From: sre...@subdimension.com ((akula))
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Enough is enough - was: Elmer is ma new luver
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:13:04 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20010523161...@news1.sharks.plc.ltd>
To reiterate: I don't use remailers and disregard posts made through them.
______________________________________________________________________________
From: Anonymous <nob...@remailer.privacy.at>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Subject: Tina Outed as NARC
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 22:46:05 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <67e45cfd2444013c...@remailer.privacy.at>
So now you admit narcing. Well here's the proof.
From: sre...@subdimension.com ((akula))
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Where's The aKooK???
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 21:56:44 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20010705215...@news3.sharks.plc.ltd>
So now you admit that is your Hotmail account? Nice backpedal.
______________________________________________________________________________
From: sre...@subdimension.com ((akula))
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Attn: akula - question re anon posting
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:58:44 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20010830135...@news3.sharks.plc.ltd>
Using 3 remailers makes it nearly impossible to determine the origin
of a message. Using more than 3 is overkill and only marginally
improves your anonymity level.
It's not possible to reliably post 100 MB/day through remailers.
If you look in alt.privacy.anon-server, you'll see messages from
the operator of the popular Frog remailer. His system is struggling
with the volume of traffic without trying to pump warez through it.
Not that many people use remailers for small binaries because they
don't want to hassle with learning how to use the remailers.
______________________________________________________________________________
From: thre...@subdimension.com ((akula))
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cracks
Subject: Re: Newbie needs help with PGP
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 15:02:30 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20020409150...@news3.sharks.plc.ltd>
Over one hundred patches or keygens have been posted in this newsgroup
by Saltine in the last 12 months. He took a break in 2001 and used
remailers ever since.
______________________________________________________________________________
From: sre...@subdimension.com ((akula))
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Tina will you please stop posting photos in this group.
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:41:03 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20020104144...@news1.sharks.plc.ltd>
Unfortunately the hypocrisy virus has bored into the brains of
people who should know better than to believe anything pumped
through a remailer.
______________________________________________________________________________
From: anadv...@subdimension.com (anadvocate)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: attn: Mjølnër
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 07:23:53 GMT
Message-ID: <3b907cc...@news.alt.net>
AH <fue...@wolfs.lair.gov>
wrote the following ( seriously... ):
>I prefer 2.6.x too. The really nice thing is it's portable. Also
>use NAI 6.5.3.
2.6 works well on the remailers too.
______________________________________________________________________________
From: sre...@subdimension.com ((akula))
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: congratulations akula, you win
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 18:44:08 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20010609184...@news1.sharks.plc.ltd>
I have posted no messages through remailers. Anyone who thinks
otherwise ought to have their head examined.
______________________________________________________________________________
From: sre...@subdimension.com (abcdi0-FAQ)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.cd.image.tools.d
Subject: Re: abcdi0: Reminder - UFF posting HALT in effect
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 15:10:11 GMT
Message-ID: <3f3a970d87.3672707459@news.sharks.plc.ltd>
One fragile remailer chain has been found that can handle 100MB/day
and actually have all the posts arrive within 24 hours.
______________________________________________________________________________
From: sre...@subdimension.com ((akula))
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: -@--@-@ TIME FOR ANOTHER DIGITAL ENEMA @-@--@-
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 20:28:03 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20010815202...@news1.sharks.plc.ltd>
Artie doesn't have the brains to use a bot for his SPAM, much less a
remailer.
______________________________________________________________________________
From: 2001.02.alt.binar...@sharks.plc.ltd ((akula))
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: +aK00Kla The Terrorist Is On The Job... This is SECRET SQUIRREL!
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 03:11:05 GMT
Message-ID: <3f3aae190f...@news.sharks.plc.ltd>
In 1999, an IPL member led me astray by his description of how remailers
work.
______________________________________________________________________________
From: sre...@subdimension.com ((akula))
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.0-day
Subject: Re: New here or want a specific release? Please read inside.
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 17:13:45 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20020217171...@news4.sharks.plc.ltd>
Quoting from lcs Mixmaster Remailer <m...@anon.lcs.mit.edu>:
>Sunk to a new lower level here! No key, no password, total nonsense.
It is a form of jamming.
______________________________________________________________________________
From: sre...@subdimension.com ((akula))
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Enough is enough - was: Elmer is ma new luver
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:13:04 -0000
Message-ID: <3f20010523161...@news1.sharks.plc.ltd>
To reiterate: I don't use remailers and disregard posts made through them.