From: sre...@subdimension.com ((akula))
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cracks
Subject: Re: Here U Go AKULA
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:39:29 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20020220213...@news2.sharks.plc.ltd>
I don't SPAM newsgroups. Who told you that I do?
______________________________________________________________________________
From: tiburón...@sharks.plc.ltd (tiburón)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.misc
Subject: Re: ATTN: ABM - posters and downloaders (Heads up a flood is coming)
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2000 15:44:08 GMT
Message-ID: <3f39fd56e2....@news.sharks.plc.ltd>
SPAM is exceedingly well defined and simply not tolerated in Usenet.
______________________________________________________________________________
From: tiburón...@sharks.plc.ltd (tiburón)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.dominion.discussion
Subject: Re: Another Update...
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 14:58:16 GMT
Message-ID: <3f3aacdbb...@news.sharks.plc.ltd>
Using HavenCo. as worst case - that's ~$40,000 for the 2
year period, meaning we need 400+ subscribers to bring the
costs down to a reasonable level.
Another funding route is SPAM. How do you all feel about
1 SPAM *.jpg being attached to each (0/*) ?
______________________________________________________________________________
From: anadv...@worldspamnet.att.com (anadvocate)
Newsgroups: alt.sex.enemas
Subject: Re: ASE Posting Problems!!!
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998
Message-ID: <6e7ve4$n...@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>
If you MUST spam, do it in small posts (abt. 500 lines).