JosX, you're not going far enough

[josX]

In article <3D75DCE2...@mindspring.com>, RM Mentock wrote:
>josX wrote:
>
>> Einsteins logic was abcent.
>
>And that proves Galilean relativity? C'mon, give me a break
>
>You're ignoring air resistance

What air resistance.
Air-resistance: F=m*a
--
jos

[Dirk Van de moortel]

"josX" <jo...@mraha.kitenet.net> wrote in message news:al4npq$daq$1...@news1.xs4all.nl...

Air-resistance is a function of velocity.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/airfri.html
Learn some baby physics before you try to attack the
basic stuff.

Dirk Vdm

[RM Mentock]

josX wrote:
>
> In article <3D75DCE2...@mindspring.com>, RM Mentock wrote:
> >josX wrote:
> >
> >> Einsteins logic was abcent.
> >
> >And that proves Galilean relativity? C'mon, give me a break
> >
> >You're ignoring air resistance
>
> What air resistance.

See, I told ya

--
RM Mentock

C. K. Monet, c'est moi

[josX]

RM Mentock wrote:
>josX wrote:
>>In article <3D75DCE2...@mindspring.com>, RM Mentock wrote:
>>>josX wrote:
>>>
>>>> Einsteins logic was abcent.
>>>
>>>And that proves Galilean relativity? C'mon, give me a break
>>>
>>>You're ignoring air resistance
>>
>>What air resistance.
>
>See, I told ya

Lame fuck.

Can you proof to us:
relativity of simultaneity
lengthcontraction
timedilation
postulate-2 of special relativity (1way-1beam-multiobserver-
-lightspeed-constancy-in-a-vacuum)
relativistic addition of velocities
Can't ?

Can you solve for us
Twin paradox: 0->.99999c in 1.8 sec
Tripduration: 9*10^9 years
You may define a preferred frame-of-reference during the acceleration
if you prefer, but not afterwards, because to make frames remember
their acceleration and to use that to determine a preferred frame,
is to define the "frame that never accelerated in the history of the
universe" as the de-facto preferred frame (absolute reference frame),
and you would have defined relativity as absolutism.
Can't ?

Can you tell us when/where the experiment was done that tested:
1way-1beam-multiobserver-lightspeed-constancy-in-a-vacuum ?
--
jos

[Dirk Van de moortel]

"josX" <jo...@mraha.kitenet.net> wrote in message news:al59p6$dfj$2...@news1.xs4all.nl...

> RM Mentock wrote:
> >josX wrote:
> >>In article <3D75DCE2...@mindspring.com>, RM Mentock wrote:
> >>>josX wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Einsteins logic was abcent.
> >>>
> >>>And that proves Galilean relativity? C'mon, give me a break
> >>>
> >>>You're ignoring air resistance
> >>
> >>What air resistance.
> >
> >See, I told ya
>
> Lame fuck.

Hey lame duck, you could at least have said thanks
for my educating you in baby physics.
Even that you can't get right.
So grok this, you little piece of whatever the dog don't want:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html#AirjosX

Dirk Vdm