)
B5 Official Fan Club at:
http://www.thestation.com

Alex Thorpe

unread,
Jun 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/11/99
to
In article <19990610033140...@ng-ff1.aol.com>, jms...@aol.com
(Jms at B5) wrote:

>>And, as I said, there was way too much "here's what happened" type stuff.
>>Yeah, it was a first episode, but I for one didn't need it.
>
>Couldn't agree more.
>
>Buckets of exposition were what they asked for.
>
> jms

Actually, I'd expected more, particularly on the ship's capabilities that
the new captain was just learning about. Of course, we fans don't need
it.

My only real gripe was wondering why they aired "A Call to Arms" AFTER the
show instead of before it. Did they *really* need to show Mortal Kombat
again?

--

-Alex

"Common Sense Ain't"


U16...@uicvm.uic.edu

unread,
Jun 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/11/99
to
>
>>And, as I said, there was way too much "here's what happened" type stuff.
>>Yeah, it was a first episode, but I for one didn't need it.
>
>Couldn't agree more.
>
>Buckets of exposition were what they asked for.
>
> jms
>
I don't know about that.... I liked the first episode. I missed the
first showing of "A Call to Arms" so I didn't know about Excaliber, Doorena,
Galen, any of a number of things.

Of couse I stayed up to watch "A Call to Arms." What a good movie! But
why did the boneheads (with apologies to the Minbari) at TNT run it after
Crusade????

Man, I hope that some channel picks up Crusades!

Terry


Mike Alvarez

unread,
Jun 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/11/99
to

Frank Swarbrick wrote in message <7jndhb$6d1$1...@nntp2.atl.mindspring.net>...

>Just finished watching "War Zone." First impression: Better than it may
>have been, but worse than it could have been.

I agree. I wasn't totally satisfied by it, but I do want more. There's a
lot of potential
here. Look what happened with B5: one of the richest science fiction epics
in many a
year.

The character of John Matheson is pretty intriguing already. The fact that
he doesn't LOOK
like you would expect is very cool. I hope they don't explain that. And
then finding out that he
is what he is (shhhh!! spoiler!!)...what agenda does he follow? Very
subtle!!

The music definitely gave the show a different feel. I'm willing to give it
a chance. Let's hope
we can go beyond the 13 episodes someday!!

Mike


Mac Breck

unread,
Jun 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/13/99
to

U16...@uicvm.uic.edu wrote in message <99162.182...@uicvm.uic.edu>...

>>
>Of couse I stayed up to watch "A Call to Arms." What a good movie! But
>why did the boneheads (with apologies to the Minbari) at TNT run it after
>Crusade????


....because they're either idiots who don't know what they're doing, or they
deliberately want to screw the show.

Mac

Michael J. Hennebry

unread,
Jun 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/14/99
to
In article <BNT83.3085$q3.2...@news21b.ispnews.com>,

No, said decision is an un-startling result of what had gone before.
When TNT thought it had a series, it scheduled a night in the B5 universe
with ACtA before Crusade. When TNT discovered that it had only the
bloody stump of a series, the premiere became much less important. TNT
had more important stuff to show before Crusade, but the time-slot after
Crusade was unimportant enough to put in ACtA. Remember competing forces
are at work. One force got Crusade on the air and ACtA on the same day
as its premiere, the other force got ACtA scheduled after Crusade.

--
Mike henn...@plains.NoDak.edu
"I'm just an old country doctor." -- Bones


0 new messages